Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Henry Kissinger’s Volte-Face: He Now Warns of Muslim Migrant Danger

By

The scales have fallen from the eyes of Henry Kissinger. He was a signatory in 2015 to a letter that urged Congress to pass legislation allowing more Muslims from Syria and Iraq — claiming to be refugees — to be admitted to the United States. Now he looks at Europe, where millions of Muslims have been allowed to settle, where they batten on the benefits provided by those generous welfare states, and sees how they have spread the virus of antisemitism that they brought with them when they arrived. Kissinger was shaken by the murderous antisemitism that was on display this week in the pro-Hamas demonstrations that Muslims and their willing collaborators took part in in many European cities. More on Kissinger’s new understanding of the Muslim threat can be found here: “Europe Let in Too Many Foreigners, Says Henry Kissinger in Wake of Pro-Hamas Demonstrations Across Continent,” by Oliver JJ Lane, Breitbart, October 13, 2023:

Pro-Hamas demonstrations show European nations, including Germany, made a “grave mistake,” and the continent should be concerned about future hostage-taking raids against its own people if the idea [sic] isn’t defeated quickly, Henry Kissinger warns.

“Europe is subject to internal pressure by groups of people “of totally different culture and religion” because of the “grave mistake” of admitting too many foreigners, Henry Kissinger said of the phenomenon of demonstrations across Europe in support of Hamas terrorists this week.

Kissinger spoke of groups of people now in Europe “of totally different culture and religion.” He didn’t use the word “Muslim,” but it is obvious whom he was speaking about, and now he admits that it was a “grave mistake” to admit so many of them; there are now tens of millions of Muslims spread across Europe. Their violent demonstrations in support of Hamas terrorists have put on full display the moral abyss between Muslims and Europeans, It’s not only antisemitism that Kissinger worries about, but the anti-Infidel worldview that already has made life so difficult for the indigenous non-Muslims in Europe, now forced to share their towns and cities with those — Muslim migrants — who hate and despise them almost as much as they do Jews.

Speaking to Politico in the wake of the Hamas terrorist attack against Israel on Saturday, longtime kingpin of the globalist movement Henry Kissinger walked back his previous position on the importance of keeping Western nations open to refugee flows and said the events of recent days showed nations had gone too far. He told the publication observing celebrations in German cities in support of Hamas is “painful” to watch.

Kissinger said: “It was a grave mistake to let in so many people of totally different culture and religion and concepts, because it creates a pressure group inside each country that does that.”.[i.e., promotes Islam]

Europe should give “unconditional political support for Israeli action” now the terrorist attack has happened, Kissinger continued, and not least because in his view European states have a vested interest in making sure no precedent is set for raids and mass taking of hostages from Western nations is set. He concluded: “Israel must vindicate its sovereignty in that area, and that it cannot permit Gaza to return to a state where it could emerge, take thousands or a large number hostage, kill thousands, and then live in that condition side-by-side with Israel.

“I would say every European nation has the same interest because the same attitude might erupt in the direction of Europe.”

Kissinger has finally realized that the war against Israel is not one over borders, but rather, over the very existence of the Jewish state. And he now grasps that the same jihadist impulse can be found, though it has not yet reached Hamas-like violence and depravity, among the Muslim populations in Europe. As Kissinger says, Israel has to “vindicate [make absolutely clear] its sovereignty” and to ensure that Hamas is crushed, so that in Gaza there will be no possibility of returning to the status quo ante bellum. Israel in Gaza is battling the same Jihadist annihilationist threat that the rest of the West will face in the future from its own population of Muslim migrants; Western solidarity with Israel in its war should now be firmly expressed.

While hostage-taking raids on Europe may seem far-fetched, they are not without ample historical precedent and match other warnings about the very high-consequence risk of the tactic coming to Europe’s shores.

Kissinger’s comments on the “grave mistake” and danger presented by mass migration creating alien power structures within Western nations are a considerable shift from his previous positions, which he long acknowledged were influenced by his own experience as a refugee from Nazi Germany going to America in the 1930s….

