New in PJ Media:
Ever since video spread far and wide last week of Sen. John Fetterman (D-Uncle Fester) reacting with sarcastic derision to news that House Republicans were considering beginning a formal impeachment inquiry against Old Joe Biden, rumors have been flying that the guy in the video wasn’t Fetterman at all.
Twitter/X is full of detailed comparisons of still photos from each, with the slovenly socialist’s supporters deriding doubters as crazed conspiracy theorists going nuts over photos taken with different lighting or from different angles. Amid all the back-and-forth about whether there are now two Fettermans, however, the biggest part of the story has been missed, and that is this: when did this man become coherent?
Fetterman himself started the rumors flying in mid-August when he radically changed his look, shaving his salt-and-pepper goatee and growing a thick brown mustache. That has led to a blizzard of photo comparisons. On Sunday, journalist Alex Rosen posted two photos in which Fetterman looks very different with the question: “How did John Fetterman grow a full beard between these 2 pictures supposedly taken on the same day?” X’ers pointed out that one of his photos was actually taken over a year before the other, but that didn’t actually address the fact that Fetterman really does look quite different in both.
Nevertheless, the idea that there was another bald, hulking, slouching, six-foot-eight slob with a crooked frown line on his forehead waiting in the wings to take Fetterman’s place strains credulity, even in these days of AI and massive fakery everywhere. There could conceivably be a fake Fetterman, but if there is, the biggest evidence of the fakery is not to be found in small details of Fetterman One’s appearance as compared to Fetterman Two. The biggest evidence is that the new Fetterman can speak coherently.
Back in June, in a fairly typical utterance, Fetterman spoke in the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee about the collapse of a section of I-95 in Pennsylvania: “Uh, no, I, I, I, uh, would, would, would just, ah, um, really like ta, y’know, the 95, 95, 95. Y’know. Um, y’know, obviously, that, y’know, you’re pretty much preoccupied with, with the 95, and I certainly am too, and you know it’s a major, uh, atery [sic], na-, not just for, for Pennsylvania, but for the east, the east coast. And, Penn- a lot of Pennsylvanians are worried that the delays and repairs bring to its standstill deal.”
There is more. Read the rest here.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
The main thing about Fetterman is the Senate changing its dress code for senators so that they wouldn’t have to go through the ordeal of dressing up for that office. However, everyone else – from support staff to people who appear before the Senate – will still have to go in their best formal apparel
I just wonder how long it will be before one summer, we’ll see a Senator go in a tanktop, shorts and barefeet (or maybe flipflops)? Last year, we also had a Rhode Island senator who twerked semi-nude: maybe that could be a Senate costume?
somehistory says
they may take more “pride” in their dress code in the future if things in society keep bending toward the perverted.
Recall i elmi, alias i omar, got a dress code change in the House so her evil cult could be represented by her slave scarf.
And if the young man who wore the horn helmet and went in to the capitol building, and was given a tour by the police, had been on “their” side, his dress would not have raised any comments from “their” media.
somehistory says
Perhaps it’s just my artist’s eyes…I love doing portraits of people with interesting faces…but the two photos don’t look like the same person. I see small differences.
And the ability to speak and understand words is a big red flag when that ability was missing only days before. As the saying goes, “the elephant in the room.”