Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Hook-Handed Terror Imam Fights Toilet Jihad in Prison

By

The most disgusting article I ever had to write.

(Trigger warning: extensive and unfortunately necessary descriptions of Islamic toilet practices.)

How many Islamic toilets is a Muslim terrorist entitled to? At least two.

That’s the ruling by a U.S. federal judge in the long running saga of a UK Muslim terror imam locked up in a Colorado prison who called for murdering non-Muslims and wants those same non-Muslims to tend to the ‘purity’ of his nether regions so he can properly pray to ‘Allah’.

And so begins the most disgusting article I ever had to write: in both the moral sense of how far backward we bent to cater to Muslim terrorists who hate us and on a grosser physical level.

The current Toilet Jihad began with a real Jihad that claimed at least four lives.

In 2007, after three years of legal wrangling, Imam Abu Hamza, an Egyptian Muslim cleric who headed a notorious UK terrorist mosque, was finally deported to the United States.

With the occasional eyepatch and a hook for a hand, a souvenir of his time working with the ‘Pakistani military’, the piratical looking cleric had preached terror at his Finsbury Park Mosque and his tawdry life and terror threats had long been a staple of British tabloid coverage.

Hamza’s involvement in the 1988 kidnapping of British tourists in Yemen, four of whom were killed, by an Al Qaeda affiliate, (the cleric explained that taking hostages was “a good thing” in Islam), his mosque, which had attracted such terror figures as the ‘twentieth hijacker’ and the ‘shoe bomber, his defenses of Al Qaeda (“Bin Laden is a good guy, everyone likes him in the Muslim world”), claim that 9/11 was “done in self-defense” and declaration that “the person who hinders Allah’s rule, this man must be eliminated” had made him the UK’s most notorious imam.

By the time the US asked for him, after he tried to set up an Al Qaeda training camp in Oregon, the UK was happy to send him off. Hamza’s lawyers however spent three years dragging out the case in the UK, claiming that sending him to America would violate his “human rights”.

In 2015, after eight more years of legal wrangling in federal courts, Hamza was sentenced to several life sentences, on charges of providing support to Al Qaeda and the Taliban, hostage taking and, as the judge put it, being “barbaric.” But Abu Hamza was just getting started.

After 11 years of lawfare and extraditions across three countries and continents, Abu Hamza had a lot of free time in prison. And he spent it waging lawfare against the United States.

Abu Hamza, now calling himself by his legal name of Mostafa Kamel Mostafa, filed lawsuits accusing the prison system of violating the First Amendment by denying him Halal food, participation in group Islamic prayers, communications with his son (unclear if it’s the one who was stripped of UK citizenship after becoming a Jihadist in Syria, the one who was convicted of money laundering, the one who stole a laptop through a kitchen window or any other sons.)

The terror imam also claimed that “his faith requires him to be provided with an electric toothbrush”, a hairbrush and prompt toenail clipping services at taxpayer expense.

`Mostly though, Abu Hamza aka Mostafa Kamel Mostafa, was obsessed with the toilet.

Muslims have detailed toilet protocols that Sharia requires them to follow. They must step into the bathroom with their left foot first. They may not have their backs to Mecca when they defecate. Men may not urinate while standing up. Muslims are required to wash their private parts with water after urinating or defecating. Muslim men then have a specific prescribed process for removing the remaining urine to ensure that they are ‘clean’ to pray to Allah.

Ideally, the less we know about all this the better, unfortunately having Muslim terrorists in prison, and specifically a Muslim terrorist with a hook for a hand and a lawyer on speed dial, and a lot of time in which to sue America, means that we have to deal with the ‘Toilet Jihad.’

What’s at stake here? (And feel free to skip this entire paragraph.) The website of the Grand Ayatollah of Iraq describes it as following: “the middle finger of the left hand is slid three times from the anus up to the scrotum; then, the thumb is placed on the penis and the forefinger is placed under the penis, and the thumb and forefinger are pulled three times along the penis up to the point of circumcision; finally, the end of the penis is pressed three times.”

This is not about hygiene, in the medical sense, but a religious practice from Sharia law.

