Keffiyeh, which is banned in multiple parliaments and countries, finds place of pride in Vatican
At best, the iconic keffiyeh is a provocative symbol of Palestianian resistance and solidarity with Palestinian nationalism. At worst, the checkered black-and-white scarf made most famous by the late Yasser Arafat is synonymous with the headgear worn by Islamic terrorists and antisemitic mobs baying for Jewish blood.
But last Saturday, the keffiyeh became the swaddling clothes for the baby Jesus to lie on in His cradle as a wheelchair-bound Pope Francis prayed before a politicized “Palestinian” nativity scene in the Vatican’s Paul VI Hall.
Jews and Christians erupted with outrage, both reminding the pope that depicting Jesus as a “Palestinian” when he was born a “Jew” was not only historically inaccurate, but a display of partisanship with the antisemitic terrorist organization Hamas.
Earlier today, the controversial nativity scene was removed from the Paul VI Hall with no explanation.
Associating Jesus with Violence
“There are no words to describe how much of an unholy desecration this is,” wrote Elica Le Bon, an attorney, singer, activist, and speaker of Iranian extraction, blasting Francis for unveiling “the nativity scene with baby Jesus in a keffiyeh.”
“This symbol has nothing to do with Jesus who lived 2,000 years ago in Judea,” she remarked, explaining in a lengthy social media post how the “keffiyeh emerged as a symbol for [the] Arab revolt against the Ottoman Empire beginning in the early 1900’s” and “subsequently became a symbol for Palestinian resistance after being popularized by Yasser Arafat in the 1960’s.
“Today, it is used as a symbol for solidarity with Palestinians in the Israel-Hamas conflict, and often worn by those advocating for the destruction of Israel and its replacement with an Arab/Muslim state, which was not the identity of the land Jesus was born in,” Le Bon observed.
“To associate Jesus with violence and wars by forcing him to wear a symbol associated with one side against the other is abhorrent, and a complete misevaluation of Jesus’s teachings. He was a Jewish rabbi and a man of peace.”
Islamic scholar Robert Spencer agreed.
“The worst aspect of it is that Pope Francis is endorsing a bloody and genocidal jihad that does not allow for the existence of a Jewish state,” he said. “‘Palestinian’ leaders have made it clear that no Jew will be allowed to live in their ‘Palestinian’ state. So what will be done with the seven million Jews in Israel? This is the real genocidal intent in the region.”
Symbol of Terrorism
In his paper “Stitched together, torn apart: The keffiyeh as cultural guide,” published in the International Journal of Cultural Studies, Evan Renfro, associate professor of political science at the University of Northern Iowa, found that Western media more frequently links the keffiyeh to terrorism than to social justice.
According to Google, the keffiyeh is the preferred headgear for terrorists. In 2021, the search engine listed the garment as the top search result for the query: “what types of headgear or scarves do terrorists wear?”.
Nadim Nashif, executive director of The Arab Center for Social Media Advancement, hit back at big tech for its “racist and dehumanising” association of a “historical headdress of Arabs and Palestinians” with terrorism. The keffiyeh originated with farmers and later became a symbol of Palestinian nationalism, Nashif noted.
Arafat, who founded Fatah (a group advocating armed rebellion against Israel) and was chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) from 1969 to 2004, helped popularize the keffiyeh around the world by almost always wearing one in public.
Leila Khaled, a Palestinian militant who took part in hijacking a plane flying from Rome to Tel Aviv in 1969, turned the keffiyeh into a symbol of Palestinian “feminist” resistance after a journalist shot a photo of her holding a rifle while styling a keffiyeh like a woman’s headscarf.
Vatican Plays Pro-Palestinian Politics
The keffiyeh-draped crib is one of a series of nativity scenes collectively titled “Nativity of Bethlehem 2024,” designed by artists Johny Andonia and Faten Nastas Mitwasi, both Palestinians from Bethlehem, Vatican News reported.
The representation blends the traditions of local artisans with contemporary elements. The materials used include iron for the main structure, olive wood for the statues of the Holy Family, and mother-of-pearl, stone, ceramic, glass, felt, and fabric for the keffiyeh.
