“Love jihad” is a term used for the phenomenon in which minority women and girls are manipulated, coerced or kidnapped by Muslim men, and then raped and forced into marriage. Each year, 1,000 mostly Hindu and Christian girls in Pakistan alone are forcibly converted to Islam in this manner. It is widespread in India, too.
But the BBC, according to a report from India, has been minimizing “love jihad,” and went so far as to completely misrepresent a recent case, making it look as though Hindu men were doing the same thing with Muslim women.
The Western mainstream media turn a blind eye to the myriad jihadi atrocities against women and infidels globally, including the severity of Christian persecution. Instead, they seek out any means to promote the “Islamophobia” canard that is nothing short of propaganda.
A month ago, Barack Obama created a stir in India over his remarks unfairly trashing India over its alleged mistreatment of Muslims. Obama stated that “there is a strong possibility that India at some point starts pulling apart.” He was goaded by Christiane Amanpour on a CNN interview in which Amanpour also asked whether “white-lash” against his presidency was “receding.” This interview took place while India’s President Narendra Modi was on a state visit to America. Amanpour was accusing India of violating “Muslim rights,” with no regard for the Islamic supremacist abuse of minority groups in India and Pakistan. Like the BBC, Amapour was pushing the popular “Islamophobia” narrative on CNN.
In a like manner, the Western mainstream activist media misrepresents the Palestinian jihad against Israel, as they amplify Palestinian propaganda.
“From Love Jihad To Misleading Headlines: Unmasking The BBC’s Agenda,” by Aditi Joshi, Jaipur Dialogues, July 3, 2023:
On the evening of June 19, a disturbing incident unfolded in the Aligarh region of Uttar Pradesh. The community discovered the lifeless body of a Muslim woman hanging outside her leased residence, sending shockwaves through the area. The woman, Muskan, had been involved in a complicated relationship that soon became the subject of speculation and false narratives.
Muskan’s Suicide
Initial reports focused on Muskan’s previous involvement with a Hindu man named Deepak. These accounts alleged that Deepak manipulated Muskan by feigning love, promising her conversion to Hinduism, only to later betray her and commit a heinous act. This narrative quickly gained traction on social media under the hashtag ‘bhagwa love trap,’ implying a larger conspiracy to counter the reality of love jihad.However, as the investigation progressed, the police uncovered crucial details that contradicted the initial narrative. They revealed that Muskan had actually separated from Deepak a year ago and had been living with another man named Mohammad Faizan ever since. Unfortunately, certain individuals on social media, with Islamist and left-liberal leanings, shared tweets falsely attributing Muskan’s death to the ‘Bhagwa Love Trap.’ Regrettably, these claims were based on misinformation and lacked any factual basis.
BBC’s Propaganda Narrative
Adding to the controversy, BBC News Hindi joined in by promoting the narrative that Muskan’s suicide directly linked to her previous relationship with Deepak. However, the BBC conveniently omitted the fact that Muskan had moved on from Deepak and had been residing with Mohammad Faizan at the time of her death.This incident highlights a troubling pattern in the BBC’s reporting, where they seem to embrace biased narratives and propagate fake news without issuing corrections. It is noteworthy that the BBC rarely covered the numerous cases of love jihad emerging across India, raising concerns about their journalistic integrity and impartiality.
History Of BBC’s Notoriety
Moreover, this was not the first time the BBC faced criticism for questionable reporting. In April 2023, BBC News attempted to generate sympathy for the deceased gangster-politician Atiq Ahmed by romanticizing him. Similarly, in February 2023, the BBC published an article that appeared to endorse child marriage, despite acknowledging the patriarchal roots of such practices…..
