Right. If you don’t wish to admit that something exists, it doesn’t exist. That’s how the establishment media operates.
“‘No proof of Islamic terrorism’: Rana Ayyub whitewashes Islamists who brutalised Israelis in October 7 attack and regularly persecute Hindus,” OpIndia, May 6, 2024:
Washington Post columnist Rana Ayyub recently claimed that there is no proof of Islamic terrorism. The incredulous claim came during an interaction with the Middle East Eye, a UK-based propaganda portal known for whitewashing Islamist depravity and contextualising atrocities committed by Islamists.
Ayyub, embroiled in a donation fraud scam that runs into crores, said that Islamic terrorism has no proof and is an artificial imagination aimed at vilifying Muslims.
“There is no proof of Islamic terrorism. It is something that has been built,” Ayyub said while drawing a comparison between Israeli PM Netanyahu and PM Modi.
“After the October 7 attack, the official X handle of BJP put out a tweet stating that what happened in Israel is what used to happen in India before they came to power. It was a dog whistle that this is Islamic terrorism…. narratives are going on that claim Modi should be doing what Bibi is doing in Israel,” Ayyub said.
This is not entirely surprising, since Ms Ayyub has a history of batting for the Islamists. If one goes by Ms Ayyub’s claims, the 9/11 terror attack in the United States, the London bombings, the Mumbai 26/11 attacks, or the Pulwama attack in February 2019 were not Islamic terror attacks, notwithstanding that the fact religion played a crucial part in the indoctrination of the terrorists who carried out the aforementioned attacks….
Wellington says
Just another “good” Washington Post columnist.
The demise of objective journalism in America has been a major contributor to where we are in America today.
No doubt.
James Lincoln says
Wellington,
Yes.
I’ll go out on a limb and say this:
If we had had honest journalism in the United States for the past 50 or so years, it would have gone a long way toward keeping our government, corporations, nonprofits, etc., “in check”.
And I don’t believe that we would be in the both depressing and dangerous situation that we’re in now.
Kevin Crosthwaite says
Well said
gravenimage says
Grimly true, Wellington.
OLD GUY says
Freedom of speech doesn’t mean it is the TRUTH.
40 rounds says
I love your hair terrorist sympathizer.
Athmanathan Seetharaman says
She looks like someone belonging to the streets where no one dares to visit. A slum dog fit for any reprehensible action not normally indulged in by decent girls.
John1 says
Burka ok with this bitch.
somehistory says
The internet says this “Rana Ayyub, investigative reporter” is a mozlum
mozlums lie. mozlums lie about others…Whites, Christians, Indians, Jews, …
and mozlums lie to further islam, which often means they lie to protect the actions of other mozlums.
Nothing surprising about this liar, lying. or mozlum, mozluming.
Rick Smith says
Totally SH
somehistory says
Thank you, Rick.
Michael Paul Skok says
Another name for the Washington Post, the Washington POS.
Bill says
That Islamic tart Rana Ayyub is either brain dead or on drugs if she seriously believes that there is no proof of Islamic Terrorism, her attitude is so very typical of her race and it’s hatred of the Jerw’s.
Tony Rice says
Too many Nelsons about .
Paul says
Why would they allow this fraud to remain in the paper? Is the WP now a propaganda newspaper? Has it truly entered the realm of Fox News?
࿗Infidel࿘ says
It has always been a propaganda newspaper
GE says
No proof of Islamic terrorism?
Um—-
Nigeria, Sudan, DRC, Artsakh? Etc.
Must be a new definition of Islamic terrorism—
Genocide and ethnic cleaning don’t count any more, I guess.
somehistory says
GE, “terrorism” to a mozlum is when someone is trying to keep a mozlum or mozlums from killing and taking over property, land, a nation, etc., a.k.a. self-defense.
mozlums never see their own acts of murder, rape, threats, etc. as terrorism because they lyingly claim that the terrorist is a ‘freedom fighter.’
the hamas terror has been called by mozlums “resistance.”
And in the places you mention, are to the mozlum terrorists, not terrorism, genocide or ethnic cleansing, because they refuse to acknowledge that others have rights; mozlums see only mozlums with rights.
40 rounds says
Spot on!
somehistory says
Thank you, 40.
gravenimage says
Too true.
somehistory says
Thanks, g.
John says
Historically Islam lies to benefit Islam. Lying is even encouraged when dealing with Kaffars . There is even an Islamic term for this behavior, Taqiyya.
FYI says
Why is Ayyub not wearing the hijab?It is Haram.Just beccause muslimas want to live among us decadent infidels who allah says are “The worst of created beings” koran 98:6 doesn’t mean they can break the rules
Put it on muslima.
