Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Former Home Secretary Suella Braverman says UK could be led by ‘Islamist government’ within 20 years

By

20 years? That long?

Comments

  1. They don’t have 20 years. They have about 5 years before Muslims overrun the UK.

    • I agree that it’s less than 20 – given the last decade and the current UK PM.

  2. The civil service is already riddled with them. All other services. It will be sooner than 20 years. Some parts of the UK are already sharia hell holes.

    • ///The civil service is already riddled with them.

      So true. They have worked the system with DEI/Woke being the onramp. Islam has tentacles trhoughout the govt. Amazing to watch.

  3. At the rate they are allowing mozlums….what is it 50 relatives for every mozlum?…into the country, it may be a year or two.
    they already have their cities and mayors’ offices, and mp’s and ‘lords,’….It won’t take twenty.

    And mozlums already have the government and the police protecting islam from the Truth; no one can tell it about what mozlums are doing; they have the police in their pocket as far as they wish to rape little White, infidel girls and citizens can’t even complain about the rapes or the terror flags flying in various villages.

    Not twenty. Perhaps a year or two…maybe even less.

  4. Suella Braverman’s warning is needed to further wake up the English. A sharp reduction on immigration from Islamic countries is needed and of course further actions. Principle of those should be the protection of free speech and the stronger penalties for those individuals and institutions that seek to intimidate such activity.

    These actions alone would probably bring strong protests from the affected populations which oddly is exactly the best thing for England. The freedom loving English would see ever more clearly the problem they face from the growing sharia supporting crowd.

    This violence would precipitate increasing calls for reducing the violent ones and separating them from civil society. We all know that shari does not create civil society.

  5. So, if the UK is eventually led by an “islamist government”, what would happen to US – UK relations, and issues regarding NATO?

    • We don’t need England, sadly but that is the path they have chosen. America likes it’s music, dogs, beer, statues, Bill of rights, guns, Christianity, our women, etc. we choose not to be slaves to this guerilla cult

      • The ordinary British white working class did not “choose” this path my friend.

        We have consistent opposed the take over of our country by foreigners but the politicians ignored us.

        We have protested on the streets and tried to vote ourselves out of this mess.

        Hundreds of our folk were imprisoned last summer.
        The Government say we rioted but most of us were protesting and were not violent.

        And as to being ” slaves to this guerilla cult” the USA was not doing so well until very recently.
        Biden and Harris were going along with it and your University campuses over run with it.

        Why was Robert Spencer banned from giving lectures to the CIA about Islam and Jihad ?

        So don’t be complacent please.

        Islam has been intimidating the world for a lot longer than the USA has been in existence.

        I mean no disrespect to America. We on this side of the pond look at your country and it’s new leadership with great admiration –
        and envy.

        Please God send us a Trump.
        At the moment I would even welcome another Hitler.

        • Eddie, I wish Britain only the best, but I fear it’s too late for anything meaningful to happen and change the future. It’s not just Britain thats going under, its all of western Europe and almost every country has decided to commit suicide. The world is headed for a very dark future and I worry for my children and grandchildren.

        • Namer I don’t know where you are in the world but I guess not Britain.

          You may well be worried about the future of your children and grandchildren in a world like this.

          How do you think we feel here in Britain ?

          I am a grandad to three little girls.

          Our Government is actively destroying this nation.

          It goes beyond politics. – this is about our survival.

          Beyond politics.
          Beyond belief.

        • That is a tough one, but under the circumstances that is understandable.

          It is quite ignorant to call this a “choice”. As Robert Soencer said: What Western governments have done to their nations is a criminal act unprecedented in human history.

          My personal guess is that those leaders were intentionally chosen and mislead themselves. It is everywhere the same type – young, narcissitic persons with some appeal and lack of knowledge and often something to blackmail them…like Trudeau, Macron, Obama.. Those people are easy to manipulate. Bring them to “Young global leaders”, flatter and “mentor” them, give them “morals” and “scientific proof”, and maybe gain some embarrassing videos…
          Every big human occurance brings BIG MONEY if you know in advance. Migration is BIB MONEY.

