Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Netanyahu: If terrorists butchered 15,000 in the UK, would you say, ‘we should give them a state next to London’?

By

The question Netanyahu poses to Starmer isn’t as straightforward as it should be. Does Starmer really care at all about British citizens, given his open-door migration policies, despite the shameful history of Muslim rape gang activity in the UK (which is ongoing), as well as attacks on citizens by illegal migrants? That leads to another question, stemming from Netanyahu’s question: what if Starmer could get away with rewarding them, in order to appease Muslims and leftists in the UK, and garner more support for his party? The answer is not obvious.

As it stands, Starmer has persistently rewarded mostly Muslim illegal migrants from Africa and the Middle East, despite the economic and social cost to British citizens, national security risks, and the rise in antisemitism given the “globalize the intifada” movement.

Starmer is a hard leftist, and does not appear to be looking out for the British people the way Netanyahu is looking out for Israel. Starmer persistently practices policies of appeasement, showing weakness to all potential jihadists who infiltrate refugee streams, and to those who support the “resistance.” The UK has seen many jihad attacks, and will likely see more.

In 2017 alone, Britons experienced the Westminster Bridge attack, the Manchester Arena bombing, and the London Bridge attack. Last month, the Mirror published a report entitled “20 years since 7/7 London bombings but UK security risk worse now than it was then.”

So the question remains: “If terrorists butchered 15,000 in Britain, would Starmer reward them?” Let’s hope not.

“Netanyahu: If terrorists butchered 15,000 in Britain, would Starmer reward them?,” by Melanie Swan, The Telegraph, August 20, 2025:

Benjamin Netanyahu has accused Sir Keir Starmer of rewarding Hamas with his plans to recognise a Palestinian state.

The Israeli prime minister appeared on a podcast on Wednesday evening taking aim at the Government over its decision to recognise Palestine next month unless Israel meets certain conditions.

He told the Triggernometry hosts: “They [Hamas] commit the greatest savagery against Jews since the Holocaust, and the Prime Minister of Britain says we will reward you with a de facto state which is committed openly to repeating the October 7 massacre over and over and over again.”

In July, Sir Keir announced that the UK would formally recognise Palestine as a result of the “increasingly intolerable” situation in Gaza unless Israel took steps to end the suffering, reach a ceasefire, refrain from annexing the West Bank and commit to a peace process.

Mr Netanyahu said: “Let’s imagine, what would be the response of Britain if about 15,000 people would be butchered in one day, and you’d have, I don’t know, 2,500 hostages taken. Would you say, ‘Oh, well, we should give our attackers a state right next to London?’ Of course not.

“The standard that is being applied is not merely wrong, it’s just downright dangerous. Because you’re really rewarding these monstrous terrorists with the greatest prize and that’s because of weakness….

Comments

  2. Frankly, it would be very interesting to see how Sir Keith would reward the butchering of say 100 Brits.

    What we should do is monitor the headlines before the massacre, during the massacrem and of course apres-massacre.

    Get six of so types of news sources from various sides

    Do a content analysis.

    Write it up as a master’s thesis

    It would be called

    The differential reporting of a massacre in Britain—how the news media reacted to the slaughter of 100 different types of infidel Brits in Birmingham

    Then we could do the control study, of 100 women, then 100 men, then 100 children

    And finally, maybe (Gd forbid) 100 Pakis or Bengalis

    It would make a fine thesis for an aspiring British scholar from the University of Londonstan.

    Sir Keith and the reportage of massacred Brits: A thesis offered in fulfillment of the Al Azhar University degree in Dawah and Jihad.

  3. Leftists/Islamists are committed to turning the UK into a Sharia based country. Starmer must have mostly Muslims in his administration. Aggressive Muslims must tell Starmer how to run the government, the UK has become a haven for Muslims, a resort with progressive benefit$.

    Is Starmer attempting to repopulate the UK, bring in enough Muslims, to change the demographics, insure his re-election?

    The UK has become an Islamic circle jerk, supporting a Palestinian State is a Muslim desire. Starmer is a wanna be Muslim.

  5. Remember to fully blame Starmer and the Labour Party for this animosity towards Israel not the bulk of the British people.

    We are under the rule of a hostile government and swamped with foreigners at the rate of about 700,000 a year legally brought in against our will and 50,000 illegals.

    In the UK we could experience our own October 7th.
    All it needs is one migrant hotel to kick off and take a town apart.
    Could it happen ?

    Many here suspect it will.

    And we know that outside of London, police numbers are not enough to cope.

    • Can’t conscientious police who hate what they are doing instead choose to be posted elsewhere in England – like Midlands, Somerset, Devon, Nottingham, Liverpool, etc? Where they’re less likely to be outnumbered by muslims?

      If not quit the force and join an illegal militia?

  6. Keir Starmer is a simpleton masquerading as an intellect, every decision he makes is the wrong one. He’s well out of his depth and if he had any decency, he’d do the honourable thing and resign. But I doubt he ever will.

  7. Netanyahu: If terrorists butchered 15,000 in the UK, would you say, ‘we should give them a state next to London’?
    …………………………………………………..

    This comparison *should* clarify things a graphic manner–but, as noted, Starmer might say, yeah, why not? Or just give them London itself…

    • Gravenimage
      We couldn’t have a worse PM the last government was bad, but this labour party is atrocious. Starmer is giving our country away

  8. Well said Netanyahu. Israel is fighting survival and it is good to see Netanyahu tearing into left wing shitheads like Starmer. Israel will win against the Muslim savages. Netanyahu seems like a good leader with strong convictions.

    • Yeah, Ofcom thinks that foreign social media platforms should regulate speech worldwide according to their sensibilities. This is something JD Vance raised during the White House meeting w/ Kier Starmer. If Ofcom doesn’t like what foreigners are saying abroad online, they should simply geofence all platforms from outside the country. Be like North Korea, which has gone as far as to violate RFC 1918

      • ” geofence all platforms from outside the country”

        Ha ha. Let them try. We will beam it in through other ways such as satellites and wireless communications.

  10. Starmer did reward Jihadis by locking up thousands of decent UK people speaking against the horrific jihad attack on young girls. This week a jihadi threatening to slit throats was not convicted in court. He is also setting up jihadi states in all the major cities of the UK. Bibi is being very kind, Starmer is much worse than he is suggesting.

  11. London is virtually a muslim area now so giving up an area next to it wouldn’t make much difference. In another decade or so England will be just another cesspool of islamic intolerance and murder so the question is really rhetorical.

  12. Starmer ist nicht nur bösartig sondern intellektuell ein Totalausfall.
    In Deutschland ist es nicht besser.

  13. Of course he would. He and his predecessors for 30 years have handed over so much of the UK.

Discover more from

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Skip to content