“There is no proof of islamic terrorism”
and “ISLam has nothing to do with IsLam” .
She looks a bit like Buraq muhammed’s flying centaur
There is no proof Buraq existed.
So…How did muhammed get to Jerusalem?
somehistory says
The fake prophet who may have only existed in the warped and evil imagination of some old pervert, never made it to Jerusalem.
The flying donkey was one of those stubborn kind and threw the evil rider off into the mire where the evil scum belonged.
The scum is still there, as all maggots refused feast on him, and all necessary bacteria jumped ship rather than have to decompose his filthy, feculent corpse.
FYI says
Smart women actually leave islam.
The stupid and the naive tend to join or stay in it.
Even when anyone leaves and decides to be an atheist that is actually better than remaining in an idiotic supremacist cult
That is why i promote …the Awesome way of the
Murtadeen{Apostates}
Hoi Polloi says
“There is no proof of Islamic terrorism. It is something that has been built,”
Well, now I’m completely convinced that she’s right and that WaPo has reversed its slide and become home to serious investigators and erudite wordsmiths.
tim gallagher says
Almost every day we have another Muslim terrorist attack with the evil Muslim terrorist shouting “allahu akbar” and saying that he is doing it for allah, and 45,000 such attacks since 9/11, so it is beyond belief that anyone would even try to come out with such bullshit as this Muslim propagandist. Still not enough proof yet for this Magoo of an investigative reporter. Does this moron really think that anyone would believe her lying nonsense. She should be hauled in and sacked and told that if she can’t see a pattern there after 45,000 Muslim terrorist attacks then she needs to find some other type of work to do. Investigating anything is not the right type of work for such a lying piece of Muslim crap. Then again, coming out with such crap, she would be useless at any type of work that requires honesty..
mike says
her comments are the very same that in the EU
Muslims screaming Allahu Akbar killing people and the law enforcement & politician
all say the cause is/was unknown
all to not upset the Muslims
and not put fear into the public
The level of stupid shows the level of the governments
Rufolino says
Exactly, Mike.
SC says
Funny how the patriot act only seems to target patriots and never prevents real terrorist attacks. these days.
40 says
Again, spot on
James Lincoln says
SC,
Wow, I didn’t see that one coming!
gravenimage says
+1
James Lincoln says
Rana Ayyub is the epitome of “deliberate ignorance”.
gravenimage says
James, with all respect, I think that Rana Ayyub is more the epitome of deliberate lying. I doubt that she is actually confused about this.
James Lincoln says
Yes, you could be right, gravenimage.
gravenimage says
Thanks, James.
abu taleb says
Does Islamic mob surround a church or even a house gathering for worship and force the church to close down is counted as terrorism? Certainly if the victims do not comply and the authority does not interfere, there may be some building destruction or/and casualties. It may not a terrorism, but it certainly a jihad action.
I believe the 45,000 number is undercounted.
somehistory says
Way “undercounted.”
gravenimage says
45,000 jihad attacks since 9/11, and Washington Post columnist says ‘There is no proof of Islamic terrorism’
………………………………………………….
This would be laughable if it were actually funny. This is deep denial.
David A Grisez says
It sure sounds like Rana Ayyub is another person who because of their personal philosophy and view on life is out of touch with the reality of Islamic Terrorism.
WPM says
She in touch ,ask any mafia leader about the mafia they say it is not really a crime group ,it is just a club , people who point it out are the real criminals the bad guys ect. Ask any upper government worker in China or Russia about the leadership in their country if the are violent ,or corrupt what kind of answer would you get? Remember and repeat Islam is “only” a religion it is not a” political ” system that is the standard garbage from the MSM. Remember the elite running this show want you either dead or their slaves they are trying to use Islam to this end ,they do not realize the elite are on the dinner menu after the rest of us beat down to obey .
Gamaliel says
Try to prove to a denier that the moon isn’t made of green cheese. You can’t. Say that it’s ridiculous that the moon is made of green cheese and the denier will say your part of a Zionist plot to steal cheese from the needy Palestinians. Say there is video of people walking on the moon and they couldn’t have been walking on cheese and they’ll say that video is a propaganda video and shows something that never happened. That’s what they say about gopro videos taken by Hamas during their attack on Israel. They say the Israelis fabricated those videos. You can’t prove something to someone who doesn’t want to believe it.
jerry glenn says
There is no doubt that there is rampant Islamopandering
Gourdhead says
Even the casual reader and typical moron would realize that the name ‘Rana Ayyub’ is a clue. These people are going to get their comeuppance soon.