          Normal people are indoctrinated and intimidated.
          We are all in big danger.

        • I share English ancestry and am proud of that. However many of working class whites vote labor and that’s the problem although conservatives can be gutless as well. I’m rooting for you guys to take back your country

        • Well Eddie how right you are. We here in America have not done so well and have nothing to brag about. George W. Bush failed miserably after 9/11. He was ignorant and still is. Labeling Islam a religion of peace after the most spectacular jihad attack in history was an embarrassment and was a blow to the free world.

          How different history might have been from that moment if he had declared the attack and act of Islamic jihad sanctioned by the Quran. Instead of rallying countries to attack Afghanistan he could have rallied them to call on Islam ie the Muslim nations of the world to guarantee that nothing like this ever be attempted again and to collectively pay for the damage caused by jihadists.

          Decades later, after opening our doors to Islam indiscriminately we face far greater problems. A problem that was small is now big. Greater sacrifices not across the ocean but at home and solving it will not be peaceful.

      • I didn’t choose this path, and neither did most of the rest of us.
        This was inflicted on us by treacherous politicians, ‘think tanks’, etc, who have sold this country and it’s people down the river since the end of WWII.
        And i resent the hell out of being told I asked for it.

        • Well said Eva.
          Every word true.

          I am desperate to fight back, not knowing how to but saddened and embarrassed to go under without that fight.

        • You didn’t ask for it any more than people in France, Sweden, Germany, India, the U.S, etc., asked for it.

          Politicians say what will get them elected and then they do as they intended to do for those who give them the big paychecks.

          A few countries have leaders who recognize that the danger will someday include them…Hungary, Argentina…and now Mr. Trump.

          If the politicians would tell the Truth about their intentions, many would never get the votes.

        • JS,

          While many Brit voters did not ‘ask for this’, the majority did!

          Long past time for enough of your fellow citizens to stop electing/re-electing the politicians who are harming your nation.

        • PRCS

          That is a massive over simplification.

          Since Blair came in with New Labour in 1997 we have been ruled in effect by a “Uni Party”
          The Tories who followed Blair were much of the same leftist globalist ilk
          This is proved by the 14 years of Tories ineffectiveness on a nose dive away from any recognise able Conservatism.
          This was highlighted by their mishandling of Brexit which they never wanted, and Johnson’s betrayal of us despite a large majority gained from voters who were desperate for change.
          So it mattered little who we voted for.

          Yes Starmer and Labour are an extreme.
          Only 18 million voted for them yet they gained over 400 seats. That is not a majority of our voting strength.
          By comparison Reform got over million votes. and gained just FIVE members of Parliament.

          Reform seems to be our only hope yet these are barely right of centre and are showing signs of not wishing to challenge the influence of Islam.

          We have a very real problem of our folk just not bothering to vote.
          Looking at our choices can anyone blame them?

          Vote for crap you get crap.

          But it is all crap.

        • PRCS. I know you are smarter than that. How can you say the majority voted for it when we all know now that Western voting ha been corrupted? Do you think that only the USA is suffering from this unforgivable denial of rights that has been going on? Our most basic right, corrupted? In spite of everything else, I think we have to draw the line there, dont you think?

        • “We have a very real problem of our folk just not bothering to vote.”

          Cant blame them but that too is a form of denial of rights Eddie. Many see voting as you said, voting for crap, so why vote at all? We are all witnessing why “not voting” is a recipe for disaster.

        • Eddie and tgusa:

          “While many Brit VOTERS did not ‘ask for this’, the majority did!”

          Voters. Actual voters.

          Those who didn’t vote, weren’t voters.

        • “While many Brit VOTERS did not ‘ask for this’, the majority did!”

          PRCS. I work in a field where a paper trail is mandatory. I have to document every single thing I do and if I dont I will be reprimanded. Perhaps fired if I fail to comply. If I have to do that in my comparatively less important job than governing a country, show me the paper trail, otherwise I have no reason to believe it is valid.

          As is said, if they have nothing to hide they have nothing to fear. Right?