All of this is serious business for a devout Muslim like Abu Hamza because while he believes 9/11 and taking hostages are good things, he is mindful of Mohammed’s warning that “most of the punishment of the grave will be because of urine” (Sunan al-Tirmidhī 348). While Hamza feels no guilt over the deaths of Ruth Williamson, Dr Peter Rowe, Margaret Whitehouse, and Andrew Thirsk in Yemen, he believes that if he prays while there’s urine still inside his organ, he will burn forever in Islamic hell without getting his 72 virgins.

(Questions as to why the cleric thinks hell would be more concerned with his bodily fluids than his role in the murder of a 34-year-old Scottish nurse are best addressed to the Islamic religion.)

Back when Abu Hamza was locked up in the UK, ”Mr Mostafa had someone to help him”. Colorado’s Supermax prison, unlike Belmarsh in the UK, “does not provide any inmates with personal attendants for the purpose of washing them after using the toilet” because that would “place a substantial burden on ADX staff or require additional staff at a substantial expense to the Bureau of Prisons.”

How Islamophobic. So Abu Hamza sued.

According to Abu Hamza’s lawsuits and complaints, Islamic law and the First Amendment entitle him to having someone properly clean him after using the toilet “essential for my 5 prayers daily.”  The prison already went to the trouble of outfitting his two cells with showers with multiple showerheads, including a lower showerhead, and allowed the terrorist imam to run the water as long as he likes, but that wasn’t good enough. (Nothing turned out to be good enough.)

The prison tried accommodating his amoral, but bodily waste obsessed belief system, by giving him a brush. Hamza claimed that the “brush was ineffective” at achieving his spiritual goals of not being tormented by Satan in the afterlife for achieving less than totally clean nether parts.

Abu Hamza demanded a bidet. The prison argued that it does not provide bidets to anyone “regardless of religion” so it’s not discriminating against Islam. It’s just worried about items that can be used as weapons. Finally, it gave in and “requested funds” to install a bidet.

Because American taxpayers are paying for every last bit of this. Including the lawsuits.

But much like Hamas and every Islamic terrorist group, having gotten what he wanted, Abu Hamza denied that he ever wanted it and demanded more. Even though there’s documentary evidence of him saying that a bidet was enough, he denied ever agreeing to that, and demanded new prosthetics, despite apparently sabotaging several efforts to fit him with a new hook. The bottom line is that Hamza would like “attendants to help him complete ritual washing”.

That means having someone on standby several times a day to clean him up to Islamic standards each time he uses the bathroom. Not because he actually needs it for hygiene purposes, but because the same religion that made him murderous, demands it.

A federal judge agreed to consider “whether defendants have substantially burdened the exercise of Mr. Mostafa’s religion by limiting him to use a bidet to clean himself.” That same judge ruled that “Mr. Mostafa has demonstrated that forcing him to be housed in a cell where he lacks a means of ritually cleaning himself places a substantial burden on the exercise of his religion” and that the prison must install a bidet in both of Hamza’s prison cells, not just one.

Only two Muslim toilets will do. For now.

And then it’s only a matter of time until another judge rules that the taxpayers must pay for an attendant to clean Abu Hamza before he prays to Allah for their cruel deaths or it’s a burden on the exercise of his religion. Religious accommodation won’t be reached until the prison not only provides new prosthetics for Abu Hamza, but ones strong enough to let him behead infidels.

Meanwhile, six figures have likely been spent on legal battles involving Abu Hamza’s Toilet Jihad. All of this could have been averted by following another traditional Islamic practice.

The death penalty.

Comments

  1. Reading correctly tax paying American are now paying someone to wipe this mans ass and squeeze his penis because he is one handed.

    Fire the judges, remove his hook, and have him clean himself or the drama part remove the hand and keep hook in place and let him service himself.

    Death penalty should have been done.

      • How expensive would it be to provide an all female firing squad? To guarantee no virgins in the afterlife for any warrior killed by a woman, lol…

        After all the jihadi should have considered his possible consequences before taking westerner’s lives…. We could even consider female firing squad training as remedy for islamophobia..

        ttyl

    • Piss be upon him. If you break our laws you do time in our prisons, no special treatment. Oh where oh where are the hanging judges?

