$9 billion was spent to secretly bring Afghans to the UK.
Earlier this year, Front Page Magazine revealed that the UK was estimated to have more political prisoners than Cuba with speech interdictions totaling 1,000 arrests a month. Many of these arrests involve speech critical of the presence of Muslims in the UK including the mass arrests of anyone revealing that, contrary to the government’s denials, a Muslim terrorist had stabbed 3 little girls to death. Now it’s been learned that the British government ran a scheme to smuggle thousands of Afghans into the UK and banned reporters from speaking about it.
Over the last several years, UK governments secretly brought in over 35,000 Afghans at a cost estimated to be as high as $9 billion. The ‘operation’ went on even though the UK’s Ministry of Defence estimated that at least 1 in 10 of the smuggled Afghans would be homeless.
But what happened next was even more shocking. After a data breach leaked information about the operation, the British government, claiming that it was trying to protect the Afghans it was smuggling into the UK, demanded an ‘injunction’ that banned anyone from reporting on it.
A leftist judge who had previously intervened for migrants then went further with a ‘super injunction’ aimed “against the world” that threatened reporters with huge fines and prison time if they even discussed the news with each other. Senior members of the government were unable to disclose to the public where the money was going because of this ‘super injunction’.
Year after year, governments colluded to maintain the ban and the censorship even as more Afghans poured into the UK. And no one in the UK was allowed to discuss what was going on.
The authorities claimed that they needed mass censorship to prevent the names of the Afghans they were smuggling from being leaked to the Taliban, but it’s likely that the Taliban already knew the names, the injunction certainly did not limit the Taliban and the ‘super injunction’ could have banned the release of any identifying information from the data breach without concealing the existence of the Afghan smuggling scheme which the Taliban were certainly aware of.
The Afghans weren’t being smuggled past the Taliban, but past the eyes of the British people.
The ‘super-injunction’ appears to have led British governments to provide distorted figures of Afghans entering the UK and misleading budget figures because both the Labour and Conservative governments did not want the public to know where their money was going.
The secrecy and the censorship has made it difficult for the British people to learn the truth about the destructive scale of the operation. Various figures have been provided for the cost of the Afghan smuggling scheme ranging from $1 billion to $9 billion (figures have been converted from pounds to dollars) and the number of those brought over from 4,000 to 35,000.
Afghans have already been invading the UK by boat, certain that if they can just land, they will be allowed to stay. With asylum approval rates peaking as high as 98%, Afghans poured in to take advantage of a ‘streamlined asylum process’ reserved nearly entirely for migrants from Muslim countries.
Former PM Rishi Sunak had promised the nation that he would fight illegal migration by accelerating asylum requests so that their claims would be processed “in days or weeks, not months or years” with “shorter guidance, fewer interviews, less paperwork”. And rather than cleaning up mass migration, Sunak turbocharged it for Afghans and migrants from other Muslim terrorist states. The “fewer interviews” allowed Afghan Muslims to apply for asylum without an interview, without paperwork and with even less vetting than there had been before.
This was not a response to public outrage over mass migration and it certainly did nothing to deter it or expel migrants from the UK, rather it provided cover for secret smuggling schemes that were intended to continue the fundamental transformation of Britain.
PM Sunak, like PM Starmer, lied to the public, pretended to care about mass migration all the while speeding it up and leading a relentless campaign to suppress any mention of the harm being caused by Muslim mass migration through a wave of social media speech arrests and a censorship scheme aimed at the public and the media to protect the smuggling of Afghans.
What was the ‘super injunction’ really protecting? A future wave of Islamic terrorists.
The recent independent review of the ‘super injunction’ that finally lifted it concluded that “there is little evidence of intent by the Taliban to conduct a campaign of retribution”. If the thousands and tens of thousands of Afghans being smuggled into the UK were really opponents of the Taliban who had loyally aided the UK, why wouldn’t the Taliban want to come after them?
The reason the Taliban don’t is because these ‘refugees’ are really enemy invaders.
Americans were sold the same phony bill of goods about the urgent need to take in Afghans in order to save them from the Taliban. But the tens of thousands of Afghans brought here illegally by Biden were waved through by the Taliban and Al Qaeda’s Haqqani Network who controlled access to Kabul Airport. The Afghans coming here weren’t fleeing the Taliban, they were vetted by the Taliban. And since then there’s been a wave of Afghan violence in the United States.
Those are the same Afghans that the Biden administration and a number of Senate members working on a bipartisan deal to ‘secure the border’ urgently tried to legalize. As Front Page Magazine reported at the time, the legalization scheme was necessary because the Afghans had no basis for filing legitimate refugee asylum requests. Much like the UK’s ‘streamlined’ scheme for Afghans, the Biden administration pushed to cut refugee resettlement and vetting times from years to days. At that speed, no one noticed (or pretended not to notice) that 36,400 Afghans carried an unidentified document and at least 11,110 had fake birthdays. 659 of the Afghans were either missing a first or a last name. So much for the “gold standard” vetting.