    • We need to pull out of NATO, Five Eyes, AUKUS….. For instance, Sweden has just been added to NATO. But when Sweden has already fallen to the jihadists, as the Momika assassination has shown, why would it be worse off were Russian tanks to roll into Stockholm?

      I mocked Braverman below for thinking UK still has 20 years. It’s there now, as we saw 2 years ago when jihadist mobs were freely marching around London, almost desecrating Armistice Day and so on. Their police have openly said that they don’t have the numbers to crack down, and Britain is not gonna use its military to do it either. Even Farage doesn’t want to have a face-off w/ muslims. So that country is toast

      • I would contend, Infidel, that NATO is largely an anachronism not because it is some kind of left-over relic of the Cold War (which Putin has been doing his best to contravene because he still functions in total Cold War mentality so tedious, foolish and destructive is he) but because of the new enemy du jour, i.e., the Islamic infiltration of so much of Europe, courtesy of dopes aplenty like Blair, Brown, Cameron (who was just goo goo gaw gaw when PM over London becoming a major center of Islamic banking), May, Merkel, Macron, Pope Francis, et al.

        But you already know this and so sorry for my stating the obvious, which is my wont at times as my dear wife would readily testify to. MAGA 2025 because if Trump fails then pretty much the best part of mankind fails. Hope you and yours are doing well.

        • Wellington

          You are pretty much right! NATO is not only a Cold War relic, but a giant international military bureaucracy that Western bureaucrats just don’t wanna let go. At least Eastern European countries all left the Warsaw Pact in 1990, and even after it split, Moscow didn’t try to recreate it. Apparently, the Poles, Hungarians, even the Russians seem better at letting go of their bureaucracies

          In fact, the membership of Turkey in NATO – which is NATO’s #2 military after ours – is what makes it even worse. I foresee its relevance being called into question sooner rather than later. Already Syria is a client state of Turkey, so whenever things settle, they may allow Turkey to do things to provoke an Israeli military response, and then what? Would NATO then invoke Article 5 against Israel, on behalf of Turkey?

          I was watching Tulsi Gabbard’s confirmation hearings, and some of the Senators confronted her about her denial of Assad using chemical weapons at the behest of Russia. She made the point that Assad’s enemies at that time included al Qaeda (which was Jabhat al Nusra, which later morphed into HTS, today’s regime in Damascus). I consider it retarded that those senators thought that Russia was a bigger enemy than al Qaeda, and we’re talking here about 2016 or so. I think a lot of elected officials from both parties need to be removed, since they’re still locked in a time warp when our #1 enemy was Communism and World Revolution, rather than islam & jihad

          The first story today talks about Russia taking to Iran about a multipolar world, which is a joke. There are just 3 poles – US, China and maybe Turkey, w/ Erdogan leading an international sunni axis w/ Qatar, Afghanistan, Pakistan & some other countries

      • Infidel that’s a very good appraisal.You have a very realistic idea of what we face here in the UK.

        Islamic influence and control is very apparent at the moment but at Governmental level they are mainly working their puppets and keeping behind them.
        They ain’t exactly subtle though, and local authorities in the North have been Islamic for decades.

        My estimation for our Political future :
        During the next four years the Labour Government will lay the foundations for the Muslim takeover.
        Islamophobia and blasphemy laws, lowering the punishment levels for sex crimes against women and children, a lowering of the age for sexual consent. The increase of Sharia law into the British legal system and more Sharia courts.
        Stamping down on indigenous opposition by restricting Freedom of Speech and imprisonment of dissidents.
        Farcical two tier justice system continuing in plain sight.

        2029 Election .Reform Party in conjunction with the Conservatives will oust Labour but will continue to appease the Muslims, many more of whom will become MP s.

        Creation of “The Party of Islam”

        Continued corruption of the electoral system and abuse of postal votes.

        2034 Election – Party of Islam as part of a coalition Government.
        Immigrant descended children equal in numbers to natives in our schools.

        2039 Election : Islamic State.

        Another 14 years.

        I hope I am wrong.

        I would be 83 .

        I hope I don’t live to see it.

