Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Harris: ‘We must have the courage to object when they use that term, radical Islamic terrorism’

By

Fine by me. How about “mainstream, Qur’anically-sanctioned Islamic terrorism”?

Of course, what she means is that there is no Islamic terrorism, and anyone can see how true that is.

Comments

  1. She’s right. We should drop the word ‘radical’. Because it’s all Islamic terrorism.

    • Yeah. While Robert’s term “mainstream, qur’anically sanctioned islamic terrorism is fine, I would just call it islamic terrorism

      If it’s a taqfiri attack like sipah-e-sahaba or Taliban attack on shi’a in Pakistan/Afghanistan, I’d call it sunni terrorism. If it’s a Houthi attack on the Saudis, I’d call it shi’a terrorism. Be denomination specific if it is muslim-on-muslim jihad

      • Yes & No. A terrorist who’s muslim could be doing it out of islam, or s/he could be doing it b’cos s/he is a commie, albeit w/ a muslim identity. muslim terrorist doesn’t by itself imply that islam was the motivation, but islamic terrorist does

        • Yes, I think that “islamic terrorism” more accurately defines it, Infidel.

        • Re: terrorism, specifically “radical Islamic terrorism”—Islam doesn’t do the terrorising.

          Muslims do.

          As I said, make them prove otherwise.

    • Well said. You beat me to it. But the brain dead ex bartender and Willie Brown sycophant is to ignorant about islam (or much else) to know that!

      • I disagree on the meaning….submission is the true meaning of islam.
        mozlums insist that everyone ‘submit’ to the demands of their fake prophet…or else.
        There is no real “peace” in islam.

      • John, Islam means *submission”, not peace, Everyone is supposed to submit to Islam, or else face murderous violence from Muslims.

  2. Her “affiliation” should get her arrested and charged, not elected and given power.

    And agree. Get rid of the adjectives and just say islam, terrorism by mozlum, and be done with the lies, lies and more lies meant to cover up what mozlums do and why they do it.

    • Exactly! To bad a few more of islam’s useful idiots didn’t learn how to do a bit of research before they opened their stupid mouths.

    • Exactly, I hear but there’s some good but who will they stand with in case of war?

      • Good question, Grannya. Few “moderate” Muslims are apt to stand with Infidels against their more devout coreligionists, even if they don’t particularly want to live under Shari’ah themselves.

  3. Rape Murder Stabbings, Bombings.
    How does this demographic improve our quality of life.
    We don’t need this alien culture and alien laws been imposed on the native peoples.
    Politicians need to stand down and the native people can decide who stays and who goes.

    • Translation from the Dutch: “Islam and the Koran are radical in themselves. Islam is 0% moderate.”

      Agreed, Ronald.

    • And yet here are four people who don’t want her to be the first Presidentress of The United States:
      * Obama. She would obliterate his unique, historical status. The strange originality of a “black” (one black parent) president would “fade into the light of common day”. He doesn’t want that ever.

      *Michelle. A woman (a real woman) arrives at a cocktail party in her new, expensive, “exclusive”, eye-catching dress. What’s the worst thing that could happen to her? Worst thing is the woman across the room wearing exactly the same dress. It’s like that. Commie-la has got the dress and even more, all the jewels and all the attention.

      * “Doctor” Biden. Because Kamala said that Joe was a racist White Guy. The real problem was that she said it in a public forum and not at that cocktail party (where “Doctor” Biden wore a dress with Vote Vote Vote stamped all over it… really gauche).

      * Hillary. Well obviously. Nobody can prove that she has a black voodoo doll skewered with knitting needles hidden somewhere. Nobody. But watch the next time Kamala grimaces and rubs the back of her neck. Not laughing. Serious.

  8. She’s correct but she’s clueless why she is correct. A classic example of stumbling into the truth while still remaining a complete fool (and no, I don’t think she really knows what Islam is about, only what she’s been told to believe and say about Islam). With Harris it’s best to assume there’s no there there. She’s about as empty as one can get. Should this dimwit become President, it’s pretty much all over for America.