The nativity scene was organized by the Higher Presidential Committee for Church Affairs in Palestine (HPCCAP, an organ of the Palestine Liberation Organization) and the Palestinian embassy to the Vatican, along with Dar Al-Kalima University and the Beitcharilo Center.
Part of the HPCCAP’s mission is to bring attention to “Israeli atrocities and violations against the Palestinian people, while countering misinformation and propaganda campaigns directed at Muslim and Christian institutions, particularly in Jerusalem,” the outfit claims on its website.
PLO executive committee member Ramzi Khouri featured prominently at the dedication joining Francis in presiding over the nativity’s dedication.
Khouri conveyed “warm greetings” from Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas and expressed “deep gratitude for the pope’s unwavering support for the Palestinian cause and his tireless efforts to end the war on Gaza and promote justice,” according to a PLO press release.
Two Arab children presented the pope with a “Star of Bethlehem” plaque bearing peace messages in Arabic and Latin during the ceremony.
“The Pope should just keep quiet,” Jewish columnist Gila Isaacson noted. In an article titled “Pope Francis’s latest blunder: Jesus was Palestinian,” she wrote: “One would think that the Pope, of all people, would know that Jesus was a Jew who lived and died under Roman rule in Judea.
“The term ‘Palestine’ wasn’t even applied to the region until after the Bar Kokhba revolt, when the Romans deliberately renamed Judea to diminish its Jewish character.”
Belittling the Holocaust
Francis’s pro-Palestine virtue-signaling comes days after The Associated Press published incendiary anti-Israel excerpts from his forthcoming book, Hope Never Disappoints: Pilgrims Toward a Better World.
In the book, Francis asserts that the Israel Defense Force’s actions in Gaza “should be carefully investigated to determine whether it fits into the technical definition of genocide as formulated by jurists and international bodies,” The Stream has previously reported.
Edith Bruck of Rome, a 93-year-old Holocaust survivor, rebuked Francis for misusing the term “genocide.” The Hungarian-born Jew who survived incarceration in the Auschwitz, Dachau, and Bergen-Belsen concentration camps stressed that despite what Francis says, Israel is not attempting to eliminate the entire Palestinian population.
“This is how he downplays the historical significance of the Shoah,” Bruck told Italian daily La Repubblica. “Genocide is something else. When a million children are burned to death, then you can talk about genocide.”
Rather, committing genocide is “something Hamas wants to do,” she said, noting that Hamas has said it “wants to wipe out all the Jews in the entire world.”
The Combat Antisemitism Movement (CAM) slammed the pontiff’s remarks, warning that “Israel is currently facing a war of intended annihilation on seven fronts, and these remarks look like a possible opening of an eighth front, from of all places, the Vatican, which can also lead to the spilling of Jewish blood around the world.”
Francis has remained silent against perpetrators of genocides against Christians in China, Nigeria, and other parts of the Islamic world, as well as Azerbaijan, as The Stream has previously noted.
In May, Francis refused to condemn Islamic extremist Tawakkol Karman for accusing Israel of “genocide” while addressing an audience at St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome.
The Israeli Embassy to the Holy See said it was “outraged and shocked” to learn that “the place was contaminated by a flagrant anti-Semitic speech” Karman delivered at the Vatican-sponsored “World Meeting on Human Fraternity.”
“When one invites someone to his home, they expect the invitee not to abuse the good will and hospitality — and if this unfortunately happens, to respond properly and promptly,” Raphael Schutz, former Israel’s ambassador to the Holy See, told The Stream at the time.
Keffiyeh Banned in Multiple Places
In November 2023, Berlin state authorities banned the keffiyeh in schools, classifying it as a direct symbol of Hamas or Hezbollah, but one that does “not yet reach the limit of criminal liability.”
“Any demonstrative behavior or expression of opinion that can be understood as advocating or approving the attacks against Israel or supporting the terrorist organizations that carry them out, such as Hamas or Hezbollah, represents a threat to school peace in the current situation and is prohibited,” Education Senator Katharina Guenther-Wuensch stated in a letter to schools.
In April, Ted Arnott, who is speaker in the Provincial Parliament of Ontario (Canada), barred lawmakers from wearing keffiyehs inside the legislative building, noting that “having done the research, it appeared to me that the keffiyeh is being worn to make a political statement.”
