My latest in PJ Media is a VIP article. I am happy to be able to offer you a 5% discount on becoming a VIP member at PJ Media. Just enter the code SPENCER when you sign up here.
One of the most ridiculous features of our age of absurdity is that there is actually a controversy over what a woman is. But first Biden’s Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson refused back in 2022 to define what a woman is, offering the excuse that she was not a biologist, and now United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn, whom Old Joe has nominated for a seat on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, says she’s “unqualified” to offer such a definition. Then Sarah Netburn is likewise unqualified to serve on the District Court, right? Well, that would require a sane political discourse in our fractured and addled nation today.
There is more. Read the rest here.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Did not stop 7 “Republican” senators from voting for her. Not just the usual 3 – Collins, Murkowski, Romney, but also Linda Graham, James Lankford and 2 others who I forget
40 rounds says
Sorry, my idiot senator voted to confirm. I’m embarrassed
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Which one?
Kerry says
First off, it looks more like a male, that would clarify why it doesn’t feel qualified to say what a female is!
somehistory says
I noticed the male-like look, also. However, real men know what a woman is even if they say they don’t understand them.
Michael Paul Skok says
We know what a woman is. But I must point out that there is a debate as to whether Michelle Obama is a woman or a man.
somehistory says
mo doesn’t appear to me to be female. If not, then male, not ‘man.’
I think Joan Rivers was correct.
maria says
Yes it is interesting.
somehistory says
Okay, so the ‘judge’ isn’t “qualified” to define “woman.” But this same ‘judge’ allowed a male who had raped children and was found guilty of these crimes, and some involving child pornography, to be moved to a woman’s prison.
If the ‘judge’ is not “qualified” to define “woman,” then the whole thing about allowing “the petitioner” to go where he wanted to go, is even worse than if the ‘judge’ knew the definition of “woman.”
Just say a resounding “no” to the appointment. This creature has no business deciding the fate of other people….and neither does the kj *creature* on the Supreme Court.
ploome says
I have been reading Jihad Watch for more than 10 years. I am irritated that you direct readers to PJ media to read about this judge when everything about her and this issue is available free-just google her name
James Lincoln says
ploome,
Enjoy the fact that you have been reading Jihad Watch – free of charge – for 10+ years…