Every time a Muslim terrorist commits his, or on occasions her, act of terror on innocent Western civilians, he or she utters what is known as the Takbir, that is the expression in Arabic “Allahu Akbar”. The targets are usually Western civilians but they could also be those Muslims not considered sufficiently pure, as when they assassinated Anwar Sadat, the third president of Egypt, in 1981.
What is the meaning of the Takbir, “Allahu Akbar”? It is often translated as “God is great”. The usually reliable and accurate Dictionary of Islam, compiled by Thomas Patrick Hughes [1838-1911], gives three different meanings. Under ‘Allahu Akbar’, he writes, “’ God is great’ or ‘God is most high’. An ejaculation which is called the Takbīr. It occurs frequently in the liturgical forms, and is used when slaying an animal for food.”[1] Under Takbīr, Hughes gives the meaning as “God is very great!”.
Ian Richard Netton in his “A Popular Dictionary of Islam”[2] has a yet another variation, though slight, of the Takbīr: “Praise, glorification, the declaration or expression ‘God is Most Great’ (Allāhu Akbar). The latter is a much used part of the ṣalāt (q.v.) [the prayer and its accompanying ritual].”
The prestigious Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd Edition, tells us:
“The formula, as the briefest expression of the absolute superiority of the One God, is used in Muslim life in different circumstances, in which the idea of God, His greatness and goodness is suggested.”
Edward William Lane [1801-1876], devoted thirty-five years of his life to compile his monumental Arabic-English Lexicon, [3]in which he examines what classical Arab scholars themselves have to say about the meaning of the Takbir. “According to some, Allahu Akbar means God is great;… but this explanation is of weak authority: according to others, the phrase is elliptical, and means God is the greatest great [being]: or God is greater than every [other] great thing: or greater than such as that one knows the measure of His majesty: [or it may be rendered God is most great, meaning, greater than any other being:] “ All the square brackets are in the original dictionary entry by Lane.
Here at last Lane has introduced the correct comparative, “greater than…”. The German scholar Carl Paul Caspari [1814-1892] wrote a comprehensive grammar of Arabic in German which was published in 1848 and translated into English in 1859 by William Wright [1830-1889], Professor of Arabic at Cambridge. It has become a classic work of reference. Caspari’s grammar informs us that the preposition min that is normally used in comparatives to express the English “than” is sometimes omitted: “e.g. Allahu Akbar God is most great, lit. God is greater min ghayrihi than any other being.” [4] This grammical form is called the Elative. So we have: kabīrun “great”; Elative akbaru “greater”.
In Sura XVII verse 111, we have the use of the form Takbir, and the meaning is clear: Allah is to be considered greater than the God of Christians: “Say: ‘Praise be to God, Who begets no son, and has no partner in (His) dominion: nor needs He any to protect Him from humiliation: Yea, magnify Him for his greatness and glory.”
wa-quli l-ḥamdu li-llāhi llaḏī lam yattaḫiḏ waladan wa-lam yakun lahū šarīkun fīl-mulki wa-lam yakun lahū waliyyun mina ḏ-ḏulli wa-kabbirhu takbīran.
Thus the expression “Allahu Akbar” is a declaration that the Muslim concept of God is greater than any other concept. It is an example of Islamic triumphalism.
Finally, I end this first part with this anecdote on the mischievous acts of the Mughal Emperor, Akbar [1542-1605] who rejected Islam, and introduced a number of anti-Islamic measures: in 1579 he ended “the custom of sending vast sums of money each year to Mecca and Medina for distribution to the poor; …in 1584 he rejected the Muslim system of dating events from the Hegira, or the flight of the prophet from Mecca to Medina [in 622], and replaced it with a new chronology beginning with his own accession; finally he had had the effrontery to begin preaching and reciting khutba himself in the mosque.” [5]This last act was greatly offensive to the orthodox.
Akbar also allowed the sale of wine, and wine-drinking; and courtiers were told to shave off their beards. As if this were not enough, Akbar mischievously had stamped on his coins the ambiguous phrase Allahu akbar; strictly speaking akbar means “greater” (not“great) but it is also, of course, the Emperor’s name, so that the words could mean “God is Greater” or “Akbar is God.” Was Akbar assuming divinity for himself? Abul Fazl’s biography of Akbar is full of terms suggesting his divinity, and he even attributes several miracles to the Emperor.