    • Agreed indeed.
      Which is why this Election cycle becomes daily more nerve-wracking.

    • After hearing a few of her speeches in 2019, I started to wonder how she was ever the DA of San Francisco, let alone AG of California or Senator. I used to live in the Bay Area (not in the City itself, thankfully), and often, in news bulletins, I’d hear about her doing something or the other, and sounding really impressive. It wasn’t until I read about her relationship w/ Willie Brown that I realized her career mobility

      Ben Carson was right about her in 2016 when he noted that she wasn’t “Black”, or at least not African-American. Her dad was Jamaican economist, & descendant of slave owners. Her mom was an Indian breast cancer researcher. Both very impressive, but not your typical African-American working class people. Point being that Kamala & her sister were privileged, in the real sense of the term. She would have been as impressive as Condi Rice had she done something w/ that, as opposed to being a vapid s?t who used Willie Brown as a ladder – both figuratively and literally ? – to climb her way to the top

  9. As other commenters have said, all the hate-fuelled evil is just basic islam straight out of the Koran. Harris, the moron, seems to want to whitewash islam completely. For “courage to object” I would say “braindead delusional stupidity to object”. Seriously, people who still haven’t woken up to hate-filled, murderous islam by now are complete fuckwits and Harris certainly qualifies as that. All the Muslim terrorist attacks, all the muslim rape gangs, and so on, people who want to run a protection racket for evil, barbaric islam are beyond delusional and stupid. Non-muslims should be wide awake to islam and smashing islam not making excuses for it.

    • You’re correct, tg, that Harris is a moron. I ran across a great description of her about a year ago, to wit, she ordinarily sounds like a sixth-grader giving a book report on a book they didn’t read.

      • Good description of her. Yes, Wellington, as was the case with the short video clips of Biden displaying his dementia on Sky News out here in Australia, and also falling over constantly, etc, I have also seen plenty of video clips of Harris talking as if she were talking to a bunch of 5 year olds. Embarrassing stuff. And then that almost insane sounding laugh. Almost sounds brain damaged and that laugh seems to be at inappropriate moments. There is also that strange saying about being “unburdened” by whatever it is (I can’t recall the rest of it), but hear her saying it using the same words over and over and I think, look, why don’t you vary it a bit and use some other word, not always “unburdened”. She seems like a disaster, a clueless disaster.

        • A republican said harris is “uninformed and lazy,” and the republican is being called “racist.”

          It’s racist to tell the Truth about anything….if the people who can’t stand the Truth have ever heard the word.

          harris is also arrogant and evil

        • Yes, somehistory, I imagine that will be the description that people who criticise Harris will cop – they are “racist” (ooh, the horror of it all). She does seem uninformed and the lazy tag surely fits her because, from what i hear out here, she had the task of controlling the southern border of the USA and was too lazy to even go down there. Then again, I guess she was all in favour of the out of control invasion that was taking place down there. Talk about a way to destroy a country in record time – those open borders will do that job very quickly. She seems hopeless to me, but I guess I must just be a nasty racist for daring to find fault with harris. As you say, telling the truth is not allowed.

        • Let me know when you have more evidence, to upgrade your comment in using the word “seem” like a disaster…” when speaking of this “person”. She’ll finish of what’s left of OBiden destruction of this country.

        • No doubt you are right, joanofrc06. Better to say that Harris is definitely a complete disaster. No more evidence is needed to call her that.

  11. Harris is an ignorant fool, has no common sense and knows nothing about running a nation. Buckle down if the democrats states she wins, all hell will break loose.

  12. Harris: ‘We must have the courage to object when they use that term, radical Islamic terrorism’
    ……………………………………

    As others have pointed out, Jihad terror is actually orthodox Islam–nothing “radical” about it. But of course Harris objected to Jihad terror being noted as Islamic at all. Just appalling–but hardly surprising.