        • Eddie

          I happen to think there will be events outside your normal politics that will cause a civil war in UK similar to the one by Oliver Cromwell. It’ll be bloody, and at the end of it, nobody will recognize the UK as a superpower. But at least, chances are you’ll be rid of the muslim presence

        • They’d probably go independent. I can see a lot of Englishmen fleeing there

        • Likely so, Infidel.

          The native Brits will become the new “refugees”.

      • I doubt that he has thought much about it. I also watched Rubio’s confirmation hearings a week ago, and even those senators didn’t connect the dots about Turkey’s belligerence in the Middle East and Balkans

      • Turkey would never be able to join NATO today. Their being in NATO really is an anocrynism.

  7. “Parliament bans Holocaust exhibition, but pro-Palestinians allowed to leaflet”

    “A Holocaust memorial exhibition has been banned from Parliament because it is too political – despite pro-Palestine activists being allowed to campaign there.

    Parliamentary authorities blocked the exhibition from being held in Westminster Hall earlier this month because it did not meet criteria for being politically neutral.
    But in July last year, activists from the Palestine Solidarity Campaign were allowed to hand out leaflets from a stall in the same place.

    Lord Pickles, the Government’s special envoy on post-Holocaust issues, said Winston Churchill would have been “appalled” by the decision.

    The exhibition, which details violence committed against Jewish people throughout history, was created by Marc Cave from the National Holocaust Centre and Museum.

    But when Mr Cave applied to bring it to Westminster Hall for a week to coincide with Holocaust Memorial Day on Jan 27, his application was rejected.
    The decision was made despite the Palestine Solidarity Campaign being allowed to have a stall in Westminster Hall in July last year.

    Mr Cave said: “It’s one of the great tragedies, I think, of the social media era, and my fear is that by Parliament being perhaps more ready to house one side of the argument but not the other – that’s kind of dangerous.”
    The exhibition tells the story of anti-Jewish pogroms, including Kristallnacht in Germany in 1938, the Farhud pogrom in Baghdad in 1941, and the Oct 7 massacre in Israel in 2023.

    The exhibition is intended to show that the Holocaust did not come out of nowhere and was not the end of anti-Jewish racism.

    Lord Pickles, the former Tory minister, told Times Radio that the decision to block it from Westminster Hall should be reversed.

    Concentration camps”

    there is more on the page

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/parliament-bans-holocaust-exhibition-but-pro-palestinians-allowed-to-leaflet/ar-AA1y9eWN?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=2e18ab8ddfb24865a74c8cafce34a125&ei=38

    • who ever would have thought that *opposing the Holocaust* would be “too political”? And that Britain would kowtow to this?

  8. Former Home Secretary Suella Braverman says UK could be led by ‘Islamist government’ within 20 years
    ……………………………………………..

    Do any other Britons find this terrifying?

  11. Braverman talks a lot of sense and the right thinking British public thinks highly of her.

    Unfortunately “talk ” is what is is good at
    She is Barrister. A King’s Council.

    She was Home Secretary for a while but was attacked for being too right wing and was sacked.
    She did not actually achieve much while in office , perhaps she was prevented from doing so by the civil servants in the Home Office. It is they and not Cabinet Ministers who really run the UK. Apparently 700 of them are Muslim.

    And as for our new hope – Farage.
    In a recent TV interview when asked about Tommy Robinson he replied:
    “My concern about Robinson is, the way he talks about Islam, it’s as if he wants to go to war with everybody of the Islamic faith.”

    Farage is the best we have on offer at the moment.

    God help us.

    If President Trump has any space on that Prison island can he take another 600?

    Our whole f*****g Parliament?

    • Yeah, people have been calling on her to join Reform. But her statements have been more willing to call out islam than Farage has been. She should instead consider joining Britain First – Paul Golding’s party. Not just she, but Priti Patel should go there as well. Britain First should form an alliance w/ Lawrence Fox’s Reclaim Party, and do nationwide party building exercise, along the lines of AfD in Germany or PVV in Netherlands

      • Priti Patel ?
        Bugger off.

