Many people stabbed in Germany by a “38 year old German woman.” I will be very surprised if this is not another Muslim migrant incident. The fact they are giving no details about her is suspicious.
I do look forward to you doing more videos, like Raymond Ibrahim has started doing. It could take the form of conversations, as opposed to interviews, w/ people from different parts of the world to discuss islamic thuggery around where they live. You could have people like Daniel Bordman up north in Canada, Tommy Robinson in England, Eva Vlaardingerbroek in Holland, some JNS host in Israel, the person who once interviewed you from Nigeria (not the Biafra lady) and so on
Also, on the question of whether or not Muhammad existed, I agree w/ you that just for historical accuracy, it would be good to know. I do think Raymond Ibrahim is right in that proving that Muhammad did not exist won’t have any effect on muslims. However, proving it would have an effect not so much on muslims but rather non-muslims, particularly non-muslim governments, who can then dismiss claims of Muhammadan heritage more easily, if it’s historically demonstrated that that person didn’t exist. Particularly in countries that seem to have strong Waqf laws, such as India
The al-Zutt story was a hoot, and makes a mockery of islam’s genuinely homophobic doctrines: under those doctrines, Muhammad should have been thrown off a tall building given what he did. However, I disagree w/ David or Raymond when they claim that it proves the existence of Muhammad due to the “embarrassment principle”. The idea that any group from India, which was then a rich & fertile land, would migrate all the way west to the Arabian (or even Syrian, if one assumes that this is someone else’s story projected onto Muhammad) just defies logic. During that era – 6th-7th century, it was European – namely Byzantine – merchants who were travelling the Silk Route to India & China for all those exotic treasures, from silk to spices. Indian or Chinese merchants weren’t the ones travelling to Constantinople or Rome to sell their wares: they had enough trade just selling to themselves, since they were still pretty populous. Therefore, the idea that Jat people traveled all the way to Syria or Arabia for any reason defies credulity, even though some Jat trolls may indeed claim that they banged Muhammad
Discover more from
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
David M says
Many people stabbed in Germany by a “38 year old German woman.” I will be very surprised if this is not another Muslim migrant incident. The fact they are giving no details about her is suspicious.
https://www.infowars.com/posts/stabbing-rampage-at-german-train-station-leaves-18-injured
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Robert
I do look forward to you doing more videos, like Raymond Ibrahim has started doing. It could take the form of conversations, as opposed to interviews, w/ people from different parts of the world to discuss islamic thuggery around where they live. You could have people like Daniel Bordman up north in Canada, Tommy Robinson in England, Eva Vlaardingerbroek in Holland, some JNS host in Israel, the person who once interviewed you from Nigeria (not the Biafra lady) and so on
Also, on the question of whether or not Muhammad existed, I agree w/ you that just for historical accuracy, it would be good to know. I do think Raymond Ibrahim is right in that proving that Muhammad did not exist won’t have any effect on muslims. However, proving it would have an effect not so much on muslims but rather non-muslims, particularly non-muslim governments, who can then dismiss claims of Muhammadan heritage more easily, if it’s historically demonstrated that that person didn’t exist. Particularly in countries that seem to have strong Waqf laws, such as India
The al-Zutt story was a hoot, and makes a mockery of islam’s genuinely homophobic doctrines: under those doctrines, Muhammad should have been thrown off a tall building given what he did. However, I disagree w/ David or Raymond when they claim that it proves the existence of Muhammad due to the “embarrassment principle”. The idea that any group from India, which was then a rich & fertile land, would migrate all the way west to the Arabian (or even Syrian, if one assumes that this is someone else’s story projected onto Muhammad) just defies logic. During that era – 6th-7th century, it was European – namely Byzantine – merchants who were travelling the Silk Route to India & China for all those exotic treasures, from silk to spices. Indian or Chinese merchants weren’t the ones travelling to Constantinople or Rome to sell their wares: they had enough trade just selling to themselves, since they were still pretty populous. Therefore, the idea that Jat people traveled all the way to Syria or Arabia for any reason defies credulity, even though some Jat trolls may indeed claim that they banged Muhammad