Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

UK Parliament Votes 364 to 111 Against Muslim Rape Gang Investigation

By

250,000 votes of rape victims vs 4 million Muslim bloc votes. No contest.

The Labour government had announced that it was responding to the brutal Muslim killing of a little girl in the UK with a crackdown on homeschooling that it had dubbed the ‘Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill’.

While Labour was trying to turn that Islamic crime into an assault on homeschooling parents, Conservatives fought to include a call for an inquiry into the Pakistani Muslim ‘grooming’ rape gangs.

Labour however successfully blocked the inquiry in a 364 to 111 vote.

Not a single Labour MP voted for it. And that’s understandable.

Even assuming that the high numbers for rape victims in the UK are correct, the UK still has 4 million Muslims.

250,000 votes of rape victims vs 4 million bloc votes concentrated in key areas is really no contest.

Comments

  3. I speak from the UK. My take on this is Professor Alexis Jay’s recommendations on the Rotherham grooming 10 years ago have not been implemented in full. Why not?

    And the leader Qari Abdul Rauf, has not been deported from the UK after serving his term in prison. Why not?

    And the recent conviction of Sharif of killing his daughter (certainly honour killing), the facts of what Reliance of the Traveller supports in terms of honour killing did not come out.

  4. Sounds like the Labour party is Britons Democrat Party. They dont care about the children, its the block vote of one group that matters.

  5. Too many scummy mozlums in the ‘government’….and too many scummy non-mozlum child molesters in ‘government.’
    The remainder who voted against are slime…and cowards, fearing reprisals from the first two groups.

    One day soon, and at the shock and surprise to many, they will reap what they have so abundantly sown.

  6. Democracy can be defeated at the ballot box, without war, via its own humanitarian notions by a continual influx of monoculture “refugees” who are commanded by religion to take the land.

    We are watching it in real time. Someday English elites will say, “We never thought it would come to this!”, and the new elites will say, “We never hid our intentions, did you not read the Quran?”

  7. 364 criminals in UK Parliament who help raping British women. May God have mercy upon their souls.

      • How many people in parliament are Muslims elected, how many are just appeasers saving their necks, when will the people revolt? Prince William, what part will he play should he become King? Dear old dad King Charles is a fool & the Queen should have put William in place not his father.

        Royalty may still have influence, let hope William has some gonads to make and impact.

  9. UK Parliament Votes 364 to 111 Against Muslim Rape Gang Investigation

    250,000 votes of rape victims vs 4 million Muslim bloc votes. No contest.
    ………………………………………..

    So sick–but sadly who can be surprised?

    • Hardly surprising, the criminals basically just voted not to investigate themselves.

  10. Was the vote strictly party line? Or were there Tories who switched sides and voted w/ Labour against it?

    • I would think so.
      This has been going on for decades, all parties would have been involved in the cover up.
      Don’t forget the moslems who were elected on pro-hamas policies recently too. They certainly wouldn’t want any kind of investigation.
      Starmer definitely wouldn’t, he was head of public prosecutions and he must have played a major part on ensuring that these girls were not only drugged, raped, trafficked, terrorised, ignored, murdered in a couple of cases, but also treated like criminals, while he, other politicians, the judiciary, the police, social services, ‘care’ homes, schools etc, were taking a knee to their rapists.

  11. Enoch Powell died in 1998 and as bad as he had seen things materializing in Britain matters have gotten exponentially worse since his death, to the point of no return I fear. It is a self-inflicted wound like few others in all of history, made all the more tragic because Britain at its best was one of the greatest polities of all time. Sad beyond all measure.

    • I don’t think even Enoch Powell could have envisioned this.
      I doubt the thought of serial gang rape and trafficking of children with the collusion of the government and all the authorities that are supposed to protect them would ever have crossed his mind. It’s not the sort of atrocity that a normal, decent person would ever imagine.

    • Agreed, Wellington and Eva.

      My grandfather was a police superintendant in England, and I cannot imagine what he would have thought of this grotesque miscarriage of justice. I don’t think that he ever would have taken part in it, but all too many police have.

  12. So Muslim men are safe to rape woman and girls in the U.K.and the government will protect the Muslim rapists.

  13. No surprises here.
    This is the UK 2025.

    These MP s are as vile and as despicable as the rapists themselves.

    The cover up protects those who fully facilitated this.

    What manner of public representative can condone this in the interests of of their political party ? In the interests of inter racial cohesion????

