As UK lawmakers voted 382 to 26 to ban the activist group Palestine Action under anti-terror laws, the UN is taking the group’s side.
The UN is infamously anti-Israel, as is abundantly apparent in its consistent passing of anti-Israel resolutions.
Islamic countries have long been buying out UN agencies in order to promote Sharia globally. The role of UNRWA employees in the October 7 jihad massacres should have had much greater consequences. In fact, the UN demanded immunity for UNRWA employees who were complicit in the October 7 jihad massacre. The UN continues to flaunt its bias in its latest rebuke of the UK.
UK Security minister Dan Jarvis had made the argument that “Palestine Action is not a legitimate protest group,” as he stated:
People engaged in lawful protest don’t need weapons. People engaged in lawful protest do not throw smoke bombs and fire pyrotechnics around innocent members of the public.
And people engaged in lawful protest do not cause millions of pounds of damage to national security infrastructure, including submarines and defence equipment for Nato.
But the UN has and will continue to turn a blind eye to the jihad threats toward Israel, Jews and in general, the West.
“UN experts urge United Kingdom not to misuse terrorism laws against protest group Palestine Action,” United Nations, July 3, 2025:
GENEVA – UN experts* today urged the United Kingdom not to ban the “direct action” group Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation under the Terrorism Act 2000.
“We are concerned at the unjustified labelling of a political protest movement as ‘terrorist’,” the experts said. “According to international standards, acts of protest that damage property, but are not intended to kill or injure people, should not be treated as terrorism.”
The Government asserts that the group is “terrorist” because some members have allegedly caused criminal damage to property, including at military bases and arms companies, with the aim of progressing its political cause and influencing the Government. Proscription would trigger a range of criminal offences relating to support for the group.
Palestine Action positions itself as a national activist network that promotes civil disobedience and takes direct action against companies and institutions deemed by the group as being used by Israel to violently enforce apartheid, occupation, colonisation and genocide in Palestine.
“While there is no binding definition of terrorism in international law, best practice international standards limit terrorism to criminal acts intended to cause death, serious personal injury or hostage taking, in order to intimidate a population or compel a government or an international organisation to do or to abstain from doing any act,” the experts said.
“The UK supported this approach in voting for Security Council resolution 1566 in 2004,” they said. “Mere property damage, without endangering life, is not sufficiently serious to qualify as terrorism.”
The experts noted that, if national law criminalises property damage as terrorism, as it does in the UK, then it would be good international practice in a democracy to exclude acts of advocacy, protest, dissent or industrial action that do not result in death or serious injury. The Security Council’s Counter-Terrorism Executive Directorate supports this approach…..
Kosh's Shadow says
“The experts noted that, if national law criminalises property damage as terrorism, as it does in the UK, then it would be good international practice in a democracy to exclude acts of advocacy, protest, dissent or industrial action that do not result in death or serious injury.”
So, and note I am NOT advocating this, nor will I do it, causing massive damage to UN property, but no serious injury, to protest their Jew-hatred would be considered by the UN to be a legitimate act of protest, right?
That is completely to point out the hypocrisy of the UN.
The entire UN should be declared a terrorist organization and thrown out of all civilized countries.
That would be my preferred way to cause a lot of financial damage to the UN, starting with the US stopping all payments, and prevent any US government money going to the UN for any purpose, including security, allowing UN motorcades, etc.
Captain Quirk says
I don’t follow. I fail to see the logic in what you write, I’m afraid.
Kosh's Shadow says
If the UN considers a group that causes significant damage due to their opinion is not necessarily a terrorist group, then they should have the same attitude towards a group that damages UN property in protest to any UN position. But I am sure they would want that group to be proscribed. Even more for an anti-Islam group. They only think it is fine do large amounts of damage against Israel.
They do not have a consistent position except for being anti-Israel.
Eva says
Let’s be honest, if these creatures hadn’t attacked Brize Norton, they wouldn’t be proscribed.
Because we all know that the british government hates Israel and despises Jews.
Look at all the non-action over the hate marches across the country, and the fact that ‘bob vylan’, emily eavis, and the bbc a-holes, who have been demonising Israel for years, are not sitting in prison cells right now. Unlike Lucy Connelly, who dared to speak against the left’s current darlings.
I hope it doesn’t happen, but I see yet another U turn in starmlin’s immediate future, the spineless s**t.
England Invaded says
Note, we have multiple traitor MPs in the House Of Commons, who openly support Palestine Action.
They are still allowed to give support while in the House due to parliamentary privilege. If they did so now outside tat arena they would be prosecuted. Showing yet again that these people are nothing but traitors and should be given the rope by ordinary people.
Alphonse Caprice says
They don’t need any of those rules. Let art. 9, para. 2 ECHR suffice. This article permits us to prohibit the koran. Literally! Please read with me:
‘Freedom to manifest one’s religion or beliefs shall be subject [only] to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of public safety, for the protection of public order, health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.’
Surah 2: 191 reads: ‘Kill them wherever you find them’.
This is only 1 of numerous exhortations to violence and murder of non believers, you and I.
An exhortation to murder people is a criminal offence. A crime, not a misdemeanor.
Stop the koran! Persecute those who spread that criminal filth.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Wonder whether Comrade Kier will fold, given that it’s the UN?
United Kingdom, United Nations, what’s the difference?
Rick Gordon says
As much as I dislike the current UN leadership- and how far they have strayed from the organization’s original goals, I still think that the US needs to be an active member. We are a voice for western civilization and humanity that is often lacking. We do not have to support those who hate us but still want our money – e.g., UNWRA and such.
Thomas Finnegan says
The Quran is HATE SPEECH!
James Lincoln says
It sure is, Thomas.
But if a native Brit brings it to the attention of the “authorities”, who do you think is going to be punished?
OLD GUY says
Sadly we all know the answer to that. One doesn’t dare be Islamophobic, even at the speaking of the truth about Islam. But you can say anything you want about Jews, Christians and Atheist and thats perfectly within the FREEDOM of SPEECH.
OH WHERE DO WE FIND THESE LEADERS AND LEGAL SCHOLARS?
gravenimage says
+1
gravenimage says
UN slams UK over ‘misuse’ of ‘terrorism laws against protest group Palestine Action’
………………………………………………….
Just appalling. Looks like the ban is holding–so far, that is…
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/jul/04/ban-on-palestine-action-to-take-effect-after-legal-challenge-fails
skeptiker says
Wieder ein Beispiel von vielen, wie die UNO benutzt wird, um gegen westliche demokratische Länder vorzugehen. Die UNO ist eine von vielen überflüssigen Organisationen, die keinen Mehrwert für die Weltbevölkerung erbringen. Sie dient als Bühne für despotische, korrupte und undemokratische Regierungen, wo in Hinterzimmern gekungelt & gekuschelt wird, Kontakte geknüpft und Geschäfte abgewickelt werden.