New in PJ Media:
Now that the Party of Democracy has done away with all that cumbersome “voting” business and anointed Kamala Harris as its presidential candidate, Harris is busy demonstrating that she holds all of her party’s deeply held principles. This reassures the Democrat base, in case anyone was worried, that she is a bona fide far-left ideologue of the kind they favor these days and can be trusted to implement the party program.
And so Harris has been paying obeisance to all the left’s gods. This has meant a call for a ceasefire in Gaza that would allow Hamas to survive and murder more Israeli civilians in the future, as it has vowed to do. Harris also made an appearance on “RuPaul’s Drag Race All Stars,” as if to emphasize that she fully intends as president to perpetuate the left’s wholehearted embrace of sexual perversion, gender delusion, and overall insanity. And in a video that surfaced on X Thursday, Harris told an appreciative audience at the Islamic Center of Southern California, “We must have the courage to object when they use that term, ‘radical Islamic terrorism.’”
Courage? That’s like saying that we must have the courage to be a total conformist lemming who says exactly what everyone else is saying. If Kamala Harris really wants to demonstrate her courage, she should try bucking the prevailing winds and stating the readily demonstrable fact that core texts of the religion of Islam teach that Muslims should wage war against and subjugate unbelievers. She will, of course, never do such a thing, primarily because she isn’t aware of that fact, but also because she likely knows that if she said such a thing, she fairly quickly would be the former Democrat candidate for president.
Hillary Clinton summed up the predominant view, at least among leftist politicians, when she declared in Nov. 2015, “Let’s be clear: Islam is not our adversary. Muslims are peaceful and tolerant people and have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism.” Virtually every politician on the left and many on the right have said much the same thing, although usually, they didn’t go as all-out as Hillary did on the sweeping generalizations. In 2011, working from the same set of assumptions, the Obama administration removed all mention of Islam and Muslims from its entire counterterrorism program. The program has not been reformed since then; the same willful ignorance prevails to this day.
There is more. Read the rest here.
Sick Of It says
Any politician who floods their country with Muslims and allows Mosques to be built en masse is by far the lowest traitor there could ever be,period!!
bill says
It is shocking that she is even being considered as a real candidate. If the voters are so foolish as to elect her the USA is doomed
࿗Infidel࿘ says
By normal Dems, she’s not. If you recall, she got 3% in the primaries in 2019, that’s how mediocre she was. In fact, even Andrew Yang, who was an afterthought among the candidates, was polling higher than her. She showed her money management skills then when she blew her entire campaign budget in Iowa, still got nowhere in the polls and pulled out before the Caucus was even held
Only reasons she’s where she is today: Biden put her there as someone who was even less popular than him, and therefore less likely to replace him. Which would have worked had it not been for Biden’s debate performance. Then there was the cratering of the Dems in the polls, and I think some of them may have written off this election. I therefore think that many of the governors who are being considered as her running mate would not be interested in the role this year, since they wanna keep their reputation intact for 2028
gravenimage says
Good points, Infidel.
Even here in the San Francisco bay area Harris is hardly universally loved.
With all of his issues, political and cognitive, I think that many more Democrats would have voted for Biden.
James Lincoln says
Kamala Harris would be Sleepy Joe – on steroids.
Four years of Harris, and the United States of America may never recover.
gravenimage says
Agreed, James. As bad as Biden has been, Harris would be much, much worse.
BPK says
I have questions about her Israel policy – that it is nonense that the US will never recover. A Harris administration along with the House and Senate threatens you whiners’ tax breaks, that’s why you are making all of this stuff up.
Dave says
‘Radicals’?
They are ‘not’ radical.
They are just being very orthodox in how they follow Islam.
“The Quran contains at least 109 verses that speak of war with nonbelievers, usually on the basis of their status as non-Muslims. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called ‘hypocrites’ and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter.”—‘TROP’
BPK says
That seems to be true from what I have read about Islam, and heard from its critics and apostates. The current population of Gaza still has majority support for Hamas and Oct. 7th.
The lives saved by Israel’s war on Gaza will mostly be Palestinian lives free from the ever-present death and terrorism from Hamas and their extremist religion. The price of that in current lives is difficult to compute, but the future has infinite human beings who can grow and develop as members of the community of democracies if they play their cards right and just adhere to civilization and human rights for their people and others.
As it currently exists extremist political militant Islan is a threat to everyone, even Muslims.
ed says
It would more contagious to call out islam for what it is
gravenimage says
Concise and to the point, Ed.
Open eyes says
Terrorism is not radical under Islam. In fact mainstream islam encourages its adherents to be terrorists. This has been the case for over 1400 years.
SC says
Yep 1400 years and they still haven’t manageg to achieve a single civilized brain cell between them.
SC says
Ok lets just call them soul less murdering ragheads then.
Walter Sieruk says
In a sense it does take “”courage to object ” to the term ” Radical Islamic terrorism” but only if is replaced by a better and more specific term which Is “Quran based Muslim jihad terrorism.”
