Has this judge been in contact with the man’s family in Pakistan? On what basis does he assume that they would disapprove of his actions? Has the judge considered that they might think his actions were just fine? After all, they have the example of Muhammad, the prophet of Islam.
Islamic tradition records that Muhammad consummated his marriage with (i.e., raped) Aisha when she was nine, and the resultant fact that child marriage and the sexualization of children are taken for granted in wide swaths of the Islamic world.
“The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death)” (Bukhari 7.62.88).
Another tradition has Aisha herself recount the scene:
The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became all right, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, “Best wishes and Allah’s Blessing and a good luck.” Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age. (Bukhari 5.58.234).
Muhammad was at this time fifty-four years old. Nowadays in the West there are elaborate efforts to deny all this. An Islamic scholar/apologist named Joshua Little has constructed an elaborate argument from close study of the chains of transmitters (isnads) of various traditions about Aisha, claiming that those traditions, despite appearing in Sahih Bukhari, the hadith collection Muslims consider most reliable, are actually inauthentic. Little’s argument, however, is absurd and self-contradictory. He acknowledges that the hadiths are late and unreliable from a historical standpoint, and even admits that the chains of transmitters, like the stories themselves, were freely forged. Then he bases his whole argument for the traditions being inauthentic even on Islamic grounds on the basis of the isnads that he just admitted could be forged. He claims to be able to determine the age of various traditions by how they were forged, but here is argument is so conjectural and subjective as to be essentially worthless.
Little is also a standard-issue lemming academic. He denounces people he calls “Islamophobes” for making much of Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha. He ignores the primary reason why anyone cares about this: not because, as he claims, “Islamophobes” contend that Muhammad’s example forces Muslims to condone child marriage, but because all too many Islamic authorities do condone child marriage. In April 2011, the Bangladesh Mufti Fazlul Haque Amini declared that those trying to pass a law banning child marriage in that country were putting Muhammad in a bad light: “Banning child marriage will cause challenging the marriage of the holy prophet of Islam, [putting] the moral character of the prophet into controversy and challenge.” He added a threat: “Islam permits child marriage and it will not be tolerated if any ruler will ever try to touch this issue in the name of giving more rights to women.” The Mufti said that 200,000 jihadists were ready to sacrifice their lives for any law restricting child marriage.
Turkey’s directorate of religious affairs (Diyanet) said in January 2018 that under Islamic law, girls as young as nine can marry.
“Islam has no age barrier in marriage and Muslims have no apology for those who refuse to accept this” — Ishaq Akintola, professor of Islamic Eschatology and Director of Muslim Rights Concern, Nigeria
“There is no minimum marriage age for either men or women in Islamic law. The law in many countries permits girls to marry only from the age of 18. This is arbitrary legislation, not Islamic law.” — Dr. Abd Al-Hamid Al-‘Ubeidi, Iraqi expert on Islamic law
There is no minimum age for marriage and that girls can be married “even if they are in the cradle.” — Dr. Salih bin Fawzan, prominent cleric and member of Saudi Arabia’s highest religious council
“Islam does not forbid marriage of young children.” — Pakistan’s Council of Islamic Ideology
“Migrant shambles as unnamed judge lets paedophile we cannot name (to protect HIS privacy) stay in UK because pervert’s Pakistani family might disapprove of him lusting after ‘barely pubescent girls,'” by Sophie Carlin, Daily Mail, February 6, 2025:
An unnamed judge let a paedophile who messaged ‘barely pubescent girls’ stay in the UK to protect him from his family’s disapproval of his actions back home.
The man – granted anonymity for his protection – was caught messaging paedophile hunters, disguised using decoy child profiles, online in August 2022.
Horrifyingly, the Pakistani father-of-two had believed he was really speaking to ‘barely pubescent girls’.
Admitting three counts of attempting to cause a child under 16 to engage in a sexual act, the man was handed an 18-month prison sentence.
He had started grooming young girls long before this in March 2021.
But an unnamed judge ruled removing him from the UK would be ‘unduly harsh’, a tribunal heard.
The judge explained the paedophile would have ‘significant difficulties’ in Pakistan because his family there have a ‘dim view’ of his crimes – and stopped the man from being deported.
It meant the paedophile was allowed to stay in the country despite being a registered sex offender….
His wife regularly visited him in prison – and felt ‘partly responsible’ for his actions because they had not had sex.
The unnamed judge accepted her ‘guilt’ for not being in ‘intimate relations’ with her husband….
James Lincoln says
Yet more proof that the UK is finished – short of a Civil War.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
They desperately need another Oliver Cromwell, and a civil war!
Rob Porter says
࿗Infidel࿘ You are right, Britain needs another Oliver Cromwell, but in the meantime I look forward to reading or hearing that this judge has met a violent end at the hands of an infuriated father whose daughter was a Muslim rapist’s victim or that an outraged special forces man has tracked down the rapist, despatched with him and hurled his body into the Thames River. Then all of US can sing ‘Oh happy day’.
somehistory says
They would only “disapprove” because he got caught at it. The scum’s wife is an enabler and a sorry excuse for a human.
A criminal, who at the time hadn’t been arrested and charged, said about other criminals, “They were stupid for getting caught.”
pakistan, full-on built on islime, is chock full to the rafters with his scummy kind. The only thing they see as wrong, is that he hasn’t brought them over.
BTeboe says
Are people in Britain this ignorant of Islam? Does this judge live on another planet? Has he not heard about the grooming gangs? Britain is finished.
Rob Porter says
Don’t worry, they are no more stupid and ignorant as people in Canada. Canada has sent billions of dollars to Muslim countries, has a Muslim cabinet minister from Somalia, Hassan, who is behind this and the $22 million to be spent on a Somalian recreational centre in Toronto.
