Israel Is Doing Europe, and the World, a Favor

The pusillanimity of UK and world leaders now calling for “de-escalation” in the Iran-Israel war — by which they mean Israel should stop its destruction of Iran’s nuclear project and of Tehran’s ballistic missiles, is discussed here: “Israel’s actions are a favour to Europe – but don’t expect a thank you,” by Grant Shapps, The Jewish Chronicle, June 16, 2025:

Blame Hollywood if you like, but Britain has drifted into that cliché scene where by-standers beg the hero not to cut the red wire. This week’s by-standers are Cabinet ministers and assorted world leaders, panicked that Israeli pilots might finish the job on Iran’s nuclear programme. The talk is all about “de-escalation”, as though you can politely handcuff a centrifuge and hope it learns some manners. Yet the red wire in question is attached to Tehran’s nuclear-bomb-in-waiting, and – brace yourself – Israel is prepared to yank it out.

Let’s admit what the diplomatic communiqués whisper: Iran is not enriching uranium for a school science prize. The International Atomic Energy Agency counts hundreds of kilos sitting at 60 per cent, a couple of turns from weapons-grade. Strap that payload to an intermediate-range Shahab and the footprint stretches far beyond Tel Aviv to nearby Europe. If you want a working definition of “clear and present danger”, that’s it – especially when the regime boasts that its reach is now “continental”.

Meanwhile, every time you map the region’s misery you find Tehran’s fingerprints. Hezbollah’s missiles in Lebanon, Hamas’s tunnels in Gaza, Shia militias turning Iraqi highways into shooting galleries, Houthis lobbing drones across the Red Sea – each a franchise in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ terror food-court. Pay, train, arm, repeat. The ayatollahs have franchised terror into a geopolitical Deliveroo – dispatching proxy couriers who drop rockets on Israel and drones on Red Sea shipping.

Against that backdrop, the suggestion that Israel must be reined in feels almost zoological – like silencing the guard dog while the burglar assembles Semtex in the neighbourhood. Yes, Israel’s operations spark unease; a bombing run is nobody’s idea of diplomacy. But allowing Iran to complete its nuclear sprint would be more than an escalation: it would be a time-release calamity….

Does anyone think that the Islamic Republic of Iran, were it to acquire nuclear weapons, would use them only to threaten Israel? Isn’t it likely that Tehran would then be able to threaten the Sunni Arab states of the Gulf, perhaps forcing them to cut their oil production to make room for more production from Iran? Isn’t it possible, given that it still would have thousands of ballistic missiles left if Israel were right now to “de-escalate,” missiles which could be fitted with thermonuclear warheads and have not only Tel Aviv and Haifa, but also Paris and London in their range, would try to bully European countries into refraining from dealing with their Muslim immigration problem by halting all such immigration and deporting great numbers of the Muslims already living in. their midst?

Eventually, months or years after the current war is over, saner heads in the West will realize, looking back, just what a feat the IDF accomplished not just for Israel, but for the entire western world, in preventing the Islamic Republic, ruled by Muslim fanatics, from becoming a nuclear power.