Five years ago, Front Page Magazine exposed the fraudulent ‘interpreter’ visa program that had been used as the basis for bringing tens of thousands of Afghans and Iraqis to America. 70,000 Iraqis and Afghans came here on the so-called translator/interpreter visas from 2007 to 2017. And 48,601 of those SIVs went to Afghans. At its peak, under Obama, there were 100,000 American soldiers in Afghanistan. That’s an “interpreter” to every 2 soldiers.
By March 2021, 100,000 Afghans and Iraqis had been approved for SIVs. The number of ‘interpreter’ visas kept on growing even as the number of U.S. troops dwindled to nothing.
The British and American governments lied to the public to force the mass invasion of Muslim migrants into their respective countries. The only difference was that the lack of free speech in the UK allowed its government to back up those lies with mass censorship.
But now the truth is coming out.
England Invaded says
Everyone in the UK needs to start deliberately saying things which the traitors in charge don’t like. They can try but they can’t jail all of us.
I recommend flooding the internet with comments which will have the authorities in a rage.
James Lincoln says
England Invaded,
Yes.
Completely overwhelm the UK police with literally millions of true Internet posts that they would ordinarily feel “compelled” to investigate.
Maybe they won’t feel so “compelled”…
40 rounds says
I like that approach but never underestimate totalitarians–they’ll make room for you
Split says
Yea I don’t think so. They will raid you and put you in the bunker of the prison with Tommy Robertson.
Now, England will let 16 year olds vote , plus you have to count more migrants become citizen, they will vote next election. England can expect more migrants more tax less freedom , creepy sharia.
gravenimage says
I know it’s hazardous, but now is the time for patriotic Britons to stand up!
somehistory says
Lies, so many lies and using the hard-earned money of taxpayers to bring terrorists in so they can intimidate, threaten rape and murder those whose money was used to bring them in.
afghans are notorious for kidnapping and raping young girls and claiming the children wanted the assaults. They also use the “don’t know the culture” to get off after they are caught.
Evil on steroids. But no longer shocking to those of us who have been disgusted, angry, and fed-up for years now.
Split says
There was a migrant in Germany, he kidnapped one a year ago and tortured her for hours, the whole deal, don’t want to get graphic, the trial went through and he was just let go without charges, got like community service and sensitivity training .
Don’t remember which country he’s from, usual suspects tho. Syria, Afghan, Pakistan , Somalia etc. multiple choice.
They, the migrants are now even in Balkans, Croatia Serbia. Making trouble in Bosnia, trying tot go to Austria where the churches are waiting for them.
gravenimage says
*Sickening*.
aum says
Any member of parliament can say anything whilst house of commons is sitting he / she will be protected from prosecution.
Unfortunately our political class are complicit with the judiciary.
John Fryer says
Long ago even one Jew was prevented from migrating to England.
Today in 2025 there are more Mosques than Churches.
The importation of Muslims has nothing to do with humanity but to solidifying the establishment of Islam and the destruction of Christianiity in Englandistan.
Afghanistan is but one example of millions arriving year by year and as we see here evidence of reducing the true state of this take over of a once Christian country.
Hank says
” there were 100,000 American soldiers in Afghanistan. That’s an “interpreter” to every 2 soldiers.”
“Americans were sold the same phony bill of goods about the urgent need to take in Afghans in order to save them from the Taliban.”
“The Afghans weren’t being smuggled past the Taliban, but past the eyes of the British people.”
Seems like they believe they were elected to busy themselves with everything else but their own economy, citizens, drug problems.
The word citizen in the western world is now a synonym to the word “sucker”.
gravenimage says
Yep…
Billy says
Western Muslims and Leftists partner to bring more Muslims to the West to help gain more power and control with totalitarian rule against all Non-Muslims. Islam offers nothing but hatred, segregation, discrimination, and terrorism against Non-Muslims.
Allah’s hateful Islam, a Criminal-Terrorist Enterprise and a Murderous-Demonic Cult of Believers, Muslim Soldiers for Allah, continually fund, promote, and practice ideological subversion, propaganda, bigotry, discrimination, deceit, mass murder, intimidation, supremacy, segregation, hatred, incitement to violence, criminality, genocide, victimhood, and terrorism as taught in Islamic Law, Sharia, and in Islam’s Quran(Quran 9:41, 88; 5:35, etc.).
Allah’s specious ideology in Qur’an 8:39 commands Muslims to fight Non-Muslims until they surrender to Muslim rule when it says, “And engage in war with them[Non-Muslims] until there will not be sedition and the religion will be completely to Allah…” Hence, Muslim actions should be legally challenged with a multi-faceted force of Western Laws like Muslims wield against Americans and Westerners via Tax Exempt Organizations, the Media and Hollywood, Foreign Funding, etc. because Islam violates and is incompatible with Western Laws(Quran 9:5,29, 111; 47:4; 49:15; 60:4 etc.).
Like a Foreign Terrorist Organization(FTO) designated by the USA Secretary of State, Islam and its Muslims function as a MUSLIM TERRORIST ORGANIZATION(MTO) fighting against Non-Muslims to make Islam supreme and NOT A PEACEFUL religion under Western Law because Islam funds, teaches, and promotes Terrorist Criminal Organizations with Muslims as Terrorists for Allah(Quran 9:5,29, 111; 49:15 etc.).