Keffiyehs remain banned there after a motion that would have permitted the scarf failed to pass days later.
In May, the parliament of the Australian state of Victoria banned MPs from wearing the keffiyeh. In a joint ruling, both chambers said the scarf was a “political” symbol. Days after the ban, Victorian Legislative Council President Shaun Leane asked four Green Party lawmakers who had been wearing keffiyehs to remove them.
Dr. Jules Gomes, (BA, BD, MTh, PhD), has a doctorate in biblical studies from the University of Cambridge. Currently a Vatican-accredited journalist based in Rome, he is the author of five books and several academic articles. Gomes lectured at Catholic and Protestant seminaries and universities and was canon theologian and artistic director at Liverpool Cathedral. This article has been cross-posted with the author’s permission from The Stream.
somehistory says
The Prophet (a true one) Isaiah wrote something which the ‘pope’…..false shepherd, fake Christian….ignores.
“New International Version
When you spread out your hands in prayer, I hide my eyes from you; even when you offer many prayers, I am not listening. Your hands are full of blood!
New Living Translation
When you lift up your hands in prayer, I will not look. Though you offer many prayers, I will not listen, for your hands are covered with the blood of innocent victims.”
And another important Scripture from Isaiah’s writings,
“Woe to those putting evil for good, bitter for sweet and darkness for light.”
As Jesus said to His enemies, “You are from your father the devil and wish to do the desires of your father”. ‘Serpents, offspring of vipers. How are you to flee the Judgment of Gehenna?”
The ‘pope’ pretends to represent God to Christ’s congregation while he goes against everything Christ commanded. “How is he to flee the Judgment of Gehenna”?
Will he be one to whom Jesus says, “Get away from me, you workers of lawlessness.”?
Michael Lee howellmike153@gmail.com says
Amen
somehistory says
Thank you, Michael Lee.
rick says
It seems the Pope wants to push his anti-Semitism directly in your face so you know exactly how he feels about Jews. Why doesn’t he spread a flag of Israel on the ground in front of the nativity scene in the Vatican’s Paul VI Hall so that visitors and tourists can step on it as they view the nativity. That should make him feel even better.
How a man who thinks of himself as someone not only religious but almost sort of “holy” enjoy insulting and belittling Jews at every opportunity he has is an amazing thing. And he will be confirmed in that hate as I am sure every few if any will tell him to his face you are not only belittling Jews but yourself as well.
I wonder if he knows anything about the history of the word “Palestine” and “Palestinians” and I doubt he knows that only Jews referred to themselves as Palestinians until the rebirth of Israel in 1948. Arabs never used the term for many reasons such as no Arab would call himself a Palestinian when Jews living in now Israel routinely called themselves that prior to 1948. But when Jesus was born the Romans whose land the Pope and his Church is on today, did not yet banish the word Israel and subsitute Palestine for it. Another reason Arabs did not use it is there is no “P” in Arabic.
somehistory says
The ‘pope’ creature is big in his own mind; he feels no need to even consider actually consulting the Word of God, much less abiding by it.
The creature is no Christian….anti-Christian is more like it. He’s lying about Jesus Christ. How much more does he need to do to show his true colors?
Jesus **loved** His brothers…the Jews. He mourned what was going to befall them at the hands of the Romans. He laid down His holy life for them.
‘What greater love than this?” He asked His disciples, that “A man should give His life in behalf of His friends.”
How can one claim to be Christian if he hates Christ’s brothers?
Ron says
Sorry,,,,, the Pope shit out what LITTLE brains he had years ago. He is an embarrassment to all the Christian faith.
Simpleton1 says
“Muslims Applaud as Pope Francis Unveils Pro-Hamas Christmas Nativity Crèche at Vatican”
.
The Pope is slowly converting to become a muslim, if he is not one already, along with his Marx, Lenin, Trotsky, Mao, ideologies.
.
It now seems that he accepts that Christ was only a prophet.
.
This is at least consistent with Islam’s teachings that Jesus was a Muslim…
.
…. [page 247] [the latter part of ] o9.8
….. those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled” (Koran 9.29),
the time and place for which is before the final descent of Jesus (upon whom be peace).
