While reeling from the IDF offensive in Gaza, the terror group Hamas has operatives in Lebanon who have since the start of the war been launching rockets at IDF soldiers and soldiers from that country. Hamas has now announced that it is forming a new terror group in Lebanon for a possible large-scale attack across Israel’s northern border. More on these plans, and on Lebanese alarm, can be found here: “Hamas Creates New Terrorist Group to Destroy Lebanon,” by Khaled Abu Toameh, Gatestone Institute,
On December 4, the Iran-backed Palestinian terror group Hamas announced the establishment of a new terrorist group in Lebanon with the goal of “liberating Jerusalem and the Al-Aqsa Mosque.” In the past two months, Hamas terrorists in Lebanon have carried out rocket attacks on Israeli soldiers and civilians in northern Israel.
Hamas has called on the Palestinians living in Lebanon to join the group, “Vanguards of the Al-Aqsa Flood,” the name it chose for its barbaric invasion of Israeli communities near the border with the Gaza Strip on October 7, when it massacred 1,200 Israelis and abducted 240 others to the Gaza Strip.
Hamas, in short, is saying that it is planning a similar invasion of Israel, but this time from Lebanon.
The announcement has drawn sharp criticism from many Lebanese, who fear that the Palestinian terror group and its patrons in Tehran are seeking to drag Lebanon into a destructive war with Israel. The Lebanese see how Hamas has brought devastation down on the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip as a result of their attack on Israel. They fear the same consequence in Lebanon.
Israel has already warned Hezbollah that if its rocket attacks in northern Israel do not cease, the IDF could “turn Beirut into Gaza.” And the same warning goes, of course, for Hamas. If it tries a large-scale attack on Israel from Lebanon, it is not just Hamas, but the Lebanese, who will pay a steep price when Israel retaliates.
“This [Hamas] statement is unacceptable, neither in form nor in content,” said Samir Geagea, head of the Lebanese Forces Party. “It harms Lebanese sovereignty and is again trying to harm the relationship between the Lebanese and Palestinians.”…
Geagea is the head of the Lebanese Christians, long a foe of Hezbollah’s attacks on Israel from Lebanese soil, and just as adamant an enemy of Hamas’ plans to hit Israel from Lebanon.
Former Lebanese Foreign Minister Gibran Bassil, who also serves as president of the Free Patriotic Movement, wrote: “We categorically reject the announcement by the Hamas movement in Lebanon. We also consider that any armed action from Lebanese territory [against Israel] is an assault on our national sovereignty.”…
Bassil, a Christian and a son-in-law of former President Michel Aoun, directs his remarks at Hamas directly, but impliedly also at Hezbollah when he denounces “any armed action” from Lebanon at Israel,
Lebanese journalist Tony Bouloss…called on the Lebanese authorities to expel the leaders of Hamas from Lebanon “and protect the Lebanese people from bringing Israeli destruction into our country.” He added: “Hezbollah wants to turn Lebanon into a new Afghanistan, attracting all terrorist organizations in the world so that Lebanon becomes an alternative homeland for rogue groups.”
Bouloss sees Hezbollah manipulating behind the scenes, not only to help Hamas establish itself more firmly in Lebanon, but to encourage other terror groups to come to Lebanon in order to form a grand alliance of such groups to attack the Zionist entity from the north..
This is not the first time that the Lebanese people voice concern over plans Iran and its proxies to turn Lebanon into a launching pad for attacking Israel. Over decades, Hezbollah has accumulated approximately 150,000 rockets and missiles, many of them precision-guided, hidden among the homes of civilians along its 75 mile (120 km) border with Israel.
The Iranian regime has many proxies and allies throughout the Middle East: the Houthis in Lebanon, the Kataib Hezbollah militia in Iraq, the Alawite-led Syrian Army, and — most important of them all — Hezbollah in Lebanon. That is why the Iranians have supplied what is now the most powerful of all terror groups with more arms — rockets and missiles — than are possessed by 90% of the world’s regular armies.
Three-quarters of the Lebanese don’t want war with Israel, whether caused either by Hezbollah, or by Hamas, attacking the Jewish state from Lebanon.
A poll conducted in Lebanon between October 13 and 17 showed that 73% of Lebanese oppose Lebanon’s entry into the current Israel-Hamas war….
In the four weeks since that poll was taken, the IDF’s assault on Hamas has led to the terror group’s reeling from loss after loss. Nearly 1000 of its tunnels now have been destroyed, about 6,000-7,000 Hamas fighters have been killed and many more wounded, most of its command-and-control centers have been reduced to rubble, huge amounts of arms have been found and seized by the IDF, and more than half of Hamas’ battalion commanders have been killed. Such dramatic losses by Hamas surely mean that the Lebanese have even less desire to be dragged into the Israel-Hamas War than they did when the poll was taken between October 13 and 17, when 73% voiced their objections to Lebanon being dragged into a war with Israel.
