All it took, apparently, was a change in administrations. Now, with the Trump administration withholding billions of dollars in funding to colleges and universities that fail to suppress the antisemitic stormtroopers who last year harassed, roughed up, and silenced Israeli and Jewish students on their campuses, suddenly many — though not all — of these institutions have seen the light, and are now calling out the police to stop these antisemitic demonstrators before they can get started again, by setting up their encampments smack dab in the middle of their campuses. More on this welcome development can be found here: “Anti-Israel encampments fail to materialize at Columbia and CCNY,” by Michael Starr, Jerusalem Post, April 27, 2025:
Planned anti-Israel protest encampments failed to materialize at Columbia University and City College of New York (CCNY) on Thursday due to warnings or policing actions by the administrations.
They were warned: try to set up an encampment, and this year the NYPD will come down on you like a wolf on the fold, you’ll be taken away, arrested for trespassing if you are a non-student, and if a student, may be expelled. Some of those trespassers could be looking at sentences of one to three years and a fine. Go ahead, baby jihadists and salon Bolsheviks — make our day. The warning worked. At Columbus and CCNY, not a single encampment has yet appeared.
New Columbia tent encampments had been planned in secret, according to a Wednesday NBC News report, with a plotted Morningside Heights campus and a Friday Manhattanville campus encampment.
The same day as the leak of the alleged plans, the Columbia public affairs office warned that it was monitoring for any disruptions.
“Encampments are prohibited under university policies, and participating in an encampment may also trigger university rules violations,” said Columbia. “Any violations of university policies and rules will be addressed immediately according to our procedures.”
No encampments manifested on Thursday or Friday at the university that popularized the protest tactic, with Columbia University Apartheid Divest silent on social media besides a call for activists to participate in a CCNY protest.
No one wants to risk being kicked out of their university. And that risk is now real. And this time, the Columbia administration means it: if you build, or stay at, one of these encampments, or bully Jewish students and faculty, you will be in violation of university rules and regulations. You may be expelled. Non-students may be guilty of criminal trespass and subject to arrest. What do those pro-Hamas protesters do now? Nothing. They have too much at stake. The universities are now determined to end the mob misrule that prevailed on many campuses last year. The pro-Hamas groupies have apparently opted to lie low. Yes, they still love Hamas and hate Israel, but there are limits to their martyrdom. We’ll just go back to our studies, they say to themselves, and then, once we have our diplomas safely in hand, we will renew our “struggle for the Palestinians” and against the “genocidal and apartheid state” of Israel.
New York City Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) announced the creation of a “liberated zone” at the CCNY quad, noting that it was established at the same location as the campus’s encampment last year….
Only at CCNY was a small protest held in late April — the Columbia campus was quiet — much diminished in size from last year’s mob, and there were no tents, no encampments, despite the claim by SJP of establishing a “liberated zone” on the CCNY campus.
Instead of the SJP holding fast in their “liberated zone” on the CCNY quad, as they did in their encampments last year, this time they quietly complied when asked by public safety officers to show their identification — non-students could be quickly taken off campus, and if they resisted, could be charged with trespassing. Then the students who remained were “evacuated” — that is, forcibly removed from the Quad. This did not happen last year at CCNY, when the SJP set up its encampment and was not made to leave. A new wind is blowing.
“We must love each other and support each other. We have nothing to lose but our chains,” activists quoted terrorist Assata Shakur as they dispersed, according to a CUNY for Palestine X/Twitter post….
“Our chains”? “Lose our chains?” What preposterous melodrama. What “chains” are those that these people are being forced to endure? The only chains that such people as Assata Shakur endure are the mind-forged manacles of Islam, that holds Muslims and their leftist collaborators in thrall. These bullies in the SJP believe that they are being persecuted by Amerikkka, that they are the victims of a police state, that they are martyrs to free speech. Nonsense. It is they who are trying to shut down all pro-Israel speech on campus. Some of these protesters are non-students, overwhelmingly Muslim, but most are American college students, among the most privileged people on the planet, with nothing more pressing to worry about than studying for their finals and hoping they won’t get caught for plagiarizing their papers from helpful sites on Google.
