The absurd claims that foreign criminals make to avoid deportation from the UK, and that the relevant courts have accepted, beggar belief. A few examples of these claims that convicted criminals make and that UK authorities accepted as valid reasons not to be deported can be found here: “You Can’t Make This Up: The Insane Reasons Criminal Migrants Stay in the UK,” by Frank Haviland, European Conservative, September 24, 2025:
…Abdul Ahmadzai is currently appealing deportation. Having fled across the Channel post-conviction for raping a 14-year-old girl in France, Ahmadzai is now represented by a lawyer concerned about Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights: “No one shall be subjected to torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”
One wonders what terrifying degree of heinous torture this might refer to. Is it the prospect of three Cordon Bleu meals a day that is troubling Ahmadzai, the Brigitte Bardot lookalikes likely to be ‘manning’ the jails, or the Johnny Hallyday mixtape emanating from the adjacent cell? Nope. In fact, it’s the cell size. According to Ahmadzai’s lawyer, there is the very “real risk” that his client could be “detained in a space fewer [sic] than three metres squared” if he were sent back to Paris.
Ahmadzai’s appeal has been adjourned until October, until which time he will remain in custody—presumably enjoying at least three square metres of prime real estate. Assuming that French prisons truly are torturous, I can’t help wondering why the French authorities aren’t under pressure to ship their entire prison population across the Channel; and, more to the point, whether it will be Macron or Starmer who first suggests doing so?
While Ahmadzai’s case may sound absurd, it is in fact bread and butter to our ECHR overlords and the human rights lawyers who routinely employ specious pretexts to foist violent criminals on the British public. To give a comprehensive account of all such abuses would probably require a biblical tome, so allow me to just give you the recent highlights:
- Konrad Makocki, a Polish serial criminal with nine convictions, including violence and domestic abuse, successfully blocked his deportation on the grounds that he had become a “father figure” to his nephew. Not only would expulsion therefore breach his “right to a family life,” it would also cause his nephew to suffer a “disproportionate” impact if his uncle were deported.
- Fatmir Bleta, an Albanian national convicted in absentia of shooting a man in the head with a Kalashnikov rifle, won the right to remain in the UK on the grounds that not being entitled to a re-trial would breach his Article 6 human rights.
- An anonymous Pakistani father, jailed for 18 months after attempting sex with “barely pubescent” girls, successfully avoided deportation on the basis that it would prove “unduly harsh on his children to be without their father.”
- Klevis Disha, an Albanian, first appeared on UK shores as an unaccompanied minor. Giving a false name and falsely claiming to have been born in the former Yugoslavia, Disha was stripped of his citizenship in 2021, after serving two years in prison when caught with the £300,000 ‘proceeds of crime.’ Astonishingly, Disha cannot be deported because of his son’s aversion to ‘foreign’ chicken nuggets….
- Ernesto Elliott, a Jamaican, successfully dodged deportation thanks to his “right to a family life.” In gratitude, Elliott went on to add murder to his extensive rap sheet, alongside knife, drug, and firearm offences. This case was particularly noteworthy, as it involved the flight famously grounded by left-wing MPs and celebrities. They wrote an open letter to then-Prime Minister Johnson, demanding all further deportations be cancelled because of the “unacceptable risk of removing anyone with a potential Windrush claim”.
Thanks to our membership of the ECHR, all Britain has to do then is attract criminals without families, children, claustrophobia, or any specific dietary requirements….
These British judges have clearly gone haywire, accepting the most absurd reasons that convicted foreign criminals put forth as to why they should not be deported, including “depriving their children of a family life” and alarm over the “small” size of the cell — nine square feet — that they might be held in if deported to France, and a murderer avoiding deportation to Jamaica because he has “a right to a family life,” and his family now lives in the UK. But of course, there is nothing preventing them from moving to Jamaica to be close to their imprisoned paterfamilias.
A mad world, my masters!
Eddie says
Ah yes the good ship Windrush gets a mention.
Turned up in Britain after cheap one way tickets to Britain were offered in Jamaica because the Windrush was docked there half empty.
British Government got a telegram advising that hundreds were aboard and on their way.
And thus cultural enrichment came to Britain and we’re so grateful.
Our country is now being overwhelmed by delightful people from all over the globe. Look how lovely our major cities are, clean and law abiding.
Who could possbily want to deport them ?
James Lincoln says
Anyone care to comment on how the UK will look in 2050?
England Invaded says
The justice system whether it be lawyers, judges, or the CPS, is completely infiltrated by islamo-leftists. Just like every government department.
skeptiker says
Der 2018 von der UNO verabschiedete Migrationspakt wurde von den linksextremistischen Regierungen, die die illegale Masseneinwanderung betreiben, 1 zu 1 umgesetzt.
Donald Trump hat in seiner Rede bei der UN letzte Woche genau darauf hingewiesen, dass die UNO diese Masseneinwanderung befeuert, um einer globalistischen freiheits- und demokratiefeindlichen Agenda Vorschub zu leisten.
In diesem Migrationspakt wird im Detail beschrieben, dass Migranten bevorzugt legalisiert und eingebürgert und mit allen Mitteln gegen den Willen der Bevölkerung durchgesetzt werden sollen.
OLD GUY says
This process should be simple. If you are convicted of committing a serious crime and you are NOT a citizen you should be automatically deported. BUT the lawyers wouldn’t be able to make as much money off the system if that happened. So lawyers make the laws with all these little wordy loop holes, so they can make more MONEY.
Eddie says
James
I wouldn’t like to comment on how things in Britain will be next week !
I think however we can guess how the UK will be in 2050 by looking at our largest coties today .London, Birmingham, Manchester and Liecester.
We import foreigners at the rate of 750,000 a year at the moment – the size of our biggest cities.
So in 2050 we can expect rule by sectarian and criminal gangs. Islam the ultimate authority.
White folk would be a persecuted fringe minority with no state protection, culture and even hisory erased.
So let’s visualise in graphic terms by thinking of movies.
A combination of Planet of the Apes, Gangs of NewYork, Gotham City under the Joker and the Land of Mordor with the Orcs running the show.
How’s that for a look in the crystal ball ?
Mike says
There is a problem with the area of the prison cell. The original statement is that it is “3 meters squared.” That is an area of 9 square meters which is about 100 square feet.
Mad Mac says
It’s 3 meters square, 3 meters by 3 meters, not 3 square meters.
About 97 square feet, almost 10×10 feet.
That is larger than many cells here in the United States
where the minimum standard these days is 80 square feet.
Older cells or as small as 6×8, 48 square feet
and have a bunk bed for two men.