Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Austria: After Muslim/non-Muslim brawl on Vienna tram, Muslim says ‘Your land will soon belong to us anyway’

By

Likely true, thanks to Europe’s socialist internationalist elites.

“After a mass brawl on tram line 52: ‘Your country will soon belong to us anyway,'” translated from “Nach Massenschlägerei in Linie 52: „Euer Land gehört uns sowieso bald“,” Unzensuriert, May 2, 2025 (thanks to Medforth):

A veritable culture war erupted on Wednesday in a tram car on tram line 52 in Vienna. An argument between a Viennese woman and two women wearing burkas escalated, resulting in a mass brawl.

Criticism of “wrapped women” is unacceptable

Although this incident cannot be found in the press releases of the Vienna State Police Directorate (LPD), a witness reported uncensored about an “event I’ve never experienced in Vienna before.” According to Bruno M., two women wearing burkas boarded tram line 52 at the Westbahnhof station between 5:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday. A Viennese woman then allegedly remarked to the “wrapped women”: “That’s not appropriate.” This resulted in not only verbal altercations, but also fists.

15 people involved in physical violence

According to the witness, up to 15 people were involved in this mass brawl. “Swear words were used that I hadn’t even heard of before,” M. said, still impressed by the experience. The phrase often heard during confrontations was also allegedly uttered: “Your land will soon belong to us anyway.”

Comments

  1. The time has surely come to start mass deportations of Muslims in Europe, Scandinavia and UK. There is no way we should have to put up with such threats and pay for the privilege in the process

    • Stop all welfare benefits to immigrants. Enforce a work requirement. Prohibit Muslim-only prayer rooms in schools, hospitals, and government offices. Deport any Muslims with criminal records, no matter how small the crime. Prevent foreign money being used to pay for building mosques, providing for their upkeep, and for paying imams. Make it a crime to block cars and pedestrians by praying on city streets and sidewalks. Ban the electronic enhancing of the call to prayer, which disturbs the peace of non-muslims and is an act of Islamic triumphalism.

      • Hear, hear! ‘For once’ (not really) clear talk (although I love your use of quaint English words: I look them up and, boy, do I learn!). I couldn’t agree with you more..,.

      • Agreed with everything except, “Deport any Muslims with criminal records, no matter how small the crime.”

        Some definitions and threshold requirements are needed here. What if the crime was protesting or fighting against Islamic behavior or governments?

        • Yeah, Salwan Momika comes to mind. They would never agree to deport all muslims, but what they are more likely to do is deport all Iraqis, Pakistanis, Turks, Syrians,…. Under that process, a lot of Assyrians, Yazidis, Syriac Christians & others would risk getting deported to their home countries

      • Thanks for sharing that — let’s break it down without falling into the trap of propaganda.

        —

        ### 🔎 What’s really going on here?

        This story — originally from *Unzensuriert* — is being circulated by Robert Spencer, a known anti-Islam activist who runs *Jihad Watch*. His entire platform is built around framing Islam as an existential threat to the West. His sources often rely on **unverified witness claims**, sensational headlines, and fringe news outlets with far-right leanings.

        In this specific case:

        * There is **no confirmation from Vienna police** about the brawl.
        * The quote “Your land will soon belong to us anyway” comes from **an anonymous witness** — not police, not camera footage, not legal testimony.
        * The story is being used to **amplify fear of Muslims**, especially women in religious dress, as invaders or cultural threats.

        —

        ### 🎯 What’s the real agenda here?

        It’s **classic replacement theory fear-mongering**:

        * Push the narrative that Muslims are overtaking Europe.

        * Paint visible Muslims (especially hijabis or burka-wearing women) as provocative or hostile.
        * Stoke resentment, justify anti-Muslim laws, and normalize discrimination under the guise of “cultural preservation.”

        —

        Whether the fight happened or not, using:
        **unverified, cherry-picked incidents** to generalize about *millions* of peaceful Muslim residents is how **xenophobia is manufactured.** If a white guy assaulted someone on a tram yelling “This is our land,” would anyone call that a Christian takeover?

