“Build housing in a different location where I think they could maybe live in peace for a change.”
The “Palestinians” were a made-up people invented by Soviet propagandists during the Cold War. In reality, they’re Arab Muslim settlers, many of whom moved to Israel not that long ago. For example, the al-Husayni clan, who gave us Hitler’s Mufti and much of the “Palestinian” jihadist elite, moved to Israel in the 18th century. Yasser Arafat, the godfather of “Palestinianism,” came out of Egypt.
A Hamas leader even admitted that they’re mostly Egyptians.
Why not have them move back to Egypt?
Questioned about his earlier Saturday call with Jordan’s Abdullah II, Trump said he had asked the king to take additional Palestinians into his country.
“I said to him that I’d love you to take on more, because I’m looking at the whole Gaza Strip right now and it’s a mess, it’s a real mess,” he told reporters aboard Air Force One.
Trump said he would like both Jordan and Egypt to house people and that he would speak to Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi about the matter on Sunday.
“You’re talking about a million and a half people, and we just clean out that whole thing,” Trump said, adding that there have been centuries-long conflicts in the region.
He continued, “I don’t know, something has to happen, but it’s literally a demolition site right now. Almost everything’s demolished and people are dying there, so I’d rather get involved with some of the Arab nations and build housing in a different location where I think they could maybe live in peace for a change.”
This is the common sense guy people love.
President Trump has good instincts. Unfortunately, he keeps being surrounded by bad advisers who try to get him to embrace the same old failed policies of past administrations. And it’s happening all over again.
Hopefully, that common sense prevails again over the new era of the swamp now clambering into the Department of Defense and the State Department.
ploome says
see:
The 11th Encyclopædia Britannica on Who Lived in Palestine
by Daniel Pipes
Jul 31, 2016
updated Apr 2, 2023
https://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2016/07/11th-encyclopaedia-britannica-who-is-palestinian
or
Britannica 1911, Palestine
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1911_Encyclopædia_Britannica/Palestine
SKA says
The name Hamshahri, which was the family name of one high ranking PLO member, is Persian in origin meaning “fellow citizen.”
Renanah Goldhar-Gemeiner says
Dr. Kedar speaks about how the names of Arabs show their recent roots outside of Israel.
In my opinion it is crucial to show how Arabs who call themselves the “Palestinians” are largely descendants of a recent massive largely illegal migration. After enshrinng sole Jewish sovereighnty rights from the Jordan River to the Med. and sole Arab rights in the vast majority of the previously Ottoman ruled land – the British without League opposition – allowed a massive Arab invastion which along with their violence and lies of indigeniety – was used by the British to block miillions of Jews who could have fled the Nazis and had no where else to flee to. And now this Jihadist-Nazi-Western collaboration continues with the occupation lie. There is much documentation on Arab illegal occupation – contintuing today.
SKA says
After the failed PLO coup against King Hussein in 1970 the Hashemite monarchy had no stomach for more Palestinians especially militants with combat experience.
Also what is the point of giving Hamas the entire Jordan River Valley from which to launch more rockets against Israel or maybe even to raid SBC massacre the Jews of Beit Shean?
Reziac says
Agreed. Jordan is small and fragile, and mostly doesn’t cause trouble (as things go in that part of the world). Let’s not rock that boat; it may sink.
Egypt is large and relatively stable, they’re probably mostly Egyptian Arabs to start with, and why not move them back? (Yeah, Egypt doesn’t want them either. Tough.) Also, if you cruise street view you’ll find a lot of abandoned apartment buildings (built but never occupied) in the Nile delta, so they may not even need to build much housing.
Also, the Gazans should be scattered so they have some incentive to assimilate, not clumped up so they can too easily continue commiserating and conspiring.
gravenimage says
President Trump Suggests Moving ‘Palestinians’ Back Where They Came From
………………………
Good for President Trump! Few in the West–even many Anti-Jihadists–have any idea that most of the “Palestinian people” are Egyptians, Syrians, Jordanians, Lebanese, Saudis, or other local Muslims. Few are from what is today modern Israel. You can iften tell their origins from their last names.
St Croix says
I’m fairly certain the UK would take them all in. The indigenous people there don’t want them, but the leaders would take them in a heartbeat–the more the merrier, to bring strife and resulting clampdown.
If that fails, how about Siberia? Since the USSR was so strategic in planning the whole Palestine Liberatin concept, backing it, teaching Propaganda 101 to Yasser Arafat, etc.