    Much is made on Jihadwatch of the influence on Islamic teachings on the subject of sex with slaves, those captive of the right hand and the rape of infidel females.
    It’s not just that.
    Pakistani men seem to have a strong proclivity to raping their own women and children in their own country. This has been highlighted by several ex Muslims and by some ‘moderate’ Muslim Pakistanis.
    I guess many Pakistani women in the UK keep silent about what their men folk are doing as otherwise they themselves would be treated the same way .

    And there is absolutely no reason why Pakistani men should suddenly stop this behaviour.
    The opposite. They are emboldened to continue by lack of penalty and any resolve by the Authorities to prevent it.
    All that will happen is that it may become more deeply driven underground.

  14. From what I recall even Powell did not highlight the real danger of Islam.
    He could never have foreseen this and never could have thought that we would import a million third world immigrants EVERY YEAR.

    He was concerned at the rate of ‘coloured immigration ‘ when it was just 50,000 over a ten year period.

    What Powell did say, in Southall in 1971 was ” ….. when he looks into the eyes of Asia that the Englishman comes face to face with those who will dispute with him possession of his native land.”

    He was no fool.

    Shoot the messenger.

    And so as Powell predicted – we keep heaping up our own funeral pyre.

    ,

    • I think Powell looked at it more from the prism of formerly colonized people vs native Brits, and anticipated that the immigration of the former would be a type of payback for the century of colonization that those countries suffered. He didn’t distinguish b/w muslims vs non-muslims at the time: he saw both as innately hostile to English, Scots, Welsh and Irish people

      To an extent, I’d say that conflation was a tad justified, given that there are still a lot of Asian-Brits and African-Brits who see any political attacks on muslims as guerrilla attacks on them as a whole, and make it a point to vote for those “inclusive” parties, like Labour. Otherwise, there is no reason for the non-muslims among these ethnic groups to vote against even parties like the BNP, given that the last was the only political party to actively speak out against muslims. If such people are gonna make common cause w/ muslims against the native peoples of the countries they moved to, then people on the other side are just as justified in conflating them, even if they may oppose only the muslims

      • Yes I agree that Powell was mainly concerned with immigration from the Commonwealth.
        From my reading of Powell however, I never came across any suggestions that he considered that immigrants of whatever colour or creed were,v as you suggest ” innately hostile ‘ to the indigenous population.
        He did say that if you take people from vastly different ethnic backgrounds and put them altogether you cannot sensibly expect them to be ‘ nice’ to each other.
        I have not the quote to hand but I can find it.
        What Powell highlighted was the problems with integration lay primarily with behavioural patterns not the skin pigmentation !
        Few people have ever read his so called 1968 “Rivers of blood” in full and in context.
        Four years earlier he had been stating that integration was the only way forward and that it would take many years and politicians from other parties agreed with him.

        His portrayal as a racist was in my view not merited, he was a realistic prophet but in his 1968 speech he used some explosive anecdotes and that is all he is remembered for .He got the most part echoed the stance of the Tory shadow cabinet on what we now call ‘ remigration’.
        The phrase commonly used in Britain used to be ” Enoch was right”.
        Powell was a political scape goat and once again the messenger was shot.
        Sadly his prophecies have a disturbing resonance today, lin a Britain that many of us no longer recognise

      • Eddie

        Thanks for that feedback, since I have never read any works of Powell. However, I don’t think he or that speech was racist: any population, no matter how welcoming, would be hostile to too many other people coming in and altering the very essence of that country. If any of the countries in question – India, Nigeria, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Ghana, et al were flooded by millions of Englishmen, they would probably be more hostile to that influx than even the old National Front used to be in UK

        Integration is important, but it can only happen when the number of immigrants is so low that the immigrants see no choice other than to integrate w/ the local population. But if there are so many immigrants that you have entire enclaves of them in parts of any city, then that makes it easier to not integrate, never learn the language, never interact w/ locals. Whenever I read stories of people – be it Indians, Pakis, Koreans, et al who live in a place abroad w/o learning English, it’s only partly funny, but I shake my head.

        Andrew Wilkow, a political commentator here, has a cliche: “You cannot keep importing an unlimited number of people from there to here w/o here becoming there”. That was probably the gist of Powell’s speech as well

        • Infidel thank you.
          You echo my own thoughts exactly.
          I know that in 50 years time Nigeria will be still the mother country of ethnic Nigerians, as will Pakistan be to Pakistanis, Afghanistan be to Afghans.

          In Britain however the indigenous folk would have all but disappeared from the land of their ancestors or be a small minority.

