New in PJ Media:
If Islam really were the religion of peace that virtually every non-Muslim politician in the Western world has been insisting it is for the last twenty-plus years, we would expect a certain kind of reaction from the mosque that jihad mass murderer Shamsud-Din Jabbar frequented. Yet a mosque that is within walking distance of Jabbar’s Houston home has offered just the opposite reaction. Law enforcement and intelligence officials are unlikely to take any notice, lost as they are in woke dogmas and fantasies, but if protecting the American people were their first priority, they would be paying close attention.
On Wednesday afternoon, Masjid Bilal ISGH (Islamic Society of Greater Houston) issued this statement:
Assalamu Alaikum [Peace be upon you] Brothers and Sisters,
I’m sure many of you have heard about the tragic events that took place in New Orleans this morning that are now being classified as an “act of terror” by the FBI.
I want to emphasize the importance of everyone to stay very vigilant and aware of your surroundings. The safety of our community is the most important thing.
If anyone is contacted by the media, it is very important that you do not respond. If approached by the FBI and a response is necessary, please refer to CAIR and ISGH.
It is crucial that we stay united at this time as we condemn these terrible acts. Please stay safe.
JazakAllahu Khairun [May Allah reward you with blessings]
Masjid Bilal Management
This statement was as notable for what it didn’t say as for what it did. The mosque expressed no shock, horror, or even disapproval of Jabbar’s jihad attack. It offered no condolences to the families of the victims. It offered nothing regarding what it planned to do to ensure that other members of the congregation didn’t misunderstand Islam in the way that Shamsud-Din Jabbar supposedly did. It didn’t include a word about cooperating with law enforcement efforts, or affirming the mosque members’ patriotism and renunciation of jihad violence.
Instead, it implied (“please stay safe”) that members of the mosque were in danger from “Islamophobes” who might target them in rage over Jabbar’s attack. It has become a common feature of the aftermath of every jihad attack: the local mosque asks for extra police protection, and mosquegoers tell eager leftist “journalists” about how scared they are of a “backlash.”
Yet such a “backlash” seldom, if ever, materializes. Nor should it. Nor should mosques so often attempt to deflect attention away from the reality of jihad violence. Masjid Bilal made matters even worse by directing members to refer inquirers to the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). CAIR is an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case — so named by the Justice Department.
There is more. Read the rest here.
Patriot64 says
As stated in this article NO MENTION OF Those whose lives were lost. Religion of Peace is a bunch of CRAP.
PRAYING FOR ALL THOSE WHO WERE MURDERED 🙏🙏🙏📿✝️
somehistory says
the goon advises the members to refer to cair or the barracks management if ‘approached by the FBi.’
If agents from the FBI “approach” a person to ask questions, and the agent is *referred* to a third party, the one referring has something to hide, so thinks the agent.
A person is not obliged to answer questions posed by LE; but if they refuse, it’s taken as a sign of guilt, having something to hide, aiding and abetting….because if you don’t have anything to hide, why refer to a lawyer? And cair outlets are rife with mozlum lawyers.
cair bigwigs have prepared their responses in advance because they know the *motives* of mozlums everywhere.
Mike says
“The thing that concerns me is this: let’s say a jihadist group detonates a nuclear device and kills 50 million Americans. Can you imagine the backlash against peaceful Muslims in the United States?”
(the late comedian Norm MacDonald)
Troybeam says
CAIR or Council on American-Islamic Relations not to be trusted, a few notations below and from other Muslims of groups
A CAIR executive director (in the United States) recently said, “if we are practicing Muslims, we are above the law of the land.”
One of the most influential Islamic scholars of the modern age, Egyptian Sayyid Qutb:
The fatherland is that place where the Islamic faith, the Islamic way of life and the Shari’ah of God is dominant; only this meaning of ‘fatherland’ is worth of the human being. There is only one place on earth which can be called the home of Islam (Dar-ul-Islam), and it is that place where the Islamic state is established and the Shari’ah is the authority and God’s limits are observed, and where all the Muslims administer the affairs of the state with mutual consultation. The rest of the world is the home of hostility (Dar-ul-Harb). A Muslim can have only two possible relations with Dar-ul-Harb: peace with a contractual agreement, or war. A country with which there is a treaty will not be considered the home of Islam (source)
http://islamicweb.com/resources/nationality.htm
Sayyid Qutb says that Muslims have a duty to overthrow any non-Islamic government by violent means. He explains:
“Islam is not merely a belief, so that it is enough merely to preach it. Islam, which is a way of life, takes practical steps to organize a movement for freeing man. Other societies do not give it [Islam] any opportunity to organize its followers according to its own method, and hence it is the duty of Islam to annihilate all such systems, as they are obstacles in the way of universal freedom. Only in this manner can the way of life be wholly dedicated to Allah, so that neither any human authority nor the question of servitude remains, as is the case in all other systems which are based on man’s servitude to man.” [Quoted from Andrew Bostom’s The Legacy of Jihad]
The foremost duty of Islam in this world is to depose Jahiliyyah (unbelievers) from the leadership of man, and to take the leadership into its own hands and enforce the particular way of life which is its permanent feature.” [Quoted from Robert Spencer’s Religion of Peace?]
In a book promoted by the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), Islamic scholar Sayyid Abul Ala Maududi writes that “Islam wishes to destroy all States and Governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and programme of Islam regardless of the country or the Nation that rules it. Islam requires the earth – not just a portion – but the whole planet.” (source)
https://torontosun.com/2012/03/30/more-controversial-muslim-books-for-sale-in-toronto/wcm/2e7f945c-708b-4398-af0b-fa02f6c04da3
Recap Erdogan, the Turkish leader who began his country’s transition from secularism to Islamism in thuggish fashion said, “You cannot be both secular and a Muslim! You will either be a Muslim, or secular. And why is that? Because Allah, the creator of the Muslim, has absolute power and rule.”
James Lincoln says
From Fox News, paraphrased:
CAIR’s strategy “triple-D”:
1. Denying the crime had anything to do with Islam
2. Deflecting with excuses
3. Demonizing anyone who calls out the terrorism as an “Islamophobe.”
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/asra-nomani-imam-new-orleans-murderers-neighborhood-mosque-preached-oct-7-denial