        “One brawl doesn’t mean conquest. One quote doesn’t mean invasion. But using every minor conflict to paint Muslims as enemies? That’s how fascism markets itself as patriotism.”

        • Robert has written several books, that are well-researched and document the details of Islam ‘s emergence, its spread by sword, the life of its founder and its plan to create a worldwide caliphate.
          Sharia on its own is a reason to condemn and make illegal its precepts and rules.
          The Islamophiles who continue to defend it are either deceived or are themselves deceivers.

        • Let’s make this really simple: there would be no culture clashes if there are zero Muslims in Europe. Therefore to eliminate altercations eliminate Muslims.

        • Oussama Slim says,

          “…Robert Spencer, a known anti-Islam activist who runs *Jihad Watch*. His entire platform is built around framing Islam as an existential threat to the West.”

          Question: do you personally think that Islam is an existential threat to the West?

          Why or why not?

        • Note that “Oussama Slim” here thinks he is “exposing” Robert Spencer for opposing the horrors of JIhad. Very odd.

          Then, the texts of Islam openly state they plan on replacing Dar-al-Harb with the horrors of Jihad and Shari’ah-and yes, of course this includes the West. Many Muslim clerics also opnly admit this–those not practicing Taqiyya.

          And this is *harldy* the only case of Muslims attacking Infidls in th places that hav given them sanctury. This is orthodox Islam.

          Then, Muslims attacking people on a train is *not* a minor incident–unless you consider anything short of 9/11 to be Jihad as usual.

        • Your entire claim is just a package of over-the expire date, bologna.

          mozlums “market” themselves as terrorists and as superior to everyone else.

    • Islam lost its military power when the results of the Industrial revolution which empowered even women to have sufficient strength to operate modern weapons against physical-strength armies. The technology involved has slowly filtered into poor Islamic nations and bought by wealthy Islamic nations. Iran represents the second Islamic nation to develop serious in-house weapons engineering.

      The result has been a checkmate against Islam and defeat if it attacks the West. The fact that no Western nation can safely or successfully occupy a Muslim nation stems from Islam and Arab attitude, being unable to hold a civil organization together without rancor. The Bible saw this problem that Islam could not erase – “….his hand will be against everyone and everyone’s hand against him, and he will live in hostility toward all his brothers.”

      The only method open to Islam to take over the West is unimpeded immigration, a second hijrah followed by high rates of reproduction. Certainly, a majority of Muslim immigrants to the West are looking for a better life, yet, the Islamic leadership is still carrying the notion of ruling the world and eliminating the Jews for Allah. The leadership is mainly sponsored, as are Mosques build by funds from outside the target nations, by countries like Saudi Arabia.

      Unfortunately, Western leaders are notoriously ignorant or unbelieving of Islam’s actual goals and willing to believe any glad-handing Muslim leader about, “The Religion Of Peace[war]”.

      It doesn’t help that too many Muslims, socially in an “Islam staightjacket” since birth, don’t know the actual militaristic doctrines of Islam. We should expect not only militancy against host countries but also hostilities within the immigrant community by those who believe the doctrine and want to enforce it.

      • This message is a thinly veiled piece of anti-Muslim propaganda dressed up as historical and geopolitical analysis. Freedom of speech? Eh” Bobby? let me grind this expose it for what it is ??

        🔥 1. “Islam lost its military power” — false narrative.
        Islam is a religion, not a military bloc. You’re describing states, armies, and technologies, not Islam. Military decline in some Muslim-majority empires (Ottoman, Mughal, etc.) had far more to do with colonialism, internal corruption, and European industrial monopolies than anything religious.

        Also, saying Islam “lost” implies there was once a global Islamic military hegemony — that’s fantasy. Muslims have fought each other as much as they’ve fought outsiders. Just like in every other civilization.

        🔥 2. “Checkmate against Islam” — what are you even talking about?
        If “checkmate” means Muslims can’t challenge Western militaries directly, that’s not religious defeat — that’s geopolitical asymmetry. Meanwhile, the U.S. couldn’t win in Iraq or Afghanistan despite total technological superiority. So who got checkmated?