        She was the Home Secretary who replaced the European immigrants with Indians, Pakistanis Africans and Arabs.
        This change of invaders was under Boris Johnson and is now termed ” The Boris Wave”
        Ethnic minority ministers find no problem at all with demographic replacement.
        Let’s their cousins in.
        Why not ?

        • In that case, Braverman is Indo-Brit as well. Her parents were from Kenya & Mauritius, and ancestors beyond that from India. She herself is Buddhist, married to a Jew

          I do think Priti was ineffective & turned out to be a mediocre Home Secretary, but I’m not convinced that the reason was that she wanted to get people of her own ethnicity into Britain en masse. People w/ that mentality typically don’t marry outside their ethnicity. Both Patel & Braverman are married to an Englishman and a South African Jew respectively

        • Infidel
          Can I say then that regardless of who Priti Patel is married to, the dynamic of mass immigration changed under her watch to the ilegal importation of third world migrants at a scale never seen before and the trend continues.
          This is bloody dangerous.

          And this was our reward for voting in Boris and the so called Conservatives with a big majority.
          Just when thought we had won and got Brexit this huge ramping up of third world immigrants was sure a smack in the gob.

          Can ethnic minorities really deeply care about a Britain they were not part of and can never really feel as the natives do ?

          You don’t get that depth of feeling because your Dad came here from India, Pakistan or Africa because he wanted to live somewhere nicer.

        • Eddie

          Actually, I live in the US, not UK, but I was the one who immigrated, not my dad. Culturally, throughout my life, I never lived much in one place, which is why it was much easier for me to assimilate. Despite that, I’m against any part of the country looking more Indian, where I would be expected to speak Hindi or any other Indian language, when English is the only language I am really good at

          Even less so when the influx in question is illegal

    • Eddie says,

      “Farage is the best we have on offer at the moment.”

      Yes, but the best of the could possibly do would be to “slow down” muslim migration, giving the UK a few more years.

      The only real hope that I see for the UK would be for “something like” Lord Pearson of Rannoch teaming up with Tommy Robinson.

  12. The only way UK can prevent this is to Ban islam , destroy the mosques ,burn the Koran, outlaw any Muslim from holding public office and deport the thousands of invaders.
    But …it means Discrimination against muslims .
    Can you see Any politician having the guts to do this?
    No …they won’t .
    It’s over !

    • Dr K .
      Yes
      You have it in a nut shell.

      But the banning of Islam could in my view be done perfectly lawfully under the ECHR and the UK Human Rights Act.

      Article 9
      Section 1.
      Gives the right to freedom of thought conscience and religion.
      HOWEVER this is a QUALIFIED right because :

      Section 2.
      ” Freedom to manifest one’s religious beliefs shall be subject only to
      Such limitations as are prescribed by law
      And are necessary in a DEMOCRATIC society
      In the interests of PUBLIC ORDER
      HEALTH or MORALS or
      For the PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS AND FREEDOM OF OTHERS”

      The teachings and practice of Islam breaches I believe every single one of these clauses . And this is a safeguard deliberately written into the Law.

      Mr SPENCER
      Sir can you please note this. I do not have a platform to make this known.

  13. How will the various factions of Islam, Sunni and Shiite, maneuver to gain power? Assassination will become a common tactic along with terror. Either way, an Islam government will control nuclear weapons. The weapons will be used against Iran or Saudi Arabia and most likely Israel. The UK will become an enemy of USA.

    • Yes please Rotten eye.
      The sooner the UK becomes an enemy of the USA the better for us.

      As the USMC lands to take over this country we’ll be lining the streets singing ” Oh say can you see by the dawn’s early light”

      Bring it on . My friends.

  14. She is very likely correct. If the United States returns to the liberal immigration policies of the Bush (“Islam is a religion of peace”), Obama, and Biden, it can happen here as well. Think aboiut this…Ilhan Omar can not be elected president of the United States…but Rashida Tlaib can.

  15. She also thinks such an outcome is unlikely. She was “wargaming” :

    “Regardless of whether one thinks this is a realistic outcome, which I do not, should we not have the courage to ask these questions?”