Hezbollah, under instructions from Iran, recently allowed 400 Hamas fighters to deploy along the border with Israel. Coordination between the two terror groups is increasing: Saleh Al-Arouri is the high-ranking Hamas official who now lives in Lebanon; he is responsible for furthering coordination between Hamas and Hezbollah. It seems that Iran may now favor the opening of a second front against Israel, on its northern border with Lebanon. Tehran knows that if there is a major attack by Hamas across that border, even if immediately repelled by the IDF, that will lead to massive Israeli bombing throughout southern Lebanon and, especially, in Beirut. But the Iranians don’t care what happens to Lebanon, as long as the IDF is stretched thin fighting both in Gaza and in Lebanon.
Hamas has in recent years been receiving aid — money and weapons — from Iran. It has, with Hezbollah’s approval, begun to mobilize fighters from among the mostly-Sunni Palestinians in Lebanon. Hamas operatives in Lebanon are eager to coordinate attacks on Israel with the much larger terror group Hezbollah, that is made up largely of Lebanese Shi’ites. Hamas has thus become part of the “Shi’a crescent” of Iran-allied fighters that extends from the Houthis in Yemen, to the Iranian-backed Kataib Hezbollah militias in Iraq, to the Syrian Army controlled by Alawites (Shiites), to Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Hamas may be able to launch rockets into Israel from Lebanon, but every such attack, whether successful or not, is answered by Israel with a much more deadly response. And should Hamas try a cross-border surge by its fighters into Israel from Lebanon, like that which it conducted with such hideous success from Gaza on October 7, it can expect much of Beirut to be destroyed. The Israelis have already warned of that result. Four-fifths of the Lebanese will blame Hamas for that destruction, and turn on the group, and then on its backer Hezbollah, with uncontrolled fury.
That, of course, is a consummation devoutly to be wished.
Wellington says
A reflection here, to wit, it would have been better for Israel, for Arab Christians, for any possible overall peace in the Middle East, and so on, if Lebanon had ceased to be a single country decades ago. Instead, it arguably would have been optimal if Lebanon had been divided in two, into a northern Lebanon run by Muslims and a southern Lebanon run by Christians. This would have meant dividing the some 4,000 square mile Lebanon (about the size of Jamaica) into two some 2,000 square mile nations (each about the size of Delaware).
A southern Lebanon, overwhelmingly Christian and on the northern border of Israel and in alliance with the Israeli state, could have profited enormously from this—economically, culturally, diplomatically, militarily, etc. It would have been a safe haven for the some 8% or so of Arabs who are Christian and who in alliance with Israel would have made good and not evil more likely to succeed in that very dark corner of the world which is the Middle East.
Another opportunity lost I would argue, but then so much has been lost in the Middle East again and again and again. And why above all reasons? Why—because of Islam and one knows this by now or should know it.
Mitigating evil in the Middle East (and so many other places on Earth) means having to lessen Islam’s influence. Instead, in the very foolish time we live in, way too many non-Muslims have indulged Islam, made excuses for it, not taking over territory and outright annexing it from Muslims (examples being Gaza and the so-called West Bank), etc. And we see the result, i.e., Muslims can virtually never be placated. Oh yeah, indulging Muslims is a fool’s errand. Better if by now a southern Lebanon Christian nation existed, better that the West Bank and Gaza were formally part of Israel. Hell, better if the Sinai to the Suez Canal were part of Israel. Think the mess that now exists has been the better option? I most certainly don’t.
JimJFox says
Will not happen. India/Pakistan/Bangladesh?
Islam is ONLY satisfied by conquest and genocide.Failing civil war in which Hezbollah is destroyed, Israel must do the job.
Wellington says
I agree. I only averred what WOULD have been ideal.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Hamas needs a branch in Lebanon? Why, they don’t trust Hizbullah to back them? Oh, I forgot, the sunni-shi’a thing. Even if they co-operate, Hamas wants to draw in sunni Lebanese who’d never support Hizbullah
SteveC says
And that used to be The Lebanon
If you aren’t against terrorists then you are with them. The Lebanon will always be a conflict zone and what is left of it will be bombed to dust until they start eliminaring the threat to their neighbours.
Barry says
One solution may be for Israel to destroy say a third of Iran’s oil industry then
warn them if they do not shut down Hezbollah & Hamas then the rest of their oil
industry will go up in flames.
High risk plan but —-
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Israel can’t attack Iran. Jordan and Iraq simply won’t give them overflight rights. Only country that can is US, but we justly don’t trust our politicians w/ wars b’cos they don’t know when to stop/pull out. For instance, the 2001 war in Afghanistan was over in 3 months, but they made it a 20-yr long nation-building project that failed
If we had leaders who promised – and meant – that a war w/ any country would imply destroying their war-making capability for good, there might be an appetite for it. But we have those who want to re-create those countries in our own image, which is why they experience an epic fail!