          There will soon be no resident culture here for immigrants to integrate with.
          And this is fine it seems as we are told we are a “multicultural” society.
          No one asked us if we wanted that.
          ” A civilisation gone with the wind”

  16. According to the feature article:

    “UK Parliament Votes 364 to 111 Against Muslim Rape Gang Investigation”

    If my math is correct, this comes out to be around 76%.

    There is no coming back from this – short of mass deportations / civil war, etc.

    • I read the quran, muslims are instructed to immigrate to a nation, breed like rabbits and when their numbers are great enough rise up and slaughter the host nations citizens unless they convert to islam. The UK is going to find themselves at war with the muslims if they deport them, all of them. We are watching the past history of isam happening yet again. It’s just plain stupid that they muslims have been allowed to escape the confines of the middle east.

  17. I had heard that when these gangs stated to “groom” young girls in Russia, the Russian men beat them up pretty badly to stop it. It made me think that perhaps the English men need to rethink their values. Sometimes a baseball bat is more effective than a vote.

    • Naja thank you

      Most English /British men would fight for their women and kids. Physically.
      Our history proves it. From 1939 to 1944 we stood virtually alone against Hitler separated by 22 miles of water.
      I ask you to look at reporting of the so called “riots” in Britain last summer and see the way those white working class men who protested were not only swiftly arrested but also in were put in prison within days..
      I was at the protest outside Downing Street a few days after the Southport killings and I saw the arrests of angry British men.
      So sure we can fight the rapists.thats simple.
      But we have to fight the State, the Police and the judicial system.
      I don’t exaggerate.
      But I do think the time is coming when there will be widespread reprisals and the police will be unable to arrest everyone.

      The Police in the UK will not take on an angry Muslim or a black crowd as the would be attacked and overwhelmed.

      The Police will be robust against white British and confidently arrest individuals in the midst of crowd as they know it will not gang up and overthrow them.

      This is a reflection of the British nature and traditional respect for the rule of law and an unarmed Police service which polices by consent of the public.
      Ethnic minority minorities often take advantage of this style of policing and THEY ARE ALLOWED TO GET AWAY WITH IT.

      Sure we can fight. And go to jail,and our wives and children suffer for it .

      • “From 1939 to 1944 we stood virtually alone against Hitler separated by 22 miles of water.”

        Not exactly alone from 1939 to 1944 Eddie.

        Soldiers of the US Army’s 34th Infantry Division, the “Red Bull” Division, landed in Belfast, Northern Ireland on January 26, 1942.

        The 1st Infantry Division, the “Big Red One,” arrived in England in the fall of 1943 as part of the buildup for the Invasion of France.

        By February 1942, members of the U.S. Eighth Air Force were on the ground, building towards a strategic bombing campaign.

        And every thinking country in the world must have known that from the shadows America had your backs from the beginning.

        During World War II the United States began guarding convoys to British territory in the North Atlantic. U.S. Navy destroyers were involved in protecting merchant shipping from U-boats. The first regular series of convoys began in September 1939, with Convoy FS1 protecting coal supply routes along Britain’s east coast.

        • My apologies I meant no unjust criticism of the US armed forces
          I guess for me it’s an emotive subject and if Britain was not entirely alone my parents told me it felt like it.

          Hitler was indeed just across the channel and we were saved from invasion by a miracle. Local boys were called up and never came home.
          Even in the villages the glow of the burning bombed cities could be seen reflected in the skies.
          And our people endured.
          But we today are lesser sons of greater sites.

        • No apologies needed. You all have done and did a very good job throughout history Eddie. Always have, from way back when. If you study the history of Western Civilization, yes, your Island deserve recognition. Not hard to figure that out.

      • Eddie, Britons certainly did stand virtually alone early in the war–including my mother and aunt, who joined British army as young women. They both served and survived the London Blitz, my mother working as a teletype operator whose building took a direct hit (luckily a dud, but it destroyed the hallway outside the office and it took three days for them to be rescued), and my aunt driving huge supply trucks between London and the mouth of the Thames under dangerous blackout conditions..

  19. So it is the British establishment aligned with the muslims against traditional indigenous British people. It is not hard to imagine Britain eventually descending in to Civil War. The one thing that the traditional British people have going for them that no other country in the world has is there are multi millions of Americans that have historical ties to the Island and it’s people. It would not take long for Americans to come to the aid of the traditional indigenous British people. Americans who wouldn’t really need the US government nor the US military to do what they believe is right. Elon Musk could supply the Ships. I should probably warn the British people that if that happens we Americans wont be being very kind to the British establishment Do not be surprised if we aren’t harsher in our treatment of the traitors than the invaders. If you need us we are here but we wont be coming to have a cup of Tea with the enemy.