  16. But she thinks it’s unlikely.
    She was “wargaming”:

    “Regardless of whether one thinks this is a realistic outcome, which I do not, should we not have the courage to ask these questions?”

  17. With the construction of so many mosques in the United Kingdom not only means that more and more Muslims are entering those two continents and likewise more and more people in the UK are now being proselytized to Islam.

    This may be disturbing enough, nevertheless this mass construction of mosques in England and other Western nations have still has a further meaning which has been explained by a former Muslim who is now a Christian, Dr. Daniel Shayesteh, in his book ISLAM THE HOUSE I LEFT BEHIND for in page 99 it informs the reader that “The mosque is vital for establishing Muslims as sovereign over non-Muslims in a non-Islamic society or country. Building a mosque in a non-Islamic society or country symbolizes Islam’s claim over that society or country, even with a non-Muslim majority.”

  18. Britain belong the British and not to foreign migrants usurpers who want to destroy England common Law and replace it with Islam with it’s Sharia.

  19. There are many Muslims in England who committed to and are actively engaging the Islamic goal of the stealth jihad for the advancement of Islam with its Sharia in the United Kingdom as well as in other Western countries is the means that known and called the “Stealth jihad.” By this technique the Muslims who are the stealth jihadists are able to infiltrate the different nations of the West and gradually “ ,inch by inch” and likewise “step by step.” Further, archive progression for their Islamic agenda in England and other Western nations.

    To this end the stealth jihadists will and do use the Islamic of Taqiyya, which the modus operandi of speaks and printing lies that are very deceptive.

    As explained in a more detail by a former Muslim and Hezbollah member who now a Christian .In his book he reveals” Lying , treachery and deception became Islam’s key tactics in conquering others. Those tactics are gathered in a doctrinal statement called “Taqiyya” which is one of the most effective arms for the spread of Islam. It means “Holy Deception” which means the use of every lie you can in order to spread Islam or to win the war against the enemy.” [1]

    ]1] Islam and the Son of God by Daniel Shayesteh , page 41.

  20. Some stealth jihadist Muslims use the strategy that is the Islamic doctrine of Taqiyya in the stealth jihad for Islam to enact Sharia in the United Kingdom.

    Taqiyya is the Islamic dogma that deception is a good ploy as long as it’s done for the advancement of Islam. Therefore, about those who engage in deception the Bible informs its readers that “Enemies disguised themselves with their lips. Proverbs 26:24. [N.I.V.] Further, in the same chapter of Proverbs [v.26 ] teaches Their malice may be concealed by deception.”

    In conclusion .Let’s not be beguiled to the sly and insidious Muslim methods of Taqiyya.

  21. The scheming stealth jihadists who attempt to have Sharia law set up in the United Kingdom engage in the doctrines of the Islamic doctrine of Taqiyya which is very insidious. Taqyyia is the jihad dogma that deception is a good thing to do as long as it’s done for the advancement of Islam with its Sharia in the UK.

    Nevertheless, the Bible “condemns those who devise wicked schemes…” Proverbs 12:11. [N.I.V.]

    Likewise, Proverbs 12:20 teaches “Deceit is in the hearts of those who plot evil.”

  22. I for one would welcome an influx of White Europeans and UK citizens to replace to soon-to-be-deported denizens of the Turd World whom FJB welcomed into our country. Just don’t bring your UK/EU socialism with you.

    • Ralph thank you.

      We left the EU – though our wish for a real Brexit was never fulfilled.

      As regards British “socialism ” most of us never wanted it. We did not need to be told how to act with compassion and fairness to others.

      • Thanks, Eddie, for your many comments on this thread. It is beyond tragic what has happened to Britain, made all the worse because it didn’t have to happen.

        • Thank you Wellington.

          When it’s a UK topic on Jihadwatch I feel obligated to contribute if it is within my knowledge.
          Indeed, as you say, this did not have to happen – but more than that, it is being done deliberately.

          I feel that my country needs friends from around the world now and America shines like a beacon showing what can be done.

          I see that many American contributers think we just let this happen and cannot understand why.

Discover more from

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Skip to content