What action is Trump doing regards Qatar?
Seems that Qatar is the honeypot of Hamas and terrorism.
Patricksays
In America the leftist Democrats are in bed with Islam, Governor Polis and a majority in both Houses, have legislated a law that takes our automatic guns away in September, 2025. Colorado is becoming another Wisconsin, with hotspots in Greeley and Ft. Collins centered around the Universities.
I don’t know what I’m going to do as I have several 9mm’s and 22mm’s. Will I have to sell my home and move, what can President Trump do about it?
Patricksays
How do you differentiate between a devout Muslim and a terrorist Muslim?
somehistorysays
I don’t know about others, but I don’t differentiate. The devout are either committing terror…in their families, their cities, their countries, or they are in agreement with those who are committing acts of terror.
Mateensays
It’s perhaps the difference between theory and practice.
Rob Portersays
You can’t differentiate. If they are a “devout Muslim” then they will believe all the mentally deranged trash in the Qur’an that says Muslim must mistreat and murder “unbelievers.” They will regard the direction to mutilate “unbelievers” is alright, so a devout Muslim is also potentially a terrorist..
Rob Portersays
An excellent podcast. I hope that Tulsi Gabbard gets to watch it. There needs to be a serious awakening to Islam in the U.S. I think there is zero chance in Canada where political correctness is like a disease, stifles critical thought and discourages people from making harsh and intelligent judgements that might offend’.
Hudders.says
As it currently stands today, each & every human being that is not a muslim death cultist or convert, is likely to see their lives greatly impacted by the tide of islamic followers, currently greatly multiplying like a deadly infestation, in their towns, cities or villages.
There is a dark diabolical cloud spreading over the so called free world.
Those in power have opened the gates of hell & the demon spawned multicultural trojan horse has galloped forth & begun to trample all thought, speech or action resisting.
Jihad has manifested itself in many ways in Britain for example. Be it psychological, sexual, polital, or criminal thuggery, the impacts are being widely felt & horrifyingly successful.
Sharia courts & patrols operate openly, a law unto themselves across the country.
Ignorance nor well meaning embraces have become the most hideous form of wanton national suicide.
As that is left it seems, is to watch the hourgless sands trickle down, until the day of jihadist bloodletting begins in earnest.
Islam is a death cult & we are all to be slaughtered on the abominable ancient altar of Allah it seems.
Unless?
࿗Infidel࿘says
It was the Papadopaulos case that convinced me that the Five Eyes were an evil bureaucratic instrument of the governments of the US, Canada, Britain, Australia and New Zealand. Otherwise, in this era of instant Google Translations, there is no reason why such a club has to be restricted to these
I once saw on Mark Steyn a long interview of George Papadopaulos, on how he was threatened while in London by Alexander Downer, Australia’s ex- foreign minister (even then), if he did anything that embarrassed not Australia, but Britain. This was obviously done under the auspices of the Five Eyes. The psychological turmoil of that time caused Simona, who was pregnant at the time, to lose their baby
I was glad to see Kash Patel some days ago announce that they are going after Comey, and I hope they do so on criminal, rather than civil grounds. Not just Comey, but a whole bunch of others – Clapper, Brennan as well as people in Obama’s & Biden’s inner circles – Samantha Powers, Susan Rice, Ron Klein, et al
Keyssays
All those agents in your last paragraph lead to the former president, who opened an office in Washington DC shortly after his second term. Got to keep organizing!
࿗Infidel࿘says
Yeah, it’s time to investigate him. Yeah, yeah, I know you don’t go after your opponents or your predecessors, but Biden broke that rule, so it’s not like Trump would be establishing a new precedent
Or if they don’t want to investigate Obama himself, what they can do is criminally go after everyone else in his circle – Susan Rice, Ron Klein, Neera Tandon, et al. Once people know that the consequences of executing a president’s illegal orders is that only they will be prosecuted for it, you’ll see that behavior end
somehistorysays
Go after the *right* ones, and they’ll turn on bo like a rabid dog turns when he touches something in his path.
࿗Infidel࿘says
They can turn on him, but what the DOJ should do is say “We don’t go after past presidents”, and just keep tormenting them. They’d be cooked, but other career bureaucrats who hope to build themselves cushy lives by brown-nosing presidents will drop that as potential career plans
Keyssays
Thank you for your thoughts, Infidel and somehistory. I like the idea of going after Obama’s inner circle, especially the active ones.
