German Media Self-Censors to Minimize Muslim Criminality

Recently, the international media announced that five German men had been arrested for raping a Spanish girl, it was revealed that all of the men have a “migration background.” Virtually all the news outlets called the men “Germans.” Very few bothered to mention that the accused weren’t actually Germans at all, but Turks. Robert Spencer wrote about this here, and more on this deliberate misidentification of Muslim Turks, resident in Germany and apparently citizens, as “Germans,” can be found here: “German media self-censors about foreign origins of 5 ‘Germans’ arrested for rape of young girl in Mallorca, and this trend will only get worse,” by John Cody, Remix News, July 17, 2023:

…While Spanish news outlet Ultima Hora reported that the 21- to 23-year-old suspects were of Turkish origin, much of the Spanish press was fixated on the “German” aspect of the crime, which the men allegedly filmed on their smartphones. Even the German press was quick to claim the men were Germans with no context, with Welt, one of the most popular conservative papers in the country, running the headline “Five German vacationers on Mallorca have to be remanded in custody.” At no point in the piece does Welt mention the migration background of the suspects. The same story was told throughout the international press, with Associated Press, Deutsche Welle, and the Daily Mail making no mention of the men’s migration background.

Every single media outlet in Germany that covered the story, save one, the newspaper Bild, described the five rapists as “Germans” or “German vacationers.” The international media, including AP, Deutsche Welle, and the Daily Mail, did the same – referring to the rapists only as “Germans” and remaining silent about all five being Muslim and Turkish in origin.

Bild newspaper was perhaps the only major German newspaper to note that the men all had a migration background, but Bild is one of the rare publications in Germany that consistently publishes such information when it is made available by the police.

The issue of migrant men, or those with a migration background, being portrayed simply as “Germans” when it comes to crime has been a theme over recent years, but we should expect this trend to continue and only get worse. The reason why is that the German government is quickly naturalizing hundreds of thousands of migrants, and as Remix News has reported in the past, once these foreigners obtain German citizenship, they are simply referred to as “Germans” in the crime statistics. Germany makes no distinction based on race or ethnicity in its own crime statistics and only divides the data between Germans and foreigners.

That is why when the five German citizens with a migration background allegedly raped the young girl in Spain, the global media and the German domestic media could loudly trumpet that Germans had participated in a gang rape.

When every German and international media outlet, save Bild, deliberately hides the Muslim identity of the five men accused of rape in Spain by describing them only as “Germans,” this means they have chosen to self-censor in order to protect Muslims from a growing popular anger. They don’t want the German people to become aware of the extent of Muslim crime. Once these Muslim Turks became citizens, they were then to be referred to in official communiques only as “Germans” in crime data; the government refuses to publish statistical breakdowns as to religion, race, and ethnicity of German citizens charged with crimes. Thus does the German – and much of the international — media protect Muslims, and misinform native Germans as to the true extent of Muslim criminality in Germany. This has led to a world of woe.

Another important bit of information kept from the German public concerns welfare recipients. Muslim migrants who obtain citizenship are from then on referred to only as “Germans”; their religion and ethnicity are no longer provided to the public. If they receive welfare benefits, they are counted as “Germans.” Even so, the number of “German” recipients of welfare benefits has halved since 2010, while the number of foreign nationals receiving social assistance payments has doubled, government data has revealed. If the recipients of welfare benefit who are naturalized German citizens but of Muslim background were to be counted as “foreign nationals” rather than as Germans, the disparity in those numbers would be even larger, and more disturbing. The number of Germans by birth receiving welfare benefits would become much smaller; the number of “foreign nationals” receiving such benefits would be even larger. “Germany: Cost of foreign welfare payments soars to €15.4 billion a year as foreign recipients double since 2010,” by Thomas Brooke, Remix News, July 27, 2023:

The number of German recipients of welfare benefits has halved since 2010, while the number of foreign nationals receiving social assistance payments has doubled, government data has revealed.

The data emerged from a response by Parliamentary State Secretary at the Federal Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs Anette Kramme to a request made by the Alternative for Germany (AfD) MP René Springer.

It revealed that the number of German recipients of the citizens’ allowance had almost halved from 5.2 million in 2020 to 2.9 million as of February 2023. In contrast, foreign recipients of social benefits had doubled from 1.3 million people in 2010 to 2.6 million currently.

With spikes in the number of recipients experienced during the 2015 migrant crisis and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, it means the German taxpayer is paying around €15.4 billion each year in social benefits for foreign recipients, a 122 percent increase over the €6.9 billion reported in 2010.

The foreigners – 86% of migrants seeking asylum in Germany are Muslims – are costing German taxpayers astronomical sums, and these amounts are on a steep upward curve. In 2010 benefits for those foreigners cost 6.9 billion euros; now they have more than doubled, to 15.4 billion euros, and the expectation is that they will double again, to 30 billion euros, not in 13 years, but by 2030.

This disaster can only be avoided if the Alternative für Deutschland can be voted in, possibly at the head of a coalition, and then takes the necessary measures that so far the other political parties refuse even to discuss. This means putting an end to Muslim immigration and expelling to their countries of origin any Muslim migrants found guilty of a crime. A policy of offering one-time financial inducements to encourage Muslims to leave Germany should also be considered. A few thousand euros given to every Muslim immigrant, whether citizen or not, who agrees to leave the country, will cost the German government far less than the welfare benefits now being provided, year after year, to Muslim economic migrants.