If any country, government, or administration wants fully to understand the Muslim mindset, it must study India. A civilization that has survived countless attacks by Islamic invaders, lost population, heritage, culture, and land to Islamic jihad, and continues to suffer from jihad activity, knows better than any other than how the Islamic psyche works. An Islamic jihadist doesn’t think as an individual, and doesn’t think as part of a society or as a civilian, either. He only thinks of himself as a Muslim, a part of the global Muslim Brotherhood, and every action he takes is taken in the interest of Islam and Muslims. And this focus is significantly expressed through the voting patterns of the Muslim population.
In April of this year, a report highlighted the improved law and order situation in Uttar Pradesh, India. “A few years ago, we couldn’t think of going out in the evening. We were not safe, and our parents would worry about our safety. But things are changing now. We convince them that we will come back safely,” said 26-year-old Anjum Khatoon, a Muslim woman enjoying fast food with her friends at an eatery located across from the BJP’s local unit office (BJP is the ruling political party notorious for its pro-Hindu stance; many Muslims claim it is an anti-Muslim party). It was well past 11PM, and the street was buzzing with Muslim women who are otherwise known to be conservative and prefer to stay indoors. “This is a huge change with women at the center of it. Our leaving the house at night says a lot about the security situation,” added another Muslim woman, the niqab-clad Nazma.
So were the Muslims, impressed by the BJP’s governance, gearing up to vote for that party in the prime ministerial elections?
“The law and order situation has definitely improved, but voting for the BJP would go against our integrity, as they target our religion,” said 50-something-old Mohammad Murshaleen, from Bandukhedi village in Kairana district, UP. What Murshaleen said is not his individual opinion; it is how many Muslims function. They hardly think beyond their religion, and their electoral decisions are just a manifestation of their deeply-rooted loyalty to Islam above all. Their leaders have conditioned the Muslim community to view the BJP as an opponent of their religion; no amount of good the party does for them will alter their contorted vision.
Rampur is a village in Uttar Pradesh with 100% Muslim voters. About 2300 votes were cast from this village, and exactly zero votes were given to the BJP. Five hundred thirty-two families in this village were granted houses through the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (a scheme by the Indian government that gives affordable housing for low and moderate-income residents), and not one member of those 532 families voted for the prime minister who came up with this scheme and improved their living conditions.
In the scheme of Indian polity, the Congress party deserves a special mention for its profound pandering to Muslims. Adhir Ranjan Choudhury, a Hindu leader from the Congress party, had served as the parliamentarian from the Muslim-dominated Bahrampur in West Bengal since 1999. However, this time, Muslim voters tossed Chaudhiury aside after an opposing party fielded a Muslim candidate, Yusuf Pathan. Hailing from Gujarat, Pathan was a debutante in politics and clueless about the culture, history, language, and challenges of the people of Bahrampur. But for the voters, Pathan’s Muslim identity was all that counted. Chaudhary alleges, “Pathan came and started telling minorities to vote for ‘bhai’ and not ‘dada.’ Dada means Hindu and bhai means Muslim,” and this unabashed divisiveness was victorious.
The only time this voting bloc rejects a Muslim is when they find another who surpasses the former in zeal for Islam, and even better, promises them a separate Islamic nation carved out of India. The India-Pakistan partition might be close to 80 years old, but this ideology is still alive and kicking.
And so, ignoring Omar Abdulla, the Muslim majority of Baramulla voted for jailed candidate Sheikh Abdul Rashid. In 2005, Rashid was arrested for supporting Islamic jihadists and subsequently jailed for over three months and 17 days. Though the magistrate dropped all charges against him on humanitarian grounds in August 2019, he was held again under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. He had filed his nomination for contesting the 2024 parliamentary election from jail. His victory is being interpreted as a signal of a growing increase in a softer form of separatism in the Muslim-dominated valley.
These are textbook examples of how many Muslims choose their political representatives with the changing degree of Islamic influence on the region in question, serving as a lesson for Europe and the US.
Crown says
“… serving as a lesson for Europe and the US.”
A lesson has zero value for students, when the students firmly press their fingers in their ears, and say …. “Nah nah nah I can’t hear you!”
Frank Anderson says
What is the surprise? There are MANY (dozens, hundreds, thousands) of excellent books from a broad spectrum of authors, starting with Robert Spencer’s Politically Incorrect Guid3 to Islam and the Crusades. All of the 30 plus that I have read, agree that Muslims never migrate to escape Islam but to force Islam on the conquered land. Between 250 and 1000 million (1 Billion) people have been murdered in the Islamic war of conquest in 1400 years, depending on who is estimating and where they look. I would prefer not being next.
Subhash Garg says
The surprise is that white media call Modi genocidal and Nazi just because he doesn’t bend over for Muslims. Just because he does things for Hinus too.In most white countriues Hindus are at the bottom of the religious totem pole. Muslims are way above them.
