There is just no way in which this is true. The Israelis have offered an olive branch to the “Palestinians” numerous times, only to be subjected to unprovoked attack after unprovoked attack. Rajoub has to say this, however, not just because of its propaganda value to fool the ignorant and unwary, but because in the absence of a caliph, all jihad must be defensive. Offensive jihad can be called only by the caliph alone.
“Hamas’ atrocities on October 7 ‘were part of a war of defense’ says top Fatah official Rajoub,” Palestinian Media Watch, August 1, 2024:
Fatah Central Committee Secretary Jibril Rajoub: “What happened on Oct. 7, [2023] is part of a war of defense and it cannot be removed from the context of the conflict, aggression, terror, and massacres that have been committed against our people since 1948 until last October…”
somehistory says
This is another big lie…which the evil people will swallow as if it is some kind of rich, and as they like to say “decadent,” dessert. (Decayed food is not so wonderful)
Not a surprise as the whole of islam is one huge lie, thought up by the ‘”father of the lie,” satan the devil.
Paul wrote about those who are “misleading and being misled.” This liar is one of those. The scum bought the lies he was fed early on and now spreads them like jam on bread.
RegT says
+1
Troybeam says
What defense, Fatah…Hamas attacked Israel and then blame Israel, they must believe the saying “If you repeat a lie enough times people will believe it”
Stand with Israel, always.
Nabil Bisssada says
“Fatah top dog: ‘What happened on Oct. 7 is part of a war of defense’”
Is that only what Fatah and Hamas can do it as a part of a war defense.
To make a war against civilians, infant babies, women, men.
Shame on you Fatah and Hamas especial you killed the civilian’s hostage and pushing them to convert to your Islam devilish religion.
Not all Muslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims
࿗Infidel࿘ says
True, but it is impossible to distinguish in advance muslims who aren’t terrorists from those who are. Also, given the islamic underpinnings of all jihad themed terrorism, it’s actually not a bad assumption to first blacklist all muslims, and then whitelist some who prove their bona fides – maybe by apostatizing or other virtuous deeds
RegT says
Actually, I believe it is easy to determine which muslims are terrorists: all those who are orthodox, and follow the qur’an explicitly, as they have been told is required. muslims who do not follow the commands of the qur’an are considered apostates, and are deemed even worse than infidels, “for they knew Allah and turned away”.
isis, al qaeda, and the taliban are all orthodox muslims – NOT “radical”. They cling to the teachings of the qur’an, the hadiths, as all true terrorists do. Raping women and children, beheading babies, taking “war brides” (sex slaves), and killing non-believers – behaving as Hamas, so-called “palestinians”, and even members of the U.N. agencies who took part in the October 7 atrocities behaved. Vile, mentally diseased, less-than-human creatures.
James Lincoln says
Infidel,
The problem is that when a given muslim is screened initially, they may not be particularly devout.
But that can all change in a New York minute. That formerly “peaceful” muslim starts memorizing the Koran, prays five times a day, and spends lots of time at the local mosque, then all of a sudden:
Jihad…
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Well, “defense” in islam doesn’t mean what it conventionally means. If one is following a non-islamic faith in an islamic neighborhood, one is being “oppressive” and muslims are then acting in defense of islam by attacking them. That’s precisely what happened at that music festival
Keith O says
What I find to be more than a little distressing about this is the simple fact that there are people in non mudslime infested countries that will believe this completely and then become the latest round of useful idiots.
Cynthia says
Defense of Islam means conquest and committing unspeakable atrocities while praising allah. Definitely not the defense that the West recognizes. Yet, we have taken these monsters into our societies, so that they can claim our lands and destroy our people.
abu taleb says
Muslims claim that it was a defensive act that Muhammad and his army went to attack the Byzantium empire at Tabuk because of rumour that Byzantium was preparing to attack. They found no Byzantium army there, so he returned empty handed, but his men later returned with spoil of war from robbing local people. This is the kind of defensive attack that Islam glorifies namely returning with wealth and women from roberies.
Rick Olsha says
No matter what is next, AM ISRAEL CHAI FOREVER !!!!!!!
James Lincoln says
Devout muslims consider offense as defense.
bagsgroove says
What’s better than a live Fatah ? A dead fatah !
Tony Rice says
What I can never understand is that the UN does not pipe up and remind the world that 5 yes FIVE Arab countries INVADED the newly re-created State of Israel to destroy it. The world needs to be reminded of that FACT time and time again re the longstanding Arab intent on destroying Israel from re-BIRTH. The world needs to be constantly reminded of that, and that Arab nations are no saints.