My latest in PJ Media is a VIP article. I am happy to be able to offer you a 5% discount on becoming a VIP member at PJ Media. Just enter the code SPENCER when you sign up here.
The Federal Communication Commission (FCC) has finally released the full, unedited video and transcript of Kamala Harris’ disastrous Oct. 2024 interview on CBS’ “60 Minutes.” It did so in response to a complaint from the Center for American Rights (CAR), accusing CBS’ New affiliate, WCBS, of “news distortion” in how it edited the video for airing. CBS was, of course, trying to make Harris look as good as possible by straining out some semblance of sense from her word salad. CBS, meanwhile, continues to insist that it did nothing wrong. Now, however, the American people can see for themselves.
There is more. Read the rest here.
WPM says
I wonder if old Willie Brown (I believe 90 years old now ) ,her old flame and still living in the Bay area will be willing to take her in as a companion a nurse maid so to speak ? Her husband already has a job “offer” that they Harris and almost first husband Doug separated by a few states and he might be looking at greener saner pastures? She at 60+ years old has to look to the future her expiration date has passed for the kind of work she is really good at .
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Hearing her responses on Israel and recalling how badly damaged Israel was by her policies, it’s again a relief that she’s not the one in the White House
I am staggered that the current AG of California Rob Bonta, while deciding not to run (okay, that’s his call), did so on the pretext that that should go to Kamala. At this point, I’m not sure that she’d win if she ran in 2 years, since any GOP opponent could raise all the issues that sunk her in the general last year, particularly the issues like transing kids, which would be too much even for California Dems. Essentially, any Republican could target her on the passage of Prop 36, pointing out that she refused to endorse it despite questions from the media. If Kamala is the candidate, the GOP could finally win a gubernatorial election in California
somehistory says
According to what I could stand to listen to, she didn’t really answer any questions. Except for her owning a glock…for which i have no personal knowledge of whether it’s true.
“One china policy”…doesn’t that mean china gets taiwan?
Glad we don’t have to listen to this woman every day. She is a lying fool, cackle, cackle.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Saying “I own a Glock” in the realm of firearms is like me saying “I own an Acer” when talking about computers. Both are the names of companies, but a real owner would talk about the model s/he owned, like say the model name and number
somehistory says
That is true. And when asked if she had ever fired it, she cackled and said, ‘of course.’ On the firing range. Firing a gun is nothing to laugh about.
any time she cackled, it signaled that she was lying.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Somehistory
I’m not a gun owner myself, but I fully understand and support the Second Amendment. Kamala, by contrast, doesn’t do the latter, but wanted to buy some cred w/ gun owners by telling them she owns a gun
Somehow, I think gun owners would be more appreciative of me than her
Troybeam says
Tragic that 60 minutes had to re-word that interview afterwards. The world knew she could talk in incoherent sentences, cringe worthy just to listen.
Kepha says
Back in the 1920’s, WIlliam McAdoo, progressive politician and son-in-law of Woodrow Wilson, characterized Warren G. Harding’s speeches as pompous ideas roaming the landscape in search of an idea. Perhaps Kamala Harris’ word salads are a similar piece of American political hokum-bunkum.