This model citizen of shattered, staggering, dhimmi Britain should be ordered to live with this immigration judge.
“Iranian criminal who wouldn’t be able to cut son’s hair ‘remotely’ if deported was allowed to stay in UK,” by Andy Dolan, Daily Mail, May 16, 2025 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
An Iranian criminal was allowed to stay in the UK after an immigration judge said that he wouldn’t be able to form a relationship with his three-year old child or cut his son’s hair ‘remotely’.
The asylum seeker, who was granted anonymity, avoided deportation after it was ruled that it would be too harsh on the toddler.
It was heard the Iranian – who ‘absconded’ immigration control for over a decade and whose asylum case has gone on for more than 20 years – was ‘very involved’ in raising his child, and would cut his hair and play with him.
A tribunal heard the man – who ‘thwarted’ deportation – was allowed to remain in the UK after a judge ruled that he could not maintain this relationship from another country.
The Home Office have since appealed this decision, arguing the judge gave inadequate reasons for his ruling.
His claim will now be reheard.
The Upper Tribunal of the Immigration and Asylum Chamber said the man first arrived in the UK in July 2004 and claimed asylum….
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Shouldn’t his son freely grow his hair & beard, since they are symbols of the “prophet”? Why does daddy need to be there?
somehistory says
His toddler would be better off without him. and there are still barbers in that nation, are there not?
Isn’t the U.K. where that other mozlum terrorist was allowed to stay because his son liked the food and didn’t like it in the home country?
The U.K, isn’t just “staggering”…so many who should know better are just plain *stupid.*
A mozlum nation doesn’t allow any such *verdicts* which would give non-mozlums any kind of freedom….not malaysia where a man can’t return to Christianity; pakistan where the cops beat up the citizens who are non-mozlums, and take their property.
But in non-mozlum run nations, the mozlum mind-set still seems to control….can’t deport back to home country because….he wouldn’t like it; he couldn’t jihad, he couldn’t eat what he wants or cut someone’s hair.
Perhaps this verdict will be overturned and the goon can go back home.
Walter Sieruk says
First, Britain belong the British and not to foreign migrants usurpers who want to destroy England common Law and replace it with Islam with its Sharia.
Second, it should be made known that the actual origin of Sharia had been revealed in a Time –Life book with the title MESOPOTAMIA: THE MIGHTY KINGS copyright 1995 ” For that future history book about the ancient pagan world of Mesopotamia informs the reader that “many Islamic laws resemble the Babylon and Assyrian forebears.” .page 150.
Therefore Sharia is of pagan origin and therefore has no value or worth.
Walter Sieruk says
There is an insidious Muslim infiltration and influence in the governmental working of the United Kingdom which is called the “Stealth jihad.” The technique is practiced by Muslims who are also stealth jihadists to infiltrate the UK using lies and deception, which they call Taqiyya,. It’s for the advancement of Islam with its Sharia in the UK.
This Muslim scheme for achieving the goal of the Islamic agenda is as, many times, as subtly effective as it is demonically clever. Furthermore, this Islamic gradualism, in some ways, is very similar to the instruction printed in the book entitled THE ART OF WAR by Sun Tzu. Which reads, “At first, then, exhibit the coyness of a maiden, until the enemy gives you an opening; afterwards emulate the rapidity of a running hare, and it will be too late for the enemy to oppose you.”
Westman says
A more important question: Is this man generating more income tax for the government than it is paying for he and his family’s upkeep or is there a 20 year record of dependency on the, “Jihad Seeker’s Allowance”?
gravenimage says
And an even more important question is what kind of danger does he present to British citizens?
James Lincoln says
Simple solution:
Deport the Iranian criminal WITH his three-year old child back to Iran.
rick says
Britain always succeeds when politicians attempt to make England a joke and a laughingstock to the world.
Greg says
You can’t make this stuff up!
Tim gallagher says
This is absolutely pathetic. The asylum case has dragged on for 20 years. It is a wonder that a country that lets that happen can get anything done. I thought that,here in Australia these cases dragged on and on, but 20 years. I think that has to be the world record. And who paid for this shitheads appeals. No doubt the taxpayers footed the bill for a lot of it.
gravenimage says
And teach Jihadists that all they need do to stay in th country is impregnate a woman and tney can stay forever…
Hank says
“It was heard the Iranian – who ‘absconded’ immigration control for over a decade and whose asylum case has gone on for more than 20 years”
These are the kind of cases shattered, staggering, dhimmi Britain gets itself into because they do not deport immediately.
gravenimage says
Yes–why was he released to dodge immigration for 20 years?
bill says
Some judges in UK and also in USA are not fit for their positions and should be dismissed
OLD GUY says
What the f kind of excuse is that. Thats like saying you can’t put a Islamic rape and in jail because there are no young girls in the all male prison.
SJC says
When did that ever stop these 7th century sexual predators ? They will rape anything with a pulse, female or male ?
40 rounds says
Or animal?
gravenimage says
Yes–sheep and goats are not safe, either…
gravenimage says
UK: Iranian criminal allowed to stay in country because he wouldn’t be able to give son haircuts if deported
………………………………..
Why think it is best for this Jhadist to teach his son to be a criminal–so long as he cuts the boy’s hair? Madness…