        🔥 3. Using a Bible verse to justify racism.
        Citing Genesis 16:12 (“his hand against everyone…”) as a prophecy about Arabs or Muslims is both racist and theologically weak. It was about Ishmael, not Islam (which didn’t exist for another 2,600 years). Twisting scripture like this is what white supremacists do to make war seem holy.

        🔥 4. “The only method open to Islam is immigration and birth rates” = Great Replacement Theory.
        This is classic fascist dog whistle — pretending Muslim families having kids is a covert invasion strategy. If high birth rates and immigration are an existential threat, the problem isn’t immigrants — it’s your fragile identity politics.

        🔥 5. “Islamic leadership wants to rule the world” — paranoid nonsense.
        There is no global Islamic leadership. Sunni and Shia nations can’t even agree on how to run the Hajj, let alone conquer the West. Wahhabi funding is real, but it’s a Saudi political project, not some unified Islamic plot. It’s not a religious inevitability — it’s money and power.

        🔥 6. The real danger isn’t Islam. It’s willful ignorance.
        When you fear a billion people over scattered fringe radicals, and you think a mosque equals a secret military outpost, you’re not thinking clearly — you’re absorbing post-9/11 paranoia or Cold War-style “civilizational clash” propaganda.

        📢 Final Word:🔊🔊🔊🔊🔊🔊🔊🔊🔊🔊
        If your worldview requires painting your neighbors as a threat based on what they believe or where they pray, you’re not defending your society — you’re dismantling it from within.!!! Can You Hear me World?!

        • You need to read the Quran. After a few sentences (not exaggerating), you would see that Islam is a military block and a wanna-be religion where the whole focus in on power regardless of how it is achieved. If you can’t see that in one page of the Quran, your reading skills are inept.

        • The Islamic prophet Mohammed claimed descent from Ishmael for the Arabs, whom he said were “the best of people”. Therefore, why shouldn’t non-Muslims take that claim seriously and conclude that some traits might have been inherited?

        • I *very much doubt that Oussama Slim’s real name is “Wallah Bro Gimmicks”. Starting with a lie does not help his case.

          Then, Westman is not Robert Spencer. And yes–being able to criticize Islam *is* freedom of speech. Why would it not be?

          Then, Islam is indeed a military bloc–Dar-al-Islam–as much as is it s a religion. He *does* know that we can read the texts of Islam–the Qur’an, Hadiths, Sira–and its history?

          He wrote:

          🔥 1. “Islam lost its military power”…had far more to do with colonialism, internal corruption, and European industrial monopolies…”

          What does he think that Westman’s reference to the Industrial Revolution was about? But the West has no monopoly on industrial innovation–anyone can innovate. But having a cultural and ideological backgfound helps–and Islam, which despises innovation and productive labor does not lead to this.

          Then, the implication that Islam nver tried to conquer urope is quit false. It was driven out of Spain, Portugal, Sicily, and much of eastern Europe, and was turned back at France and Vienna.

          And Muslims hating each othr does *not* mean that they do not hate Infidels.

          And oddly, Oussama Slim is on e of the only Muslims who admits that Islam does not date back to the bginning of time. Many of his pious coreligionsists would kill him for that. Makes for good Taqiyya, though…

          And it is Islam above all others which sacralizes war.
          Abd many Muslims speak opnly about outbreeding Infidels–including Islamic clerics.

          AAnd the idea that invasion is just a problm of the victims is grotesque–but to be expctd by a supremacist Muslim.

          Then, Islam itself preaches world conqueswt–and Islamic institutions like Al Azhar confirm this.
          And no–knowing what Islam preches is not ignorance. but the opposite.

          Then, the idea that if one recognized Fascisn, Communism, ot Islam as a lgitimate threat that one is dismantlng–what? Democracy? Note that Oussama Slim does not say. But this is false–totalitarian creeds–including Islam–*is* a threat to the free world, and shoul;d be called out as such. Pious Muslims openly acknowledge that they want to replace freedom with brutal Shar’ah law..

          And yes–the world can hear your Taqiyya.

    • The Threat Timeline
      2015: Kadar begins bomb threats, targeting U.S. airlines and Australian schools.

