A grand jury has just indicted a dozen Stanford students and one non-student for vandalism and conspiracy to trespass during their 2024 storming and takeover of the university president’s office, where they did $300,000 worth of damage. They are no doubt surprised that the federal government is now involved, when all they expected was punishment from the university itself, such as suspension for a term or two, or the withholding of their degrees. Now they realize they are in deep trouble, and may go to prison. More on the current trials and tribulations, so well-deserved, of these pro-Hamas vandals, can be found here. “Stanford University Pro-Hamas Protesters Indicted on Felony Charges,” by Dion J. Pierre, Algemeiner, October 3, 2025:
A Santa Clara County, California grand jury has indicted, on federal charges of vandalism and trespassing, nearly a dozen pro-Hamas students who commandeered then-school president Richard Saller’s office in June 2024.
As previously reported by The Algemeiner, anti-Israel activists associated with the campus group Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) raided Saller’s office, locking themselves inside using, the Stanford Daily said at the time, “bike locks, chains, ladders, and chairs.” The incident was part of a larger pro-Hamas demonstration in which SJP demanded that the university adopt the boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) movement, which seeks to isolate Israel from the international community as the first step to its eventual elimination.
Twelve students in total had participated in the action, including one non-student, but the 12th student has reportedly become a “cooperating witness,” having agreed to tell on his friends in exchange for evading criminal penalties. The remaining 11 are accused of causing some $300,00 in damages to Saller’s office and the administrative building in which it is located. As such, “Stanford is demanding restitution,” according to an email the group’s lawyer, Jeff Wozniak, sent to the Daily for publication on Thursday.
“The legal team supporting the 11 have demanded a dialogue with the university, but so far no response has been received,” he wrote.
Meanwhile, SJP maintains that the group acted morally, if not lawfully, telling the Daily, “Students acted to break through indifference, to force attention on an injustice that holding signs outside an office could never achieve.”
Before occupying Saller’s office, the anti-Israel group assembled a collection of tents on White Plaza — widely referred to as a “Gaza Solidarity Encampment.” Despite living there for several weeks, the university declined to negotiate terms with its members, a rebuff SJP called “gravely insulting to Palestinians and pro-Palestinian students on campus.”
Refusing to be ignored, SJP raided Saller’s office with other students, forming a human chain and covering security cameras with tin foil. SJP then reiterated its terms, demanding that no criminal charges be filed against its members and that any disciplinary proceedings currently underway be terminated….
The stench of antisemitism wafts all over American campuses today. Almost four-fifths of Jewish students report that they hide their identities; more than four-fifths hide their support of Zionism. Jewish students report physical threats from fellow students; their professors show little sympathy and do not make “reasonable accommodations” to their needs — i.e., not scheduling exams on Jewish religious holidays.
It is in this atmosphere of widespread hostility to Jews and to Israel that the Stanford students no doubt thought would lead, at most, to a symbolic slap on the wrist from the administration, possible suspension for a term or two, or the temporary withholding of a degree for those who were graduating. They have been surprised to discover that their violent trespass and vandalism of President Staller’s office are not being dealt with in-house; the federal government is prosecuting them, and they will almost certainly be convicted. The judge will likely not only find them guilty, giving them criminal records that may make future employment difficult, but may also sentence them to prison.
And meanwhile, the university demands that these pro-Hamas students make “restitution” for the $300,000 worth of damage that they did to President Staller’s office, when they smashed all the furniture and threw red paint — symbolic blood — everywhere. Add to that the enormous cost of legal fees they will have incurred, and the students may now find they are on the hook for $50,000 apiece. That should make pro-Hamas students everywhere think twice before they engage in such violent protests.
Cynthia says
Throw the book at them
somehistory says
Just as muzzies in the U.K., France and elsewhere act against the laws of the lands they now occupy, muzzies in the U.S. claim their *unlawful* actions are lawful and should not be prosecuted.
muzzies rape, murder, assault, etc. and then claim the *culture* is the reason, or they claim mental problems. Upon release, they take up the same actions.
Now, in the U.S. they claim any actions taken against them are un-Constitutional, and discriminatory, while they actually are breaking the Laws in un-Constitutional and discriminatory ways.
Vandalism and property destruction are unlawful and deserve prosecution. It’s about time the various government offices and entities prosecute the muzzies and their criminal cohorts.
OLD GUY says
Charge them and convict them as domestic terrorist, to set an example for others who might think destroying and intimidating other peoples property and lives is a social event. It is time to put a stop to these acts now, before it gets totally out of hand.
somehistory says
OT and I won’t be surprised if the perp is muzzie. If it is, how long before it’s exposed?
“Mosque set on fire in ‘hate crime’”
“….“That there were no injuries is purely by chance. I have spoken with Sussex Police this morning, and I’m very grateful to them and East Sussex Fire and Rescue Service for their response.
“This violence and hatred has no place in our peaceful, tolerant local community. We will root it out, and we stand in solidarity with all affected.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/mosque-set-on-fire-in-hate-crime/ar-AA1NSXwx?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=68e2d73793144abe8ab8f9327941e623&ei=28
gravenimage says
It would not surprise me…
Huh?!? says
This is a good sign that Uncle Sam is fighting back.
James Lincoln says
It’s a good thing that FEDERAL charges were brought.
gravenimage says
Important point, James. Not sure if California would have prosecuted this at all.
James Lincoln says
Yes, gravenimage.
Much to their chagrin, that is probably what those Stanford students had thought.
gravenimage says
+1
Taffy says
Someone’s arithmetic is off! 11 are being prosecuted and the damage is $300k. So how does that translate to $50k apiece? And this is incorrect from a legal viewpoint also. For intentional torts, the group participants are jointly and severally,y liable. This means that the university can collect the whole judgment from one or any combination of them. Say one of them is a rich kid with $500k. The university a take the full $500 k from him, leaving him to sue the others for contribution.
But thank you President Trump! Criminal acts must have criminal consequences. I hope that these morons are sentenced to federal prison for a few years to reflect on whether their criminal support of Gaza was worth it. Standing on your soapbox and spewing hatred is Constitutionally protected. Destroying other people’s stuff is not.
rubiconcrest says
$500k does not seem like much when some ‘friend’ can write them a check for the damages. Can they be held personally responsible by garnishing wages?
Hugh Fitzgerald says
“Someone’s arithmetic is off! 11 are being prosecuted and the damage is $300k. So how does that translate to $50k apiece?”
I was including an estimate for legal fees.
gravenimage says
+1
gravenimage says
Pro-Hamas Stanford Students Indicted for Trespass and Vandalism
…………………………………………………………………
*So* glad to hear this!
Proud kafir says
A primitive people with a primitive book who use fear and intimidation to force others to comply with their insane ideology, why? They have spent too little time acquiring skills that would elevate their primal instincts into the 21st century, and why should they when it has worked for them for 1400 years?