Muslims have been threatening boulangeries and restaurants in France, even those owned by non-Muslims, to become strictly halal. That means all pork products must be banned. Some outlets have had to ban alcohol, while others have declared that only men should shop in their stores during the week, and women only on weekends. More on this phenomenon of “creeping sharia” can be found here: “Sharia is taking over France,” by Giulio Meotti, Arutz Sheva, August 26, 2024:
In France, sharia is taking over and the bienpensants don’t care.
After months of pressure and the latest altercation in his bakery in Vénissieux (Lyon), Alexandre Dallery announced on Friday that the boulangerie would stop selling pork products.
Le Parisien tells us that one of Dallery’s sales assistants directed two customers towards a bacon quiche. Several minutes later, the two men returned “furiously” and “violently” to the boulangerie after discovering the presence of pork in their meal. To avoid further mistakes, the owner of the bakery therefore decided to continue his business without the ham. In a comment posted on Facebook, Dallery spoke of “several pressures over several months to make it halal.”
No one forced the two Muslim customers to buy the bacon quiche. Could they not have asked the shop clerk “does this quiche contain any pork products”? And even after discovering bacon in their quiche, was it necessary to throw a hysterical fit and threaten the store’s owner? After all, no Muslim is being forced to buy a bacon quiche. To avoid any future mistakes, the owner could simply put up a large warning sign, indicating all of his confections that contain pork. That should have been the end of the story. Instead, the Muslims returned to the store “furiously and “violently,” and threatened the store owner, who quickly decided that to avoid problems from maddened Muslims, he would simply stop using pork products. “They wanted to burn everything, break everything,” Dallery wrote. “To calm things down, we no longer sell ham. Otherwise they’ll burn everything.” Such threats of violence constitute a crime. But Dallery did not call the police. He chooses to be a good dhimmi and yield to Muslim demands, no matter how outrageous.
The announcement from the bakery is chilling, but we are in Lyon, the third largest city in France where Muslims make up 30 percent of the population. Who can blame Dallery, the dhimmi baker?
In Vaulx-en-Velin, also in Lyon, even non-Muslim students confess to Europe 1 that they feel the pressure of Sharia to veil themselves.
Muslims have created an atmosphere of menace, an underhum of violence, that causes even some non-Muslim girls and women, wanting to avoid being attacked by angry Muslim males, to wear the hijab. Why not yield, and wearing a veil, which is not that burdensome, so as to avoid possible trouble? And so, little by little, the rules of Sharia spread ever more widely in France.
And they are succeeding in making France halal, piece by piece.
This bakery is not the first to succumb to Islamist attacks.
Last March, in Paris, an Algerian restaurateur stopped selling alcohol following a raid organized by Muslims who adhere to Koranic prohibitions. In Quimper, a French butcher’s shop closed following several attacks. The restaurant reopened two years later, taken over by a new family, but now offers 100 percent halal meat…”
Muslims in Paris forced a restaurant owner, apparently a non-observant Muslim, to stop selling alcohol by conducting a threatening raid on his establishment. He promptly stopped selling alcohol. Repeated attacks on a butcher’s shop in Quimper that sold pork products finally led the owner to close. Two years later, the place reopened under new ownership; it no longer sells pork products. That’s a win for the local enforcers of Sharia law, and a warning to other butchers and restaurant owners to comply with Muslim dietary prohibitions before they become targets of Muslim attacks.
The boulangerie tells us that we are faced with a clear and unmistakable manifestation of jihad: conquest of the territories of the “unbelievers” by Muslims. By hook or by crook, the country of secularism, of the Enlightenment, of Voltaire and of equality is becoming a little more compatible with sharia every day. Meanwhile, most of the media turns a blind eye, or rather two. This denial of reality is such that it borders on complicity.
In the historic center of Bordeaux, an Afghan in a djellaba stabs two people, killing one and seriously injuring the other. He had reproached them for “boire un coup”, for drinking alcohol, on the day of Eid al-fitr, the holiday that marks the end of Ramadan.
In Bordeaux, the Afghan was enforcing the Muslim prohibition on alcohol by stabbing two people, killing one of them, for the crime of drinking alcohol, and still worse, doing so at the end of Ramadan, on Eid al-Fitr. Were the victims Muslims or non-Muslims? It hardly matters. The rules of Islam were being enforced through murderous violence.
Thirteen-year-old Samara is beaten outside the Arthur Rimbaud middle school in Montpellier. “Samara wears a little makeup – declared the girl’s mother, Hassiba Radjoul – And this little girl who attacked her has her veil. They called her kouffar (unbeliever.) My daughter dresses in European style. There were insults, kahba (bitch).”
