Just a day after the rebel group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) had seized Damascus, and Bashar Assad had fled to Moscow, Assad’s army crumbled into dust, with soldiers ripping off their uniforms so as to avoid being killed by vengeful, and now triumphant, rebels. Those soldiers left largely unattended huge quantities of weaponry. The IDF seized the occasion to improve its defensive posture against Syria. There was a brief window of just a few days, between the fall of Assad and the regime in Damascus stabilizing and taking control of those abandoned weapons, during which the IDF did two things. First, it moved Israeli soldiers into Syria, where they established two new military outposts, one on the Syrian side of Mt. Hermon, and one extending further into Syria from the pre-existing buffer zone separating Israeli and Syrian troops on the Golan. Now the IDF controls the commanding heights that extend into Syria; the Israelis have a clear unimpeded view of Damascus — now literally in their sights — far below.
The second undertaking, which began just as soon as Assad had left for Russia, was the IDF’s systematic destruction of the Syrian army’s weaponry. The Israelis knew exactly where the weapons were located; they had long been preparing for a possible war against Assad, and had their target bank ready.
The IDF announced on December 10 that its air force and navy had conducted over 480 strikes in Syria in the span of 48 hours, 350 of which targeted airfields, anti-aircraft batteries, missiles, drones, fighter jets, tanks, and weapon production sites, destroying between 70% and 80% of Syria’s strategic weapons. It also sank Syria’s navy. And there was nothing that Ahmed al-Sharaa and the men of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham could do about it. Now Israel has not only made itself much safer, having removed Syria as a viable military threat to the Jewish state, but also has “demilitarized” the Jihadists in Damascus.
We have just seen that after al-Sharaa’s repeated promise that Syria’s minorities had nothing to worry about, decently, the jihadist “security services” — as they call themselves — entered Latakia to capture or kill Alawite members of Assad’s army. They were apparently ambushed by Alawite veterans of Assad’s army, and suffered a loss of 125 men. At that point, they decided to take revenge on the civilian population, killing more than 1,000 Alawite civilians — some reports claim up to 4,000 civilians have now been killed, and they also have been killing Christians — mostly Greek Orthodox but including some Melkites — because, of course, that’s what jihadists like to do. More than a thousand civilians, possibly as many as 4,000 according to some Alawite sources, have been killed in the space of two days. That’s a lot, but imagine what the jihadists could have done if they still possessed all the weapons that Israel destroyed, and had been able to use them not only in campaigns against the three million Alawites in Latakia and Tartous, but also against the four million Kurds, the 600,000 Druze, and also to crush other Sunni groups that have been disabused of their initial hopes for a “moderate” HTS, now that its jihadist ideology has been revealed. All of those threatened minorities in Syria owe the IDF a debt of gratitude, as the unintended beneficiaries of its successful campaign to destroy the weaponry left behind by Assad’s army.
Cynthia says
Great job, IDF! You should stay in that Golan region for your own protection. Look at how savage the jihadi government is towards other Muslims, slaughtering women and children. They are no different than Hamas.
The world hides these details, but highlights every move Israel makes in its defense.
Jon Sobieski says
Looks like genocide to me and the world’s media is just mute about it. Islam is like kudzu. Before you know it, it’s every where and impossible to get rid of.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
I think much of the world, not just US or Europe, has peacekeeping fatigue. But if not, Latakia, Tartous and the entire Syrian coast should be enabled to secede and form an independent Christian & Alawite country, on condition that they have nothing to do w/ Iran. In other words, it can’t be Assad 3.0
Bahrein sounds like a good model for such a country