I think that, even though Obama is a “past-President-not-to-be-gone after”, he, too, is still continually active; active implementing his stated transformation agenda.
Most Presidents fade away, but not Obama. In plain sight he opens an office in DC having continual political visitors. For what purpose?
Unfortunately, he did not say:
“Old Presidents never die–they just fade away … I now close my Presidential career and just fade away – an old politician who tried to do his duty as God gave him the light to see that duty. Good-by.”
There are some who are wondering if Susan Rice “met” with Zelensky before recent Trump-Zelensky fiasco. Would Susan Rice do that on her own (or through her “proxie)? Rice, using the Community Organizer playbook, suggests that Trump-Vance purposely sabotaged the meeting. Then, Zelensky immediately jets off to embrace Globalist Starmer.
The Obama people did not let Trump fade away after his Presidency. They brought false accusations against him to punish their hated enemy.
I say, as long as Obama is active (appearing during the campaign to shame black males, etc., etc.,), he too, is open to scrutiny – past and present.
At the very least bring Obama’s part to light (not to mention the Bidens’ part in Ukraine).
Prosecute? As soon as the Dems chant “nobody’s above the law!” everyday.
somehistorysays
Keys,
Since the rule is “nobody is above the law,’ that should rightly apply to past presidents or those who pretended to be president without the legal right to be.
bo is a trouble -maker. Why should he get to freely do whatever he pleases, say whatever he pleases and never expect a knock on his door by someone holding a badge?
If hitler had not committed suicide, would he not have been caught and tried at Nuremburg?
Israel has the right to occupy Syriasays
The Druze do not like terrorism from the terrorist organization Al Qaeda and it would be right for them to repeat Eastern Ukraine with a referendum, when the regions decided that they did not want to follow the clown Zelensky.
It would be right if the Druze demanded a referendum. The Israeli army would be stationed nearby in case of an Al Qaeda attack.
That way, Israeli army would then neatly divide Damascus in half, half for Israel and half for Al Qaeda.
the Druze should be annexed in Israelsays
Should Spencer rather explain why Israel should not incorporate the Druze into its Israel? A Berlin Wall should be built across the middle of Damascus.
Billysays
Islam’s Countries spend BILLIONS on Islam’s Mosques and in America Universities to continue Indoctrination for terrorism and violence against Non-Muslims as taught in Islam’s Quran.
The FRUIT of Islam is incessant WAR, ideological subversion, propaganda, terrorism, discrimination, slavery, malice, ISLAMIZATION, persecution, and violence against all Non-Muslims; this FACT must be taught and broadcast to the general public to prohibit Islam, its Mosques, its Courts, and its Schools(See Islamic Law Manual – “Reliance of the Traveller”, 9.0- and more). Also, Islam is an Antichrist System terrorizing Israel, Christians, and Non-Muslims(Quran 3:28,54; 5:51 and more). Plus, there is NO EQUALITY UNDER THE LAW in Islam or in Islamic Law(Quran 5:51; 9:29; 98:6-7 and more). In Sahih Bukhari(V6,B60,N80), Abu Huraira narrates, “‘You(Muslims) are the best of peoples ever raised for mankind.’ means, the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them[Non-Muslims] with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam[see Quran 3:110].” See also Quran 3:22,151; 69:30-32; 98:6-7.
Walter Sieruksays
In this video discussion, Robert Spencer had spoken a valid and true statement when he said, “The terrorists are not radical from the standpoint of Islamic theology and law.”
About the terms “Radical Islam.” and “Radical Muslim,”
Those are Western terms and unknown in the Muslim world. Therefore those words really not fitting term as the following explains.
For the terms such a as well as “Radical Islam” and “Radical Muslim” is actually a misuse of terms. “Moderate Muslim” are actually Western term and not that well known in the Islamic Middle East.
This is because what In the Islamic mindset in the Muslim Middle East as well as in Indonesia and other Muslim controlled countries what the non-Muslims of the Western nations view as “radical and “extremist” the Muslims of those places in the world see as “Normal” and even Devout and committed to the Cause of Islam.”
In addition, those “Moderate Muslims” are those of the Islamic worldview and non-devout and non –committed Muslims. The violent jihadists even see them as “hypocrites.” Therefore, this explains the jihadist chant of those jihad-minded Muslims in different Islamic terror organizations. When they chant aloud “Death to infidels and hypocrites.” Meaning Death to people who and not Muslims and people who are non- jihadist Muslims.