After his final coming, nothing but Islam will be accepted from them, for taking the poll tax is only effective until Jesus’ descent (upon him and our Prophet be peace), which is the divinely revealed law of Muhammad.
The coming of Jesus does not entail a separate divinely revealed law, for he will rule by the law of Muhammad.
As for the Prophet’s saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),
“I am the last, there will be no prophet after me,”
this does not contradict the final coming of Jesus (upon whom be peace), since he will not rule according to the Evangel, but as a follower of our Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace)).
.
Reliance of the Traveller and Tools for the Worshipper. o9.8 [page 247]
A CLASSIC MANUAL OF ISLAMIC SACRED LAW
by AHMAD IBN NAQIB AL-MISRI (Died 1368 AD)
https://seekerofthesacred.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf
.
So the ummah can believe that the take-over of Rome is becoming more feasible, and nigh. How can they not believe ?
So where possible the implementation of sharia will relentlessly progress.
.
Despite some slight Roman Catholic protestations the Pope wheels on, in an acceptable & approving “Biden’esque” manner.
If the Cardinals can pick that Pope, will they ever pick any other form for the Papacy?
somehistory says
Agreed. He may as well show us all his little carpet upon which he bangs his head while saluting his gpd, satan with his backside.
William Kemmler says
“If the Cardinals can pick that Pope, will they ever pick any other form for the Papacy?”
Nope. As Bergoglio (won’t call him Francis) has packed the College of Cardinals with his own supporters there’s no chance that a more traditional Pope will ever be elected again.
Wellington says
Not only a fool, but a malicious fool is Francis.
I was raised Catholic and always told by priests and nuns who taught me (and, to their credit, they taught me many basics like math, English grammar and Latin pretty damn well), that Roman Catholicism was the true faith. But that “claim” is looking pretty damn bleak right now, isn’t it, with someone like Francis at the helm?
Oh yeah, very bleak because why would God, assuming He exists and assuming that Roman Catholicism is the true faith, permit a Latin American Leftist who is deficient in sundry ways become the Pontifex Maximus unless, of course, God does indeed work in very mysterious ways, and which such ways my skeptical side (a big side of me to be sure) says, “Nah, can’t be this damn mysterious.” No way, no how.
James Lincoln says
Having Pope Francis is much worse than having no Pope at all.
Yes, he is that bad…
abu taleb says
To be fair, that headgear that looks like tablecloth is worn by many Arabs who are not terrorists, so labelling it as terrorist scarf is not correct.
But clearly the commie Pope and Vatican is anti Biblical by portraying Joseph, Mary and Jesus as Arabs by using that tablegear.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Had Jesus been alive today & living in Bethlehem, he’d have been slaughtered by the Palestinians. Regardless of whether they regarded him as a Jew or a Christian. Otoh, had he been living in Nazareth, he’d have been fine, and left alone
The pontiff ought to be ashamed of himself for such a corruption of history, let alone scripture
somehistory says
You are right, Infidel.
And he should be, but he’s way too arrogant to ever get to thinking about whether he’s wrong or right.
Michael Lee howellmike153@gmail.com says
Amen the catholic church is the devil’s church they worship idols.
There blasphemous ways will come upon there heads.
Skeptiker says
Was für ein seniler Trottel.
somehistory says
This creature….talking ‘climate change, migrants, ‘
“”Sporadic acts of philanthropy are not enough,” he said. “Cultural and structural changes are necessary, so that enduring change may come about.””
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/pope-francis-calls-for-new-global-accords-on-debt-military-spending/ar-AA1vJvQp?ocid=BingNewsSerp
Andrew Blackadder says
This wee fat Popey dude is showing that he is in fact the Anti Christ when he supports the savages who are slaughtering his flock in Nigeria and many other countries while he says nothing, nada, nicht though he has no problem washing and kissing their feet.
Im not a Christian but i sure hope those of that faith are right about Jesus coming soon as all things seem to be in place for it to happen and I welcome his arrival with open arms.
Dan says
Pope Francis has been repeatedly prone to heretical level errors. Which is probably why most Catholic writers wanting the Pope as an example of Christ on earth refer back to previous popes.
Given he just loaded the Council of Cardinals with ideologically like-minded supporters he probably will continue to degrade Catholicism for the rest of his ‘tenor’…