While their media and politicians shy away from acknowledging the obvious, the United Kingdom is caught in a disturbing pattern of rape gang scandals involving predominantly Pakistani-origin Muslim men. These criminal networks have exploited defenseless young girls and subjected them to horrific sexual abuse. Many have been murdered in the most brutal and unimaginable ways. Yet the British media has always labeled these perpetrators as “Asian” while reporting on such cases. People have had enough, and now, this willfully and craftily committed inaccuracy on the part of media and politicians alike has sparked widespread criticism for its insensitivity, and rightly so.
Asia, the largest continent on the planet, is home to over 40 diverse countries, and this blanket term unfairly implicates communities far removed from these barbaric crimes. What do they mean by claiming that Asian men have been raping and killing thousands of British girls? Are they Buddhists from Japan? Hindus from Nepal? Jains from India? Using the term “Asian” for organized gangs consisting of men of a specific shared identity dilutes the accountability of the cultural factors that motivate them to indulge in such heinous activities.
Let’s delve into the specifics of some of the more popular grooming gang cases, the individuals involved, and their backgrounds.
In one of the earliest high-profile cases reported in 2012, nine men were convicted of grooming and sexually exploiting young girls in Rochdale. The gang members were Shabir Ahmed, Adil Khan, and Abdul Aziz, among others, of Pakistani Muslim origin. Ahmed, described as the ringleader, repeatedly justified his actions with reference to Islamic teaching.
In 2014, a government-commissioned report, commonly referred to as the Jay Report, uncovered the fact that over 1,400 children — some as young as 11 — were abused in the town of Rotherham between 1997 and 2013. Some were doused in petrol and threatened with being set on fire; others were threatened with guns and forced to watch “brutally violent rapes.” The perpetrators were of Pakistani descent and had names including Iqlak Yousaf, Nabeel Kurshid, Mohammed Imran Ali Akhtar, Tanweer Ali, Salah Ahmed El-Hakam, and Asif Ali.
In 2018, investigations in Telford revealed harrowing details about the sexual abuse of up to 1,000 girls over four decades. Again, the majority of the offenders were of Pakistani Muslim origin. Survivors narrated how they were beaten, trafficked, and raped by men who operated through organized networks.
Again, in 2018, 20 men were convicted of sexually abusing at least 15 young girls over several years in Huddersfield. The gang members, including Mohammed Akram, Niaz Ahmed, and Zahid Hassan, hailed from Pakistan. But in this case, some perpetrators also hailed from Bangladesh, another Islamic country in South Asia, giving tough competition to Pakistan in Islamic jihad and all things inspired by it. Their crimes involved systematic grooming, drugging, and abuse.
The Newcastle sex abuse ring was comprised of seventeen men and a woman who sexually abused teen girls and young women from 2010 to 2014. Dubbed “Operation Sanctuary,” this case led to the conviction of 18 men and one woman, including Mohammed Ali, Nashir Uddin, Monjur Choudhury, Taherul Alam, Habibur Rahim, Badrul Hussain, Carolann Gallon, Saiful Islam, AbdulHamid Minoyee, Prabhat Nelli, Abdul Sabe, Jahangir Zaman, Nadeem Aslam, Mohammed Azram, Yassar Hussain, Redwan Siddquee, and Mohibur Rahman. While most of these convicts were of Pakistani heritage, others were Muslims from countries including Bangladesh, Turkey, Iran, and Iran.
In a more recent case of 2022, seven men were jailed for a raft of historic rape charges against a vulnerable minor. Amjad Hussain, Nazir Khan, Kamran Hussain, Imran Sabir, Hassan Basharat, Baber Hussain, and Usman Sultan were the perpetrators.
One has to be exceedingly dimwitted not to identify the obvious pattern here.
By using the term “Asian,” the media and the political elites attempt to distance Islam and Pakistan from these crimes, and in the process, they implicate an entire continent’s population, including Indians, Chinese, Japanese, and others who have no connection to these crimes. Blanket labeling not only perpetuates harmful stereotypes, but also alienates innocent communities and acquits communities and cults that are specifically, particularly, and solely involved in such criminalities.