The 13-year-old Muslim girl was screamed at and beaten by her Muslim classmates because she wore “a little makeup.” By itself, makeup is not prohibited in Islam, but it becomes haram if it is applied to attract the attention of men and boys. Apparently the girls who beat Samara decided that her “little makeup” had been applied for such a purpose.
Then a principal [at the Montpellier school where Samara was a student] was threatened with death for asking a student to remove her veil in class.
In French public schools, it is forbidden by law to wear any outwardly religious symbols. They violate the principle of laicité. Hijabs, crucifixes, kippahs, Sikh turbans are all banned. The principal was simply enforcing that law by asking a student to remove her veil (hijab). Now he’s been threatened with death by other Muslims. What was he to do — enforce the regulations, or risk death? The author, Giulio Meotti, doesn’t tell us the result. I suspect he chose not to pursue the matter, letting that student attend school wearing her hijab so that he could be assured of staying alive. Not everyone can be a hero.
SC says
Vive la guillotine, vive la France. Terminez la merde.
jerry glenn says
Joe do you say “Bring back crucifixion” in French?
Ade Fegan says
It won’t stop at pork alcohol and the veil
gravenimage says
So true. Ade–this is just Islam getting started….
Jon Sobieski says
Islam is a snake. Why would anyone allow it into their house? By house, I mean home, village, city, region, state or country.
C McG says
Indeed, it never does
angelo barbato says
It will not stop until the whole Western World are Dhimmi:
somehistory says
Some groups and people in France believe Macron may appoint a mozlum as pm.
SC says
The French took out their royal family, some helped route the Nazis Macron is just a poncy asshole who pretends he has a mandate. Once the people decide enough is enough those that actually care will deal with the threats as necessary. Macron is just a modern vichy collaborator. And the ragheads are just the modern Nazi’s. Both of whom are an absoluteanathema to the civilised French
C McG says
“Macron is just a modern Vichy collaborator……..just the Modern Nazi’s”
“Just” implies something of not much import, even if as you say they were just. . .that diminishes the egregiousness of the collaborators and the Nazis.
In any case they are far worse than “just” those things . What we face today is much much worse than anything seen in history it is a Global and ultimate totalitarianism.
I agree it is anathema to the civilised not just the French.
SC says
The Just was not meant to minimise it was meant to identify them as exactly what they are
tedh754 says
I truly believe that to be devout they have to be psychos.
C McG says
Not necessarily they may be merely stupid and ignorant of their own religion and Holy Book. Many Muslims are ill educated and derive their knowledge from Imams as with Christianity in the past where folk were led by the nose by their religious betters. As you say “psychos” are no doubt v attracted to such a misogynistic and totalitarian ideology but other than those there is no alternative but to be described as stupid or ignorant
somehistory says
Read the book by Dr. Jaime Glazov on the subject of “psychopaths; charming and seducing” …I can’t at the moment recall the exact title.
islam is chock-full of psychopaths. And not all of them are *intelligent,* but all do have the special characteristics that cause them to be so obtuse to the Truth.
mgoldberg says
As posted many times previously, if one was an observant Jew, one would never go to purchase an item in a non glatt kosher bakery and be ‘offended’ because there were non kosher products there. Absurd. That is the position that the french and everyone else should take and demand: if you want halal, go to an halal bakery only and don’t ever quibble because you got something non halal at a store that has NON HALAL products. It is absurd that we don’t make this obvious fact the reality and demand that Islam cease and desist their subjugation of others under halal demands. And the point is, why the heck does anyone allow muslims to get away with this??? You don’t want to eat it… fine, go to a place that doesn’t serve it. No observant Jew would ever consider it as a legitimate demand of a non kosher establishment that how dare they serve non kosher products?!?
gravenimage says
Exactly, mgoldberg. My husband and I are vegan, and we often shop at non-vegan-only stores. But we are careful, and if we do buy somthing which is not entirely vegan–it happens occassionally–we don’t blame the store, and certainly would *never* say that they shoud not be allowed to carry the product. Muslims are different…
mgoldberg says
And yet….. we in the west put up with this charade; this forced command to do only as muslims do. And we do not allow any other goups such carte blanche. We have enabled them to be the gangster fueled, mob ruled thuggees that put everyone to their bidding. And it is so irrational. It is a violation of the right to property, to independence; If governments would simply sue the heck out of these muslim subjugators it would all come to quick closure.
mgoldberg says
Next week, I’m going to listen to a Jewish law fare expert on all this matter of suing Jihadists for their violence. If I get the chance, I hope I’ll be able to get some legal sense of why this is not happening; this suing the sharia proponents who invade the private businesses demanding they become sharia compliant.