    • Solution is simple. Go to the nearest mosque and inform the resident imam that it is necessary for him to supply a person on a daily basis to perform the disgusting ritual cleaning whenever the prisoner deems it necessary. No need for any non-moslem to have to do this disgusting ritual. Make a moslem do it because they’re the only ones that would do it correctly, right? And when the imam refuses to do so then simply inform the court and the prisoner that you attempted to find an appropriate ass wiper/dick squeezer but couldn’t locate anyone willing to perform the ritual act so that they can’t fulfill any order of the court and he’ll have to just be happy with the bidet that was provided to him. End of problem.

  4. I recall a detailed discussion about this more than a decade ago here on JihadWatch – too bad those comment archives are no longer there. They were talking about a person assigned to clean him b’cos of his hooked hand

    • He was in UK prison, was extradited to US.for jihad. Why would we deport someone whose extradition we wanted?

  6. If some poor guy is assigned to do what this son of satan wants, there should be a spoon handy…one which has been made into a shiv.

    This is beyond disgusting; that *judges* give these evil creatures everything they want. Prison is meant to deprive criminals of their freedoms; not give in to the criminals and provide whatever they demand.

    His lawyers will next be claiming it’s against islime for him to be imprisoned.

    Send him to Gitmo by sharkback.

  7. This is really simple. The Imam is locked up in our prison. Therefore, he deals with our rules. If one of us were locked up in an Islamic country’s jail would we get our American civil rights? Hell no!

  8. Worked with a bunch of Somali Muslims who used our bathrooms like a firehouse symposium.they are filthy pigs, I don’t care what their religion imposes on them for liturgical toilet ettiqueut.

    • The Biden Afghan refugees destroyed the bathrooms at Ft. McCoy, WI. Millions of dollars in damages.

  9. The answer is, “NO, you get one toilet, just like all the other inmates.” Perhaps he’ll rethink doing something that will get him sent to prison again. “Gee, I don’t want to go there. I only get one toilet.”

  10. Islam and all devout Muslims don’t belong in America. Islam and Muslims are totalitarian, they want to kill all non-Muslims, including all Christians and Jews (pigs and apes), Allah and Muhammad demand it. Therefore, don’t keep being complicit with Muslims, kissing their ass, to accommodate doesn’t fly. Why accommodate a Muslim that wants to kill you? Make them pay for their terrorist ways! Deny, deny, deny!!!

  11. Screw him. He is a terrorist and murderer. I would give him a windowless concrete box with a bucket. Maybe an outhouse with a hole in the ground cut thru plywood.

    The rest is on him.

  12. I couldnt care less about toileting the incarcerated. What i really care about is the taxpayer funded procreation of children happening through conjugal visitations.
    Bombshell story… Trump will see this.

  13. Simple solution – assign inmates to wash his nethers and the job will vanish along with Hamza.

  15. Let NAIT………the North American Islamic Trust pay for his idiosyncrasies……
    The American taxpayer should not be on the hook…..

  16. “all of this could have been averted by following another traditional islamic practice : the death penalty.”
    that’s right! death penalty by shooting in the back, burial of the naked body with the ass facing mecca, covered in pig dung and urine; the entire treatment filmed and broadcast to all the embassies of islamic countries in the world.

  17. I hope all the tooth brushes and other brushes he receives are made with pig hair.
    S

  18. Replace his hooked hand with a garden hose put him in a concrete cell with a a hole in the floor him bare ass naked . He can wash himself down every time he uses the hole in the floor as his personal bathroom.. He can pray in this room on his personal rubber bathmat facing towards Mecca , do his personal business facing away ,shove his Islamic blessed food on a metal slot of the doorway to his cell.

  19. The whole thing is a joke!!! Despicable creatures end up as judges in federal courts hungering to suck Allah, and the decent people pay the price. If only there was a way trump administration could disbar every one of the pigs who crept into position as judges hellbent on destroying civilised life and America111

  20. If he were not in jail, he would be taking care of his own business without an attendant, no?
    His family could give him some diaper wipes at their expense.