Recognizing how some perpetrators have invoked Islamic teachings to justify their actions is crucial. For instance, Shabir Ahmed, the ringleader in the Rochdale case, described his victims as “white trash,” and claimed superiority over them due to his faith. One cannot simply overlook how many of the convicted gang members justified their horrific actions through interpretations of their religious texts and teachings. The media reluctance to specify their Pakistani Muslim backgrounds reflects destructive political correctness and shameful fear of offending the ever-delicate sensibilities of Muslims. This ultimately undermines efforts to combat the grooming networks.
somehistory says
As with every other word used….”migrants, islamophobia, radical, militant, herdsmen, etc.”….it’s for the sole purpose of hiding the Truth about islam and mozlums.
Calling these mozlum scum by any other name, keeps the heat off of mozlums as a whole, and hides the fact that islam is responsible for the mozlums raping and murdering at will.
We really shouldn’t expect the politicians and their lackeys in LE, and the media to change any of it.
David M says
Easy solution, just change the word “Asian” to “Muslim”. They won’t like that.
gravenimage says
+1
This is like other obfuscation, like calling Jihad terrorists “a Manchester man” or “a Florida man”, which explains nothing about their motives and why they are Jihad terrorists.
David M says
Or “a car” just killed 30 people. No, it was the Muslim driving the car who did it.
gravenimage says
True, David.
Zeenah says
If You are unwilling to identify Your Enemy You will never win the War.
Mike says
Zeenah: true! That’s a good quote from the book “The Art of War” by Sun Tzu.
“If you know both yourself and your enemy, you need not fear the result of a thousand battles.”
“If you know yourself but not your enemy, for every victory, you will suffer a defeat.”
“If you know neither yourself nor your enemy, you will lose every battle.”
England Invaded says
To be honest, in the UK, the term for people from the Indian sub-continent has always been Asian. What America calls Asians, we call South East Asians.
However, the word Asian now in the UK, is used to verbally distract people from the fact that the majority of child rapists gangs are Pakistani muslims. Just like the term Grooming Gangs is used to lessen the impact, which is beyond ridiculous. The old British term might have just been ‘wogs’, which maybe should make a come back.
Note, in the West including the UK, there are always the constant attempts to make crimes look worse if they had a racial or religious motivation. Despite the outcome of other crimes would be the same, often the level of punishment is decided by such motivation. Not in these cases though, despite it is admitted that these gangs targeted white British girls because they were white and non muslim, none have been prosecuted by way of racial or religious crimes.That just works one way
Mike says
EI: good points. In the UK, “Oriental” is generally used to describe East Asians who are usually of Mongolian racial origin.
Southeast Asia refers more to Thais, Vietnamese, Filipinos, etc, and also to mainly Islamic Indonesia and Malaysia.
South Asian would be more accurate, but it includes people from Pakistan, India, Nepal, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka.
Why not call them the “porkypaki grooming gangs”? Also, with apologies to Pakistani Muslims and Pakistani non-Muslims who are not involved with these vile, rapey gangs.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
The problem w/ these continental terms is that they forcefully bunch in law abiding Hindus, Buddhists, Daoists, Shintos, Sikhs, Jains and Zoroastrians from Asia w/ muslims, be they from Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Iraq, Syria or anywhere else. In the US, we have the same issue w/ the term “South Asian” being used, b’cos it conflates law-abiding successful citizens of Indian origin w/ law-breaking losers from Pakistan and Bangladesh
It’s not like these people would have hesitated to name Christians, Jews, Hindus, Sikhs or others who perpetrated any crimes. They must similarly stop treating muslims w/ kit gloves
gravenimage says
Spot on, Infidel.
Rarely says
You can’t solve a problem unless you know what the problem is.
gravenimage says
So true, Rarely.
Greg says
I have called this over use of the title “Asians” being used for describing Muslim rape gang for years!
Simpleton1 says
At least this gives a real insight of about 27 towns & the lives of some people.
An earlier series of documentaries by Tommy Robinson
I am astounded that no court case of defamation, libel or slander has been made, as far as I am aware, about this series, where TR named rapists, business’s where they occurred, & some individual police.
It would seem that the movie “Silenced” that was screened & deemed a contempt of court, a case bought by a muslim solicitor & accepted by the Judge, as guilty & worthy of solitary confinement in maximum security.
“Silenced” in my opinion is relatively mild on that school boy scrap & the bully was deemed as libeled though there seemed to be other evidence & witnesses,
And a tremendous cost to the education department in closing the school & paying out of the teachers a very good redundancy with a NDA, Non Disclosure Agreement.
One can see that the muslim gangs would have a bounty on TR and his family, for losing some parts of their money flow of pimping & drug dealing.
