My latest in PJ Media is a VIP article. I am happy to be able to offer you a 5% discount on becoming a VIP member at PJ Media. Just enter the code SPENCER when you sign up here.
The most popular name for baby boys in England and Wales today is Muhammad, and upon hearing this news, many people will shrug their shoulders and say, “So what?” A hundred years ago, the most popular name for baby boys in England and Wales was John. Three quarters of a century before that, in 1850, it was William. More recently, fifty years ago, it was Paul. Now it’s Muhammad, and many will see no greater significance in that than in any of the earlier changes. Fashions in names, like fashions in everything else, come and go. Some will even charge that to think there is more to this than to earlier changes is “Islamophobic” and “bigoted.” And yet there is much more involved here than just that.
There is more. Read the rest here.
Alex Lund says
I wonder what will happen, when Islam takes over? When they control the nuclear warheads of GB?
And later that of France?
Will they use them for blackmail (not that they need it considering that muslims will be a majority in all European countries in a few years – just by birth alone.) or will they fire them?
Hank says
At least in France they did have hope had they voted for Eric Zemmour for President.
One of his promises was to ban the naming of children Muhammad, not to mention mass deportation of the illegal Muslim invasion effectively expelling an ever increasing dangerous environment for the indigenous non-Muslim citizens.
Hopefully, they get to vote for him again.
Isabella van der westhuizen says
I agree this is a concern but just remember they are all called Mohammed. The western names compete between Peter Paul Mark John and Cecil. So teh western names are divided whilst the Muslim names tend to cluster
Donna says
Great Britain is over. Islam is the death of every country it decides to out populate. Winston Churchill knew about these rabid beings. So sad his countrymen forgot their history fighting these beasts and why.
Walter Sieruk says
This shows that the that the Muslims propagandists in the United Kingdom are making a strong influence in England.
Furthermore, somewhat , related to this topic is the subject In this twenty –first century post 9/11 “War of Ideals” great and terrible conflict between the Judeo- Christian West and the Islamic East, T
he sad reality is that one of the things that is holding back much progress of the West is that many Westerners are infected by the worthless , sick and unrealistic philosophies that are called “ Multiculturalism.” And “Cultural Relativity.”
Which is the concept that all culture are equal because those Mult. and C.R concept teaches the foolishness that all values derive their meaning within the specific social content. This folly of thinking leads, or misleads, many people to view every position as only “opinion” and that truth is only relevant to the person or society holding that view. In other words, discovering actual truth in impossible.
Such Mult, and C.R is absurd, nonsensical and contradictory. For example, to say “finding the truth is impossible “Is a statement of contradiction. For in making that statement that is saying, in essence, “I have found the truth which is finding the truth is not possible.” It should be obvious that this “War of Ideas” needs to and should have a solidly based in and on truth and not by a worthless “war of opinions” A C.R. person would say about a scholarly truth teller about Islam with its different kinds of jihad , as Pamela Geller, that she is only giving her “opinion” on the subject.
Such ignorance is appalling. Just look at history. If Americans had that C.R. and Mult. view ,as many Americans do today , then during World war II it would had been madness and a fools fight to go into battle against the military forces of Nazism if it was only just “opinion” that Hitler was wrong and evil.
Likewise in this twenty-first century it would be nonsense, for example, for the US troops to fight and maybe even die in Afghanistan if it’s just “opinion” that the Taliban and Al Qaeda are wrong and evil.
Two other examples of the falseness of C.R. with its teaching that everything is only “opinion.”
First is in the elate 1970’s two guys said “There are so many different religions that no one can ever know the truth about religion.” They were really saying that statement so dogmatically that they were self-contradicting. For they were saying that they know the truth about religion that is not one can know the truth about religion. Second, a shallow man in the 1980’s said when asked the question “Why do you always small talk ? You don’t ever talk about a topic that might have some value, as politics? After all , all thing are related “ That shallow C.R man replied “There are so many different political ideas that finding the true one is unattainable and all thing are not related.” The wisdom-less man was saying that he obtained the truth which is the he can’t obtain the truth and who does can is really truthfully say that all thing are not related in he can’t find the truth. How foolish, an obvious contradiction. What is needed to counter this nonsense C.R./Mult. . is the concept of “Absolutism.” Which a definition of this, with the scope of the topic, is “An absolute standard or principle .” In this “war of idea’s it’s the Bible with its absolute standards and principles to stand firm against Islam is its different types of jihad with its many evils. In conclusion, in this War of Ideas a firm foundation for truth may be found in the Bible and not the weak folly of CR.and that other PC idea in which everything is “opinion.”