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Whenever anybody on YouTube posts something about Love Jihad, especially if it is in the title or description, YouTube automatically attaches an ‘advisory’ linked to the Wikipedia article on Love Jihad, which starts w/ “Love jihad or Romeo jihad,[5] is an Islamophobic[11] conspiracy theory[22] developed by proponents of the Hindutva ideology…” Never mind that everything in the accusations have been borne out over several cases all over the subcontinent over the years
I actually disagree w/ the term “love jihad” not only b’cos there is no love involved, but also b’cos it covers a range of behaviors from muslim guys against Hindu & other non-muslim (such as Christian, Jain, Sikh, Buddhist) girls. In fact, there are a few patterns that they follow:
‣ Hindu woman knowingly marries muslim man, & converts to islam
‣ Hindu woman knowingly marries muslim man on the condition that she won’t embrace islam. However, either he breaks the terms of the marriage, or his other family members do, & put pressure on the Hindu wife to convert, making her life a living hell
‣ Hindu woman marries a muslim man who masquerades as Hindu, & reveals the truth only after marriage, kids, and then starts pressuring her to convert, rather than be embarrassed about the deception being exposed
‣ Muslim man stalks Hindu woman (and worse, minor girls) trying to nab them. Pretty often, the girls are raped/murdered
‣ Muslim man abducts Hindu minor girl, marries her under islamic rites, which currently allow girls as young as 15 to marry. Never mind that Hindu girls that are 15 can’t marry
‣ Muslim man is honest about his muslim background, but claims to be an ex-muslim. He then marries the Hindu woman, then discloses that he never left islam & then tries to forcibly convert her. For this reason, ex muslims should stick to other ex muslims when it comes to looking for spouses
Of all of the above, the first category is never included in love jihad. However, the next ones are, since they involve coercion of the Hindu woman into converting. Even in the first case, a Hindu woman who converts sometimes finds herself abandoned, or even worse, pimped around the family. Using the example of Mohammed and Zainab, they consider it halal for the wife to have sex w/ not just the husband, but his father, brothers, uncles, cousins
For these reasons, the term I prefer is “muslim trafficking of _____” where ____ is Hindu girls in the subcontinent, Christian girls in Pakistan or UK or Europe and so on. However, I tried doing this on the new Twitter of Elon Musk, and they suspended me. It’s not much different from the old Twitter of Vijaya Gadde, which suspended me for using the term “rapefugee” for describing one of those muslim refugees in Europe who raped locals. (I think Elon has his heart in the right place but the entire architecture of Twitter needs to be overhauled to be something like Telegram, where you only see who you choose to see – nothing more, but more importantly, nothing less)
Anyway, this muslim trafficking is a form of genocide against infidels, & needs to be recognized as such worldwide
John says
what about exmuslims who were converts to islam? what should they do?
gravenimage says
John, they should be honest. But sadly they may have to suffer because there will be Hindu and other Infidel women who will be quite rightly suspicious of such claims. Just another negative courtesy of Islam itself.
If someone says they are ex-Catholic, say, no one has any reason to doubt them. Not so with Islam.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Ex-muslims who were converts to islam should reveal why they converted to islam in the first place. If they were forced, like many Hindus & Christians in Pakistan, it may be okay to be more flexible, but one must never let one’s guard down
Otherwise, like other ex-muslims, they too should restrict their searches for a spouse to ex-muslims. Like Gravenimage mentioned, they unfortunately suffer due to other muslims who masquerade as ex-muslims but pull off stunts like the one I described in my 6th point above
Similarly, my advice to all non-muslim women/girls is to steer clear of muslims – current or ex. This is a tad like the Trans thing, where the faith of one’s birth should be used to ID someone and plan accordingly.
Also important is not getting deceived by a muslim in the first place, and the way around that is to get to know the guy’s family, preferably using another relative, such as a cousin, to find out, or see if a background check can be done on a guy. For teens & tweens, that would be uncomfortable since they may not know whether they want a long term relationship like marriage in the first place. However, it’s important b’cos the alternative could be so much worse, as many of these muslim trafficking stories bear out
Hoi Polloi says
Good post. I am repeatedly appalled by just how virulently anti-Christian the BBC is, so I’d believe much worse than what you’ve posted. Twitter still won’t take Tommy Robinson back. That ME money has bought a lot of liars.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
I think that’s b’cos in Europe/UK (not sure which one Tommy is living in now), Twitter follows the dictates of either the EU or Offcom. Musk has made it clear that Twitter won’t lock horns w/ local authorities in countries where it operates, which is fair: he is only stubborn about the First Amendment in the US, where it is in fact law
I thought that Tommy was on Gettr: that’s what he plugged when he did his Nupur J Sharma interview
Hoi Polloi says
He is still there but would like to be back on Twitter. Yes, Musk can’t fight all the fights at once; at least he’s pushing the First Amendment issue.
