In Naperville, IL, allegations arose from a video on social media, supposedly depicting two Hindu American students burning a book claimed to be the Quran.
The incident led to condemnation from Islamic groups, but it was later revealed that the book was not the Quran.
This… pic.twitter.com/FFVEg571zw
— Hindu American Foundation (@HinduAmerican) October 27, 2023
False claims of this kind have led to mob violence, riots and murder in India, Bangladesh and Pakistan. And now all this has come West, with eager help, of course, from the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).
mike says
It’s just a fen book
if Muslims burned the Hindu’s book
CAIR would still claim
Hodophobia
Westman says
Where is the rest of the social fire engine crew – Al Sharpton and the SPLC?
somehistory says
The book mozlums worship is full of demonic evil and the worst filth anyone could think to write. It deserves a burning.
The rats of c.a.i. should be arrested; and any who can be, should be kicked out of the country. The c.a.i.r uncivil, no-rights for infidel people, connected to the mozlum brotherhood…a designated terror organization…un-indicted co-conspirator, supporters of hamas, mozlum group should be the subject of a federal investigation using the RICO Act.
It is a crime…and not just a misdemeanor…to incite to riot, violence, murder, and it is a criminal offence to lie to the authorities. The members of c.a.i.r. are liars and they have carried hoaxes all the way to the police in order to have innocent infidels arrested for things they never did, and to cause the public to fear their organization and to fear offending a mozlum.
Any Hindu person injured by this hoax, should sue the pants of c.a.i.r.
Gurek says
I fully agree with you. The evil qur’an which is the worst horror book of all times instructing its believers to go out and murder the unbelievers deserves to be wiped out from the face of earth. Children under the age 18 should not read that horrifying book because their psychology can be disturbed by its unimaginable evil instructions and how evil humans can be.
somehistory says
Thank you, Gurek. I believe you are right about keeping the book from the kids. Young adults seem to be extremely suggestive, too, seeing how many have converted and then went on a killing spree.
FYI says
The author of the koran,mr “allah” claims he knowns ALL things in koran 2:29 but proves he doesn’t in the well known scientific errors and EPC Theology fail of koran 5:116
So allah is clearly NOT all knowing,not omniscient as he claims.
The question for the scholar of islam is..
How can allah be God if he is provably not omniscient?
You need to be omniscient to be God and allah proves he is not.
Any point explaining this to the muslims?No
The quran is of HUMAN origin.Totally..An impersonator of God.
Walter Sieruk says
Actually, burning the Qur ‘an is a very stupid thing to do. By contrast ,an intelligent way to handle that religious book of Islam and all the deadly violence that it inspires to to study and examine that specific religious book of Islam and then expose the errors and contradictions that it contains.
This has actually already been done, For example, on pages 145 through 157 in THE ISLAMIC INVASION by Robert Morey in which he wrote a section on the Qu‘ran with its self-contradictions. Just two of the many he cited are the following “The Qu’ran differs on whether a day is a thousand years or fifty thousand years in God’s sight’ and “Who was first to believe? Abraham or Moses [Sura 6:14 versus 7:143]? The above is inconsistent and illogical. Further, Morey wrote about “The fact that Judaism and Christianity broke up into different sects was used in the Qu ‘ran to prove that they are not of God [Suras 30:20-32. 42:13, 14]. Yet Islam has broken up into many warring sects and therefore cannot be true if the Quran is right.”
Moreover, Morey in his book shows many more contradictions and absurdities in the Quran, there are and how Muhammad incorporated extra Biblical and Jewish folklore along with pre-Islamic Arabian myth and parts of Zoroastrian and Hindu stories into the Quran.
Furthermore, the Muslims claim that “the Quran is the direct, literal word of God unmodified in any way by the Prophet who uttered them at the bidding of God.” In addition , in the book UNVEILING ISLAM by Ergun Mehmet Caner and Eethi Caner has shown that the Quran was modified in the following account on pages 45. “Muhammad felt the need to improve on the words of Allah, since he changed Allah’s wisdom for his own on several occasions. A hadith tells of the nonchalant emendations of Muhammad:’ On a number of occasions he [a scribe] had, with the Prophet’s consent changed the closing words of verses. For example, when the prophet had said ‘God is mighty and wise ‘ Adbollah b. Abi Sarh suggested writing down ‘Knowing and wise’ and the Prophet answered that there was no objection. Having observed a succession of changes of this type, Adbollah renounced Islam on the grounds that revelations, if from God could not be changed at the prompting of a scribe such as himself. After his apostasy he went to Mecca and joined the Qorayshites.’ Other writers reveal that later Muhammad and his people did go war with the Qorayshites and he personally killed Abdollah. Obviously Abdollah knew too much and Muhammad wanted Abdollah’s knowledge to die with him.”
In conclusion, the Qu ‘ran is not only a fiction, it’s also a hoax.
Even though the above essay was posted before, it should now be added that the last statement of the above that “the Qu ‘ran is not only a fiction, it’s also a hoax.” To put this in a Biblical way. As in from the Bible, it may be truly explained that the Qu ‘ran is a deceptive work of “the cunning and craftiness of men in their deceitful scheming.” Ephesians 14:12.. [N.I.V.]
Walter Sieruk says
It’s very true when it was said that “Islam is the most successful fraud in the history of humanity” It’s also true that the entire foundation of Islam is based on the Qu ‘ran.
It’s good to expose the flaws used in the “logic” to uphold the Qu ‘ran by the propagandists for Islam.
For example, there’s an old challenge given by many the apologists for Islam to support of their firm belief that the Qu ‘ran is ,truly, Divine.
The challenge they declare is “Try to write a book as beautifully written as the Qu’ ran . you cannot.”
The answer to that claim this that just because a written work of religious literature has beauty in it does not necessary mean that it’s the infallible Word of God.
For there are many highly religious books that are very beautifully written that have been around for centuries but not literally God’s Word.
For example, many of the books that make up the Apocrypha are very well written but they didn’t make into the Bible as God’s word. For instance, the specific apocrypha book of The Song of Three Young Men is a very pious beautifully written religious work of religious literature beautifully written still not the Divine Word of God.
In addition, there have been and are many very intelligent men who read the Qu ‘ran and found it to be overly repetitious, dull inconsistent and even in some places contradictory.
This naturally is in contrast to how all Muslims hear the Qu ‘ran when it is recited. So those two contrasting views of the Qu ‘ran just prove valid the old saying that “Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.”
In conclusion, it should be obvious that just because a person finds something in a book that is religious book is beautifully written doesn’t actually mean it’s Divine.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
The above rumors were probably cited to add Hindus to Jews as the target list of the islamic/BLM/Antifa mobs in major cities. Hindus generally fine-tune their condemnation of islam by attacking Pakistan, & would probably have burned Paki flags. Particularly on the 15th anniversary of 26/11/2008