Concerning the last part of this above essay, the violent spirit of that vicious jihadist chant “Death to infidels and hypocrites.” The later word of the chant “hypocrites” in the jihad –minded Muslim worldview is further explain in the book titled JIHADIST PSYCHOPATH by Jamie Glazov , for on page 42 the reader is informed that “Islam mandates that devout and real Muslims must punish , and in some circumstances kill, those Muslims whom they regard as neither legitimate nor properly devout.”
Walter Sieruksays
In this video interview to further elaborate on the truth that Robert Spencer said which is that “The terrorists are not radical from the standpoint of Islamic theology and law.”
One lie about the religion of Islam that the Western news media keep telling the public is that there are to different kinds of Islam, which are “Radical Islam” and “Moderate Islam.”
Many scholars on Islam ,such as Brigitte Gabriel and Robert Spencer, had explain that the terms “Radical Islam” and “Moderate Islam” Western terms and are unknown to the Islamic world. As one of their leader said “Islam is Islam”
Furthermore, a Muslim in an Islamic country would view that a Westerner would call a “Radical Muslim” in a Muslim nation he would be seen as a “devote Muslim” who is totally committed to the cause of Islam by the way of the violent jihad,
By contrast what a Westerner would call a “moderate Muslim’ many Muslims in Asia as well as the Middle East call a Muslim who is not really living up to his faith in Islam by not taking up arms in the violence and killing of the jihad for Islam.
Therefore many of Muslim, overseas , would call him a “hypocrite” This is way many devote Muslim who are violent jihadists gather together in a group and chant “Death to infidels and hypocrites ” Meaning “Death to non-Muslims and non-violent, jihadist Muslims.
Walter Sieruksays
The ideology of Islamic terrorism has its foundation based on the theology of Islam’s “holy book” the Qu ‘ran, which instructs in the use of violence and killing for the advancement of Islam. As found in, for example, 2:191. 5:33. 9:5, 111.123. 47:4.
Islam is a false, dangerous and deadly religion and false religion.
Discover more from
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
John Childs says
What action is Trump doing regards Qatar?
Seems that Qatar is the honeypot of Hamas and terrorism.
Patrick says
In America the leftist Democrats are in bed with Islam, Governor Polis and a majority in both Houses, have legislated a law that takes our automatic guns away in September, 2025. Colorado is becoming another Wisconsin, with hotspots in Greeley and Ft. Collins centered around the Universities.
I don’t know what I’m going to do as I have several 9mm’s and 22mm’s. Will I have to sell my home and move, what can President Trump do about it?
Patrick says
How do you differentiate between a devout Muslim and a terrorist Muslim?
somehistory says
I don’t know about others, but I don’t differentiate. The devout are either committing terror…in their families, their cities, their countries, or they are in agreement with those who are committing acts of terror.
Mateen says
It’s perhaps the difference between theory and practice.
Rob Porter says
You can’t differentiate. If they are a “devout Muslim” then they will believe all the mentally deranged trash in the Qur’an that says Muslim must mistreat and murder “unbelievers.” They will regard the direction to mutilate “unbelievers” is alright, so a devout Muslim is also potentially a terrorist..
Rob Porter says
An excellent podcast. I hope that Tulsi Gabbard gets to watch it. There needs to be a serious awakening to Islam in the U.S. I think there is zero chance in Canada where political correctness is like a disease, stifles critical thought and discourages people from making harsh and intelligent judgements that might offend’.
Hudders. says
As it currently stands today, each & every human being that is not a muslim death cultist or convert, is likely to see their lives greatly impacted by the tide of islamic followers, currently greatly multiplying like a deadly infestation, in their towns, cities or villages.
There is a dark diabolical cloud spreading over the so called free world.
Those in power have opened the gates of hell & the demon spawned multicultural trojan horse has galloped forth & begun to trample all thought, speech or action resisting.
Jihad has manifested itself in many ways in Britain for example. Be it psychological, sexual, polital, or criminal thuggery, the impacts are being widely felt & horrifyingly successful.
Sharia courts & patrols operate openly, a law unto themselves across the country.
Ignorance nor well meaning embraces have become the most hideous form of wanton national suicide.
As that is left it seems, is to watch the hourgless sands trickle down, until the day of jihadist bloodletting begins in earnest.