CalvinsLutheran says
The subconscious sadomasochistic thinking of the entire modern world is exactly as human beings in dating choices stomp and step over the nice guy/girl then run to grovel at the feet of the bad boy/girl. No deviation from that paradigm ever. The ultra-shrewd intelligence of the demonic mindset of Islam sees the West as puerile naive and stupid as sheep bleating in the wolf’s lair. The flowery verbiage of Western Islam apologists is proof positive of Western complicity in our capitulation. At least that’s how the Jihadists believe. Prosperity cannot believe that there are malevolent individuals who care not about Western values or lives, To the Last minute the Left will apologize for their own demise then will attempt to stigmatize the Right for not coming to their rescue.
Emilie Green says
“So were the Muslims, impressed by the BJP’s governance, gearing up to vote for that party in the prime ministerial elections?”
When, o’ when, are we gonna learn?
No good deed goes unpunished. Especially when Muslims are involved.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
While Ashlyn did well to cover how well off muslims have it in India, and their total lack of gratitude for it, the unreported story here is how a section of Hindus, at least, have recognized the BJP as an anti-Hindu party disguised as a Hindu party, and have voted against it enough to reduce it to a minority on its own, but w/ a majority if supported by its allies. While the BJP had been pandering to muslims, here are a lot of things where they’ve let Hindus down:
➤ Crimes against Hindus by muslims are at a record high. The notorious love jihad cases are just one type, but there are others as well, like muslims encroaching on Hindu or public property, building stray mosques or fake burial sites and so on
➤ Discrimination against Hindus is at a high as well. Ashlyn mentioned government welfare schemes that muslims are taking advantage of. The percentage of such schemes that go to muslims far exceeds their percentage of the population
➤ While the Citizenship Amendment Act was introduced w/ great fanfare 5 years ago, it remained a theoretical law only b’cos the “rules” of the act, which laid down its implementation, was never defined. Until a few weeks ago, when the court was breathing down the neck of the government on an unrelated matter. Hindus who’ve managed to escape to India from Pakistan have been rotting in the heat of the Thar desert, and their lot has been so miserable that some even returned to Pakistan. In the meantime, illegal Bangladeshi & Rohingya refugees have been given homes by BJP governments not in muslim areas like Lakshwadweep, but in Hindu areas like Delhi & Jammu. Similar facilities have been denied to Hindus escaping from Pakistan or Bangladesh
➤ While muslims, Christians, Sikhs all have their own control over their holy sites viz mosques, churches and gurdwaras, Hindu temples are all under government control, and donations to these shrines by Hindus get stolen by the government for use in Haj Houses and so on
➤ In addition to the above point, major Hindu holy cities like Varanasi and Ayodhya have seen several Hindu temples demolished to make those cities more tourist accessible, building “corridors” as well as commercial properties like hotels and malls. Even if some of the buildings destroyed were historical. Also, a lot of Hindu residents have seen their homes impounded & demolished to make way for this corridor, w/o compensating them. In fact, anger over this drove a lot of Hindus in UP to reject the BJP, and contributed to reducing the BJP from a majority to a plurality party. In Ayodhya, the BJP lost all the seats in that region, while in Varanasi, Modi’s margin was a fraction of what it was in the last 2 elections
➤ While BJP accords islam all respect due to a religion, it does its best to claim that “Hinduism is not a religion but a way of life”, which is horse-manure. But the result of this is that the RSS has a deal w/ muslims where they accept that they are Indian and embrace Indian nationalism, and in turn, the RSS will do everything to make every religious concession imaginable to them
➤ Since independence, Indians have been taught a fake history about the various muslim dynasties in India being benevolent towards Hindus. It was hoped that it would change under the BJP, but in 10 years, nothing has changed. Also, muslims are allowed to have madrassas, Christians missionary schools & so on, but Hindus are not allowed to have their own institutions. That too has not changed under this supposed “Hindu nationalist government”
➤ One of the worst thing this government has done is increase the caste divide within Hindus, which it was once assumed it would never do, given that Hindu votes needed to be consolidated via a vis muslims. Reservation quotas have been expanded, and that too to include muslims, and worst of all, a law called the SC/ST Act assumes that if soneone from one of the “backward” castes merely makes an allegation of a crime against someone from an “upper” caste, then the latter would be considered guilty & have to prove his/her innocence. Putting Modi right up there w/ the likes of Cyril Ramaposa and Robert Mugabe
➤ Cattle slaughter, which is considered sinful by Hindus, has been promoted, making India the #2 beef exporter in the world. Not just that, a lot of the cattle is stolen by muslims from Hindus for this purpose. Previously, there used to be Hindu vigilantes opposing them, in the absence of government action, but the BJP government cracked down on them, putting the bovine property of Hindus at risk
➤ India’s foreign policy is a disgrace. When the Nupur Sharma incident happened, India groveled before some very evil countries, like Qatar and Iran, and suspended her (even though they reinstated her and had her run for parliament). Both Qatar and Turkey have been supportive of Pakistan, in particular Imran Khan’s former regime. Also, since October 7th, India has sided against Israel in the UN on every occasion, and most recently, condemned the attack on Rafah. This is in sharp contrast to mainstream Hindu citizens who, including BJP supporters, have unequivocally supported Israel
Overall, it is good that the BJP was reduced from a majority to a plurality, since the opposition I.N.D.I.A alliance, while improved, didn’t do much to convince Hindus that it would be fair to them. However, Modi has for the time being been humbled. He was an unbearable narcissist the last couple of years, but for the first time, is not the one exclusively hogging the cameras. However, he is 73, but is already starting to slur his speeches, like Biden. The sooner the BJP replaces him w/ someone else, the better
In the meantime, hopefully over the next 5 years, other Hindu parties will emerge to champion the cause of Hindus in the one country on earth that can take the bulk of them, as well as challenge and end the policies of pandering to muslims
libertyORdeath says
It’s starting to seem like the only real way to have a truly prosperous multicultural democracy is to return to the mostly self-imposed segregation of America’s past.
