“That’s not a situation that any country would like to get involved in”
No one who knows anything about the Middle East seriously thought that Arab Muslim armies would be securing Gaza, let alone disarming Hamas, but the King of Jordan, who lives in fear of the Muslim Brotherhood, the parent organization of Hamas, taking over the part of Israel that the British appointed his family to rule, said it out loud.
Countries would reject being asked to “enforce” peace in Gaza if deployed under the Trump ceasefire plan, King Abdullah of Jordan has told the BBC.
“What is the mandate of security forces inside of Gaza? And we hope that it is peacekeeping, because if it’s peace enforcing, nobody will want to touch that,” said King Abdullah in an exclusive interview for BBC Panorama.
“Peacekeeping is that you’re sitting there supporting the local police force, the Palestinians, which Jordan and Egypt are willing to train in large numbers, but that takes time. If we’re running around Gaza on patrol with weapons, that’s not a situation that any country would like to get involved in.”
That’s not ‘peacekeeping’. Or rather it’s the UN definition of peacekeeping which falls somewhere between the passively useless and the actively malicious (e.g. UNIFIL’s aggressive protection of Hezbollah which recently escalated to downing an Israeli drone) support for terrorists.
Jordan will ‘train’ ‘Palestinian’ police. Who will those ‘police’ be? Well we’ve already been told. They’ll be some combo of the PLO, Hamas or other Islamic terror groups. What will supporting them consist of? Most likely opposing Israel.
King Abdullah said he would not send Jordanian forces into Gaza because his country was “too close politically” to the situation.
Nor will anyone else except supporters of Hamas in support of Hamas.
There’s two options here.
Let Israel finish Hamas
Play out this fantasy in which someone other than us, preferably a Muslim country will actually try to reform Gaza. And all evidence is that this is a non-starter. We shouldn’t be doing it and no one else will actually disarm Hamas.
This is why wars are endless because they’re left undone. ‘Peacemakers’ make for endless wars. Winners finish wars.
SKA says
Put non-Palestinian militaries into Gaza or the militaries of other non-Arab Muslim nations just means that in addition to using civilians as human shields they will also use those non-civilians as human shields. Hamas will continue to launch rockets into Israel who will in return retaliate. And when these other Muslim troops are killed that will be used as a pretext for a pan-Arab or pan-Muslim war against Israel.
somehistory says
Jesus spoke of the blessing that ‘peacemakers’ would receive from His Father.
Jesus also spoke of “wars and rumors of wars,” and in the Revelation He gave to John through an angel, He said “war” riding one of the horses of the Apocalypse, would “take peace away from the earth.”
One can be a “peacemaker” in his dealings with other people; family, friends, neighbors.
Since war has “been granted to take peace away from the earth,” getting entire nations to be peaceable with other nations and groups…especially those who *want war,* is impossible.
Kuffar says
My original plan still will work. Bomb Gaza to rubble. Ship the people to Tunisia. Push the rubble into the sea and then Israel can create a Zion Riviera.
Jim says
👍
Taffy says
Ummmm, the part about pushing the rubble into the sea is not a particularly environmentally friendly move and will destroy the beaches. Also, I advocate moving the Gazan’s to Yemen rather than Tunisia or Libya and let the Houthis deal with them. And now that there are no more hostages, start building large wood fires at the entrances to the Hamas tunnels and let the draft and chimney effect distribute the smoke throughout the tunnel network. No more Hamas after that!
skeptiker says
Korrekt.
MJ Raichyk, PhD says
And we’re almost there… Didn’t IDF already issue identity cards for access to aide?
Place lots of nice clean shipping crates painted with IDs for a family group and handy for those people to gather their belongings and personal treasures AND SELVES safely inside for delivery of aid and safe keeping stuff…with sanitation installed.. modern composting dry-toilets and greywater exit..
Then bring in big equipment for rubble removing but INCLUDING MOBILE CRANES to haul each family safely inside their crate onto ships to Tunisia… for there offloading to create new ”trailer parks”
TTYL
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Maybe don’t count on Arab countries. Let Israel ask countries like Azerbaijan, which is a quasi-ally, and Indonesia, which has been giving feelers to Israel, to send their troops there. Just use troops that don’t have any special affinity towards Arabs
ploome says
it is all about islam and jihad
ALL muslims don’t want this balestinian problem to end…the Gaza people are the deaths/mrtyrs the koran demands to continue the jihad to keep the and amplify intolerable pressure and violence on the Jews.
It is the advantage to the muslims to keep this battle/jihad alive.