Allah’s Islam, a supremacist Antichrist Ideology, is using Western Freedoms and Laws against Non-Muslims to conquer Non-Muslims under Islamic Rule. Non-Muslims should legally designate Islam as a Muslim Terrorist Organization(MTO) where Mosques, Muslim Schools, Islamic Centers, Sharia Courts, and Muslim Organizations are banned because of their incitement of segregation and discrimination to fight back against ISLAMIZATION, Muslim subjugation, and tyrannical violence(Quran 4:65; 9:5,29,111; 60:4; 98:6-7 and more).
Sahih Bukhari 3126 says, “… the Prophet said, He who fights so that Allah’s Word(ie. Islam) should be superior, fights for Allah’s Cause.” Allah, the Accuser, in Quran 9:111 says, “Surely Allah has purchased from the believers[Muslims] their souls and their money so that they may have the garden[Heavenly Paradise]. They engage in war for the sake of Allah[ie. Allah’s Cause), so they kill and are killed…”. Allah teaches that Jihad Death leads to Muslim Paradise. Allah in Qur’an 3:169 says, “And do not consider those who were killed for the sake of Allah as dead. Yet they are alive with their lord, receiving their provision.”
Under Islam and Islamic Law, Muslims have the Legal Right and the Quranic Duty to terrorize Non-Muslims because neglecting this QURANIC DUTY is a CRIME of Blasphemy, Unbelief, and Infidelity against tyrannical Allah. Jihad means warfare against Non-Muslims to ESTABLISH ISLAM’S RELIGION AS SUPREME(Quran 3:115, 151; 9:5, 29, 111; Muslim Law Manual: “Reliance of the Traveller”, o9.0 and more).
More specifically, Islam, a terroristic-totalitarian way of life, is a Muslim Terrorist Ideology and Murderous, Criminal Enterprise of: incitement, intolerance, continuous war, discrimination, segregation, slavery, supremacy, genocide, polygamy, propaganda, deceit, hatred, sedition, terrorism, and violence against all Non-Muslims as taught in the Quran(Quran 2:191, 208,216; 4:65, 89,91, 95, 115; 5:14,64; 8:12,39,60, 74; 9:5,21,29,36, 41,49, 73,88, 111,123; 21:92; 47:4; 49:15; 60:4; 61:9-11; 62:6; 89:14; etc.).
jerry glenn says
UK surges in the European Islamopandering derby.
somehistory says
Kind of OT
“Iraqi who argued he cannot be deported because he is divorced, wins appeal after legal error”
“…….The Iraqi entered Britain “clandestinely” in 2020 after travelling through Turkey and across Europe before arriving by boat in the UK. He submitted his application for asylum the following day.”..
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/iraqi-who-argued-he-cannot-be-deported-because-he-is-divorced-wins-appeal-after-legal-error/ar-AA1J9W8x?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=c4f10c6b98814e4d8d0dd1b5050b1520&ei=30
Westman says
The UK middle and lower classes are being replaced, puposefully, because they aren’t sustaining the population. It’s a cynical view but there is no other conclusion that fits actual government actions at all levels.
Muslims also have social strata and the Muslim elite, just like the landed Brits, believe they can stay among the elite regardless of the social upheaval caused by rapid immigration. The Islamization of the UK and Europe was intentional to ensure an adequate supply of workers to sustain the industries that benefit the Elite. The elite “Aristocracy” never cared about the the damage to native Brits and are only becoming concerned because the native Brits are organizing resistance after finally realizing their society and culture are being replaced by Islam.
The English Feudal System invented the term “working class” with the intention of not being a member which still holds today – different construction but still the same trap of class domination.
Arresting or jailing dissidents who oppose immigration seems a logical policy to those whose future social and financial status depend upon it. However their assumption that Islam won’t topple the British elite is pure ignorance intentionally left undisturbed by Muslim elites. Christopher Hitchens brilliantly warned Britain but it seems that too many didn’t listen.
soda says
When you see such great evil happening like this, you can bet someone is getting rich from it. I’m sure Qatar and other rich Arab states have paid off the elites, to smuggle in thousands and millions of enemy combatants.
They’re basically the Taliban in the US, UK and Europe…brought here to case mass destruction and warfare to bring these states down and make an Islamic takeover that much easier…or just to destroy the West.
thomas r Parry says
The Afgan refugees Hope England has enough young boys to keep them happy.
Ralph says
Goats, too.
Ralph says
UK is spinning out of control into the Dumpster of history. Not by accident, either, but by self-destructive actions of the political leaders of the nation and the citizenry who seem to be unable to vote the rascals out of office or rise up in righteous insurrection to protect their nation and their families\\
All the American lives lost in WWII in Europe have been wasted, I’m terribly sorry to say.
gravenimage says
UK Government Threatened Jail for Exposing its Afghan Smuggling
…………………………………
UK authortes willing to perescute anyone exposing their betrayal of their people…