Islam is a death cult & we are all to be slaughtered on the abominable ancient altar of Allah it seems.
Unless?
࿗Infidel࿘ says
It was the Papadopaulos case that convinced me that the Five Eyes were an evil bureaucratic instrument of the governments of the US, Canada, Britain, Australia and New Zealand. Otherwise, in this era of instant Google Translations, there is no reason why such a club has to be restricted to these
I once saw on Mark Steyn a long interview of George Papadopaulos, on how he was threatened while in London by Alexander Downer, Australia’s ex- foreign minister (even then), if he did anything that embarrassed not Australia, but Britain. This was obviously done under the auspices of the Five Eyes. The psychological turmoil of that time caused Simona, who was pregnant at the time, to lose their baby
I was glad to see Kash Patel some days ago announce that they are going after Comey, and I hope they do so on criminal, rather than civil grounds. Not just Comey, but a whole bunch of others – Clapper, Brennan as well as people in Obama’s & Biden’s inner circles – Samantha Powers, Susan Rice, Ron Klein, et al
Keys says
All those agents in your last paragraph lead to the former president, who opened an office in Washington DC shortly after his second term. Got to keep organizing!
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Yeah, it’s time to investigate him. Yeah, yeah, I know you don’t go after your opponents or your predecessors, but Biden broke that rule, so it’s not like Trump would be establishing a new precedent
Or if they don’t want to investigate Obama himself, what they can do is criminally go after everyone else in his circle – Susan Rice, Ron Klein, Neera Tandon, et al. Once people know that the consequences of executing a president’s illegal orders is that only they will be prosecuted for it, you’ll see that behavior end
somehistory says
Go after the *right* ones, and they’ll turn on bo like a rabid dog turns when he touches something in his path.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
They can turn on him, but what the DOJ should do is say “We don’t go after past presidents”, and just keep tormenting them. They’d be cooked, but other career bureaucrats who hope to build themselves cushy lives by brown-nosing presidents will drop that as potential career plans
Keys says
Thank you for your thoughts, Infidel and somehistory. I like the idea of going after Obama’s inner circle, especially the active ones.
I think that, even though Obama is a “past-President-not-to-be-gone after”, he, too, is still continually active; active implementing his stated transformation agenda.
Most Presidents fade away, but not Obama. In plain sight he opens an office in DC having continual political visitors. For what purpose?
Unfortunately, he did not say:
“Old Presidents never die–they just fade away … I now close my Presidential career and just fade away – an old politician who tried to do his duty as God gave him the light to see that duty. Good-by.”
There are some who are wondering if Susan Rice “met” with Zelensky before recent Trump-Zelensky fiasco. Would Susan Rice do that on her own (or through her “proxie)? Rice, using the Community Organizer playbook, suggests that Trump-Vance purposely sabotaged the meeting. Then, Zelensky immediately jets off to embrace Globalist Starmer.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/susan-rice-slams-rumor-that-team-obama-advised-zelenskyy-on-trump-meeting-up-to-the-same-old-tired-crap/ar-AA1A471M
The Obama people did not let Trump fade away after his Presidency. They brought false accusations against him to punish their hated enemy.
I say, as long as Obama is active (appearing during the campaign to shame black males, etc., etc.,), he too, is open to scrutiny – past and present.
At the very least bring Obama’s part to light (not to mention the Bidens’ part in Ukraine).
Prosecute? As soon as the Dems chant “nobody’s above the law!” everyday.
somehistory says
Keys,
Since the rule is “nobody is above the law,’ that should rightly apply to past presidents or those who pretended to be president without the legal right to be.
bo is a trouble -maker. Why should he get to freely do whatever he pleases, say whatever he pleases and never expect a knock on his door by someone holding a badge?
If hitler had not committed suicide, would he not have been caught and tried at Nuremburg?
Israel has the right to occupy Syria says
The Druze do not like terrorism from the terrorist organization Al Qaeda and it would be right for them to repeat Eastern Ukraine with a referendum, when the regions decided that they did not want to follow the clown Zelensky.
It would be right if the Druze demanded a referendum. The Israeli army would be stationed nearby in case of an Al Qaeda attack.
That way, Israeli army would then neatly divide Damascus in half, half for Israel and half for Al Qaeda.
the Druze should be annexed in Israel says
Should Spencer rather explain why Israel should not incorporate the Druze into its Israel? A Berlin Wall should be built across the middle of Damascus.