As a refugee from the Nazis, Kissinger was reflexively favorable to all those wanting to be admitted to the U.S. as refugees or, rather, all those who claimed to be refugees. This was a colossal error on his part, based on his ignorance of Islam and his dreamy belief that all refugees were essentially equal in their ability, and willingness, to assimilate. He did not distinguish between a Muslim coming from Syria or Iraq and a Christian coming from Mexico or the Philippines. It has taken him many decades to grasp the nature of Islam, and the threat posed by Muslims.

Kissinger in 2015 urged Congress to take in more Muslim migrants because, in his tortured logic, that would show that the United States had nothing against Muslims and, so he dreamily believed, this would lessen the appeal of ISIS. But ISIS’s appeal was unaffected by how Infidels treated Muslims. ISIS didn’t care if Infidel states treated Muslims well or ill; its goal was to destroy all of them, and to create a world where Islam everywhere dominates, and Muslims rule, everywhere. Kissinger wanted to admit Muslims into the U.S. so as to head off a  “war between Islam and the West.” He failed so singularly to understand that nothing the West can do will win permanent Muslim favor; if the West were to allow the Muslims to destroy Israel, that would merely whet, not sate, Muslim appetites for still more Islamic victories over Infidels. That war, or jihad, has been waged by Muslims against the world’s non-Muslims for the past 1400 years. When the Western world admits Muslims into its midst, that does not change the Muslim imperative to conquer, by demography or by war, the Infidel lands and peoples. Allowing more Muslim migrants into our countries simply swells the size of a dangerous fifth column.

Kissinger, who has always fancied himself a master of geopolitical realpolitik, was an innocent about the texts and teachings of Islam, unaware that waging jihad is a permanent duty for all Muslims. Now he seems, at the age of 100, to recognize that he was wrong on the subject of Muslim migrants, and that the Western world, too, was wrong, in admitting Muslims who for the most part do not wish to, and are unable to, integrate peacefully into the societies of Infidels who are, Muslims are taught, “the most vile of created beings.”

Mea culpa, mea maxima culpa, on the matter of Muslim migrants, signals Henry Kissinger at long last. He has a lot to answer for, as do all those other cosseted soi-disant “brilliant thinkers” in their chanceries and think tanks and consultancies — the people belonging to the political elites of Europe who ignored Islamic history and theology, and admitted into their midst tens of millions of Muslims who may yet be the agents of the civilized Western world’s destruction.

Comments

  1. Follow the money which flows into the bank accounts of so many in the US, from Saudi coffers, now supplemented by Chinese largesse and loot from the US taxpayer routed via Kyiv. Follow the money and the stench of the sewer will fill your nostrils!

  2. Anyone with 1/2 a working braincell could have figured out that inviting members of the cult of death “Islam” within their borders would have resulted in mayhem and complete disaster.

  3. This guy ain’t dead already? The Gods must hate him for keeping him away for as long as they have

  4. What took him so long to come to this conclusion? It just goes to show that no amount of intelligence is a guarantee against foolish and dangerous thinking. Noam Chomsky serves as another example of this.

    • Kissinger has for decades betrayed the people he was supposedly defending. His purpose has always to have power and the prestige.
      He was an aid to LBJ when he realized the democrats would not win the 1968 presidential race. He sneaked over to Nixon and played the game to being his advisor.

    • Wellington says,

      “It just goes to show that no amount of intelligence is a guarantee against foolish and dangerous thinking”

      Bingo.

      And Henry Kissinger is a very intelligent man.

    • Another high IQ/witless fool is Alan Dershowitz, who has asserted recently that Biden has been a “great president” and will vote for him again in 2024 if he is the Democrat presidential candidate. He has also asserted that, while pro-Israel, he is also “pro-Palestinian,” believing that Hamas does not represent the views of ordinary Gazans or, by extension, Muslims in general. Sadly, he was not asked to provide any evidence to support his position. Another bien pensant fool, then, to add to the endless list of fools of this ilk.

