And therefore should not exist.
The DNC 2016 party platform began by claiming that “Democrats meet in Philadelphia with the same basic belief that animated the Continental Congress when they gathered here 240 years ago.” Four years later, out went the Continental Congress and all of America.
The 2020 DNC platform began with a politically fashionable ‘land acknowledgement’ asserting that America was an illegitimate entity operating on stolen land “built on Indigenous homelands.”
The 2024 platform likewise begins with a ‘land acknowledgement’ claiming that Chicago properly belongs to 13 different Indian tribes. Once again, the DNC asserts that they “recognize that our country was built on Indigenous homelands.” That is to say America should not exist.
If the Democrats truly believe it, why not turn over Chicago to the Indian tribes?
Land acknowledgements were initiated by an Australian Marxist terrorist supporter at a counterculture festival in the 1970s. Its goal was to establish that Australians were foreigners and had to follow aboriginal laws and culture. 50 years later the practice, grounded in ‘decolonization’ has been widely adopted by American leftists and their ruling party.
Land acknowledgements are a form of historical revisionism, like the 1619 Project and destroying Columbus statues, that are paving the way for delegitimizing America.
The DNC transplanting them to Chicago demonstrates a whole new level of historical and scientific illiteracy. The Indians are not “native to this continent” unless the party’s new scientific consensus, which already believes that men can become women, also believes in separate human origins for different races (a racist 19th century belief once held by Democrats.)
Nor have they been here “since time immemorial”, but were Asian populations who crossed the Bering Strait in early human history. (The theory is unpopular with many Indian tribes.)
The DNC platform claims that Chicago was really the property of the Ojibwe, Odawa, and Potawatomi, along with the Myaamia, Ho-Chunk, Menominee, Sac and Fox, Peoria, Kaskaskia, Wea, Kickapoo, and Mascouten Indians. But what actually happened to those tribes?
The Ojibwe, Odawa, Potawatomi, Fox, Kickapoo and many of the others on the list allied with the British in the War of 1812. During the war, they carried out brutal atrocities such as the Potawatomi massacre of women and children during the evacuation from Fort Dearborn. (The massacre has become politically incorrect and monuments to the victims have been removed.)
The DNC land acknowledgement boasts that it made the Prairie Band of Potawatomi the “first federally recognized Tribal Nation in Illinois in 175 years.”
The Democrat platform claims that Chicago was the “traditional homelands of the Anishinaabe, also known as the Council of the Three Fires: the Ojibwe, Odawa, and Potawatomi Nations.”
That would have been news to them.
The Ojibwe, Odawa, and Potawatomi moved around quite a bit. They were forced westward by Iroquois expansionism. Some of the tribes to whom the DNC wants to assign Chicago were actually living in what is today Canada. There was no eternal Indian homeland in Chicago (named after a foul smelling plant) just a place different tribes passed through in between wars with each other and through alliances and wars with different Europeans. Like the War of 1812.
The United States and Great Britain ended the war with the Treaty of Ghent. Article Nine of the treaty mandated that the United States also conclude all hostilities with Indian tribes and “restore to such Tribes or Nations respectively all the possessions, rights, and privileges” so long as they “agree to desist from all hostilities against the United States of America.”
Some tribes chose to end hostilities, others moved with the British to Canada, and still others continued to engage in attacks. The tribes and smaller groups made and broke alliances with the British, the French and the Americans based on their perceived interests. They were not a fundamentally different “native people” with nobler, peaceful and more spiritual values. That is white liberal noble savage nonsense. They were colonists, warriors and hunters, like the Europeans, but without the same level of civilizational development or technology.
The DNC’s land acknowledgment fails to address any of this thorny history or answer the question of whether the Democrats, whose original party foolishly started the War of 1812 while being unprepared to fight it, would have been better off losing the war and the country.
Would Kamala prefer a world in which the British not only burned the White House but retained possession of it because that is what her party’s idiotic ‘land acknowledgment’ amounts to.
Instead the DNC reduces the Indians to magical “indigenous” people who “have been here since time immemorial” and “protected our lands, waters, and animals.”
The Indian tribes did not protect land and animals, they used them as hunting grounds.
Whatever human population existed in the Americas (which likely little resembled the modern conception of Indian tribes) probably led to the extinction of the megafauna, such as the mammoth and the saber-toothed tiger. They in turn were probably exterminated by the Indians, much as the more indigenous Hawaiians were enslaved and killed by the Polynesian colonists.