Billy says
Islam’s Countries spend BILLIONS on Islam’s Mosques and in America Universities to continue Indoctrination for terrorism and violence against Non-Muslims as taught in Islam’s Quran.
The FRUIT of Islam is incessant WAR, ideological subversion, propaganda, terrorism, discrimination, slavery, malice, ISLAMIZATION, persecution, and violence against all Non-Muslims; this FACT must be taught and broadcast to the general public to prohibit Islam, its Mosques, its Courts, and its Schools(See Islamic Law Manual – “Reliance of the Traveller”, 9.0- and more). Also, Islam is an Antichrist System terrorizing Israel, Christians, and Non-Muslims(Quran 3:28,54; 5:51 and more). Plus, there is NO EQUALITY UNDER THE LAW in Islam or in Islamic Law(Quran 5:51; 9:29; 98:6-7 and more). In Sahih Bukhari(V6,B60,N80), Abu Huraira narrates, “‘You(Muslims) are the best of peoples ever raised for mankind.’ means, the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them[Non-Muslims] with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam[see Quran 3:110].” See also Quran 3:22,151; 69:30-32; 98:6-7.
Walter Sieruk says
In this video discussion, Robert Spencer had spoken a valid and true statement when he said, “The terrorists are not radical from the standpoint of Islamic theology and law.”
About the terms “Radical Islam.” and “Radical Muslim,”
Those are Western terms and unknown in the Muslim world. Therefore those words really not fitting term as the following explains.
For the terms such a as well as “Radical Islam” and “Radical Muslim” is actually a misuse of terms. “Moderate Muslim” are actually Western term and not that well known in the Islamic Middle East.
This is because what In the Islamic mindset in the Muslim Middle East as well as in Indonesia and other Muslim controlled countries what the non-Muslims of the Western nations view as “radical and “extremist” the Muslims of those places in the world see as “Normal” and even Devout and committed to the Cause of Islam.”
In addition, those “Moderate Muslims” are those of the Islamic worldview and non-devout and non –committed Muslims. The violent jihadists even see them as “hypocrites.” Therefore, this explains the jihadist chant of those jihad-minded Muslims in different Islamic terror organizations. When they chant aloud “Death to infidels and hypocrites.” Meaning Death to people who and not Muslims and people who are non- jihadist Muslims.
Concerning the last part of this above essay, the violent spirit of that vicious jihadist chant “Death to infidels and hypocrites.” The later word of the chant “hypocrites” in the jihad –minded Muslim worldview is further explain in the book titled JIHADIST PSYCHOPATH by Jamie Glazov , for on page 42 the reader is informed that “Islam mandates that devout and real Muslims must punish , and in some circumstances kill, those Muslims whom they regard as neither legitimate nor properly devout.”
Walter Sieruk says
In this video interview to further elaborate on the truth that Robert Spencer said which is that “The terrorists are not radical from the standpoint of Islamic theology and law.”
One lie about the religion of Islam that the Western news media keep telling the public is that there are to different kinds of Islam, which are “Radical Islam” and “Moderate Islam.”
Many scholars on Islam ,such as Brigitte Gabriel and Robert Spencer, had explain that the terms “Radical Islam” and “Moderate Islam” Western terms and are unknown to the Islamic world. As one of their leader said “Islam is Islam”
Furthermore, a Muslim in an Islamic country would view that a Westerner would call a “Radical Muslim” in a Muslim nation he would be seen as a “devote Muslim” who is totally committed to the cause of Islam by the way of the violent jihad,
By contrast what a Westerner would call a “moderate Muslim’ many Muslims in Asia as well as the Middle East call a Muslim who is not really living up to his faith in Islam by not taking up arms in the violence and killing of the jihad for Islam.
Therefore many of Muslim, overseas , would call him a “hypocrite” This is way many devote Muslim who are violent jihadists gather together in a group and chant “Death to infidels and hypocrites ” Meaning “Death to non-Muslims and non-violent, jihadist Muslims.
Walter Sieruk says
The ideology of Islamic terrorism has its foundation based on the theology of Islam’s “holy book” the Qu ‘ran, which instructs in the use of violence and killing for the advancement of Islam. As found in, for example, 2:191. 5:33. 9:5, 111.123. 47:4.
Islam is a false, dangerous and deadly religion and false religion.