For those terms “radical Islamic terrorism ” as well as “Islamic extremism” are not really not fitting terms. the reason why this is so is because what In the Islamic mindset in the Muslim Middle East as well as in Indonesia and other Muslim controlled countries what the non-Muslims of the Western nations view as “radical and “extremist” the Muslims of those places in the world see as “Normal” and even Devout and committed to the Cause of Islam.”
In addition, those “Moderate Muslims” are those of the Islamic worldview and non-devout and non –committed Muslims. The violent jihadists even see them as “hypocrites.” Therefore, this explains the jihadist chant of those jihad-minded Muslims in different Islamic terror organizations. When they chant aloud “Death to infidels and hypocrites.” Meaning Death to people who and not Muslims and people who are non- jihadist Muslims.
Concerning the last part of this above essay, the violent spirit of that vicious jihadist chant “Death to infidels and hypocrites.” The later word of the chant “hypocrites” in the jihad –minded Muslim worldview is further explain in the book titled JIHADIST PSYCHOPATH by Jamie Glazov , for on page 42 the reader is informed that “Islam mandates that devout and real Muslims must punish , and in some circumstances kill, those Muslims whom they regard as neither legitimate nor properly devout.”
Walter Sieruk says
Actually , does take “courage to object ” to the term “Radical Islamic Terrorism” if it means using a much more appropriate and fitting term instead ,which would be” Quran based Muslim jihad terrorism.”
About the words “Radical Islamic Terrorism.”
Many scholars on Islam ,such as Brigitte Gabriel and Robert Spencer, had explain that the terms “Radical Islamic terrorism ” and even the term “Moderate Islam” Western terms and are unknown to the Islamic world. As one of their leader said “Islam is Islam”
Furthermore, a Muslim in an Islamic country would view that a Westerner would call a “Radical Muslim” in a Muslim nation he would be seen as a “devote Muslim” who is totally committed to the cause of Islam by the way of the violent jihad,
By contrast what a Westerner would call a “moderate Muslim’ many Muslims in Asia as well as the Middle East call a Muslim who is not really living up to his faith in Islam by not taking up arms in the violence and killing of the jihad for Islam.
Therefore many of Muslim, overseas , would call him a “hypocrite” This is way many devote Muslim who are violent jihadists gather together in a group and chant “Death to infidels and hypocrites ” Meaning “Death to non-Muslims and non-violent, jihadist Muslims.
jewdog says
Ever read “Being There” by Jerzy Kosinski? Kamala is like Chance Gardener, the protagonist who becomes president, but is actually just a simple-minded gardener who speaks in vacuous, circumloquacious platitudes. She’s like a Jackson Pollock painting in being the recipient of admiration for something that eludes description or obvious value. It’s the King’s Clothes effect.
She will probably beat Trump.
James Lincoln says
Excellent analogy, jewdog.
gravenimage says
Chance the gardener was an innocent character who never wanted to be president. Not so much the case here…
tgusa says
Sahih al-Bukhari 2658—The Prophet said: “Isn’t the witness of a woman equal to half of that of a man?” The women said: “Yes.” He said: “This is because of the deficiency of her mind.”
When it comes to Kamala and the rest of the western female leftists I cannot disagree with that.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Yeah, imagine a dawagandist making that spiel, and holding Kamala as his example? He can even reinforce that w/ other gems like AOC, Liz Warren, Nicky Haley, and plenty of others
bill says
Apposite and well observed
Gamaliel says
There is a video that starts with Obama saying Muslims throughout the world are peaceful. The video then takes us all over the world where we get to meet the so called “peaceful” Muslims. You can see it on rumble at https://rumble.com/vnj4bb-how-moderate-are-muslims.html . Good luck trying to find the video with google. It’s not politically correct. The video is part of a page about immigration at https://getinsight.pro/schools/immigration.htm
࿗Infidel࿘ says
At his Minnesota rally today, President Trump brought that up, and also denounced the Dems for denying the existence of jihad
gravenimage says
Good for him!
Bret says
Let’s not forget radical leftist terrorism that started with Floyd’s overdose and has culminated with the attempted assassination of Trump.
OLD GUY says
Islam is a killer of all, knows no boundary even within it self. Evil violence, rape and murder pour down from those in charge no different than a Drug Cartel.
R_not says
I actually agree with her, it should be called islam’s violent jihadis who are their ‘most holiest’ jihadis and obeying islam’s ‘god’ and perverted, murdering thug prophet.
Ewanda says
“RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM”
GOOD!! Finally let’s get rid of that artificial and inaccurate term.
The accurate term is “ORTHODOX ISLAM” and the sooner everyone starts using those words the faster people will be educated to know that there is only one Islam and terrorism is orthodox to it.
We must stop giving Islam a pass by confusing Western Civilization to think that there is a peaceful and friendly sugar-coated system that most of its members practice.
Because Islam is a loosely bound global movement, jihadis are actually their military wing just like we have our traditional military wing in our system.