According to the Immigration Attitudes Tracker by Ipsos and British Future, “public dissatisfaction with the Government’s handling of immigration is at its highest level” since before Brexit. Seven out of ten British citizens across the political spectrum are disappointed for varying reasons in the government’s failure to manage the constant flow of migrants into the country via the English Channel.
Brexit, which took place during the tenure of David Cameron, who regrets it (which is easy to say about anything after leaving office), was driven by dissatisfaction with the British government’s laxity on immigration policy. The longtime and persistent migrant invasion of the UK through the prime ministerial tenures of Cameron, Theresa May, Boris Johnson, Liz Truss (although hers was so brief as to be insignificant) and now Rishi Sunak has been compounded by repeated government broken promises to do something to stop it. Economic migrants — not refugees as defined by the Refugee Convention (by which a refugee is to stop in the first country of safety) — have swarmed into Britain in huge numbers, and nothing effective has been done to stop them.
When Sunak began his tenure as prime minister last October, he hailed Brexit and promised to promote responsible immigration based on a two-way street. Yet nothing has changed. If anything, it’s getting worse.
In July, a top former Conservative government minister — former Justice Secretary Brandon Lewis — asked British citizens to take illegal migrants into their homes. Never mind the Muslim rape gangs, the unwillingness of all too many migrants to assimilate, and also the increase in crime rates that countries including Sweden, Germany and
The migrant crisis continues to weaken Britain’s economy and threaten its national security, as its politicians continue to sidestep their responsibilities.
This situation is unsustainable, and British citizens know it. From COVID mismanagement to migrant overflows, they’re dissatisfied with the blatant disregard of their wishes and their needs that has been repeatedly shown by their political leaders.
“Dissatisfaction with Government’s handling of immigration at highest level since 2015,” British Future, September 12, 2023:
Public dissatisfaction with the Government’s handling of immigration is at its highest level since before the EU referendum, according to the latest findings from the Immigration Attitudes Tracker by Ipsos and British Future.
The new survey finds that two-thirds of the public (66%) are dissatisfied with the way the Government is dealing with immigration, the highest level since the first tracker survey in 2015. Just 12% say they are satisfied.
Only a fifth (22%) of Conservative supporters are satisfied with the Government on immigration while most Conservatives (56%) are dissatisfied – a quarter (26%) ‘very dissatisfied’. Almost three quarters (73%) of Labour supporters are dissatisfied with how the Government is dealing with immigration.
The top reason given for dissatisfaction with the Government is the failure to stop Channel crossings, but responses are divided by politics. For Labour supporters who are unhappy with the Government on immigration, ‘Creating a negative or fearful environment for migrants’ (46%) and ‘Not treating asylum-seekers well’ (45%) are equally important reasons for dissatisfaction as ‘Not doing enough to stop channel crossings’ (46%). Among Conservative supporters, however, 82% cite ‘Not doing enough to stop Channel crossings’ as a reason for their dissatisfaction, and only 9% ‘creating a negative or fearful environment for migrants’.
Such sharp division by politics is common across a range of questions.
At a time of high net migration, the new tracker survey finds that 48% of the public now supports reducing immigration (up from 42% in 2022), compared to 44% who would prefer numbers to stay the same or increase. Support for reducing immigration is still nearly 20 points lower than in 2015, the first year of the tracker, when 67% of the public backed reductions.
More people (43%) think that immigration has had a positive impact on Britain than the 37% who feel its impact has been negative, though negativity has increased by 8 points from 29% since 2022.
Responses differ significantly by politics. Two-thirds of Conservative supporters (67%) now favour reducing migration, compared to only 38% of Labour supporters who favour reductions. More than half (56%) of Labour supporters say immigration numbers should increase (28%) or stay the same (28%), compared to 30% of Conservatives who say numbers should either increase (16%) or stay the same (14%).
Michael Copeland says
Britain’s leaders are answering to outside influences, not to the electorate.
John Allan says
The government’s HANDLING of immigration!!??
Try MISHANDLING!!
࿗Infidel࿘ says
So question to the Brits here – those not on the Left obviously – aside from the Tories, which other parties are you considering? I would think Labour would be out of consideration, as would be the Lib-Dems, SNP, Plaid Cymru & others. So who are your options here – Reform? Reclaim? Britain First? For Britain? UKIP?
If someone outside Tories or Labour had a chance, who could it be?
Treereen says
Tories are on the Left now. They simply continued what Labour started in the 1990s.
Reform, Reclaim, Britain First and other parties need to unite first and somehow fight off efforts to destabilise or discredit the party when it becomes “too” successful – this happened to UKIP. We have the “first past the post” system, not proportional representation. Without all those small parties uniting, Tories or Labour will always get the most votes.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Only problem is that Nigel is too islamophobiaphobic, & won’t entertain such an idea. Result is the British Uniparty (similar to the German CDU-SDP uniparty) reigning supreme
clive roach says
What can you expect when we have a government who advertises what they can get if they can get here witch works out around £50 thousand pounds per refugee legal or illegal where as in France they would be lucky to get £5 thousand it’s past the time they where all swept away and we had something new or at least people who put their country first
James Lincoln says
If Brexit did not halt muslim migration, what was the point of it?
Hudders. says
Mishandling!!!???
Why don’t they call it what it REALLY is?
-An invasion; a steady stealth replacement jihad, by many thousands of lusty, low iq, medeival minded, muslim soldier age males; who also are proven to hold utter comtempt for the UK, it’s laws & it’s legal inhabitants.
Each and every day, towns, cities & even the most far flung villages, have seen an infux, an infestation…… nay an invasion, of these miscreants!
Scores of incidents contrary to the laws of the land & common decency are happening as we speak, yet to report them avails nought!
-For the reportees themselves are likely to be branded racist & in many cases the subject of reprisal & retarded rebuke, from the islamic ingrates &/or those left wing lying lunatics, who seem hell bent on supporting this sickening satanic sandwashing.
The UK is in great danger.
Many politicians are complicit and thus the public feels helpless, ignored and ever more frightened.
When will this invasion stop?
When will the tipping point be reached?
Heaven help the UK.
Rufolino says
I can feel your feelings Hudders -and I agree.
The UK is on the road to destroying itself.
Manos says
BNP IS THE ONLY SOLUTION