⚠️ En Autriche trois jeunes (suspectés proches de Daesh) viennent d’être arrêté alors qu’ils projetaient un attentat sur la marche des fiertés à Vienne. Des armes ont été saisies.
De partout l’extr-droite s’attaquent aux droits des LGBTI et dans la rue. Stoppons-les ! pic.twitter.com/iojGiZKNBo
— Raphaël Arnault (@ArnaultRaphael) June 18, 2023
Raphaël Arnault is an Antifa thug who, in a classic case of projection, calls those whom he hates and fears “fascists.” This Marxist dissembler calls the Islamic State (which he refers to as Daesh, its Arabic acronym), “far right.” Then the establishment media will do its bit by lamenting the alleged rise of the “far right.” Everyone involved knows that this smear term is usually used to refer to National Socialists and the like, as well as completely law-abiding believers in Constitutional republics who want to end the madness of open borders and kowtowing to jihad violence. Thus an incident of jihad will be used to buttress the establishment narrative that “far-right terrorism” is on the rise.
(Thanks to Medforth.)
somehistory says
Absolutely. It’s the *fault* of those who want real Law and Order, and not that of days and nights of rage to force others to tow their evil line (lies , of course)
. So, the uninformed, those who are busy with mundane affairs, will believe the lies and not prepare themselves accordingly. And so they will believe it’s the ones who want things to be “right” that are the danger.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
It’s funny how Antifa – and the larger Left in general & the LGBTQIA+ movement in particular – has the same definition of persecution that islam has: if you’re not toeing their line, you are persecuting them
I’d like some entity to really persecute them, so that they get what it really means. Maybe the Hamtramck City Council can lead the way w/ the Left at least, if not the Jihadists?
Westman says
Under what conditions will “Pride” categories be exempt from military draft? The “reborn” wanna-be politician, Raphaël Arnault, may find both the government and citizens lose interest in gender-sexual issues when faced with being poor and required to go to war. Anti-war demonstrations would swamp any notions of “prides” clamoring for attention.
It’s amazing how the EU stumbles toward war as a demand of a US amateur shadow executive government. Left without cheap fossil fuel, giving away their own defense materials, and under the thumb of an elitist EU central, unaccountable, government. Imagine Ursula Gertrud von der Crazy, with no military experience, directing the EU in wartime.
By fall, there will be riots in France, Germany, etc, but they will have nothing to do with gender/gay/trans “rights”. Raphaël Arnault won’t be able to get the time-of-day unless he is a leading anti-war proponent.
tgusa says
The creeps want to distribute alphabet porn to kids and they think it is their right. I’m usually against violence but to protect children they probably should be put to the sword.
I’m writing a book (with pictures) of all my “experiences” and they go back to the sexual revolution, when things were quite wild, so be ready. If I bring that book to school what is the over and under of how fast I end up on the list of sex offenders?
somehistory says
If you claim to be a non-man, er woman, you might get away with it. Stay a man, and off you go to the pokey.
Did you see the news about the teacher who *shamed* the kids because they had something to say about the student claiming to be a cat?
And, I’m with you on the violence thing. When kids are involved, they definitely should be shown that perversion is not acceptable….or tolerated.
tgusa says
Every time one of them asks I just change my mind, make something up, to confuse them.
somehistory says
if anyone ever asked me, I’d just say noyb. So much today is made public that should be kept private; and so much is obvious that people shouldn’t need to ask. So if anyone ever asked, I’d consider that they were making trouble…or trying to.
FYI says
antifa:they act like fascists,dress like fascists.
The modern version of those soviet-era Leftist Bolsheviks.
Oui.Stoppons-les!
Wellington says
Two Points: 1) Fascism can be found on both the Far Left and the Far Right. Each destroy freedom and many other noble things; 2) Because of sloppy language in our era (fitting since so much else is sloppy in our era), the term “conservative” is incorrectly treated as synonymous with those who are reactionary—and nothing could be further from the truth.
Those on the Far Left are radicals and those on the Far Right are reactionary. To equate conservatism with reactionary rubbish is a major error, just as to equate liberalism with radical rubbish also is.
As examples, Marxism is radical rubbish while Nazism after the Night of the Long Knives (before said brutal event on June 30th, 1934, Nazism was so muddled it had some radical nonsense as well) was solely reactionary rubbish.
Islam is NOT conservative. It is reactionary. I do wish more people would note this highly important distinction. Even many who should know better do not and this does not redound to the prevailing of truth overall.
PRCS says
I disagree:
Conservative:
ADJECTIVE
averse to change or innovation and holding traditional values:
NOUN
a person who is averse to change and holds traditional values:
That definition in mind, Islam is extremely conservative. It cannot and will not be changed by its human followers.
There is, of course, no liberal Islam.
Wellington says
I disagree. Conservatism resists change for its own sake. It seeks to preserve traditions but is not averse to bettering matters, though it is more cautious by far than liberalism where change is concerned and values traditions more than liberalism. Conservatism is “disposed to preserving existing conditions” (The Random House College Dictionary) but this does not equate to a disallowance of any change. By contrast, one who is reactionary effectively resists all change. Such a person is inflexible and rigid.
Islam is reactionary, not conservative. Ronald Reagan was a conservative and often flexible. The theocratic regime running Iran is reactionary and virtually inflexible. I have never looked upon Islam as conservative. Never. It is reactionary.
PRCS says
I disagree.
Reactionary as a noun:
One who is very conservative.
https://diffsense.com/diff/conservative/reactionary#:~:text=When%20used%20as%20nouns%2C%20conservative%20means%20one%20who,to%20a%20supposed%20golden%20age%20of%20the%20past.
That YOU have never looked upon Islam as conservative…..
born saturday says
antifa is some of the main terrorist organisations that has worked very hard to tackle anyone who was against the muslim invasion…. they should be characterised as the terrorists they are and sent to prison where they belong to find out the sexual apetites of their fellow muslims they worked so hard to impost in europe…..
antifas into prison to dance ballet and other oriental dances!!!!!!
born saturday says
their terrorism is serving the rotten authoritarian neo marxist and liberal establishment….
gravenimage says
As jihad attack on ