Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Can Europe Vote its Way Out of Islamization?

By

Voters may be ready, but politicians aren’t.

The week before a 23-year-old Syrian refugee stabbed 5 people in Austria, the authorities had arrested a 14-year-old Turkish teenager who had been preparing for a bomb attack on a train station. That made for two Islamic terrorist attacks in two weeks in the small sleepy country.

Germany is reeling from two car attacks in two months and an Afghan refugee stabbing a 2-year-old boy to death making for three terrorist attacks in three months. The latest victims from the Munich car attack by a Muslim terrorist include a mother and her 2-year-old daughter.

Germany’s upcoming elections will be the latest test to determine whether Europe can take any more. Austria’s elections saw the Freedom Party score its best numbers yet. Some 60% of the Austrian electorate had come out for ‘conservative’ political parties critical of Islamic migration.

Austria’s political parties remain dysfunctional, but its electorate is demanding an end to terror.

Polls show that 1 in 5 Germans are ready to vote for Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) making it potentially the second largest party in the country. If so, AFD would be on track to double its numbers in under four years. Most of the credit for that would go to the German public, not AfD which, like most right-wing parties in Europe, continues to run inept political campaigns.

But what voters want or vote for often doesn’t matter in Europe. Voter surges in France and the Netherlands by parties critical of Islamization were nullified by a corrupt political culture that colluded to keep Geert Wilders and Marine LePen out of office. The compromise government in the Netherlands without Wilders has failed to achieve any actual change and was nearly brought down when its Moroccan State Secretary for Benefits and Customs resigned in a huff over government remarks critical of Islam after the Muslim riots in Amsterdam targeting Jews.

Numbers from late last year show that Marine LePen would win 35% of the vote in a 2027 presidential election in France, a little better than her 2017 results, and the 2024 election gave her National Rally party 37% of the popular vote. But recent history shows that without winning an outright majority, right-wing parties in Western Europe will simply not be allowed to govern.

European coalition politics and dysfunctional right-wing parties which often make it impossible to form a government continue to cripple any meaningful European response to the crisis.

America’s strong executive branch and two-party system have their pitfalls, but they also make it possible for someone like Trump (or, vice versa Obama) to be elected and have free reign to make significant changes over the course of four years. That’s difficult to accomplish in Europe where governments rise and fall, and can be brought down through coalition and internal party backstabbing. If Trump had won an election in Europe, he would have likely lasted six months before being brought down in a palace coup. Most likely though, like Geert Wilders, he would never have even been allowed to take office and make any changes in the first place.

Israel’s Prime Minister Netanyahu, who survived multiple rounds of elections and coalition failures to become one of the country’s longest serving prime ministers, shows that it is possible to remain in office, but at the cost of constant political maneuverings and compromises with coalition members that make it difficult to make any meaningful changes in the country.

Parliamentary governments are meant to be fragile by design, but that weakness has not made Europe more democratic, rather it has turned over control of countries to unelected officials, lifetime bureaucrats running ‘caretaker’ governments while the parties squabble, NGOs, activist groups whose externally funded street riots can topple government and the European Union.

And all of that may make it impossible for Europe to vote its way out of the Islamization crisis.

European voters have been slowly moving to the right as the pace of Islamic terrorism continues to pick up. But the rising number of terrorist attacks is only a symptom of the growing Islamization. The same demographic processes that gifted Germany with 3 terrorist attacks in 3 months and Austria with two terrorist plots in two weeks also raises the power of Muslim voters.

After Geert Wilders called for “no more Morrocans”, the Netherlands compromise ruling coalition, from which he was excluded, included a Moroccan immigrant.

There are two arrows trending upward in Europe. One is growing voter awareness while the other is rising Muslim demographics. The race between those two arrows may determine whether Europe, formerly the cradle of Western civilization, has a future.

Islamic terrorism serves the same function in Europe as it does across the Middle East. The twin alternatives of Islamization by ‘choice’ or by force. Much of Europe’s elite political class has chosen Islamization by choice. Islamization by force is a reminder that choice doesn’t enter into it.

In the UK, a man burned a Koran in front of the Turkish consulate.in London. A Muslim man attacked him with a knife. The authorities arrested both. They released the stabber on bail while the Koran burner was kept locked up on charges of “intent to cause against the religious institution of Islam.”

That and the coverup of countless girls raped by Muslim sex grooming gangs is what Islamization by choice looks like.

Current numbers appear to show a lead for Nigel Farage’s Reform party, ahead of the mainline parties, for the first time, but Farage has also made it clear that he’s no longer opposed to Islamization. Reform has received sizable funds from Muslim millionaire Zia Yusuf.

UK voters may want a change, but much like voters across Europe, there is no easy way for the country that once prided itself on democracy to vote its way out of an impending theocracy.

Voters may be ready, but politicians aren’t.

Comments

    • They better do it soon before they are overrun by the invasion forces of islam.

      • Nigel Farage, other than his Brexit victoty, has turned out a thorough deadloss in respect of vile Muslim behaviour and Muslim immigration. As graphically described in the Oxford Union by Tommy Robinson, Muslims as a group are a disgusting mob of criminals, with their stabbings, throwing acid in the face of people, raping, murdering and mooching off government benefits. In effect, they are mostly a wretched plague on Wester societies and Wester politicians are a useless lot who do not care enough about their people.

        Decent people with morals deeply ingrained are revolted and outraged by news of their girls being raped and gang-raped by bits of low-grade human filth from ‘shit-hole’ Pakistan, yet not politicians like Kiers Starmer, Justin Trudeau, Macron and Scholz. People sometimes refer to these people as ‘the elite’, but the evidence is that there is nothing ‘elite’ about them. Without morals they are lower than shark dung resting on the. ocean floor. Take that Starmer, Trudeau, Macron, Scholz !

  2. “European coalition politics and dysfunctional right-wing parties which often make it impossible to form a government continue to cripple any meaningful European response to the crisis. . .”

    then,

    “When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth . . .”

  3. I fear Western Europe is finished. The combination of massive Muslim immigration plus Leftism plus continued willful ignorance by non-Leftists aplenty forms a very unholy trinity that does not betoken well for this region of the world.

    Still, hope does spring eternal and anything is possible but the odds right now are decidedly against Western Europe surviving as the Western Europe of old. What a waste, what a monumental waste. And for nothing good—for Islam, for Leftism and for ignorance.

  4. People in Britain are pinning their hopes on the Reform Party not seeing the obvious – that Farage will never make a stand against Islam.
    He has as good as capitulated to an Islamic takeover already -; as many of his comments in the last six months have shown.

    Supporters say “Vote Reform to get our country back! ” – what does that mean when our country has been progressively given to foreigners for the last 75 years.?

    Without deporting millions of malcontent and volatile third world imports we cannot “get our country back’: – and when Farage tells us that he is not even going to attempt that -then Reform supporters need to start listening.

    But none of our leaders, over decades, have ever understood Islam.

    And will the British accept Islam when it is forced upon us ? No – I don’t see that the native folk will.
    And regardless of what Government is in power British men will have to fight on the streets to protect their families – and it will be bloody – but what choice is there?

    The ballot box won’t sort this – not just in Britain but all across Europe this is becoming apparent – time and time again as the will of ordinary people is being side lined and ignored.

    • Eddie

      Why don’t you Brits rally behind Paul Golding’s “Britain First”? It’s based on “America First”, and has no inhibitions opposing the islamization of the UK. Brits and Europeans all need to lose their inhibitions of supporting “racist” parties, b’cos those are the only parties that can salvage their countries

      • Very good question Infidel.

        “Britain First” are a peculiarity.
        They are a bona fide registered Political Party.
        I am myself a member but most patriotic Brits who attend rallies in London are not.
        I don’t understand this.
        i think perhaps it is a suspicion that they are a throwback from the British National Party which had a racist Nazi reputation.
        They are a small group but today 1st March they have a rally protest in Nuneaton. They have invited all patriots and it will be interesting to see how many folk attend.

        I can’t be there today but in any case I am personally disappointed with Britain First as they never, never answer any messages or questions I send them.
        I have not therefore taken part in any of their events.
        The Party asks for money donations every single week.
        Grifters?

        I do however wish their event today every success.

        I get the impression Britain First are seen as racist by many otherwise patriotic people.
        I see nothing in their manifesto to indicate they are racist beyond them wanting Britain to be primarily a country where the indigenous folk remain majority of the population, that incoming minorities integrate and respect our laws, our religion and our way of life.
        If that is seen as racist, unfair or intolerant then the people of the UK are not yet ready for Britain First.

        • Eddie says,

          “I get the impression Britain First are seen as racist by many otherwise patriotic people.”

          Likely true, but native Brits who vote for Britain First should not care if they are erroneously labeled as being racist.

          The Democrats in the United States erroneously label anyone who voted for Pres. Trump in 2024 is – you guessed it – racist.

          The difference is this:

          MAGA Republicans do not care if they are erroneously labeled as being racist. They care about their country – and their children’s future.

        • Eddie

          I have noticed this w/ certain new or fringe parties. They are so understaffed and unplanned that they have no mechanism to deal w/ inquiries from people who wish to either join, or support them

          Good for you for supporting them!

    • I understand ‘the Nige’ was bought by a barbarian. So we’ll just have to dump him. And that’s not physically, but democratically. Brilliant guy, but for sale. What a shame. And what a shameless sh**. Not that I’m in favour, but I’m afraid that, indeed, we are heading for civil war.

      • Britain and Europe need leaders to stand up, face facts and speak out NOW against Islam and the violent crime wave caused by third world immigrants in every Western country.
        That situation can only and will only, get worse.

        Nigel Farage is not going to stand up so unless a tough patriotic right wing person steps up we are sunk.

        Patriots in Britain also ask why Farage throws Tommy Robinson under the bus time and time again ?
        Surely they are both fighting for the same thing?

        But they ain’t.
        Tommy Robinson is opposed to the Islamic takeover and Farage is not.

        No time for some clever political long game Nigel but then you say you are not concerned about demographic change ….
        But is not even just that.
        No Jews, no Gays, no trans, no music, no dancing, no dogs, no churches, no pubs no alcohol, no bacon, no Christmas, no age limit on marriage or sex, no women’s rights…..
        Well you know all that on Jihadwatch – but does Nigel ?

  5. I think it’s too late for much of Europe. They did not pay attention to immigration from areas hostile to their culture, values, and civilization.
    Canada – under Trudeau’s leadership is moving into the same situation.
    I hope that the US will not get that bad.

    • “Today, it became clear that the free world needs a new leader. It’s up to us, Europeans, to take this challenge.”

      That’s good for a laugh. I think Russia is more of a free-worlder than Western Europe is today.

      • I think so too. I don’t like Putin cozying up to jihadists in Iran or making Chechnya a shariah state or deporting Russians who desecrate the qur’an to muslim areas for trial. But one thing: he doesn’t force on Russians muslims from abroad: the only muslims who do get to move to Russia are ex-Soviet muslims from the -stans, whose culture is still more Soviet than islamic

    • “Today, it became clear that the free world needs a new leader. It’s up to us, Europeans, to take this challenge.”

      If you or I spewed that kind of free speech in her EU neck of the free world we would be set upon and arrested and jailed. Do they even think about what they say before they say it? If they say they do think about what they say before they say it that worries me much much more.

      • Afraid you’re right, tgusa! Both ways, of course. And ‘Do they even think about what they say before they say it?’ Look the shameful sham sh** shameless Trump dumped on Zelensky yesterday, look at the shameful sham sh** Merz fooled the German electorate with. He pretended he was against mass immigration, but once he won the elections he turned around and said ‘uh, uh, no, no, we will not close the borders’. Man what a quagmire we’re in. So the other way you referred to is coming closer and closer.

  7. “ That made for two Islamic terrorist attacks in two weeks in the small sleepy country.”

    I would not call Germany a small or sleepy country. It is number 2 by population in Europe (behind Russia) and it is number 6 in land area behind Russia, Sweden, France, Spain and Ukraine (not in order). It is definitely not sleepy. It has the highest GDP in Europe.

    • @Twffy: he was writing about Austria, not Germany. And no, Austria is not a small sleepy country.

  9. One good thing is unlike in the not so distant past, today in Europe I dont see adoring crowds lining the streets cheering on an organization that would eventually leave Europe in ruins as a result of their philosophy. A wrong headed, misguided, unyielding and maniacal philosophy.

    https://www.criticalpast.com/video/65675021937_Adolf-Hitler_Hitler-driven-in-car_Berlin-streets_Hermann-Goring_crowds-cheer

    Fast forward to today and the EU and its co-conspirators. A wrong headed, misguided, unyielding and maniacal philosophy of destruction. That sounds vaguely familiar. History doesn’t necessarily repeat but sometimes it rhymes.

    I see a bad moon rising. I see trouble on the way.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUQiUFZ5RDw

    • Your authorities will deny peaceful black African Christians entry because of skin colour but will open wide their arms and doors to Islamic Middle East and Arabs to enter in droves because at least they have white skin. Why cry now? I only pity your future generations.

      • In the UK, it isn’t skin colour – a lot of our incoming colonists are Somalian – but anyone who is claiming asylum because of persecution on account of their Christian faith has to jump bizarre theological hoops to prove it. In other word, the system is effectively anti-Christian rather than anti-black.

        • Now I don’t understand something. Explain to me why the left can be antisemitical to the hilt but antiblack? You’ll go to prison hell! Not that I’m antiblack, I just don’t understand why the one and not the other. But that may well be why Keir is called two-tier Kier…

  10. Not as long as they have inhibitions voting for “racist” parties, be it PVV in the Netherlands, AfD in Germany, Britain First in UK, National Rally in France and so on

    Problem in Germany was that East Germans voted for AfD, but West Germans thought that was a step too far, and returned to the CDU/CSU. Result is not just them, but all of Germany getting screwed. In Germany’s case, I think East Germans should say that they want to secede just like they were before 1989, except that this time, they don’t wanna be run by communists. Oh, and the West Germans can keep all of Berlin as an exclave, while maybe giving the East Germans Bonn to use as a capital

    • It is one helluva screwed up world isn’t it? These days no matter which way you turn there are problems. Problems that echo the past keep creeping in to today’s world in twisted ways.

    • Infidel,

      A “new” East Germany would have the potential to be more like Poland or Hungary politically.

  11. Nope.
    Some states might keep them out.
    But many states are already lost.
    Brainwashing about diversity and such, allowing millions of them already in (once they are in you will not be able to remove them especially with such lax border control).
    Most of the muslims in countries get additional extra rights.
    As they are now becoming the deciding factor for who wins an election.
    They will keep the ones that please them in power until they can run alone.
    Then it will be over for democracy. Without a single shot.

    Diversity, inclusivity and equity is actually the greatest threat to democracy along with moral high ground. It undermines democracy as it does not accept nor recognize cultural differences.

    Add to this the EUnion high eschelon, who are basicly ideologically well educated corrupt idiots. They are just opportunists, but not for their country or the EU but for themselves. The worst kind.
    I also imagine that quite a lot of them are easily blackmailed and manipulated.
    (Macron cannot be this idiotic on his own.:D)

    • Concerned Reader
      Thank you for one of the best appraisals on the dangers of mass immigration and DEI that I have read recently. Well don

      The intellectual leftie white globalist is the root cause of much of the current situation.

      George Orwell, himself an intellectual leftie, identified the problem in his “England your England” written in the early years of the Second World War :

      “Another marked characteristic is the emotional shallowness of people who LIVE IN A WORLD OF IDEAS and have little contact with PHYSICAL REALITY.”

  12. A week or so ago, two Dutch ministers tried to bar some barbaric ‘priests’ from entering the Netherlands to attend a barbaric conference concerning the ramadan. In the interim procedure against their attempt, they didn’t address the problem head on, however, but instead chose to criticize these ‘imams’ on the basis of their sermons and speeches. Not a word was spent on the content of the koran. Nothing was said about surah 47, 4, or 2, 191. And this may well have been done either because they haven’t a clue about these surah’s, or on purpose, for fear of being accused of breaking the Dutch constitution, which states that there is freedom of religion. Judging by their attempt to stop these barbarians from entering the country, I bet they are ‘in the know’ about the intentions of barbarism, but hey, that doesn’t change the fact they didn’t use these arguments.

    The only problem with this is that the constitution actually qualifies this freedom with the words ‘except for everyone’s responsibility before the law’, meaning that this freedom is hemmed in by (a.o.) the Dutch penal code, which makes incitement to violence a criminal offence actively enforced where barbarism-critical people are concerned. However, based on the principle of equality, the same criteria should be used to prosecute barbarism and its open and brazen incitement to violence (cf. surah 47, 4 and 2, 191 a.o.), but these ministers obviousy sh** in their pants for fear of saying this out loud in court. Not because they are physically afraid of being stabbed in the neck (not yet, anyway), but of being forced to resign for saying bad things about the ‘religion of peace’, which farcical idiocy still reigns supreme in public discourse.

  13. You hate black African Christians because they are black skin but open your arms wide to admit Middle East Muslims and Arabs in droves because they are white skin. Like I always say, I weep for your children and generations yet unborn, they will have no country when they come.

  14. Lizzy
    There is too much assumption in what you say.
    WHO is it you are accusing that hate Black Africans because of their skin colour?

    WHO is it that are welcoming Muslims and Arabs because they are “white” White ??

    I am white British. From my point of view primarily I want my nation to be in the vast majority composed of the ethnic Island people who call this land the home of their ancestors.
    My people, generation on generation, who have made this place and lived in it and in times of wat have died to keep it free from foreign invasion.
    I mean no harm or disrespect to other nations.
    In. 50 years time Nigeria, India Syria Afghanistan etc will still be the mother countries of their own ethnic peoples? Yes – certainly. And right so.

    What will England and the countries of Western Europe be like ?

    You make this a matter of skin colour.
    I say that I don’t care about skin colour when it comes to seeing imported peoples .slaughtering our children with knives.

    The main problem is rooted in behaviour not in the pigment of skin.
    The other problems are associated with numbers and integration.

    I would be happy to have an African Christian family live next door to me if they were good people.
    But not hundreds of thousands of foreign people who change my Nation completely and forever.

    And I say all this without even touching on Islam – which is the most obvious threat to my “children and generations unborn” who as you rightly say will ” have no country when they come “”
    The way Britain is going the indigenous population will be a minority in the not too distant future
    Should I be made to feel I have no right to say anything against that – without being called racist or just concerned with skin colour?

    In Britain patriot working class people say

    “We were never asked”.

    And now we get put in prison for protesting against immigration

    I respectfully ask you to think on this.

    • Eddie says,

      “I would be happy to have an African Christian family live next door to me if they were good people.”

      Me too.

      Rational people have no problem with that.

  15. I left Germany because I don’t see sanity. Not with respect to islam, nor any of the other perversions pushed by the “elites”. However, the switch will be sudden not gradual and it will be induced by DJT. But how to get islam out of countries like the UK, France or Germany, I have no idea.

    • Richard,
      I believe that the vaunted but much misused European Convention on Human Rights ECHR could provide the answer on declaring Islam incompatible with Human Rights.

      Article 9 section 1 Protects Freedom of thought, conscience and religion.

      However Article 9; Section 2 has this proviso to that right:

      ” Freedom to manifest one’s religious beliefs shall be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY in the interests of PUBLIC SAFETY, for the PROTECTION OF PUBLIC ORDER, HEALTH OR MORALS, or for the protection of the RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS OF OTHERS.”

      In very obvious terms the ideology of Islam runs counter, in so many ways , to most of the terms laid out in section 2.
      This is particularly so in the case of public safety, morals and the rights and freedom of others.

      Islam cannot change, and thus cannot operate in a free democratic Western society and the ECHR should protect all signatory countries.

      • HEAR, HEAR! Finally someone who fights the fight the way it should be fought, just like Hans Brinker jr. above. Time for some reverse lawfare!

  16. Far too late for that. The citizens should have spoken up when the first illegals were allowed in along with what the government had brought in for a “work force”. Should have put their own citizens to work if they needed people.

    Islam has its claws deep inside Europe, if the citizens choose to finally fight back they better plan on using the tactics Islam is using on them or look to the old battlefield tactics and weapons that can be made since guns are outlawed.

  17. OK Troybeam lI think must reply to lyour assertion that :
    “the citizens should have spoken up when the first illegals were allowed in along with what the government brought in as a work force”

    We are going to have to go back some and please folks forgive me if you already know all this, and I will try to keep it simple.

    The first incursion by immigrants was as far as I am aware 1948 when the good ship”Windrush” arrived with a few hundred West Indians who had bought cheap one way tickets, the British Government had not invited them – but did not send them back. They were not really “Illegal” because as Commonwealth citizens they were allowed into Britain with the same citizen rights as the native population.
    By 1968 the native working class were being displaced from areas of cities which had changed it’s population and no longer looked or felt like England anymore.
    One Conservative MP , Enoch Powell, made a speech about it and was damned as a racist but workers took to the streets to support him. He had nearly a 100, 000 letters within a few weeks agreeing with his speech .