  5. And don’t forget what a toady Kissinger was to his first patron, Nelson Rockefeller. Or the way, while at Harvard, Kissinger created a program for “future world leaders” that allowed him to make all sorts of useful contacts, that came in handy later on, to grease his resistible rise. A much more intelligent and subtle professor in the Government Department at the time was Stanley Hoffmann who, unlike Kissinger, would not stoop to flatter princes.Henry Kissinger’s model was Sammy Glick, Hoffmann’s the estimable Raymond Aron.

  6. I suppose it is better late than never. Every gullible fool that finally wakes up to the reality that it is a huge mistake to let Muslims enter any non-Muslim country is a good thing. How could it take this clown, Kissinger, so long to finally get the message. People like him must be smart on some issues but on other issues either have shit for brains or are too afraid to tell the unpalatable truth on some issues even though they do know the truth. If it is the latter, then there is no excuse for that. And, of course, people like Kissinger don’t have to live among the Muslim barbarians and so are well insulated from the adverse effects of letting these barbarians in. The average person has to put up with those adverse consequences.

  7. Well, better late than never. Meanwhile, Kissinger did a lot of harm in his past, naive actions. He established the idiotic land-for-peace principle, or, in reality, land-for-nothing. I leave it up to the judges in Heaven to decide his fate.

  8. now we compound this with the NWO and Klaus Schwab the Failure of the Federal Reserve on the horizon
    Nations that were fought for being destroyed from the inside by it’s own government and parties. Where our military’s died defending. We have a war and WE THE PEOPLE are being Assault from all sides and with only a hand of people in Washington to save us. The US government is the kind of people I would never want to go to war for or with. They will shoot you in the back in a heart beat

  9. Just wondering if people like Angela Merkel will eventually “get it”.

  10. Actually if we look at the current situation and the gaza ground invasion, it is bound to create a million palestinian refugees. I fear that refugees would be directed to Europe and the usa because arab world doesn’t give a shit about the palestinians and nobody gonna put pressure on them. This refugees in a few years time will again cause the same problem that Robert has been reporting over the past years. This is why people like tucker Carlson and vivek ramaswamy are calling for the usa to stop supporting this war and worry about the border crisis. But looks like the conservatives who were anti war in the case of ukraine have all now become pro war. Also ukraine refugees are much better than palestinians.

    • The “Palestinians” cannot technically be refugees because they can’t flee a country that doesn’t exist.

      Why in the hell would ANY western country take in “Palestinian” terrorists after what we just saw. Why would moving in the fifth column of a foreign country ever be a good idea?

      After all the support we saw from muslim countries after the terrorist attack, why would they go ANYWHERE but there?

      They claim they hate infidels and being governed by non-muslims, so why would they want to come here.

      Why would we allow Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Lebanon, Jordan and Syria to fund and support the “Palestinian” terrorists and then bail them out by allowing the “refugees” to go anywhere outside the muslim world?

      • 1. There were Palestinian refugees even before this attack, look at the refugee camps in lebanon, syria, jordan, west Bank. Majority of European and usa leaders will consider the people fleeing this war to be refugees.

        2. I agree it would not be a good idea for the Palestinians to move to a foreign country. But the Western world leader don’t consider Palestinian to be terrorists, they consider hamas to be terrorist( although there is a split of opinion here as many Western leaders have called them resistance fighters and all that decolonization bs.) nobody has said that the Palestinian people have supported hamas instead they have maintained the postion that hamas don’t have popular support and are a fringe group.

        3. Yes I agree that after the support for hamas they should go there, but the arab world has not taken a single Palestinian refugee. Egypt has closed the rafah crossing and has not allowed Palestinian refugees to enter even during this crisis. What makes you think, they will take in millions of Palestinians when they didn’t do that in any of the previous middle Eastern conflicts.

