“I am telling you that my religion doesn’t tolerate other religion… the only one law which needs to spread… has to be Islam.”
When will we learn? Maybe when a Muslim terrorist group bombs a nuclear reactor? That’s not an unreal scenario.
Just take this case out of Australia involving an Algerian Muslim spiritual leader occupying its territory.
The terrorist who led the grou p that planned to attack several highly populated Australian locations has been released from a Melbourne prison – with reports saying he’s headed straight for the western suburbs.
Abdul Nacer Benbrika was initially charged over leading a terror cell conspiring to attack the Melbourne Cricket Ground (MCG) during the 2005 AFL Grand Final, as well as Victoria’s Crown Casino and the Lucas Heights reactor in Sydney.
That’s Australia’s only nuclear reactor.
On Tuesday morning, the Victorian Supreme Court ruled that Benbrika was a low risk to public safety but was required to continue a deradicalisation program.
If Abdul is “low-risk”, what’s a high-risk terrorist? A guy who plans to blow up the sun?
Abdul already expressed his views on “radicalization”.
“Osama bin Laden was a great man before 11th September, which they said he did it. Until now, nobody knows who did it. What you have to understand that anyone who fights for the sake of Allah, the first – when he dies, the first drop of blood that comes from him out, all his sin will be forgiven.”
“I am telling you that my religion doesn’t tolerate other religion. It doesn’t tolerate. The only one law which needs to spread, it can be here or anywhere else, has to be Islam.”
That deradicalization program is bound to go well.
Algerian-born Benbrika had urged them to target large crowds at sports matches or a train station to pressure the Australian government to withdraw its soldiers from Iraq and Afghanistan, the court heard.
Benbrika had said it was “permissible to kill women, children and the aged,” prosecutors said.
So Islam. Basically.
Handing down her judgment, Justice Hollingworth said the evidence “clearly establishes” that Benbrika had made substantial progress towards deradicalisation in recent years.
And yet she didn’t offer to have him move in with her.
Deradicalization programs should come with refunds. “Terror threat ended or your country back.”
Walter Sieruk says
Even by the very best psychiatrists in even the most updated and sophisticated deradicalization program will be able to cause that jihadist imam to change his vicious and deadly Islamic Quran based mindset . Its been tried with many jihadists failed terribly. In other words , no amount therapy will be able to straighten him out ,as in turn him into a non-dangerous peaceful man .
For th4 ancient Greek poet Aristophanes, had it right when he had written “Even the wisest of the wise can never make a crab walk straight.”
As the German philosopher ,Immanuel Kant wrote “Out of the crooked timber of humanity no straight thing can be made>’
Hoi Polloi says
I guess we’re supposed to wait to see if he kills the deradicalizers? Is that stage one of the training? Does the judge want to tell us just how she gets the idea that it works? Is she volunteering to test out her theories by, as the article asks, having him move in?
This is one of the craziest of this type ruling yet. Usually the privileged globalist logic is evident; the poor and powerless will be the target and the wealthy and privileged will be safe from the consequences of their rulings. But a nuclear reactor attack? Does she understand that would endanger even the more expensive neighborhoods like hers? Apparently not.
tim gallagher says
I’m not sure if these deradicalisation programs ever work. I can remember some Muslim who was part of such a program in the UK murdering some people. I suspect that this judge knows bugger all about whether they work and has irresponsibly let this evil creature out of jail. He should put sent to live next door to the judge. They never have to put up with the consequences of their dopey decisions, only the average citizens do. The release of this scumbag has had huge publicity here in Australia and the politicians will telling the police who have to keep him from doing harm to make sure that he cannot do anything because, here in Australia, if this particular evil piece of shit does manage to harm anyone there will be the greatest rage among the average people ever seen and the politicians, always thinking mostly about self-preservation, know it. They know it would end their political careers which is pretty much all they care about.
PRCS says
tim,
So-called deradicalization programs don’t work because truly devout Muslims–despite the declarations and opinions of uninformed and/or lying politicians, “reporters”, legal begals, etc.–not radicals, have not been radicalized, are not “extremists”, and have not perverted the ROP.
Such programs are, of course, a waste of time and taxpayer monies and perpetuates the general public’s erroneous belief that government is doing something about a problem they know so little about.
tim gallagher says
I’m sure that’s true, PRCS. I know I would never believe that any Muslim can be trusted so, if the deradicalisation program seemed to be working, i would refuse to believe it and would be pretty sure that the Muslim was lying as they always do to all of us non-Muslims. The issue of theis scumbag’s release is red hot at the moment in Australia and people are angry about it and therefore I think that the politicians will be making sure that he doesn’t get the chance to do any harm. Of course, it will, as always, cost a fortune in staff who will have to prevent the scumbag from doing harm. You are right that these deradicalisation programs are basically bullshit and are merely aimed at convincing people that the politicians and other authorities are doing something even though the something is futile rubbish.
Hoi Polloi says
I’m glad the people are angry; they should be.
tim gallagher says
Yes, Hoi Polloi, the average citizen would have to be comatose or braindead not to be pissed off about this scumbag being released into the community. Soon enough it will fade as an issue, but if this particular maggot manages to do any harm the politicians know that they will be in hot water. All you can hope is that this whole saga and the publicity it has received might wake a few more slow learners up to the evil nature of islam and its followers such as this Abdul Benbricka creature.
D says
Save time & money. Implant a chip in his brain. And when he tries to be violent again, zap his heart & lungs just stop working. Problem solved.
James Lincoln says
PRCS,
Good point.
My take-home is that you cannot “deradicalized” someone who is not, in fact, “radical”.
Robert Corrow says
Yes.
A reality so far quite successfully denied by Muslims and their useful idiots–everywhere.
Walter Sieruk says
A deradicalization program of any method will never be able to change that dangerous and jihadist inciting imam into peaceful man , The reason why this is do is because Islam had thoroughly corrupted and crooked his mind and soul to the extent that he can can’t be straightened out. As in made into a good man.
Therefore he’s lacking in basic human ethics and can’t be counted to be a non-threat to society.
As the Bible reads “What is crooked cannot be straightened : what is lacking cannot be counted.” Ecclesiastes 1:15. [N.I.V.]
Hudders. says
Behold…..Qur’an inspired nuclear annihilationism.
Islam is unbelievably dangerous.
How many more wait in the wings?
Troybeam says
Never going to happen.
Rarely says
Amazing advance in psychiatry. We’re about to see an elephant fly. Soon we’ll be able to empty our prisons. Nobel Prize in Medicine is assured.
Davidka says
The “de-radicalizing” programs have NEVER worked. The proponents can hardly point to a single successful such intervention. The problem is that the violent Muslims are not “radical” by their lights. They are true to Islam and Islam, not silly programs like this imposed by stupid naive authorities, governs their attitudes and behavior. How they laugh at these judges!
And even if they profess they have changed, the promises are worthless. It is just tachiya in use: the doctrine that tells Muslims it is OK to deceive to achieve a permitted goal, in Islam, and compulsory to deceive to achieve a compulsory goal in Islam. Such as Jihad. It’s that simple.
Lisa T. says
As if we need further evidence of how crazy this ideology is, how can all these Muslim men ever look in the mirror and think their scraggly beards are attractive? Did the Prophet or Allah say it was a sin to be clean shaven or trim their beards?
As for this terrorist being de radicalized, the psychiatrists and the judge must be fooled by his taqqiya.