TR has left the UK and now faces further issues due to Silenced, which explains the case with the violent Syrian boy. Apple does not allow access to TR Telegram comments, btw.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
I have a 9 year old laptop w/ Linux on it, and that’s what I use for all my basic browsing when it comes to social media. In fact, all the big 3 tech platforms – Apple, Microsoft & Google – are completely woke, so I’ve made sure that I’m not at the mercy of anyone who pulls the plug on me: I have one of each
Which violent Syrian boy is he talking about?
Hoi Polloi says
Story as reported was that a migrant boy was water-boarded on school grounds by islamophobic students. TR did Silenced to prove that the migrant was violent toward teachers and students. The court system blocked the video and testimony about the way the supposed victim was, in reality,attacking and endangering others and then fined TR, threatening him with prison if the video was released. It’s now on rumble, etc.
The iPhone is work-issue and inferior to your mode, doubtless.
gravenimage says
Fine post, Infidel. And I agree that the term “Love Jihad” is woefully inadequate.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Unfortunately, we’re stuck w/ it, b’cos that’s how most Hindus have branded this issue. In Twitter, they use the initials LJ to denote it
Hoi Polloi says
So, we’re back to segregation, racial mostly peaceful extreme violence, and the one drop rule post-BHO but we’re responsible for the regression, not BHO? How can their be “white-lash” against his presidency when he’s half-white? He’s out a lot lately trying to distract from his increasingly exposed incompetent and criminal cronies and the coverups.
gravenimage says
BBC slammed in India for misrepresentation of ‘Love Jihad’
………………………………
Just despicable–attributing the horrors of Islamic “Love Jihad” to Hindus and other infidels. Then, many falsely claim that “Love Jihad” doesn’t exist at all.
Here is a BBC article that really sums this insanity up:
“Love jihad: The Indian law threatening interfaith love”
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-55158684
It features a large picture of a Muslim woman in a Niqab holding a sign reading, “We are one. Do not divide us in the name of religion”. The BBC doesn’t question that fact that Islam doesn’t allow Muslim women tp marry non-Muslims like Hindus and Christians, and often “Honor Kills” both if they try.
John Smith says
Gravenimage
There was a time when the BBC was one of the finest outlets in the world for reporting the truth with an unbiased attitude. Sadly those days are long gone. Today the BBC is just another tool for radical left, and as Trump puts it,”FAKE NEWS”.
Thanks for the link you sent, and as you say, that photo says it all.
James Lincoln says
Yes, John.
The BBC was fair and balanced around 50-60 years ago.
Now, it’s the propaganda arm of the Left.
Hoi Polloi says
Just like the BBC to go with covering islam’s violence and pedophilia by dropping the jihad in the name and pushing the idea that India hates love itself. It’s clearly as Infidel says, a serious problem in need of a better label.
somehistory says
“shared tweets falsely attributing Muskan’s death to the ‘Bhagwa Love Trap.’ Regrettably, these claims were based on misinformation and lacked any factual basis.”
I don’t believe “regrettably” is appropriate in this instance. Makes it sound as if it’s “regrettable” that the claims were false. But, maybe it’s just me and others see it as okay to use the word.
What is “regrettable” is the lack of integrity on the part of the *news* org. But, it’s full of mozlums, so who should be surprised.
Aum says
Grooming is appropriate.
OLD GUY says
Islam what a great religion, kidnaping, rape and murder all allowed in the name of Allah.