        4. Western leaders consider Islam to be a religion of peace. Even after this horrific attack I have not seen any western leader link the hamas attack to islam.

        5. Because this has already happened in the iraq and Syrian war. Also there are Palestinian refugee camps in lebanon, syria, jordan what sort of pressure has the Western leaders put in absorbing them into their country in the last 70 years. Nobody has called out the funding of the Palestinians by the arab world. Only Iran is mentioned in supporting hamas by some leaders, although the us administration has denied any Iran involvement. The qatari funding has not even been discussed, nobody has put any pressure on qatar to stop harboring the hamas leaders. The reason is qatar has a us military base.

        Finally, I hope iam wrong and this does not happen, but looking at the ground reality and the past history of middle Eastern conflict, this is a serious possibility and concern, all measures should be taken to avoid this.

  11. Let’s stop beating around the bush here and just call a spade a spade.

    Kissinger literally wrote the Kissinger report advocating for mass migration. He is also one of the main architects of the UN REPLACEMENT migration policy which seeks to replace Europeans and North Americans with third-world migrants.

    Kissinger didn’t care about the threat of open borders until he thought it might be a negative FOR JEWS.

    He didn’t care when Americans or British were being assaulted, raped, tortured or murdered.

    He didn’t care when it led to OVER 100,000 fentynal POISONING DEATHS per years.

    He didn’t care when thousands of British girls were groomed and REPEATEDLY raped and tortured thanks to his open borders policies.

    He didn’t care when the cartels began to take over cities and mirder Americans.

    He only cares NOW, when the main threat is a specific threat to JEWS. How convenient that it only took 1 attack on Jews to change his mind, and quick too.

    I’ll accept ANYONE who finally opens their eyes to the disaster of open borders and forced multiculturalism and has the b@11s to speak publicly about it. Byt Let’s not act like he suddenly had a change of heart and now cares about us.

    He doesn’t. He only cares about Jews. It’s pretty obvious.

    • Kissinger “only cares about Jews,” you say. False. Kissinger urged Nixon to withhold badly needed military hardware to Israel during the 1973 Yom Kippur war, hoping to promote what Kissinger perceived as a restructured balance of power between Israel and its implacable Muslim enemies. Nixon demurred, and very probably saved Israel from defeat and possible annihilation.

      • Doesn’t mean his change of heart isn’t due to his realization that importing millions of Muslims might lead to more dead jews.

        The context of the interview was the muslims celebrating the murder of jews. It had nothing to do with a foreign policy decision he made 50 years ago.

        Kissinger has always been a globalist zionist at heart. He might care about America to a point, but it’s a distant second.

  12. Klaus Schwab was the protégé of Henry Kissinger. Without Henry there would be no WEF , no Great Reset (now in process) and no climate hoax.

    If WW3 starts soon we can thank Henry.

    • And if anyone has to eat bugs They can thank Klaus

      I am NOT eating bugs.

      “Raus Klaus,Raus Klaus!”

      As for WW3 i believe there are likely to be other forces behind this.They wanted Russia to be the excuse [ and still they keep desperately poking the Bear!} i like to call them the Deplorable Basketcases.

      As Hillary Clinton once famously said in Public {“WE need to go to war with Russia”}
      Who is WE?And WHY?

      Israel is a better bet to trigger WW3…

      Besides,WW3 is one way of reducing CO2 emissions :according to Bill and his Brilliant Equation,the factor P{=the word’s population}…needs to be reduced to reduce CO2 levels.

  15. Henry Kissinger and his too late revelations about a “grave mistake,” and how “painful” this is to watch.

    I’ll tell you what’s painful, Henry. It’s being trafficked, tortured, and gang raped. It’s being bombed. It’s being kidnapped. It’s watching your family being destroyed. It’s watching globalists steal your country and fearing for your children’s future.

    Your self-regard allows only for you to admit a “mistake” that was obvious to so many who were then targeted for being right.

Discover more from

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Skip to content