Let countries fighting Islamic terrorism win.
There’s a pattern here. Muslim terrorists kill non-Muslims. They play victim after the retaliation begins, demand a ceasefire and then celebrate the ‘ceasefire’ (which they immediately violate) as a victory.
What does this do to deter the next Muslim terrorist attack?
What does this ‘ceasefire’ do to get justice for a murdered U.S. citizen?
India has accused Pakistan of violating a ceasefire agreement, hours after the truce was reached.
India’s foreign secretary Vikram Misri said his country’s armed forces have been “given instructions to deal strongly with violations along the border” after multiple explosions were heard in at least three cities in Indian-controlled Kashmir.
In an address on Saturday evening, Pakistan’s prime minister Shehbaz Sharif did not directly address the allegations, instead saying Pakistan will “do anything” to defend itself if its independence is challenged.
He also said his country had achieved a “historical victory” and praised Pakistan’s army, navy and armed forces.
“Here there is a sort of air of triumphalism… you get the sense that Pakistan feels like it’s the stronger party coming out of this moment,” correspondent Cordelia Lynch said.
She also explained that the praise for America is only being heard from one side.
“Pakistan has certainly expressed its gratitude to Donald Trump, they claim America played a pivotal role,” Lynch added.
“That is not echoed in New Delhi… they’ve been pretty quiet on America’s involvement.”
“I am going to increase trade, substantially, with both of these great nations. Additionally, I will work with you both to see if, after a ‘thousand years’, a solution can be arrived at concerning Kashmir,” President Trump posted on TruthSocial.
The “solution” is that India retains Kashmir and gets to defend itself against Islamic terrorism. No other solution is needed.
I don’t see why the United States is even involved. We were supposed to stop playing the world’s policeman and being involved in all the world’s conflicts. Instead, we seem to be getting involved in more of them.
Pakistan is an enemy, not an ally, and our relationship with India remains positive, but historically tentative. We have no business even being involved in this conflict. And nothing we do will fundamentally change the fact that Pakistan is an Islamic terrorist state perpetually at war with India.
If India wants to go after Pakistan, that is its business and not ours. And we should stay out of it.
Nor should we be proposing any deals to carve up Kashmir, ditto for Israel and Gaza. Let the countries fighting Islamic terrorism win.
Stive says
C’mon people, there is a leader that comes as an angel of light, especially to Christians, as he almost deceives the Very Elect, but the elect ( those called) are deceived, but the Very Elect ( those chosen out of the called), make it, though bamboozled a little, wake up quickly. This son of perdition will hurt the good and help the wicked. It’s happening now more and more, and every day the Very Elect have more see but the regular elect stay blinded.
And a narcissistic egotist can never be trusted period, no matter who sh bor he is.
somehistory says
Sorry, but you need to read closely the Scripture which describes the “angel of light.” It is not a man; it is not a person, even one claiming to be Christian. The “angel of light” is satan the devil.
Alkflaeda says
Islam is his project, and has been from its inception – Mohammed was a medium who channelled a demon, not a prophet.
Athmanathan S says
Indian army on the pretext of destroying terrorists ‘ camps blasted their airports, planes and unknowingly bombed the secret atomic weapons storage underground. An earthquake occurred like some implosion happened. There may be spread of toxic emissions. Egypt sent its stock of boron chemical to check radiation. A fitting reply by India to state sponsored terrorisms.
commonsense says
Daniel Greenfield understands the Muslim playbook perfectly. It’s appalling that Trump seemingly does not. Indeed, Pakistan is our enemy – the fact that its government protected and hid Bin Laden, likely for years, while pocketing American aid is a sufficient reason to deem it so. Why, in fact, does Pakistan receive even one cent of U.S. aid? What has Pakistan ever done for us besides exporting cheap apparel and dishrags sold in Walmart?
Nienie says
Precisely!
Pakistan is not an adversary, but an Islamist enemy.
Stop US $ aid to Pakistan.
PacosMojo says
“I don’t see why the United States is even involved. We were supposed to stop playing the world’s policeman and being involved in all the world’s conflicts. Instead, we seem to be getting involved in more of them.”
You warmongering lying sac! You’d be the first chickenhawk screaming your size-6 head off if the US decided to stop assisting Israel militarily.
PacosMojo says
Chicken hawks unite! You guys are pathetic.
somehistory says
You like to throw around the “chicken hawk” label Your comments have no logic, but read as a supporter of islime, pakistan, and moslem terrorists.
By the way, have you ever actually seen a chicken hawk? I have and your accusing others of being chicken hawks is really a misnomer.
PacosMojo says
When the shoe fits. And boy does it fit a bunch of NeoCONs around here.
somehistory says
You obviously don’t know anything about Hawks or shoes.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
In fact, over the weekend, on @X, Indian posters dug up @realDonaldTrump’s tweets from 2012 and 2018 denouncing Pakistan for harboring Osama, and calling for an end to any aid to that countrhy. It’s pathetic how the foreign policy has changed on a dime
Is there any way we can get back the Donald Trump of 2018, if not 2012, back in the White House? I’m not too thrilled w/ the 2025 version
PacosMojo says
Why? You want to encourage two nuclear powers to continue fighting a hot war? And what would be achieved? Nothing. Just like the multiple other times they’ve fought. Except that maybe one of them decides to push the button. No thanks.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
It’s their conflict: we need to keep out of it. If one insists on starting jihad terror attacks on the other and the other decides that it needs to retaliate, that’s their right. Had we been subjected to anything remotely close, we’d have started a war. Even if the president was Trump, Vance, Tucker or Tulsi
We have no business getting ourselves involved in a war outside our neighborhood. But neither should we interfere w/ other countries fighting one either
As for nuclear powers, Pakistan couldn’t invoke their nuclear arsenal, much as they’d have liked to. According to some reports, India neutralized a few of their sites. Also, even if their flareup did go nuclear, it’ll be limited to South Asia. But again, their problem, not ours
Anonymous says
It is wise for Americans to either support India or stay out of the Indo Pak War. US cannot trust the country which once his Laden, then wanted Islamic Terrorist.
Common sense says
Pakistan lost badly, but the Jihadi government of Pakistan claims a false win to placate the rabid Pakistani population
࿗Infidel࿘ says
The jury is still out on that. As is often the case, truth is the first casualty of war. It will be the internal practices of both Pakistan and India that will give us an insight into who won Operation Sindoor
James Lincoln says
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio needs to hire Daniel Greenfield.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
DHS should hire him – Kristie Noem. Or DNI & Tulsi Gabbard. He covers islamic subversive activity in this country more thoroughly than anyone
James Lincoln says
Infidel,
Yes, and yes.