    Move forward to the 1970s and Prime Minister Wilson is said to have brought in Pakistani Muslims to work in North England factories. Also as I understand it ,much about that time Indians and Muslim Pakistanis were expelled from East Africa and again came in legally as Commonwealth citizens.
    These were to the grand parents or parents of many of the UK Muslims of today.

    The British public had no say in the matter .
    Many of the old cotton mill towns of the North are now Muslim communities.

    The Blair Labour Government of 1997 opened the flood gates to immigrants and it got worse under the succeeding Tory Governments. Immigrants were effectively given protected status as ethnic minorities and the tail was now wagging the dog.

    Many people tried to vote for change in immigration policy but got no where. We voted to leave the EU largely due to the lack of National borders.
    That did not work beyond replacing European immigrants with third world migrants in larger numbers. This stands at about a million a year.
    All this was “legally” sanctioned.

    Then we have had boat loads of illegal migrants at a rate of about 40 to 50,000 a year and our Government sends ships and life boats to collect them….

    So please don’t say that the citizens should have spoken up ! We did.
    We have been s**t on by our political leaders for over 70 years.

    And today if someone posts on social media a photo of migrants arriving on a beach and puts a caption “Coming to a town near you” they get sent to prison.

    • You get what you vote for, its that simple. As for the mass influx of Muslims my comment was the current issue, 2000 on not from way back when.

      • Then sorry I misunderstood you.
        I thought you were referring to the presence of a large number of Muslims in the UK.
        Something most of us never wanted let alone voted for.

  18. Must be total Muslim deportation and remigration from Europe UK Canada all Western countries and from southern half of Africa and India. All Muslims must be made to back to Muslim countries only. Its as simple as that. It can and must be done.

  19. “Can Europe Vote its Way Out of Islamization?”

    Answer:
    Of course not.

    Because the Muslims the soldiers of Allah are invading, Europe as illegal or legal migrants, supporting by the authorization of the western leaders and the money of the rich Muslims countries.

    https://www.facebook.com/100026027172181/posts/1650793092464914/?mibextid=rS40aB7S9Ucbxw6v

    https://youtu.be/02Y3LyQekco?si=1Rz78ZPbvDhNs2WU

    https://youtu.be/OJjyJFzkb7I?si=-dyAdao7pHGpHO21

    N.B.

    ” USA
    If only 10% of the Muslims believe and practice as is what they have in the Koran and the sharia law means we have more than 300,000.00 terrorists”

    “Americans’ and the western Embassies in the Muslims countries grants 99,9% the visa for the Muslims but not for the Christians to Islamize the western countries”

    “Islam is not a religion it’s gang policy and rules same as the mafia. The member who leaves gets a death sentence.”

    “Muslims in the western countries with their deadly crimes proof they are making a Holocaust against the citizens.”

    “Less Muslims, less crimes, more secure.”

    “Every Muslim is a timing bomb.”

    Any Muslim until he is citizen commit any crime in any western countries must immediately be deported with his family to any Muslim country.”

    “Muslims in USA, Europe and the western countries are using their Sperm bombs, who are more danger than atomic bomb.”

    “Not all Muslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims.”

  20. Can Europe Vote its Way Out of Islamization?
    …………………………………….

    I think there is still time–so long as the law is rigorously applied.

  21. No Infidel I can’t agree with that and what laws are there to stop it ?
    . We are talking here about Europe VOTING it’s way out.
    Well in Germany it would seem only the AFD supporters would vote for that and in France Marine Le Pen’s party.
    We have seen the obstacles placed against both.
    Gert Wilders party in the Netherlands is also ganged up against.
    In Britain we have no chance under Starmer and the Muslims block vote in their millions.
    They have no interest in Democracy of course and recent Muslim MPs have got in to office on making Gaza their main campaigning aim.

    Postal votes in the UK Muslim communities are much abused as collectors go door to door to get the blank forms and fill them in and of course husbands tick the boxes for their wives anyway.

    To stop Islamisation will take more than a voting system. It has been very successful over the last 1400 years and it has not been stopped by politicians yet.
    It would take National leaders – dictators of ruthless strength to ban the practice of Islam in their countries. For that is what is necessary or the threat will ever be present.

    Is that even possible?

Discover more from

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Skip to content