The veteran journalist Ira Stoll has many times in the past held up for critical inspection the New York Times’ coverage of Israel and the Middle East which, he demonstrates, “is becoming increasingly unmoored from reality.” More from his latest philippic can be found here: “New York Times ‘Ceasefire’ Coverage Laments That Israel Will Exist,” by Ira Stoll, Algemeiner, January 23, 2025:
…A recent Times article about a ceasefire in Gaza carries five bylines — Aaron Boxerman, Rawan Sheikh Ahmad, Johnatan Reiss, Ephrat Livni, and Adam Rasgon. A sixth reporter, Nick Cumming-Bruce, is credited at the end of the piece for having “contributed reporting from Geneva.” With so many people involved, accuracy and accountability is more difficult.
The Times article reports, “Aid workers also hope that the cease-fire would allow for far more medical evacuations. The WHO reported that Israel had approved the evacuation of 5,405 patients since the start of the war. But the pace of evacuations slowed to a trickle after Israel closed the Rafah crossing in May.”
Actually it was not “Israel” that “closed the Rafah crossing,” which is a passage between Gaza and Egypt. The Rafah crossing was closed by Egypt after the Israelis took over the other side. That threatened to end the smuggling that reportedly brought in huge bribe revenues to powerful people in Egypt.
The Rafah crossing has been mentioned in hundreds of stories in the Times about the Gaza war. It has clearly been described as linking Gaza to Egypt. It had been closed by Egypt when the IDF took over the Gaza side of the crossing. But not one of the five Times reporters responsible for this latest article on the ceasefire appeared to know this. Instead they were determined — blaming Israel has become a habit with them — to attribute the “slowing to a trickle” of medical evacuations from Gaza to Israel for its “closing the Rafah crossing.” Israel had closed its side of the Rafah crossing, so that weapons could not be smuggled into Gaza, but did not try to stop medical evacuations from Gaza; it was Egypt that prevented those humanitarian evacuations, a fact that the Times’ reporters got completely wrong.
Another Times article about the ceasefire — this one under Rasgon’s solo byline, though with reporting contributed by Boxerman and Jerusalem bureau chief Patrick Kingsley — is no more accurate. “When Hamas launched its Oct. 7, 2023, attack against Israel, it had hoped to ignite a regional war that would draw in its allies and lead to Israel’s destruction. Instead, it has been left to fight Israel almost entirely alone,” the Times writes. This conveniently skips over how Israel was attacked by Hezbollah, from Iran, and by some students and faculty on US and European university campuses. Prime Minister Netanyahu has described it as a “seven-front” war — not only Gaza, but also Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Iran, and Judea and Samaria (also known as the West Bank).
The Times depicts the current hostilities as Israel fighting Hamas, which we are subtly encouraged to sympathize with because it has “been left to fight Israel almost entirely alone.” This is nonsense. On October 8, 2023, the hugely well-armed terror group Hezbollah, with an arsenal of some 150,000 rockets and missiles, attacked Israel with rockets launched from its bases in South Lebanon, in an attempt to help Hamas. By late January, Hezbollah had fired more than 12,000 rockets into civilian areas of the Galilee in northern Israel, from what was believed to be a prewar arsenal of 150,000 rockets and missiles.
Nor does the Times article mention the massive attack, using 300 ballistic missiles, that were launched by Iran against the Jewish state on October 1, 2024. For if it did, it would convey an idea — that there is a massive regional gang-up on Israel — which might win the Jewish state some sympathy. And that, for The New York Times, would never do.
The Times does mention attacks on Israel from Yemen, but it describes them airily as “occasional rocket and drone attacks, most of which Israel has intercepted.” If the “occasional rocket and drone attacks” had targeted, say, the New York Times bureau in Washington, or Columbia Journalism School, one doubts that the Times would be so casually dismissive of them.
Some of those Houthi attacks that the Times appears to pooh-pooh as ineffective managed to land smack in the middle of Tel Aviv. In one December attack on the city, 16 people were wounded when a missile hit a playground. In another attack, one Israeli was killed. In all, since October 2023, the Houthis have fired a total of more than 400 missiles and rockets at Israel, and launched hundreds of others at international shipping so as to prevent ships from using the Red Sea. This campaign has meant that ships linking Israel to Asia have to use much more circuitous routes, around the Cape of Good Hope, up the West Coast of Africa, and then to an Israeli port in the Mediterranean, rather than sailing straight up to Eilat, or down the Red Sea from Eilat. This has increased transportation costs for both Israeli imports and exports. For the Times, those 400 Houthi missiles and rockets are described as “occasional” attacks.