Daniel Bielak says
+1
C MCG says
It’s not genuine offence being taken it is a tactic in war soft war. It is an opportunity to assert dominance (always by violence and threats it seems) and and install Shari’ah slowly but surely.
Daniel Bielak says
About 80 years ago, the Nazi Germans and their many Western collaborators murdered almost all of the Jewish people in Europe. Most of my grandfather’s family were murdered by the Nazis. Very many Christian Europeans, for centuries, libeled, vilified, oppressed, persecuted, and mass-murdered, the mostly tolerant and peaceful Jews in their midst. Now very many Europeans kowtow to the intolerant aggressive Muslims in their midst and libel and vilify the liberal democratic sole Jewish country in the world and support its genocidal Muslim attackers. And now many Christians in America hold the same hateful bigotry toward the Jewish people that their European ancestors did. It is time for Westerners to realize that defense of the Jewish people and Israel is Western self-defense against external and internal enemies of Western democracy. Thank you to everyone who supports the Jewish people, Israel, and Western democracy.
Relevant Articles by Dr. Francisco Gil-White:
SEMITISM vs. ANTISEMITISM (Part 1). The Structure of our History
franciscogilwhite.substack.com/p/semitism-vs-antisemitism-structure-of-history
Semitism Ascendant: The story of ancient Mesopotamia [SEMITISM vs. ANTISEMITISM Part 2]
franciscogilwhite.substack.com/p/semitism-vs-antisemitism-ancient-mesopotamia
The Church (and Western) paradox [SEMITISM vs. ANTISEMITISM Part 3]
franciscogilwhite.substack.com/p/semitism-vs-antisemitism-catholic-church-paradox
How did the Church become both Jewish and Greco-Roman? Paul did that. [SEMITISM vs. ANTISEMITISM Part 4]
franciscogilwhite.substack.com/p/semitism-vs-antisemitism-church-roman-jewish
St Croix says
Francisco Gil White deserves to be more widely read! He lays it all out very cogently. Anyone who disagrees with him should have to deal with the facts he presents, vs. attacking the messenger. People like Francisco are a “test” in themselves to see who is really what.
Take an interview with him by Sean Hannity after FGW had been fired from Penn State for being honest and thorough and changing his mind on the PLO/Fatah vs. Israel “ethnic conflict”–after he had examined the evidence and turned up more through research.
Hannity tore into him on some side issue, that he didn’t do what he was hired to do, so Penn State bosses were justified in terminating him. Hannity was RUDE, he was obnoxious. He asked questions of FGW, but would not allow him to answer said questions. It was very clear that Hannity had gone into that interview with an agenda; to squash FGW and paint him as a mischief-making wannabe and whiner who didn’t want to do the job he was hired to do or follow the directions. (And to ignore the issue of WHY he was really let go, those important details of content and context).
Didn’t do his job? As if being a PhD and presenting your research is the same as working in a canning factory and knowing when to turn on the boiler? I would be perplexed except I see that many of those who seem to be looking for truth while being tough on foolishness (Hannity’s brand) are in fact pushing an agenda of lies. There is an undeclared, unseen agenda. All the while, telling enough truth to appeal to a certain demographic.
FGW’s work was not dismissed or disparaged by those at Penn State for lack of quality or procedural mistakes. Rather, it was too good. It was “flawless” and that was a real problem–because they were funded as a university to promote a side in that conflict. It was “their brand”. Truth be damned!
Israel/Jews are a lightning rod and a litmus test of the hearts of people, individuals and tribes, institutions and governments, leaders, artists; everyone! We all will come down on one side or the other eventually, maybe to save our lives, maybe to lose our lives, maybe to protect Jewish lives.
In the scriptures the Lord says “Look, I have made Jerusalem a cup of staggering for all nations.” We can all see that picture forming, as it has down through many ages.
FGW’s unique contribution is showing how the sides line up alongside or arrayed against “semitism” as a distinctive way of life and governance, and has done so since civilizations began, even before there was a Jewish state, or Israel even existed as a group of people/nation. Tyrants hate semitism. They must. It threatens their hold on control: resources, institutions, people, belief systems and land.
Daniel Bielak says
+1
Daniel Bielak says
Thank you, St Croix.
Walter Sieruk says
Those cunning and devious stealth jihadists in their crafty and guileful Islamic zeal to establish Sharia in France by many insidious methods in their sly infiltration in to French schools and media and even into the government of France.
For those Muslims who are cultural social , political activists will ,inch by inch , food by foot mile by mile strive in the nation of France for the advancement of Islam and its Sharia in that nation and other Western governments.