      Jan–Feb 2016: Over 590 threats made to schools in Australia.

      Late 2016: Apparent pause; during this time, Kadar refines tech tools and launches his dark web threat-for-hire service.

      Jan–Mar 2017: 2,000+ bomb threats sent worldwide, mostly targeting Jewish centers. Many include robotic voices claiming to be from ISIS.

      March 23, 2017: Arrested in Ashkelon, Israel. Found with spoofing gear, custom antennas, encrypted drives, and Bitcoin wallets.

      2018: Tried and convicted in Israel. Sentenced to 10 years. U.S. does not extradite.

      2024: UK’s CST references his case in new antisemitism threat assessments—still using a hoax to justify fear-based policy.——Media Hysteria & Quiet Retraction
      Before his arrest: headlines accused Muslims, white supremacists, Trump supporters.

      After his arrest: brief coverage, no retractions, no widespread corrections.

      The ADL and others who cited his threats as proof of antisemitism never adjusted their stats.

      His threats remain embedded in public perception and policy—even though they were fake.
      Had Kadar been Muslim:——-Australia’s Silence
      Over 590 bomb threats were made to Australian schools.

      Despite the disruption and fear caused, Australia never pushed for Kadar’s extradition.

      Authorities credited Israel with the arrest and quietly moved on.

      Had the perpetrator been Muslim, the outrage would’ve been global—and merciless.
      He would’ve been labeled a terrorist.

      He would’ve been extradited and tried in the U.S.

      He would’ve faced life in prison or worse.

      But because he was Jewish, Israeli, and targeting his own community for profit:

      He was protected.

      Tried at home.

      Shielded from international prosecution.

      Forgotten.———uld’ve been global—and merciless.
      id like you opinon please this 1 2000 calls causing chaos in Airports schools communities his own peole suffered from traumas Robert Spencer where are you brother how come no one blasted this in the news you still talking about 2012 marder. Bravoo Bobby 🙂

      • Mr Spencer is NOT YOUR BROTHER !. 😠🙄another lie you told. Oussama what a daft name😅🤡😆

      • The idea that Jhad terror began in 2015 is quite false. Has Oussama Slim forgotten 9/11, the Madrid Train bombong, the London Tube bombings and so many other Jihad terror attacks? Or does he just hope that we have forgotten?

        And the claim that Jihad terror attacks are “fake”–or perpetuated by Jews–is grotesque.

  2. Judging by history, especially judging by what happened in WWII, this guy is making an incredible mistake, given the fact that Western culture has factually (not actually, but factually) proven it is by far more effective in killing off people than mohamedanism. I profer the following evidence: mohamed (if he really did exist, which is not the case) only killed 800 to 900 Jews after the battle of the trench (if that battle actually did take place). OK, scumbag Osama bin Laden killed 3,000 Americans. So what? The jerries killed 6 million Jews in the ‘Vernichtungslager’, which actually did take place. So hmmm, go ahead, pull their leg, by all means, but beware, because it may explode in your face… Talking about gambling…

  3. Allah’s Islam is a Criminal-Terrorist Gang Enterprise against ALL Non-Muslims as taught in Islam’s Quran(Quran 9:5,29,111 and more).

    Non-Muslims CANNOT have peace with Allah’s Islam, a Terrorist-Criminal Enterprise, and its deceitful believers because Islam and its murderous god, Allah, demand a continuous Muslim war, a RELIGIOUS DUTY, against unbelievers where Non-Muslims are CRIMINALS under Islam due to illegal UNBELIEF and unlawful BLASPHEMY against Allah when despicable Allah in Qur’an 8:39 says, “And engage in war with them[Non-Muslims] until there will not be sedition and the religion will be completely to Allah…” Similarly, contemptible Allah in Quran 2:208 says, “O you who have believed[Muslims], enter completely into Islam and do not follow the steps of Satan; surely he is an obvious enemy to you.”(see also Quran 30:30)

    Islam contradicts Western Laws and incites violence and terrorism against Non-Muslims as Allah punishes Non-Muslims by Muslim hands(Quran 9:14 and more). HENCE, NON-MUSLIMS MUST MAKE ISLAM, ITS MOSQUES, ITS SCHOOLS, ITS COURTS, ETC. ILLEGAL UNDER WESTERN LAW(Quran 9:29 and more). Also, Islam and its many Organizations must be identified and publicly declared to be MUSLIM TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS(MTO) for their funding, teaching, and support of terrorism, violence, and discrimination against Non-Muslims as taught in Islam’s Quran(eg. Quran 3:151; 9:5,29,111; 60:4; 98:6-7 and more).