  21. this is a prime example of why we need to enforce capital punishment when people are guilty of murder beyond a reasonable doubt. The point made over and over in the article that he savagely brutally took the lives of innocent people but the American taxpayer who is already overburdened at this time with inflation and high cost of living; in addition to Housing and feeding him for the rest of his life. Must have a servant rub his crotch every time he goes to the bathroom so he can feel good about his cult. The fact that the religion taught him that it was OK to be a Savage and actively murder innocent human beings including women, teaches him that he needs fussy practices that make no sense in the bathroom kind of reminds me of the psychopathology in movies of serial killers… who have very strange rituals that are sexual in nature often. And I have a hard time believing that this ritual of cleaning oneself is not partially sexual in nature as there seems to be a lot of rubbing and squeezing going on. Has less to do with being clean and some strange fixation with a human member and feces. And I highly doubt as you’ve mentioned the article that he thinks he is going to hell because he killed innocent people. And that our fore fathers do not mean in freedom of religion that a Jihad terrorist has a luxury of having his meat rubbed and his ass wiped every time he goes to the bathroom or he has even the luxury of indoor plumbing with a bidet; which even the local Muslims that work at My Dunkin’ Donuts don’t have what they have as a water pitcher next to the bathroom toilet or even a cup. And maybe they just need to suit him with a different arm piece so he can splash himself properly… I mean it seems they already did by giving him the opportunity with a spray device in the shower. I’m sorry but we don’t need to be catering to people like this especially if they are are guilty of murder. You should not have your religious rights given to you within reason at the tax expense; and there should be some kind of lawsuit against this and some kind of justice because this is clearly wrong it’s clearly wrong that he want any rights other than basic cleanliness in this situation at all. And it’s a severe misuse of not only taxpayer money but the justice system as well. This man gave up his rights when he took the lives of innocent people; and I’m in favor in this point of capital Punishment especially of Jihadi terrorists; what is really really crazy in this whole situation as well is that his lawyers, the judges, and all the people vying for his rights here, would easily be targets for him as they are unbelievers… and in his eyes they are chattel. In his eyes they are the worst of creatures lower than pigs and dogs. And yeah they still cater to him how incredibly narcissistic and evil; and how incredibly naïve and stupid our justice system is and the judges presiding over these cases. And in reality he cost us so much more by taking lives that can never be recovered he owes more with his punishment not less; and imprisonment or even death is too good for him. Perhaps he deserves to feel unclean if he refuses normal practical toilets. That is not cruel and unusual, it is just. He should be on his knees begging God to forgive him everyday five times a day. And it still would not be enough payment for the lives he took. How incredibly backwards; and vile this human is.

  22. He should have been put to death when first convicted. To bring him to the U.S. and then give him a king’s treatment is so wrong. He wouldn’t have that if he lived on his own. He wouldn’t have his meals prepared, a bed to sleep in unless he paid for it, security from those who might wish him harm, medical care he didn’t have to find on his own or to pay for when found…..

    He should have been whacked instead of bringing him here to be treated like a king.

    And thank you, Mr. Greenfield, for the paragraph warning….thankfully I was able to avoid reading it.

    • I didn’t know that guy was still even alive! All this time, on our dime, while I am sure he must mock and laugh at the way we cater to his every sick whim.

      • Yes, Mo, we pay for his evil, disgusting thoughts and actions against us.

  23. Give him a goat. Goats will eat anything and he can have some sexual release at the same time.

  24. Hook-Handed Terror Imam Fights Toilet Jihad in Prison
    ………………………………………………..

    More lawfare. And why would he use an electric toothbrush? Only chewing on a Miswak Is Islamic enough for toothcare for Muslims (such as it is).

  25. This report is inaccurate. Hamza in fact has lost both hands and one is replaced by a hook. I understand from other reports his hooked arm is infected. This must make his life every difficult especially in the hygiene respects. However he is a truly despicable man and I have absoluetly no sympathy. This why I approve of the death penalty in such cases, which would have saved millions of dollars. I do not see why the tax payer should have to support such people for life at great expense.

  26. PS one of the frequent absurdities of Islam. Human urine is so offensive to allah yet drinking camel urine is
    a form of therapy!

  27. PS one of the frequent absurdities of Islam. Human urine is so offensive to allah yet drinking camel urine is
    a form of therapy!

  28. Seems Mostafa Kamel Mostafa , the name he is in Federal prison under, is a double amputee.

    I’d like to turn his double into a triple, simply remove his head per Islam.

    Give him the martyrdom, as a muslim, he so aspires to.

    The ultimate in “accommodating him practicing his religion.”

Discover more from

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Skip to content