Get Muhammad: A Critical Biographyhere, and if you like it, please leave a positive review at Amazon, which has been scrubbing positive reviews.
Comments
InfidelLoversays
I will certainly get it. All books by Rovert Spencer have been meticulously researched and I will certainly want to go through this., I also follow Jay Smiths research on the early start of Islam and how the standard Islamic Narrative does not stand up to known facts known now. It is fascinating to live in a century where the data on Islam is trickling in.
gravenimagesays
Video: Frank Gaffney and Robert Spencer on what we can know about Muhammad, and why it matters
…………………………………..
Just fascinating–and very disturbing–stuff. I can’t wait to read Spencer’s new book.
And of course only in Islam is someone who studies this history threatened with death by devout belevers. Sick.
somehistorysays
Mr. Spencer has had an interesting life. Thanks for sharing all that you have learned so those of us who listen, can take precautions, and make whatever preparations we need.
࿗Infidel࿘says
Given that Frank Gaffney is a geopolitical analyst, I would have liked him to focus more on those aspects of this book. Namely:
➤ The trade routes from Constantinople to Purushpura/Taxila did not go through, nor anywhere near Mecca, and that neither Mecca nor Medina showed any signs of existing during the supposed existence of Muhammad
➤ In which case, these invasions more likely originated in Damascus, rather than Mecca/Medina, and that the original faith of these Syrian invaders was a Monophysite sect of Christianity that denied the divinity of Christ. That was the basis of the Umayyad faith, rather than islam. That also accounts for the Syraic writings of the original qur’anic manuscripts
➤ Also, how the initial “mosques” faced Petra, rather than Mecca, and how the original Kaaba was there as well, until the fall of Petra, when it was moved to Mecca
I look forward to your conversation tomorrow w/ David Wood on the book
Discover more from
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
InfidelLover says
I will certainly get it. All books by Rovert Spencer have been meticulously researched and I will certainly want to go through this., I also follow Jay Smiths research on the early start of Islam and how the standard Islamic Narrative does not stand up to known facts known now. It is fascinating to live in a century where the data on Islam is trickling in.
gravenimage says
Video: Frank Gaffney and Robert Spencer on what we can know about Muhammad, and why it matters
…………………………………..
Just fascinating–and very disturbing–stuff. I can’t wait to read Spencer’s new book.
And of course only in Islam is someone who studies this history threatened with death by devout belevers. Sick.
somehistory says
Mr. Spencer has had an interesting life. Thanks for sharing all that you have learned so those of us who listen, can take precautions, and make whatever preparations we need.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Given that Frank Gaffney is a geopolitical analyst, I would have liked him to focus more on those aspects of this book. Namely:
➤ The trade routes from Constantinople to Purushpura/Taxila did not go through, nor anywhere near Mecca, and that neither Mecca nor Medina showed any signs of existing during the supposed existence of Muhammad
➤ In which case, these invasions more likely originated in Damascus, rather than Mecca/Medina, and that the original faith of these Syrian invaders was a Monophysite sect of Christianity that denied the divinity of Christ. That was the basis of the Umayyad faith, rather than islam. That also accounts for the Syraic writings of the original qur’anic manuscripts
➤ Also, how the initial “mosques” faced Petra, rather than Mecca, and how the original Kaaba was there as well, until the fall of Petra, when it was moved to Mecca
I look forward to your conversation tomorrow w/ David Wood on the book