    • @Tony, I don’t know where you live, but in the EU there is article 9, para. 2 of the European Convention of/for Human Rights, which opens the way to do exactly what you preach. The left shuts up about that article, but boy does it have potential…

        • Here here!
          Well said Goofy and keep spreading the word

          It is high time Western leaders realised they have a legitimate piece of Human Rights law to prevent the depredations of Islam in democratic countries.
          If Article 9 section 2 ECHR was not written for that very purpose then what is it for?

    • 1. This Is Hate Speech.
      The text you shared demonizes an entire religion and its followers based on selected verses stripped of context. It’s the same kind of rhetoric used to justify hate crimes, mosque attacks, and political persecution. If someone said the same thing about Christians or Jews, it would rightly be called out as extremist bigotry.

      2. Misusing Quranic Verses.
      The Qur’an, like many ancient religious texts, has verses tied to specific historical conflicts. Quoting them without historical or linguistic context — and ignoring the peaceful verses and mainstream interpretations — is dishonest and misleading. Scholars (Muslim and non-Muslim alike) have thoroughly debunked this cherry-picking approach.

      Qur’an 9:5 (“kill the polytheists”) refers to a specific breach of treaty during a historical war and was limited in scope.

      Qur’an 8:39 and 9:29 were revealed in times of actual military conflict, not general rules for Muslims to wage war on non-Muslims eternally.

      Qur’an 2:208 is calling Muslims to fully follow their faith, not to wage war on others.

      3. Muslims Are Not a Monolith.
      Claiming all Muslims are part of a “terrorist enterprise” is like calling all Christians the KKK or all Jews the IDF. It’s not just false — it’s dangerous. Most victims of terrorism are Muslims themselves, and most Muslims live peacefully within Western societies, upholding local laws.

      4. Free Speech Is Not a Free Pass to Incite Genocide.
      In the West, speech that promotes hatred against a religious group — especially calling for criminalizing their worship, their schools, or labeling them all terrorists — violates human rights standards and in many cases, hate speech laws.

      If you’re dealing with questions about religion, extremism, or conflicts between ideologies, I can help break it down critically — but not like this. This is straight-up incitement, and it’s morally and intellectually bankrupt.

      Would you like help understanding a specific Quranic verse or historical event instead — in a way that doesn’t promote hate?

      • Oussama Slim,
        Every Moslem devil needs to be immediately deported from western lands. The Quran banned and every single mosque and madrassas bulldozed. Problem solved. Your deception and lies happens to also be very Islamic, namely al-taqiyya, al-kitman. Bravo Bravo, shill for Satan, who is Islams Allah.

      • So exposing the savagery of Islam is “hate”–but the barbarism of Islam itself is not? I notice you do not say what the “context” of Muslims threatening and murdering Infidels actually is. This is very common with Islamic apologists.

        Pious Muslims do not want Infidels to understand what Islam has in store for us–but just look at any Islamic land and it is quite obvious. We *do* know how to read the Qur’an, Hadth, Sira, and comments of Islamic clerics. It is Islam that preaches genocide of Infidels.

        Note there is not a word of criticism for this violence. But why would there be?

      • Islam is not compatible with the West or the Constitution. It’s a hateful and deceptive ideology and does not belong in the USA or Europe or Russia.