India and America both demonstrate how a multicultural or multi-religious nation is lacking in many areas compared to a dictatorship like China or a theocracy like Pakistan.
How do the Muslims of Pakistan ensure that it remains a Muslim-ruled nation in perpetuity, despite having nearly the same situation as it’s neighbors in India?
By actively practicing discrimination and ethnic cleansing of their Hindu countrymen.
If the BJP truly wants to keep India (or what’s left of it, anyways) as a Hindu-run country, then it must act to ensure that future instead of allowing some globalist multicultural fantasy that will NEVER be applied to Muslim nations in our lifetimes.
It must encourage Muslims to emigrate to Pakistan and for the few remaining Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh to move to India. And most of all, it must go forward as a totally unashamed protector of the Hindu people. That doesn’t have to mean anti-Muslim, but I guess it’s up to them.
Nobody is confused as to whether Pakistan is a Muslim nation.
I think the Muslims have enough real estate in this world anyways.
libertyORdeath says
Forgot to say thanks for the info Infidel.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
libertyORdeath
I have often argued here that an Apartheid-like system, which may have been inappropriate for South Africa, is actually the ideal solution in any country that has a significant muslim minority. After all, what were the main features of Apartheid? It was
➤ Segregated populations, forced to live in different homelands
➤ Ban on mixed marriages
➤ Segregated everything, from stores to businesses
Let’s say you had such a system, either in India or in Europe. Here’s what the above features would give you
➤ An end to the various types of jihad, since the populations are segregated. If any Muslim tries to move into a non-muslim homeland, there is an immediate crackdown and both homelands remain unaltered
➤ An end to things like grooming gangs in Europe, Love Jihad in India and so on. Non Muslim girls would be safe everywhere, since muslims have to stick to their homelands and are not allowed anywhere near them
➤ Muslims would no longer be able to corner various businesses, such as tanning & leather, anywhere outside their homelands. So if India had such a system, muslims would not be able to enter Hindu areas and corner various businesses, forcing Hindus out of them. Conversely too, non-muslims couldn’t go to their areas & corner their businesses either
The above solution is the only non-violent way I can think of to solve this issue of jihad. Of course, it’ll never be entertained, b’cos…. Apartheid, but the only other alternatives are a peaceful Islamization, or a total blowout war
Brian Ozzy says
Thanks for all that great information!
Brian Ozzy says
Thanks for all that great information!
GE says
Infidel,
Thanks for the info and insight.
Have been waiting to hear your thoughts on the recent election.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
kibertyORdeath, Brian and GE
Y’all are welcome
libertyORdeath says
This seems to be the thing that brings together blacks and Muslims – their preference for poor rule by their in-group over superior Ryle by an outsider.
You could switch out the Muslims of Uttar Pradesh with the blacks of South Africa, Jamaica, or Mississippi and see the same self-destructive and xenophobic tendencies highlighted in this article.
Next comes the blame.
In spite of all the evidence to the contrary, the Muslims of UP will almost surely blame the Hindus for any misfortune caused by their decisions, just like the blacks of former colonies. And just like the most prosperous blacks in history – Americans.
abu taleb says
> “A few years ago, we couldn’t think of going out in the evening. We were not safe, and our parents would worry about our safety. But things are changing now. We convince them that we will come back safely,” said 26-year-old Anjum Khatoon
What is the difference between a few years ago and now? Was that a few years ago it was muslims who ruled the are and now non muslims?
࿗Infidel࿘ says
A few years ago, the government that they had was one that openly pandered to muslims, and made no apologies about it. However, in the process, they made it a point to patronize muslim & a few select other criminals, which would have made the environs of the above locality unsafe for those muslim women as well. The BJP govt there initially did well, cracking down on all those criminals & improving the law & order considerably
These women declined to support the BJP despite all that due to the perception that the party is anti-muslim. If they however looked at the BJP’s actual record, rather than the statements of its most rabid supporters, they’d find out that there ain’t a big gap b/w what they wanted and what the BJP is actually delivering
John Forbes says
As a general rule, Muslims always choose Islam over any secular state! This is reflected often all over and spectacularly in the West!
Gurek says
Secularism is now dead in all Muslim countries. They’ve sold themselves as cheap prostitutes to the Arabs.