And our foreign aid budget helps fund the Jihadists in Iraq.
I won’t rehash the twenty years of debates over the Iraq War except to say that the end result was that Iran controls Iraq.
Baghdad is essentially a puppet regime of Tehran. The Shiite majority have a death grip on political power and have used it to crush the Kurds and Sunnis. And the United States has, even post-withdrawal, spent a fortune on training and aiding an enemy military force.
That’s essentially the admission coming from the Prime Minister of Iraq.
Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammad Shia al-Sudani described US airstrikes on facilities used by Hezbollah as a “clear and hostile act” Tuesday after three American troops were wounded in a terrorist drone strike the previous day.
As expected, it wasn’t the attack, one in a long series on Americans, that was the hostile act, but the American response.
The United States conducted limited strikes on the Shiite Jihadists of Kataib Hezbollah by going after their bases.
The Iraqi prime minster’s media office said in a statement that one member of Baghdad’s security forces was killed in the US strikes, while 18 others were wounded, including civilians.
Who was that member?
The security “serviceman” referenced in the Iraqi prime minister’s statement was a member of Hashd Al-Shaabi, known as Popular Mobilization Units (PMU), a predominantly Shia paramilitary force, according to a statement released by the group. In 2016, the Iraqi parliament passed a bill recognizing the Shia militia fighters as a government entity operating alongside the Iraqi military.
The PMUs are Shiite Jihadists just like Kataib Hezbollah. The difference is that the Shiite regime in Baghdad used the ISIS attacks as a pretext for sidelining the military and making the PMUs into their key force.
Essentially the regime in Baghdad is a Shiite terror group that is defended by them. Understandably they’re upset that we bombed their people. And, just as understandably, they support the attacks on us.
As I wrote earlier this year, our foreign aid budget helps fund the Jihadists in Iraq.
In 2020 and 2021, the United States spent over $600 million on foreign aid in Iraq. That’s down from a high of over $2 billion in 2018 and $4.4 billion in 2016. But it still means that we have blown through over $10 billion on Iraq since 2016. That’s long since we officially withdrew.
Meanwhile, where was Iraq’s money going? Iraq’s latest budget dedicates $2.8 billion to Shiite PMU terror militias including Kataeb Hezbollah: an Iran-backed terror group that has been responsible for the deaths of numerous American soldiers.
The United States has spent over $1 billion financing the nation’s military while Iraq spends billions financing the Iranian PMU terror militias which are expected to approach a quarter of million Jihadis.
Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed al-Sudani and his government were backed by the PMU’s and are turning them into an even bigger army.
That’s not surprising since al-Sudani is a second generation member of a Shiite Islamist movement loyal to Iran’s Islamic Revolution. The Shiite Coordination Framework, which is behind the Sudani government, is filled with Shiite Islamists groups with their own militias. For example, the Badr alliance, created by Iran, controls both sizable chunks of Iraq’s military and police forces, as well as one of the larger militias, and has a sizable presence in Iraq’s parliament.
A basic question is, “what the hell are we doing?”
Iraq is controlled by enemy forces. We’re funding some of them and we certainly aren’t there to do much except perhaps provide some support to the Kurds. There’s no plan here, meanwhile our people are under fire and the Biden administration is trying to maintain the status quo while responding with pinpricks.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
So much for the Bushian theory that democracy would end the enmity of Arab/muslim countries against us. Everybody who worked for the Bush state department deserves to be banned from ever saying a thing about Foreign Policy again
SteveM says
I dont even know why we went back? Shoulda just let them kill each other forever. Doh?
Take those troops and put them on our border.
SteveM says
We had perfect war going there.Iran was fixin to enter Iraq to take it to ISIS (before we did iit for them), then rest of Sunni world would have joined… just huge bombfire of islam would have occured in middle east Tens of millions dead. But that’s our govt “we must do something” and “think of the children”
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Actually, the Arab Spring induced civil wars were just fine, but the EU and its “no-man-is-an-island” ideologues had to open up to millions of muslim rapefugees from the region. Thereby making it a Western problem as well. If they had simply put their foot down & said no, then the scenario you lay out may well have worked: sunnis & shi’a would have destroyed each other’s fighting capabilities and every country in the region would have been as weak as Syria (w/o Russian backup)
KuhnKat says
The leftard view that is forced on us in the US is that both sides are right and must be held equivalent, except for those the leftards support. Whites have been guilt tripped into being unable to make rational JUDGEMENTS!! Especially Christians have been fed the fallacy of “judge not lest ye be judged” which was NEVER meant to cover everything all the time.
Jim says
The Iraq war cost us a lot of blood and treasure, was it worth it? We might just as well have let Saddam go on tyranninzing the country.