    How many guns would independent volunteer Americans need?

    https://www.visualcapitalist.com/mapped-u-s-states-with-the-most-guns/

  20. Multitudes of Americans have a historical link to the Island (and also to a lessor degree to the Island of Ireland. lots of Irish in America) That attitude hasn’t changed since back in the day when the Imperial Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor and America went to war with a Germany goes down first strategy. Would anyone believe we Americans would do this for any other country in the world except our extended family members? Name one other country in the world that everyday Americans would flock to support in large numbers.

    • Thank you so much for your supportive comments and kindness.
      The problem in Britain is largely a Muslim take over by infiltration of all our establishment backed and encouraged by a political elites, our own native and naive liberal globalists
      Everyone can see this.
      So it is difficult to fight, as the “enemy “is already within and embedded and protected by so called democracy.

      The ordinary native working class have been trying to oppose mass immigration for decades, not out of any sense of racial superiority but because we we seek to preserve our ancient nation and we should have a right to do that.
      We are not Americans, and are not a new land where immigration has been part of all that has made you what you are. You make it work by your allegiance to the American ideals and your flag which embraces you all.
      Britain has seen more immigration in the last ten years than. In the preceding two millennia.
      And the incomers retain their loyalties to their native countries.

      We native Brits will not be lucky enough to be allowed reserves where we can live as a people in the land of our forefathers for ” as long the rivers flow and the grass grows.”

      I am a fiercely patriotic Englishman but right now I would sell my country to the USA and boot out our Parliament and with it our so called Head of State – the King.

      • My ancestors came from your Island to the New World nearly 350 years ago but still I have care and consideration for you all back there. It is a bond that can never be broken unless we both are completely destroyed. We together destroyed? I dont think that is possible. Prove me wrong, if anyone dares.

      • Fiercely Patriotic….

        We are not Americans. But yes you are, in a way. Are we immigrants to America from Britain or are we Americans of British decent? I dont think it matters in this new world we have to survive in and try to make better. Today’s, America, has changed demographically and that’s OK as long a whoever they are embrace the US Constitution, our culture, our society, and land.

        No, you are not Americans (or vise versa). Lol.

        • Thank you again.
          Decency and tolerance and a sense of fair play.
          Not all Nations, ” cultures” or ideologies share these principles.
          And now it is our downfall for indeed no civilised society can survive if the barbarians are let in through the gate by your own traitors.

      • And long before the US Constitution (1776). there was the Magna Carta (1215). A country that came up with the Magna Carta so long ago deserves to be defended..

        • Yes indeed but

          ” a society that does not protect it’s women and children does not deserve to exist”
          : Rafe Heydell Mankoo. Senior Fellow. ‘ The New Culture Forum ‘

          And he is right.

          And the blatant example of this failure is the UK Government and many Liberal MPs. as shown in their recent vote to prevent investigation of those who supported and still support the rape gangs by their cover up.

          This can only show that our Government are mentally unhinged and morally corrupt and are traitors to all we are, and have ever been.

          And we have these bastards in power for four more years and the more that other democratic countries heap scorn upon them the better !

        • “a society that does not protect it’s women and children does not deserve to exist”

          There is a difference between society and government Eddie. We see that on display in big bold letters here. One thing that gives me hope is British society doesn’t have a history of rolling over and surrendering no matter who the adversary is or where they are. There is a difference between society and government but as of yet the government hasn’t figured that out. I dont like those bastards so I wont let them know that they are making a big mistake. A big mistake that the bastards will pay dearly for. Keep up the fight! The only thing you have to lose is everything. Might as well go for it.

  21. I said at least a decade ago that the reason there was nothing being done about the rape gangs is that it would also expose native elite Brit pedophiles. And, of course, this lack of “investigation” is just another way to kiss moslem *ss which the Brits are so adept at.

    • Thousands of ordinary British working class girls have tortured drugged and gang raped by these bastards.
      Yes we are adept at kissing the ” Moslem *ss”
      And ordinary working class people have been betrayed by their so called leaders and imprisoned if they protest.
      And we don’t have guns to protect ourselves.
      The Brits did pretty damn good at standing virtually alone against the Nazis for years before America came to fight for the ‘ cause of freedom.’.

      The best thing about our country is not the fine buildings, the green fields or our history but our people. Ordinary people who are too decent kind law abiding and tolerant.

      But what do I see in the USA on your college campuses ? Support for Islamists by your own youth?

      Watch then.
      Its your future too.
      Let’s hope Trump saves you.

Discover more from

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Skip to content