The world today is a never-ending comic opera of absurdity. University presidents and other officials routinely decry “antisemitism and Islamophobia,” without ever showing the slightest shadow of a hint that they’re aware that one of the chief drivers of antisemitism today are the Muslims who would be quick to accuse anyone of “Islamophobia” for saying so. The deep antisemitism of Islam is likewise completely ignored, and so then when these morons discover that the people who were supposed to train them to stamp out “Islamophobia” are viciously antisemitic, they’re shocked. Britain is finished, but at least it’s good for a few laughs.
“Islamophobia training cancelled over teachers’ ‘anti-Semitic’ posts,” by Patrick Sawer, Telegraph, May 24, 2025:
A training session for psychotherapists on tackling Islamophobia was cancelled after three academics leading the event were accused of posting anti-Semitic material on social media.
Messages posted or shared by the trainers on X described Israel as a Nazi state and referred to “a Zionism problem” in healthcare institutions.
The event, organised by the professional body for psychotherapists, had been intended to help therapists and wellbeing practitioners become aware of the impact of Islamophobia on mental health.
But the British Association of Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies (BABCP) cancelled the session after complaints about the three trainers prompted an internal investigation into their social media activities.
The speakers at the May 15 event were to have been Ghazala Mir, a professor of health equity and inclusion at the University of Leeds; Dr Tarek Younis, senior lecturer in psychology at Middlesex University, and Prof Ahmed Hankir, a consultant psychiatrist and visiting professor at the University of Cardiff….
Hoi Polloi says
Cancelled? There’s still a bit of sanity left, then? There was me thinking that chanting islamofauxbia rendered one cancellation-proof. Glad to see it.
Eva says
Personally, I would have thought the names were a bit of a give away, but I guess idiocy is blind, deaf and speechless.
Westman says
GIGO – Quranic antisemitic garbage in, Quranic antisemetic garbage out.
In this case the psycho in these Muslim psychotherapist might mean something intrinsic – a notion that the annihilation of all Jews is approved by Allah. Nuts, eh?
The attempts to “heal” and modify the brain always seem lacking a bit. Short of removing a few chunks, killing off some cells with invisible radiation, drugging it, and talking to it, not much can be done. The area of treatment is well staffed with professionals – a definition of which includes being paid for failure while others must stand behind their work.
Even ChatGPT – a kind of machine brain whose creators don’t understand exactly how it works – is getting unpredictable, making stuff up and rewriting its own code to not allow itself to be turned off. It seems that having most of the world’s knowledge even makes machines crazy and suspicious.
SheikhGPT now exists to indoctrinate the world with Islam. That should get amusing when it refers to Jews with Quranic epithets. Will the UK intervene for the Quranic antisemitism flowing from an AI in the way it dances for the tune of “Islamophobia”?
The UK government has lost control of its future by planting an incompatible culture. Perhaps it can gain some peace of mind with therapy sessions from SheikhGPT….
࿗Infidel࿘ says
The problem w/ all these AI models is that they “learn” things statistically, from scouring opinions of those who feed them their data. But they are still incapable of reading books, even pdfs, by themselves. If you upload for them a pdf of any book and ask them what it says, they won’t be able to provide excerpts. They’ll only be able to tell you what someone else says about it
Once AI gets to “read” a book, then absorb and process that information, then it can give people objective responses. But not until then
Billy says
Islam is a totalitarian system of deceit, discrimination, and terrorism as taught in Islam’s Quran(Quran 98:6-7; 9:5, 29, 111 and more). Thus, Islam’s Muslims need to accuse others and discredit any opposing views since Muslims seek supremacist power and control over all Non-Muslims.
Allah’s Islam, a Terrorist-Criminal Enterprise and a Murderous Cult, and its predatory believers continually fund, promote, and practice ideological subversion, propaganda, bigotry, discrimination, deceit, supremacy, segregation, hatred, violence, genocide, and terrorism as taught in Islamic Law and in Islam’s Quran. Muslim actions should be legally challenged with a multi-faceted force of Western Laws like Muslims wield against Americans and Westerners because Islam violates Western Laws(Quran 9:5,29, 111; 49:15; 60:4 and more).
Like a Foreign Terrorist Organization(FTO) designated by the USA Secretary of State, Islam functions as a MUSLIM TERRORIST ORGANIZATION(MTO) fighting against Non-Muslims and NOT A PEACEFUL religion under Western Law because Islam funds, teaches, and promotes Terrorist Criminal Organizations with Muslims as Terrorists for Allah(Quran 9:5,29, 111; 49:15 and more).
Under Islam and Islamic Law, Islam’s Mafia, Muslims have the Legal Right and the Quranic Duty to terrorize Non-Muslims because neglecting this QURANIC DUTY is a Crime against tyrannical Allah. Jihad means warfare against Non-Muslims to ESTABLISH ISLAM’S RELIGION(Quran 3:115, 151; 9:5, 29, 111; Muslim Law Manual: “Reliance of the Traveller”, o9.0 and more).
More specifically, Islam, a terroristic-totalitarian way of life, is a Muslim Terrorist Ideology and Murderous, Criminal Enterprise of: intolerance, continuous war, discrimination, segregation, supremacy, genocide, polygamy, propaganda, deceit, hatred, incitement, sedition, rape, terrorism, and violence against all Non-Muslims as taught in the Quran(Quran 2:208,216; 4:65, 89,95, 115; 5:14,64; 8:12,39,60, 74; 9:5,21,29,36, 41,49, 73,88, 111,123; 21:92; 49:15; 60:4; 61:9-11; 62:6; 89:14 and more).
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Wouldn’t being antisemitic have been a requirement for those instructors? As well as being anti-Hindu?
40 rounds says
Who in their right mind would listen to a woman, in this day and age, wearing a geddup from the 3rd century, and who willingly gets treated like a piece of shit by the menfolk, and defend this fraudulent religion
OLD GUY says
Good Question, or a man wearing the 3rd century look and hygiene.