What the rest of the world doesn’t yet realize, is that after the world (UN, EU, UK, China, Russia..etc…) helps the muslim jihad against the Jews,
they are next.
Already underway in Africa. The jihad against Christians has been so long ignored-they are only blacks after all, a long suffering victim group, and not objects of jealousy and resentment like the Jews. We are witnessing the jihad against Christians in Europe and USA through threats, random violence and LAWFARE, and psychologic manipulation.
Terrifying and effective -see how much influence and power muslims have gained since 9/11….amazing
gravenimage says
Infidel, Islam itself preaches the hatred and genocide of Jews. Demanding that Islamic nations have direct access to Israel’s borders–more than they already do, that is–is with all respect *not wise*.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
ploome & graven
I hear you. However, given that these one side has been demanding that muslim security forces, rather than Israeli, manage the Gaza strip, and that has made its way into the 20 point peace agreement, I suggested the 2 countries that are least hostile to Israel
I agree that Indonesia is problematic. On Azerbaijan, however, it’s a more race-centric country, and their problem w/ Armenia is about as much about race than it is about islam. In fact, due to 70+ years of Soviet rule, that country is religiously atheistic, but puts higher priority on ethnicity, which is what the Soviets did. That’s why Azerbaijan, despite being shi’a (like Iran), is more affiliated to Turkey but has a rivalry w/ Iran, while Tajikistan, despite being sunni, was more affiliated to Iran for a while (although today, it seems to prefer Zoroastrianism)
SKA says
+1 Azerbaijan, to the best of my knowledge, was the only Muslim nation that project Israel’s blue and white unto its signature government buildings in downtown Baku. They also have an adversarial relationship with Iran and welcomed President Trump’s to create a transportation link along the Zangezur Corridor to unite the Azerbaijani enclave of Nakhchiven with the rest of Azerbaijan. But having noted all this it has been my personal experience that whenever one is under the bombs and missiles of X your mind quickly assesses X as your mortal enemy. If Azerbanjani troops in Gaza were to come under Israeli retaliatory fire this could radicalize those troops to hate Israel and this would play into the hands of Islamists.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
SKA
I saw one report that said that Azerbaijan, Indonesia & Pakistan are the 3 countries that would provide security forces for Gaza. Like I said above, the first is okay, the second, maybe, Q
However, allowing Pakistan in is a bad idea: that country’s very basis is islam, just like the very basis of East Germany or North Korea or South Yemen was/is communism. They loathe Jews almost as much as they loathe Hindus, and are an ally of Iran. They fall in the same category as Turkey, Qatar and Bangladesh
https://www.breitbart.com/asia/2025/10/27/international-gaza-force-could-include-troops-from-pakistan-azerbaijan-indonesia
gravenimage says
Infidel–with all respect–I don’t think that the Jihad terror aggressors who attacked Israel should have had the right to demand that only their savage coreligionists be allowed in Gaza.
And Azerbaijan has attacked Armenia–out to finish the genocide against them. Not the best model…
gravenimage says
King of Jordan: None of Us are Disarming Hamas or Policing Gaza
……………………………………………
Actually, their refusing is the best case scenario. Much worse would be having Islamic nations like Jordan which have already attacked Israel on her border pretending to reign in Jihad terrorists.
skeptiker says
Mein Plan steht auch immer noch. Hamas militärisch besiegen, entwaffnen, vor Gericht stellen und wegsperren und den Rest samt ihrer Familien aus Gaza vertreiben. Dann wird Frieden sein.
OLD GUY says
“”Peacekeepers” make for endless wars. Winners finish wars.” By finish wars do you mean you annihilate the enemy? That sounds like it is right out of Islam’s play book for world domination.
ploome says
The arabs in Gaza and so called balestinians, experience no consequences for their perpetual violence and slaughter of Israelis. Their culture and islamic cult demands jihad and dominance and submission of ALL OTHERS above all else.
Their dead are honored above all others as martyrs and assured a paradise as extravagant and carnal as desired.
The victims of islamic slaughter seem unable and unwilling to see the patterns in islamic jihad, and continue to throw money and resource at muslims, and accept their so called refugees into Europe and USA. That is the Western delusion that muslims would abandon jihad if only they were more economically secure.or socially included. That somehow muslims would integrate. See the integration in Dearborn, or anywhere muslims gather.
The arabs should feel the consequences of their actions.
Let them live in the hell their hate has created. Let them rebuild their cities and homes themselves. Let them feed themselves. Let them educate and clothe and heal themselves. They should be totally shunned.