      • You are trying to beautify Islam through some “philosofic” arguments stating rightfully that “not all Moslems are terrorists”. Well, this is true. But what of “only” 40% of Muslims who endorse terror against the infidels? We don’t judge by words. We judge by facts. The facts are that ALL terror acts are committed by Moslems. How do you explain this?
        Another fact: the IDF – Israel Defence Force is fighting exactly against a huge terror army (HAMAS) which in one day only, massacred 900 defenceless Jewish civilians. In short – the Israeli army is there to defend innocent non-Muslim citizens agains the envoys of terrorist Islam. Judging by worldwide experience – it is better for Europe to stop legal and illegal invasion into Europe, because the Europeans can “get angry” and use force to expell all Moslems brutally, and this will be a real pity, mostly for the innocent Moslems…albeit it may be the only solution.

      • We here are all *free** to say, if we choose, that we ***hate**** islime and all that it murders and rapes and lies for.
        Good **hate speech**….hate of the evils of islime.

  4. There’s so many real, far more serious problems associated with what’s sometimes referred to as “Stealth” or “Soft” jihad, whereby too many Islamist variety Muslims are given admittance into what they consider to be either kafir or dhimmi nations in order to seemingly innocently taking them over by out baby-making the native populations, and so being able to eventually rule them in democratic elections not occurring in their countries, that the last comment one Muslim participant said may very likely become reality.

    The native Austrian woman should have just kept silent and not initiated this confrontation over something so trivial.

    Pick your battles wisely!

  5. And remember: Austria was in on the war… Remember: Hitler was an Austrian. Remember: North-West European science brought mathematics, physics and industry to such a degree of fruition as to enable them to automatize destruction, and it hasn’t stopped in 1945… Witness the total obliteration of ‘gaza’… So, ‘death cultus’? Feel free… Have a ball… Some guy (in let’s say Minesota) will blow your head off in (for all I care) Belgium with a drone… Remember the death throes of yahyah sinwar? You won’t even have those… You’ll just go ‘poof’.

    • My lord! What north europe?! Do you mean east europe??? Slavs brought most of the inventions. The great serb/slav Nikolaj Teslaić alone. Marie Currie was polish etc etc

    • “Yogi Bear” is soaked in violent fantasy, thinly veiled threats, and supremacist arrogance. It’s a textbook example of how tech-powered militarism blends with racialized hate speech to justify state violence and dehumanization of others, especially Palestinians and Muslims.

      Let’s call it what it is and dismantle it:

      🔥 1. “Austria was in on the war… Hitler was Austrian…”
      So what? That has zero relevance to immigrants or Muslims today. Bringing up Hitler’s nationality as some kind of karmic justification for violence now is lazy deflection — like saying Germans today deserve drone strikes because of WWII.

      🔥 2. “North-West European science… automatize destruction…”
      That’s not a brag, that’s a confession. You’re glorifying a legacy of industrialized slaughter — colonial genocide, nukes, white phosphorus, drone assassinations — and pretending it’s some kind of badge of honor.

      If this is “civilization,” then what’s barbarism?

      🔥 3. “Witness the total obliteration of Gaza…”
      If you think Gaza’s destruction is a success story — you are celebrating war crimes. Thousands of civilians, including children, were burned, crushed, starved, and bombed — not warriors, not militants — regular people. And this comment mocks it like it’s a video game.

      🔥 4. “You’ll just go ‘poof’…”
      This is the language of drone imperialism: killing without consequence, murder as policy, death as spectacle. And it’s exactly this mindset that breeds more resistance, not peace. You don’t pacify people with power — you radicalize them.

      💣 Final word:
      The real “death cult” isn’t a religion — it’s the system that glorifies remote murder, celebrates genocide, and sees brown bodies as target practice. You don’t win hearts with hellfire missiles. You bury truth in rubble and wonder why the world hates your “freedom.” BTW thats just an Imoji not a real Bomb hehehehehe your Cute YOGIYOOOOOOO!!!!🔊🔊🔊! I wonder if this isnt Just BobbYYYYYYY ? Eh” Bobby?? Is That you or YogiYoooooo?

      • Slim, you’re effin’ pathetic.

        Your efforts remind me of the 4-year campaign by the Biden administration and its lackey media to convince us of an alternate reality – that The Big Guy was sharp as a tack. Or that “…the border is secure”.

        You are not going to convince anyone here, that Islam is some benevolent force in the world. It’s not. It is a quintessentially intolerant death cult, hegemonistic, imperialistic and murderous throughout its sick history.