Canada almost never or never nowadays, supports Israel in the United Nations and sides with Muslim countries of the OIC, yet when a few days ago Justin Trudeau was at the Holocaust memorial in Israel, he told the Israelis that he is “a Zionist”. The lies and complete drivel that spew out of his mouth is stunning, but never mind he’s been Canada’s ‘leader’ for almost ten years.
tgusa says
“An unnamed judge”
The judge is unnamed because it would face significant difficulties among the UK population if people knew its name. The judge may have unspoken sympathies towards pedophiles. Who knows, we dont know who it is. If you are a pedophile judge It has your back.
bill says
No doubt a left wing judge unfit for his position, I hope he will be named and shamed and removed
James Lincoln says
The leftist judge remains nameless…
And, all the while, Tommy Robinson rots in prison solitary confinement.
gravenimage says
Yes–more persecutio of this British hero. Just shameful.
OLD GUY says
Since when does a criminals, “families feelings” have anything to do with the conviction and sentencing of a CRIMINAL? And a PEDOPHILE AT THAT. Fire or impeach the JUDGE.
somehistory says
In a “just” world, the victim and the family of the victim are the ones to consider in sentencing the guilty perp.
After, the perp is supposed to be *punished* and that can severely affect his family. And that’s a result of being a criminal.
gravenimage says
Spot on, OLD GUY.
Also note that in this insane view, it it considered better that they support child abuse.
alexreid says
FFS! It is literally written into their Culture! It’s called “Bacha Bazi” This is the sodomising & gang sodomising young boys. Back in the 1970’s/80s a mainstream UK TV Station did a documentary on this. You had young boys being grabbed off the streets & sodomised in the alleys. I’m not sure of the spelling but, phonetically, it sounds/looks like “Taharoosh”. This is the raping & gang raping of girls or, women. Usually non-Muslim women. If it’s Muslim females, it’s because they , ‘were not Muslim enough’. Or, they are harlots & adulterers.
On Youtube in the Search Box type in:- Podcast of the Lotus Eaters – Nonce Watch Afghanistan, During Obama’s Presidency an incident in a Military Base. The Senior Afghani Officers were called in to justify it to their American Counterparts. They did so, simply saying, “What do you expect them to do? F*ck their Grannies’ P*ssies.”
What had occurred went all the way to the White House. Obama said, “Just let it slide.”
alexreid says
FFS! It is literally written into their Culture! It’s called “Bacha Bazi” This is the sodomising & gang sodomising young boys. Back in the 1970’s/80s a mainstream UK TV Station did a documentary on this. You had young boys being grabbed off the streets & sodomised in the alleys. I’m not sure of the spelling but, phonetically, it sounds/looks like “Taharoosh”. This is the raping & gang raping of girls or, women. Usually non-Muslim women. If it’s Muslim females, it’s because they , ‘were not Muslim enough’. Or, they are harlots & adulterers.
On Youtube in the Search Box type in:- Podcast of the Lotus Eaters – Nonce Watch Afghanistan, During Obama’s Presidency an incident in a Military Base. The Senior Afghani Officers were called in to justify it to their American Counterparts. They did so, simply saying, “What do you expect them to do? F*ck their Grannies’ P*ssies.”
What had occurred went all the way to the White House. Obama said, “Just let it slide.”
alexreid says
FFS! It is literally written into their Culture! It’s called “Bacha Bazi” This is the sodomising & gang sodomising young boys. Back in the 1970’s/80s a mainstream UK TV Station did a documentary on this. You had young boys being grabbed off the streets & sodomised in the alleys. I’m not sure of the spelling but, phonetically, it sounds/looks like “Taharoosh”. This is the raping & gang raping of girls or, women. Usually non-Muslim women. If it’s Muslim females, it’s because they , ‘were not Muslim enough’. Or, they are harlots & adulterers.
On Youtube in the Search Box type in:- Podcast of the Lotus Eaters – Nonce Watch Afghanistan, During Obama’s Presidency an incident in a Military Base. The Senior Afghani Officers were called in to justify it to their American Counterparts. They did so, simply saying, “What do you expect them to do? F*ck their Grannies’ P*ssies.”
What had occurred went all the way to the White House. Obama said, “Just let it slide.”
somehistory says
“Dangerous foreign nationals dodging deportation to be tagged like terror suspects”
“Dangerous foreign nationals who use human rights laws to avoid deportation will be tagged like suspected terrorists to protect the public.
Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, will announce powers in her Border Security Bill this week to impose electronic tags, night-time curfews and exclusion zones on foreign nationals who cannot be removed from the UK.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/dangerous-foreign-nationals-dodging-deportation-to-be-tagged-like-terror-suspects/ar-AA1Azko0?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=2ee4b24f30f943b790fcea77fe359b26&ei=38
somehistory says
“…The powers would enable ministers to place restrictions on members of the Rochdale grooming gang whom the Home Office has so far been unable to deport to Pakistan. They include ringleaders Adil Khan, 53, and Qari Abdul Rauf, 55, jailed for eight and six years respectively for a catalogue of child sex offences.
They would also apply to Mada Pasa, who shared a death threat against Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, via TikTok but has no UK convictions.”.
gravenimage says
Judge lets Muslim migrant pedophile stay in UK: he thinks his family in Pakistan would disapprove of his pedophilia
……………………………………
What insanity. Not only–as noted–do most Muslims support pedophilia, as it is a core part of Islam, but in any case why should the UK care what this perp’s family thinks one way or the other?
Some families support their members’ crimes; some do not. This should not be the basis on which punishment is based. This just allows him to victimize more British children. Madness.