The Indians had more trouble hunting herd animals to extinction than they did apex predators, but that was because they lacked the technology to wipe out entire species. And those who did, like the Mayans and the Mound Builders (who built pyramids in Illinois and had more right to a DNC land acknowledgement) lacked the technology to survive overhunting a food species.
The myth of Indians valuing and preserving wildlife only to have Americans swoop in and destroy species like the bison or the passenger pigeon is more white liberal noble savage nonsense. While some tribes sensibly took steps to limit the impact of their hunting, others gleefully killed as many animals as they could. Indian creation myths left them with little grasp of the possibility of species extinction and refused to accept it when it was explained to them.
Perhaps the DNC could tell us how hunting bison by driving them off cliffs in huge numbers entailed protecting animals. Or killing entire herds of bison just for their tongues.
Given horses, rifles and a market demand for bison, beaver and other animals, the Indian tribes engaged in large scale killing of animals whose existence they took for granted.
The death of the bison and the passenger pigeon were more due to the Indians than Americans.
But the DNC is not interested in turning over Chicago to the Indians. No more than it is interested in real history and real Indians. Much as black people are to the 1619 Project, the Indians are to land acknowledgements as only a means to delegitimize America.
The DNC’s continuing use of land acknowledgements is more than an accident.
While the 2016 Democrat platform at least tipped the hat to the Founding Fathers, the 2024 platform makes a point of rejecting their work and the entire notion of America.
In a paragraph proposing slavery reparations and a study of “the continuing impacts of slavery” (which ended over 150 years ago), the DNC 2024 platform sarcastically jabs at the Declaration of Independence by endorsing ‘equity’ and contends that “we have a long way to go to realize the full promise of America, but we are committed as a party to continuing the work to build a nation where all people are not only created equal, but treated equally throughout their lives.” There is understandably no mention of the “inalienable rights” that come next since the purpose of equity is to eliminate individual rights and make the state absolute in all things.
The only mentions of the “constitution” in the DNC 2024 platform involve either attacking former President Trump or falsely claiming that there is some constitutional right to killing infants in the womb. Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson, once seen as the founders of the party, are absent, the only Jackson in the document is Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson.
Democrats claim that they want to “ensure the promise of America for everyone, including black, Latino, and Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI) Americans”, but what is that promise and where was it made? The DNC platform does not know or care.
America, in the DNC view, is an unfulfilled “promise” of equality that their party intends to fulfill through equity. What it is not is exceptional. Its history is of no interest. It is a bunch of racists living on stolen Indian land. And the mission of the Democrats is to put an end to America through a totalitarian state for which the DNC platform is only a partial blueprint.
mike says
All land around the world has been stolen at one time or another
Keys says
“And the mission of the Democrats is to put an end to America through a totalitarian state for which the DNC platform is only a partial blueprint.”
Absolutely agree. There are too many, even in the Democrat party, who do not see this happening. This is why Obama wanted to “fundamentally transform” America. This is what Obama meant by “hope and change”. This is what “build back better” means. This is why the Dems transformed Trump’s courageous, heartfelt “fight, fight, fight” into the manufactured slogan-chant “we fight, we win”.
All these tactics are communist in origin including the “community organizing” tactics of Saul Alinsky.
Rebecca Quick says
Totally spot on. I don’t think many Democrats realize that the Democrat party is working towards a One World Government, where there are the Nobles, and the peasants. Again. Of course, lying is a huge part of not letting the populace figure out what’s happening with the party. Getting people to believe the lies is another Communist play.
It occurred to me that what Obama meant by “Fundamentally Transforming the country” was a push into totalitarianism, or Communism like in China or North Korea. People are taught what Communism is “supposed to be” until they give up their rights and find out something totally different and very evil is what was meant.
Emilie Green says
Stolen land?
Com’n, those necklaces were worth something,
https://ponderingprinciples.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Manhattan-Indians.jpg
Wellington says
All part of the reason why the Democratic Party needs to be renamed, to wit, the Anti-American Party.
There. Fixed it.
maria says
Yes, there is no “democratic party” only the Anti-American Party supported mostly of muslims
40 rounds says
Yes some land was gained by dubious methods but much of the land was either purchased legitimately purchased, or won in battle. Fair? Not always but many tribes stole land from others, didn’t think anything of it and considered it normal operating procedure. I don’t feel guilty about it
OLD GUY says
Most land on earth has been taken by someone else. According to the Bible Adam and Eve where the first settlers on earth. Who actually knows who was on American soil first. These wealthy politicians need to show the way and give up their property to the Indigenous people of around the country. They could live on their yachts offshore.