The SJP has now given up trying to scare CUNY into yielding to its demands. It “issues demands,” but no longer dares to disrupt campus life. CUNY is no longer going to tolerate such nonsense. SJP can yell all it wants, but no one in the administration at CUNY is paying attention. They have something more important to do: run a university, and make sure federal funds are not withheld.
While SJP at CUNY has verbally threatened “to continue to disrupt these institutions,” it has not dared to put up another encampment, or disrupt a single class, or harass a single Jewish or Israeli student or faculty member. They don’t dare, because they now know that, thanks to the Trump administration’s threat to withhold federal funds, their university, like so many others, will no longer tolerate what these SJP thugs got away with last year.
In short, in the past month, university administrators have been quick to threaten disciplinary actions against those who hoped to set up protest encampments. That has led students either to not put up any encampments, in stark contrast to what they did last year, or if they do put them up, to swiftly take them down — as they refused to do last year — when the university demands it, and both campus and regular police, depending on the circumstances, are there to promptly enforce the rules. There have been no reports recently of any classes taught by Jewish or Israeli professors being disrupted. Nor have there been any reports recently — there were so many last year — of harassment and bullying of Jewish students. The Trump administration has shown that determination at the very top to stamp out anti-Israel and antisemitic activity on campuses does work. Threats to withhold federal funds have had a salutary effect. Keep up the good work in Washington, please. Remain implacable. On campuses from sea to shining sea, it’s having an effect.
Steve Manning says
I support Israel but how does this not violate our 1st Amendment? When Democrats get back in power and they will they’ll make everything hate speech and have us arrested.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
So those demonstrators are at liberty to organize demonstrations, and chant the most vile of slogans, such as hating Jews, hating Israel,…. Where their 1st Amendment rights end is when they start violating the rights of other students, be it Jewish students, or indeed other students who disagree w/ them. In most of the above cases, they’d do things like obstructing Jewish students from attending school, harassing them in their dorms and intimidating them. All of that is criminal activity not covered by the 1st Amendment
As for the Dems, we saw what they did for 4 years: it’s not new, and they don’t need our example to set a precedent. If anything, they taught us how to treat them when the shoe is on the other foot, namely ours! We showed it in the case of Anheuser Busch and Bud Light, and suddenly, corporations which were tripping over each other on how to outwoke each other are suddenly firing their DEI staff, removing all long term DEI objectives and finally starting to act like businesses again
Hugh Fitzgerald says
It’s conduct, not speech, that is to be regulated, prevented, punished. The First Amendment has nothing to do with it.
Wellington says
Really? You honestly don’t know the difference between speech and action? The 1st Amendment protects free speech, even so-called hate speech, but it does not protect actions which are intimidating and threatening, such as have occurred numerous times on numerous American campuses. Learn the difference because it is a key difference.
Heidi says
Violences, intimidation and assault aren’t part of the 1st amendment.
Susan B Shulman says
Thank goodness, and President Trump!!!
Magooey says
Maybe it time for some actual free speech on campus. In particular it should be time to expose Islamic Sharia Law and Islamic traditions as imposing an actual apartheid regime on all the countries affected. Just look at the Pact of Umar for a start.
Winston 101 says
Magooey,
Thank you for the reference, I will look into it. Pact of Umar is a new piece of information for me.
tgusa says
Democrats are a party of violent gangs. That is why they are in a snit about the deportation of MS 13 man. We wont ban free speech but their speech leads to violence and they know it.
“Pritzker: GOP cannot know a moment of peace”
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5270744-pritzker-calls-for-protests/
“Jack Posobiec confronts Jamie Raskin, gets ASSAULTED by Democrat union workers at Union Station”
https://x.com/JackPosobiec/status/1917330779538960578
Oh look. Raskin is doing an Ivy League at Union Station.
skeptiker says
Also, irgendetwas ist in der Bildung in den letzten Jahren in den USA wohl gründlich schief gelaufen.
Wie sind diese zutiefst freiheitsfeindlichen und demokratieverachtenden Ansichten in die Köpfe des akademischen Nachwuchses gekommen? Welchen Vorbildern folgen diese aktivistischen “Braunhemden”?
Könnte das vielleicht etwas mit dem Lehrpersonal an den Schulen und Universitäten zu tun haben, die dem Ungeist des Wokismus und Genderismus verfallen sind?
Ich bekomme Pickel bei der Vorstellung, dass das die kommenden Führungskräfte sein sollen.