I know, all of these are terrible ideas. Terrible problems, terrible solutions! But a two-state solution is Deep State annihilation of Israel. Trump seems to understand, but he has some rats in the basement there.
Stephen says
Siberia would be a bit tough because of the cold, but at least they wouldn’t have to have 10 kids just so they can be filmed crying and carrying water bottles ..
࿗Infidel࿘ says
If they’re moved to Egypt, please don’t move them to the Sinai. It should remain a demilitarized zone, although currently, Egyptian forces are there busily battling ISIS, which is why Israel doesn’t mind them being there, despite a requirement in the Camp David Accords that the Sinai be demilitarized. Israel needs a buffer zone so that in case Egypt ever gets a regime like Hamas, which they did in 2011 w/ Morsi, that their de facto border is the Suez Canal
As I suggested yesterday, better idea: move them to Arab countries that do not border Israel, such as Qatar, Kuwait, Yemen or Algeria. Heck, maybe even send them to Ilhan Omar’s Somalia
Susan Lorson says
Antarctica would really be the perfect place to relocate Gazan Muslims.
Dov Berrol says
Both Egypt and Saudi Arabia are building brand new high-tech cities that could provide new homes and construction jobs for Gazans. Egypt is build a New Administrative Capital east of Cairo that is planned to accomodate 5 million residents. And Saudi Arabia is building a seaside city called Neom on the Red Sea coast across from the Sinai Peninsula which could also take in any Gazan trying to free themselves from Hamas terrorists.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Saudi Arabia’s Neom, which is near Jordan’s Aqaba & Israel’s Eilat, is a very expensive futuristic city w/ all sorts of concepts built in. There is no way the Saudis will trash that by getting Palis there. In fact, I expect that it will only be available to Saudi & other Arab elites, and maybe some Western elites as well – those who support the Saudis
Egypt’s New Cairo project is one to build a new capital to take the pressure of Cairo. But it’s a strange one in that it’s still approximately at the same location. It would be like the US moving the capital from Washington DC to Alexandria, VA or Annapolis, MD. A lot of countries have developed and moved their capitals to completely different parts of the country. Nigeria Lagos to Abuja, Burma Rangoon to Naw Pyi Daw, Belize from Belize City to Belmopan, Kazakhstan Almaty to Astana…. Most recent one currently underway is Indonesia moving from Jakarta to Nusantara (on Borneo, a different island). In all these cases, the capital was moved to a different part of the country for varying reasons.
However, in this particular case, Egypt is trying to take the load of Cairo, but building a new city right next door, instead of in a different city further upstream the Nile or something
I watched a YouTube channel that covers geography and discussed things like this – RealLifeLore, and both Neom and New Cairo seem to be financial boondoggles. In fact, going through their video, Saudi Arabia is a lot less rich and a lot more unstable than it ever was for a variety of reasons, and this project could potentially drive them to the red. Which leads me to believe that neither of these 2 countries should be where the Palis are sent: they should be sent to a faraway country like Qatar or Yemen
wasnotme says
A very good idea to remove these people back to whence they came from being Saudi Arabia and Egypt! They should not be able to force an opposing state located right next to a Jewish nation! or force their presence upon any other nation.
WPM says
The Moslem majority nations of the Middle East rather dump their problem children into Western Europe or the Americas .Trump should use the threat of stopping all aid to Egypt ,put tariffs on all their goods .That should help push them to take in their problem fellow Moslems .
WPM says
The Moslem majority nations of the Middle East rather dump their problem children into Western Europe or the Americas .Trump should use the threat of stopping all aid to Egypt ,put tariffs on all their goods .That should help push them to take in their problem fellow Moslems .
Dan says
Some pluses and minuses there. Jordan is almost a Palestinian state already. If you add more Palestinians to the mix the monarchy may completely fold. In which case there may be a short, violent civil war followed by the creation of a new, socialist-oriented, anti-Israel nation-state. Another option would be to involve many of the Islamic states in taking in portions of the Palestinians. If these states did this with the commitment of integrating Palestinians into their own countries (perhaps with international support) instead of creating refugee camps, or other like enclaves, this could be beneficial for everyone involved. To be avoided would be the creation of a group of scattered diaspora-like centers that would continue to teach the Palestinian mythology and Jihad/return philosophy. You would have to exclude UN participation. And find countries far enough away to make any large to medium scale operations unlikely.
I think it could be done if managed carefully (another reason to exclude the UN).