Rebecca Quick says
Again, spot on. And yes, move the Democrat Politicians WAY offshore, please!
Anat Hochberg says
If so, all the Black Americans should go back to Africa, Americans of Irish descent to Ireland, Americans of Italian descent to Italy, etc. etc. etc….. Leave all the US territory to the Native Americans.
somehistory says
That would be a problem unsolvable for people like me…part Native American, part Irish, part German, part French, part Scot. There are probably very few who could say that they are just one “part.”
Reziac says
What? The One Drop Rule only applies to Kamala?? /sarc
Mike says
But there would be overlapping land disputes amongst many of the Amerindian tribes themselves.
40 rounds says
The whole thing is a silly notion. So then should be all return to the alleged cradle of civilization Africa?
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Maybe Siberia, where these people came from when Alaska and Chukotka were fused as a land mass, and there was no Bering separation?
40 rounds says
The whole thing is a silly notion. So then should we all return to the alleged cradle of civilization Africa?
Rick Gordon says
Their starting point is incredible. In spite of the loud cheering in Chicago, the Democrat Party has ‘successfully’ moved further left …. and is truly bent on destroying our country – that so many generations have worked to make better over time … and inclusive over time.
I don’t want my grandchildren’s lives dictated by gov’t bureaucrats in Washington!
STJOHNOFGRAFTON says
Stupid Democrats. They can remedy the land theft by returning all their own land to Native Americans. Handing over the Obama mansion and vast estates at Martha’s Vineyard will be a good demonstration of Democrat resolve.
tgusa says
Stolen land. Yeah sure hamasocrats.
https://sl.bing.net/g3RQguG33hQ
We bought it or fought for it. There is land in all democrat cites that has been stolen from Americans who fought for it or bought it. Not fought for, not paid for, stolen. The Indians were unfortunate losers. After who knows how many centuries of warring and conquering each other they encountered a people who were better at doing what they had been doing to each other for so very long.
Democrats have been sponsoring a foreign invasion of America for a long time now. Stolen land. At least we Americans paid for it or fought for it. Democrats are takers not makers and with their low T males and their Cat ladies they could never win a war in the dangerous world we live in. That is one reason I support the vasectomy mobile democrats have parked outside of their convention.The fewer the better.
tgusa says
Here is a question. If all traditional Americans were to vanish overnight from the USA how long would it be before democrats were conquered and enslaved by foreign adversaries? Not long would be my guess.
FYI says
They do put on a good show the Elites.”fool the sheeple” productions.
No mention of any serious issues..
I choose to laugh at what i want to laugh at but sometimes you have to consider it might be a bit inappropriate.
Kamala Harri doesn’t seem to get that..
What about mass ilegal immigration,increasing homelesness and poverty.,impending WW3…?
What does kacklimg Kamala think about any of that?
“ha ha ha ha..”
brenrod says
The past is gone and to the Victors went the spoils. I wasn’t here then so I got nothing. Those folks are no more important or better than me. I have my own narratives of hardships worse than theirs but no one cares. I am tired of hearing about all these whining groups. I think we should bring back banishing as a punishment so we can get folks out who can’t get along with us.
Emmanuel says
“Everything that exists deserves to perish.” — Karl Marx
Rebecca Quick says
The only thing missing here is the “thumbs up or down” so that comments can be marked with agreements or not. Some pretty amusing comments have been made here. I agree with all of them. Save perhaps one who doesn’t agree) It takes people who can think to make a good argument with these points. Too many people on psych drugs to be able to think anymore. Not to mention mixing up all the drug-induced people by saying there are 74 gender identities. I breed dogs, and trust me, there are just 2.
Kepha says
They probably ignored that a member of the Kaw/Kansa nation was Veep during Herbert Hoover’s administration. Due to the matrilineal inheritance system of the Kansa, Charles Curtis was a member of the tribe due to his mother; and, he moved onto the Rez to his grandparents when his white father was fighting for the Union in the Civil War. The result was that his first language was Kansa, even though he later was well-educated in English, and made a career as a lawyer before going into Kansas state politics. Then again, Charles Curtis (who was also a mover and shaker for getting non-citizen Indians made citizens in 1923), was a Republican, so his breaking a glass ceiling doesn’t count.