And the bigger blue gang & establishment would not care, as the muslims know they have the police on their leash as seen in Episode 1.
The twisting & turning in this investigation, going in so many different directions would make a script writer of “A Game of Thrones” envious, but this is real life, based on peoples experiences & noting the ongoing dangerous, & murderous situations.
The only thing is that like a soap opera, sometimes it can seem tedious, until another reveal of certain incidents, that show it is all continuing.
The Rape of Britain – Episode 1
https://youtu.be/s5ghsL4CRvo
1 hour 12 minutes : 2024 : Urban Scoop : by & narrated by Tommy Robinson.
The Rape of Britain – Episode 2 – The Family Business
https://youtu.be/ay0bDTBVpTg
1 hour 31 minutes : 2024 : Urban Scoop : by & narrated by Tommy Robinson.
Maybe 1 at time per evening? as they are long.
Simpleton1 says
And in some parts one can the expectations that have become ingrained of “what about’ism, in accepting that new normal.
Watch The Rape Of Britain – Part 3 – S.A.V.E
https://youtu.be/45Z474FQMtQ
44 mins : Urban Scoop : 2024 : by & narrated by Tommy Robinson.
TOMMY ROBINSON – THE RAPE OF BRITAIN – Episode 4
https://youtu.be/bQrR3TMj8BY
1 hour 5 minutes : 2024 : Pinac Nz : by & narrated by Tommy Robinson.
The moment of this photo Councillors, Senior Police & Gang organizers, at 38 minutes 30 secs. … hmmmm …
The Rape of Britain – Episode 5
https://youtu.be/tQhxWlPdkDo
1 hour 14 secs : 2024
The women speak frankly, & straight forward of what was done to them, and does give a context, not only to the rapists, but also how the authorities seem to be aware & put little problems in the way at the time & even now in these docos,
Tommy also drops in a number of facts, maddening little things, like the % of muslims is lower than you would think, & other statistics so one should figure, that if this not sorted, then there will be a civil war.
I think Musk may watched some clips from these videos.
One can see how some families have a sense of hopelessness, & figure they are backed into a corner by the establishent, so have nothing to loose.
Plus how the gangs & establishment were out to intimidate who & when ever they could.
To retain their power & control.
Was good to see how TR was organized, kept his word better than the government in helping the women now to protect them & even their parents.
I recall TR experienced his parents house also being smashed up years ago too.
Raymond Bullock says
This is a national crime against humanity by the UK government against their young female constituents. What he_ _ is going on here? Your daughters being raped and mutilated and murdered by men who organize to commit these horrendous crimes? Yet nothing is being done about it. What kind of world are we living in? It is more savage than the most primitive barbarity.
gravenimage says
British media and politicians must stop referring to Muslim rape gangs as ‘Asian’: Pakistan is not Asia
……………………………………………………………
Technically, Pakistan is Asia–but this, as noted, tells you nothing about why this is happening. What is salient is that Pakistan *is Muslim*.
More:
Asia, the largest continent on the planet, is home to over 40 diverse countries, and this blanket term unfairly implicates communities far removed from these barbaric crimes. What do they mean by claiming that Asian men have been raping and killing thousands of British girls? Are they Buddhists from Japan? Hindus from Nepal? Jains from India? Using the term “Asian” for organized gangs consisting of men of a specific shared identity dilutes the accountability of the cultural factors that motivate them to indulge in such heinous activities
……………………………………………………………
Nor is it Jews from Israel, also part of Asia. Again, these rapes of British children is because virtually all Pakistanis are Muslim, which sacralizes the rape of both children and Infidels.
But British authorities don’t want to acknowledge this…
࿗Infidel࿘ says
I think what Ashlyn meant to say was that Pakistan is not all of Asia. Also, when people think of Pakistan, it’s not Asia that comes to mind, but Indic muslim
Ever since 9/11, I made it a point to extend the meaning of the term “Middle East”, which was previously bounded by Turkey, Egypt and Iran – to include Afghanistan and Pakistan. B’cos the geopolitics of those 2 countries could no longer be explained only by events contained within those 2 countries.
gravenimage says
Infidel, I was not being critical of Ashlyn in my post.
Mike says
Graven: from what I have read, something like 92 percent of these grooming gangs are Pakistani Muslim background.
Then, around 7 percent are Muslims from other backgrounds (such as North African, Turkish, Somali, Afghan, Bangladeshi, Indian Muslim, and so on).