    And of course Jihadists often target other Muslims–because they belong to the “wrong” sect, or because they are deemed insufficiently Islamic. Neither of these mean that Jihadists are not acting in the name of Islam.

  13. Kamala Harriss aid that the term “radical Islamic terrorism” should be abolished.” All right. for their is a much better , more clear and more described term that should be used in its place . The more appropriate term the really should be used is “Quran based Muslim terrorism.”

    .”

    For those terms “radical Islamic terrorism ” as well as “Islamic extremism” are not really not fitting terms. the reason why this is so is because what In the Islamic mindset in the Muslim Middle East as well as in Indonesia and other Muslim controlled countries what the non-Muslims of the Western nations view as “radical and “extremist” the Muslims of those places in the world see as “Normal” and even Devout and committed to the Cause of Islam.”

    In addition, those “Moderate Muslims” are those of the Islamic worldview and non-devout and non –committed Muslims. The violent jihadists even see them as “hypocrites.” Therefore, this explains the jihadist chant of those jihad-minded Muslims in different Islamic terror organizations. When they chant aloud “Death to infidels and hypocrites.” Meaning Death to people who and not Muslims and people who are non- jihadist Muslims.

    Concerning the last part of this above essay, the violent spirit of that vicious jihadist chant “Death to infidels and hypocrites.” The later word of the chant “hypocrites” in the jihad –minded Muslim worldview is further explain in the book titled JIHADIST PSYCHOPATH by Jamie Glazov , for on page 42 the reader is informed that “Islam mandates that devout and real Muslims must punish , and in some circumstances kill, those Muslims whom they regard as neither legitimate nor properly devout.”

  14. So Kamala Harris want to abolish term “Radical Islamic Terrorism ” is a good idea the term used instead is “Quran based Muslim terrorism.”

    About the words “Radical Islamic Terrorism.”

    Many scholars on Islam ,such as Brigitte Gabriel and Robert Spencer, had explain that the terms “Radical Islamic terrorism ” and even the term “Moderate Islam” Western terms and are unknown to the Islamic world. As one of their leader said “Islam is Islam”

    Furthermore, a Muslim in an Islamic country would view that a Westerner would call a “Radical Muslim” in a Muslim nation he would be seen as a “devote Muslim” who is totally committed to the cause of Islam by the way of the violent jihad,

    By contrast what a Westerner would call a “moderate Muslim’ many Muslims in Asia as well as the Middle East call a Muslim who is not really living up to his faith in Islam by not taking up arms in the violence and killing of the jihad for Islam.

    Therefore many of Muslim, overseas , would call him a “hypocrite” This is way many devote Muslim who are violent jihadists gather together in a group and chant “Death to infidels and hypocrites ” Meaning “Death to non-Muslims and non-violent, jihadist Muslims.

  15. If I have to listen to that woman’s voice for the next four and a half years I’m gonna pull out what’s left of my hair. She is so pedantic and insulting to everyone with average or above IQ

  16. after the shit show of obama and biden the cupboards are bare on this bs.

  18. I actually agree with her. We shall use instead just Islamic terrorism. They are all the same. Radical.

  20. Yes, Kamala, we must challenge those who use that term. All of them. Because it is gross disinformation and our fellow citizens need to be told the unvarnished truth.

    Allow me to suggest you make note of that to Fox News personalites Sean Hannity and Eric Shawn, Donald Trump, and anyone else you hear regurgitating that nonsense.

  22. I OBJECT TO THE ROUTINE USE OF THE TERM “Radical Islam.” There is no such thing as radical, moderate or reform Islam. Any change in its 1400 years of teaching, practice and slaughter is considered blasphemy or apostasy, punishable by death at the hands of any vigilante without trial or legal proceeding. The people who murder “in the name of Islam” are doing exactly what standard, orthodox, normal Islam has taught and practiced for 1400 years, killing between 250 and 1000 million people in the process. Refuse to take the bait that Islam opens the possibility of halting its drive of conquest and murder. “A snake will always be a snake regardless of how well it is treated.”.