The Times article concludes:
For many civilians, a future with both Israel and Hamas in the picture is bleak.
“We’re talking about a people stuck between a state ready to act with total brutality and a group ready to provoke that state to act with brutality,” said Akram Atallah, a Palestinian columnist from Gaza….
Who is Akram Atallah, the man who is given the last word by the Times’ reporters? An innocent columnist? Not at all. He was imprisoned in the 1990s for links to Hamas; he even shared a cell with Ismail Haniyeh, the Hamas leader. But for the Times, he is simply a “columnist.”
Man wants but little here below. All we ask of the Grey Lady is that her reporters — a little anthropomorphizing here may be excused — get the most basic facts straight about Israel and the “Palestinians.” Do not blame Israel for “closing the Rafah crossing” — thus slowing medical evacuations — when it is Egypt that has closed off its border crossing with Gaza. Don’t pretend that Israel is only fighting a single enemy, Hamas, when it has also had to deal with more than 12,000 rockets and missiles fired by Hezbollah since October 8, 2023, 400 rockets fired by the Houthis from Yemen, and 300 ballistic missiles launched by Iran on October 1, 2024 against the Jewish state. Fais un petit effort, New York Times. You’re a billion-dollar business. When you cover the Middle East, please try to get things straight.
rick says
I don’t think the ” massive regional gang-up on Israel” means Hezbollah and the Houthis for Hamas. I am sure they thought that their Oct. 7th attack would not only spur outbreaks against Israel from the “west bank” Arabs but would “Wake Up” the entire Arab world a al 1948, 1967 and 1973 and cause all “brother” nations to converge on Israel and bring total war on Israel.
That is a very bad assumption but Palestinians only made bad assumptions except when they hold hostages to trade for imprisoned terrorists in Israel prisons. Then they do exceptionally well with most of the Western World behind them as well as a good section of Israel itself.
That Egypt and Jordan have peace accords with Israel made no difference to Hamas which considered those promises to Israel “fake” and just waiting for a time to go back to full scale war. The only country Hamas can count on to counter Israel is Israel itself when Hamas uses human bodies to extract a winning strategy. As we now see with the Biden-Trump-Hamas ceasefire agreement.
Walter Sieruk says
That word which is “Palestine” really should be put in quotes. The reason why this is so is because here is not nor was there ever a genuine land that is “Palestine.” That is a modern fiction.
“The land of Israel was renamed Syria Palestrina by Hadrian, the Roman Emperor. Following the second revolt against Rome in AD 132- 135. The Philistines had always been the enemy of the Jews .and as such it was an insult to the Jewish people.” [1]
It should also be added, that Hadrian had deliberately intended the renaming of Israel to be an insult and offence to the Jews.
[1] Miracle of Israel by Gary Frazier and Jim Fletcher, page 65.
Walter Sieruk says
There never in history was there a “Palestinian state.”
History reveals that the ancient Philistines recorded in the Bible and history reveals the people who came from the Greek Islands and some parts of the mainland Greece and the Island of Crete They have no connection, at all, the to the Arab /Muslim of modern times who called themselves the “Palestinians.”
From those ancient people, the Philistines, the word “Palestine” .came into being.
There is no genuine ethic group or race who are the “Palestinians.”
Early in the last century a anyone living in that land, Arab or Jew, who lived in that land was called a ”Palestinian.”
Only after 1964 did the Arab/Muslims start to refer to themselves , exclusively , by the word “Palestinian.”
The reason for that is that they felt that by giving themselves that title they would appear to have some kind of valid claim on that land.
Walter Sieruk says
All genuine Christians who know the Bible should be very willing to declare the truth, which is that God had given all this land that now composes the State of Israel, including all of the West Bank, which in reality is Judah and Samaria ,to the Jewish people. This may be found in the Bible, as seen in, for example, Genesis 28:13-15. 35:10-12. Deuteronomy 32:48,49. Psalm 105:7-11.
In other words the Jews have tall this land by Divine Right. Furthermore, the Jewish people should have this land by historic rights as shown in First Kings 4:20,21, 24,25. 8:55, 56.
For the Bible informs its reader “For the Lord has chosen Jacob for Himself, Israel for His special treasure.” Psalm 135:4. [N.K.J.V.]
James Lincoln says
The only thing that could “save” (really not worth saving) the New York Times would be for them to have at least 50% of their leadership / staff be conservatives.
Followed by a “rebranding”.