[1] Thomas Patrick Hughes. Dictionary of Islam, Calcutta: 1988 [Ist published: 1885], p.14. Hughes was the British government in India examiner for Pashto, and one of the original fellows of the Oriental University of the Punjab at Lahore (in present day Pakistan).
[2] Ian Richard Netton, A Popular Dictionary of Islam, Richmond (Surrey, U.K.): Curzon Press, p.242.
[3]Edward William Lane, Arabic-English Lexicon, in Eight Parts, Beirut: Librairie du Liban, 1968 [Ist Pub. London: Williams and Norgate, 1885], Part 7, p.2587.
[4] William Wright, A Grammar of the Arabic Language, translated from the German of [Carl Paul] Caspari, and edited with numerous additions and Corrections, [Third Edition revised by W. Robertson Smith and M. J. de Goeje, Vol. II, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1964, pp.133-134.
[5] Bamber Gascoigne, The Great Mughals, pp. 107-08.
somehistory says
All interesting.
The God of the Bible, The Holy One of Israel, will soon show the universe just Who is the Greatest.
satan the devil is the ‘god’ of islime and the “father of the lie.” One of the demon’s lies: that he is god and greater than The Holy One of Israel.
As for The Holy One *needing* others; this is false. Out of His great Love, He created so as to have others enjoy life and all that life could bring.
PRCS USN (ret) says
Soon, eh?
He’s already had 2000 years to personally do anything.
Billy says
Islam is totalitarian, antagonistic, and terroristic against ALL Non-Muslims. Allah in Qur’an 8:39 says, “And engage in war with them[Non-Muslims] until there will not be sedition and the religion will be completely to Allah…”. Allah desires to fill hell with Non-Muslims who do not accept Islam(Quran 7:18; 11:119; 32:13, 35:8 etc.).
Under Islam and Islamic Law, Muslims have the Legal Right and the Quranic Duty to terrorize Non-Muslims because neglecting this QURANIC DUTY is a CRIME of Blasphemy, Unbelief, and Infidelity against tyrannical Allah. Jihad means warfare against Non-Muslims to ESTABLISH ISLAM’S RELIGION AS SUPREME(Quran 3:115, 151; 9:5, 29, 111; Muslim Law Manual: “Reliance of the Traveller”, o9.0 and more).
࿗Infidel࿘ says
The part about Akbar above is invented. He never rejected islam: he was a muslim more inclined towards shi’a (which his mother was, unlike his father who was sunni). He founded a sect called “deen e ilahi”, but that sect was a vehicle for making him the caliph, rather than anything else. Never had >39 members, and on his deathbed, he recited the shehada
Yeah, he was a debauched ruler: I’ve seen pictures of Baburide paintings showing bunch of gay men in a ringa ringa rosie circle, al Zutt style. But that doesn’t mean he wasn’t muslim. One Indian historian has described how he described his campaign against Mewar as a jihad, and massacred 30,000 civilians in the fort of Chittor in the name of allah
Rarely says
How can anyone argue that there is only one god and then say “my god is greater than your god” thereby assuming that there are two gods (minimum)?
Of course muslims claim their concept of God is correct — every other religion does the same. It’s how the religion dictates its adherents to act that is the only thing that’s relevant. Those dictates almost always seem to be man-made.
But, of course, all this is obvious.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
That’s one of the most clueless things you’ve ever said
Yeah, all religions claim to be the true one, but only this one – islam – has a doctrine of hatred and violence of people who don’t follow it, or defines morality based on one’s belief system. Jews, for instance, don’t define the truth as being whatever someone who believes in the Torah & the Talmud say
If all other religions, or indeed, any other religion, was similar to islam, there would have been daily reports about excesses by their members. The only belief system, if not a religion, that is even close to islam in terms of its barbarism, is communism
gravenimage says
What Could Possibly Be the Connection Between Peter Pan Playing Cricket and Islamic Triumphalism? (Part 1)
……………………………….
Wow–*this* is obscure! The “Allahakbarries” cricket team, was founded by J.M. Barrie, author of Peter Pan. The team’s name was a joke reverence to Islam.The team was known for its lack of cricketing skill and included many famous literary figures of the time.
We need more of this sort of thing!