The French people need to stop this , Those stealth jihad Muslims are very viciously agressive and the
French people need to stop this Islamic subversion of their country.
gravenimage says
Creeping Sharia In France
…………………………..
All patriotic French people should be resisting this barbarism.
Walter Sieruk says
To gravenimage, about your short but clear statement, the answer is that ‘yes you are right and indeed, the people of France should and need to , as you wisely keyboarded “be resisting this barbarism.” That is Islamic barbarism.
Walter Sieruk says
By the cunning sly and insidious stealth jihad or by the violent bloodily and deadly jihad those Muslims activists in France are dedicated to enacting Sharia in France as well as other Western nations.
They should not be appeased in any way. For they attempt ‘By hook or by crook,” will strive to achieve their Islamic goals and not let up For “give them an inch and they take a mile” is a fitting way to describe them.
To this in another way, their is an old Arab fable about a man who owned a large tent and one cold winter night a camel said that tent owner “It’s so very freezing outside” and then asked “May I please stick in nose in the tent to keep in warm at night. It doesn’t take much room ,at all. ” The man kindly allowed the camel to do so. They next night the camel asked”May I please stick my head in the he to keep it warn because it’s so very cold at night.the tent owner to let the camel to so. The third night the camel asked “please let me put my shoulders into the tent to also keep them warm in this bitter cold night .”
In time that cunning camel was in the entire tent and the kind but foolish man was out in the cold.
The French people need to aware and on guard regarding Muslim demand, in the nation of France.
Mike says
In Afghanistan and sometimes Pakistan, they put makeup and girls’ clothing on young Bacha Bazi boys, have them dance, and then anally rape them.
Unbeliever1 says
Speaking of Sharia. I don’t know if the fact that Ontario KFC outlets have been serving only halal chicken has been reported here..
Canadians react to KFC Canada serving only halal meat while excluding pork options
https://nowtoronto.com/news/canadians-react-to-kfc-canada-serving-only-halal-meat-while-excluding-pork-options/
tgusa says
Pay no attention to the islamists who wish to enforce their culture on everyone. We all know that the gravest threat is white supremacists who might show up at the store on women only weekends and purchase pork chops beer and all sorts of terrible horrible things. Some of them might even bring their dog. Those guys aren’t going to sexually assault the women they meet. That is really a ghastly situation and a real threat to freedom and independence of not only women but everyone. As I said, pay no attention to the islamists on the street, in your bedroom, at your work, in the stores, and so on, etc etc.
Tony Rice says
Every day somewhere in France, a Church is set on fire. We haven’t even now been told who set Notre Dame ablaze
FYI says
This is a difficult one for muslims to answer regarding their belief that
“islam will dominate the world”
Sunni or Shi’ite?
Which branch of islam will win?
Sunnis and Shites hate each other.:will that mean a Sunni-Shi’te war?
Oh and the communists want to rule the world too.That might explain the RED-GREEN AXIS
Do muslims ever consider the Hindus…the Buddhists etc live on this planet?No.
Then of course for others,there is the Parousia…..
SC says
One of them will win once they have entirely eliminated the other.
OLD GUY says
The answer is to destroy islam before it destroys you.
SC says
Agreed.
jerry glenn says
France surges in the international Islamopandering derby.
Daniel Bielak says
+1
John Pepple says
All of this was predictable. And when our elites finally get around to acknowledging that we’re headed toward Islamic law, they will whine, “But who could have predicted this?” Many of us, actually. The elites simply didn’t want to listen
Nabil Bissada says
Muslims are a coward.
In time you are giving them human rights, democracy and freedom they will never stop for trying to make a coup against the constitution, Christian religion and culture.
The problem is the European leaders, they are very weak and ready to sell their countries.
Deal with the Muslims by the same way their Muslims countries are dealing with them. No democracy, No human rights and No freedom. They will obey, respecting, the constitution and the flag.
In Egypt any migrants legal or illegal for any mistake they will deporting him immediately from the street to the airport. No way to take him to his apartment for pickup clothes or money.
Start to deport who do not respect the constitution and threat the citizens.
If you want to keep your country safe and secure, who are asking for the sharia law send him to Afghanistan or any Muslim country immediately.
Forge the court and the judge when you deal with the Muslims terrorists, it’s a matter of life secure.
When you deal with Muslims you must be a dictator, it’s the only way they know for respect and to follow the rules.
Not all Muslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims
Goofy says
The solution is quite simple;
Don’t sell food of any kind to any Muslim, neither for private consumption nor for resale.
Mary Markstrom says
The answer is to ban halal.