    • IMO, the average person interprets “radical Islam” to be individual Muslims/groups of Muslims (ISIS/Al-Qaeda/HAMAS, etc.) practicing a supposed perversion of The Religion of Peace; a specific definition of which is left undefined.

  23. Westerners are forbidden by Muslims to study Islam except if taught by Muslims. Imagine that. Muslims are forbidden to analytically and historically study Islam themselves. Imagine that. But it still makes sense in both instances: Westerners have all the information on Earth about Islam yet know virtually nothing about it so why teach the brain-dead anything? We raise functionally illiterate Ivy League college students who robotically shout “Intifada! Intifada! as they watch their own flag being burnt by those who swear to BURN them en masse at first opportunity. We have LGBTQ+ who believe Islam considers them “friends” and Israel enemies. All on the Left. Common Core assures that the West will collapse right before our eyes. Have seen all of the above up close and personal. There is sure some sort of ultra-mesmerism at work EXACTLY as in science fiction horror movies (which actually were Christian allegories used through Providence to educate the Western population about the supernatural) and in 2Thessalonians 2nd Chapter and 2Corinthians 4:4. At this point in American History you must have a friendly imams permission to get a Democratic nomination for the Oval Office. Dearborn says yea or nay to it. Why do Biden or Harris GROVEL before Dearborn? Harris is simply doing what is DICTATED to her. LGBTQ+ exalts Hamas and spurns Tel Aviv. Apply logic to that. I say “BOOMERS OF THE WORLD UNITE!” or all of us go buy a fiddle and emulate Emperor Nero.

  24. Heels-up Harris also wants to get rid of the term “illegal alien”, notwithstanding the fact that it is embedded in government documents.

    Harris represents the epitome of the term “useful idiot”.

  25. I prefer the term “reactionary” to “radical.” Our society is dominated by leftists, and one needs to use the right language when talking to them. So, when one refers to radical Muslims, leftists think that those Muslims are their ideological kin, and so they defend them. Once you start using the word “reactionary,” they are forced to think about what they are doing.

    Likewise, if we say that Hamas is the enemy, leftists aren’t going to react the way we want them to. But when one calls them homophobic, that may change things. I would like to think that some of the Queers for Palestine dropped out, or at least that others who might have joined them have refused to do so. Of course, we still have a long way to go in educating them, obviously.

    A few years ago, I heard a liberal friend complain about someone on the “far right.” I asked what she thought of ISIS. I was expecting one of two reactions from her. She might have agreed, saying, “Oh, yes, they are the real far right.” Or she might have insisted that they were leftists, in which case I was going to point out that leftists were against slavery and ISIS was not.

    But what she said completely floored me. She said that she didn’t think that ISIS was on the left-right spectrum at all. Sigh.

    This business of how things get labeled is very important, and we must get it right in order to force leftists to think about what they are doing.

  26. Typical of Harris to placate Muslims for votes. She’s a disaster looking for a place to explode. The White House? The God of Abraham, Ishmael, and Issac is coming to administer divine judgement on Ametica. There will be unimaginable screaming and nashing of teeth when evil is thrown in Hell! You best decide now where you stand!

  27. I usually use the term ‘violent jihad’ since terrorism is one aspect of it. jihad is about war if one reads islamic texts and sharia and its history – the true history not the propaganda that the oil rich islamic countries and the Muslim Brotherhood want to shovel out.

    • Yes, the genereal public has for too long been told that jihad is merely a ‘personal internal struggle’, or similar.

      The ‘violent’ adjective needs greater use.

  28. FUNDAMENTAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM, as commanded by their ‘prophet’ and his little fake ‘god’.

  29. Will someone please tell Donald Trump to stop saying “radical Islamic terrorism”!

  30. Will someone please tell Mark Levin to not say “radical Islamic terrorism”.

Discover more from

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Skip to content