        • Unfortunately you are right. So far, Islam has killed millios of other moslems (in the last 15 years). Just imagine what they would do to Christians and Jews. This generation of moslems is not the generation of the past century of goat herders and camel drivers. Many are well educated in the best western universities, but their basic murderous character is still there.

      • Islam is *not* a race–it is an idology.

        And rhe implication that all westetrn science is military is ludicrous.

        And no–science is not “barbarism”.

        And Yogi Bear is not Robert Spencer–again, Oussama Slim seems not to understand how widely read Jihad Watch is.

        • The khomeinie (sp may be wrong) of iran, has ordered that mozlums of every “race” nation, ethnicity, etc., gather for their mobs to trample the ground around the black rock., per the article today on JW
          Even he knows islime is not a “race” separate from other races of mankind.

  7. These Asylum seekers in Europe and the Americas want help from us, but would never give help to us.
    They take and take and take and never give.
    Then on top of that they cheer about conquering Western countries and forcing us to convert to Islam.
    Asylum needs to be ended. There should be maybe one country that can claim Asylum and that’s Ukraine. None of the rest should be able to claim asylum. It’s nothing more than a scam to get into Western countries.

    • “It’s nothing more than a scam to get into Western countries.”
      Its a scam to get into non-Muslim countries, especially Western countries illegally
      Those Muslimas are just virtue-signaling for Islam and are looking for a provocation.
      If Austria knows what is good for the coming generations of Austrians they should deport these heathens as soon as possible. Maybe Trump can lend Austria some cargo planes and handcuffs.

  8. Austria: After Muslim/non-Muslim brawl on Vienna tram, Muslim says ‘Your land will soon belong to us anyway’
    ………………………………

    Yes–pious Muslims want to turn Austria–and the rest of the civilizd world–into just another stretch of Islamic hell.

  9. No it won’t muslim.
    Never !
    Our lands will never belong to you dogs*
    Crudades#2 Incoming
    Sharia Is Shit-Don’t Put Up With It

    *apologies to our beloved canine companions

  12. I had an experience with a lady in a hijab on a bus in a UK city, about 20 years ago. She insisted that her double buggy was a wheelchair, and that I needed to vacate the wheelchair space, where I was sitting on a fold-down seat, and stand up for the journey so that she could put her buggy there. There was enough space for the buggy elsewhere on the bus, which, though there were no seats available, was not really crowded, so I refused. After pointing several times to the wheelchair sign, and insisting that a buggy was a wheelchair, the lady decided she would put it in the space whilst I was there, and it became necessary for her to keep ramming the buggy into my legs – not once, by accident, but several times, each time pulling it back and ramming again. (The fact that she could do this indicates that there was room to manoeuvre on the bus).The bus had separate spaces for buggies and wheelchairs – it was just that the other buggy space was already occupied. The notice above the fold-down seat that I was using said “Please vacate this space if a wheelchair user needs it”. If I had vacated it, the lady in the hijab could have sat on the seat with her buggy folded in front of her, which I think is what she may have wanted to do. She was not visibly pregnant, and was younger than I was, so I saw no reason to give her priority. We arrived at the station soon after and I got off, so I assume that she took the space she had wanted.

    • Typical–I note that she did not ask you for a favor,but immediatly turned to demands and then assault. That’s Islam. I’m sure the driver was busy, but thy should have told the assailant to knock to off or get off the bus.

    • You should have had her charged with assault. Especially if you had bruises to prove it.

  13. Its time we as westerners stood up to these individuals , ,to think that these peaple are up holding the word of Mahoumad the vilest of any one person , , just recently David Wood revealed A portion from the Hadith whereas Mahoumad went into the dessert met with 8 men who all mounted him , This is the sort of person that muslams Honour , the Hadith is full of such atrocities Lets put on the body armor and let them that we will stand up for what is the truth

  14. Question; were the other passengers allied with the woman, or were they fighting with the overdressed mozlums?
    Who came out the winner? Kudos to the lady unafraid to speak up.

Discover more from

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Skip to content