Then, under one percent are the occasional Sikh, white Christian guy, or Hindu, for example.
It would be interesting to find out what percentage of the entire community of Pakistani-British, Muslim males (adult or minors) have been involved with these grooming gangs.
gravenimage says
+1
aum says
British media and politicians must stop referring to Muslim rape gangs as ‘Asian’: Pakistan is not Asia
Ashyln Davis – Thank You.
I have been writing about this point in the comments section on various British media reports but the media outlets are too lazy to change – GB news seems to be changing – we shall see whether others follow.
abu taleb says
As an Asian, I feel offended when the media say the rape gangs are Asian, because there is no rape gangs in UK from either my country or my ethnicity. I think, Asian people in UK should sue the media for slandering the Asians.
Namer says
Ditto to all previous comments.
I also cant help but wonder:
– What kind of sick politicians and police would allow this to happen to these girls and do nothing. Are they being invited in to participate because thats what it looks like to me.
– How many young boys were the victims of these rape gangs too?
jerry glenn says
Yes. Stop the Islamopandering.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
It’s not just trying to mask the Pakis by calling them Asian: the claims are downright false. For instance, in Bristol, the rapes that happened were done by Somalis, and there have been a lot of
muslims of other ethnicities, including outside Asia, who’ve participated in this. Calling them Asian is downright slander to the groups that Ashlyn referenced
James Lincoln says
British media – especially the BBC – and nearly all British politicians are deliberately lying to the public.
Telling the truth would require them to “analyze the truth” about these rape gangs – which would cause a “breach of the peace”.
Hank says
Islam hiding behind another term again.
The problem is Islam
Eddie says
The official British Home office report on the so called” grooming” gangs is available to be seen on line and it tells us that the perpetrators were mainly “Asian” men so it MUST BE TRUE (?)
The Home office was stated in a recent video report to have 700 Muslim staff, and a special unit called RICU is in being to ensure the correct spin is put on incidents which may reflect badly on Muslims/Islam. See website of Connor Tomlinson.
So we can surely trust the Home Office to tell us the truth.
Any way let us be generous and accept that these rapes had nothing to do with Islam. If we do that then should cancel the risk of us being called Islamophobic.
It still leaves us however with the majority of offenders being ethnically Pakistani.
So is it not fair to say there is a big problem with many men from Pakistan ?
I don’t recall seeing reports of gangs of white British men raping thousands of young Pakistani girls . Sure we have plenty of white paedophiles but they don’t usually involve their friends, brothers, dads and uncles…..
Is it fair to say that for the protection of young girls, that no Western country should have Pakistani men living in those countries,
and that they should return or be returned to Pakistan?
They can do what they like there and good riddance.
Then we can crowd fund to build a bloody great wall all around Pakistan and let none of them out and they can find their own sexual amusements within their own borders. Hardly a loss to the rest of the world.
A bit harsh ? A bit unfair ?
Well no. Because it has been stated that over the past two decades 250,000 white trash British girls were gang raped. So let’s say that accepting a few of the offenders are now in prison, several hundred thousand of these rapists are still walking free in British towns.
And the British government has just stopped an inquiry into the cover ups that allowed all this happen.
Not the done thing to make a fuss old boy. Stiff upper lip and all that, close your eyes and think of England.
Put the kettle on and make a nice cup of tea and you’ll soon feel better.
With best wishes from “shattered, staggering, dhimmi Britain.
gravenimage says
Many of these girls ae vulnerable, and some are indeed poorly educated–but I would not call them “trash”. Their rapists are trash, not the victims. (By the way, I am former “white trash” myself)
somehistory says
Agreed, g. The victims are not “trash.” They are young, vulnerable to exploitation and abuse. Many because they don’t have stable homes.
Psychopaths and child molesters are adept in choosing and manipulating their targets.
The ghouls who rape, and often murder, these children are worse than trash. But the victims are considered less than worthy of protection.
If the daughters of the elite, the “royals’ or any other “important” people were the victims, more would be done to pursue and punish the mozlum gangs. But the rapists know better than to seek out those girls and focus on the throwaway children.
Eddie says
The rapists called these girls white trash.
I use these words as that is what is recorded in court transcripts.
It shows the arrogance and justification they the Muslim perpetrators have.
I am myself white English and my father was a dustman and labourer and I grew up on a council estate.
These white trash girls are my people.
Mike says
The Portuguese term “lixo” is more appropriate for the porkypaki grooming gang members.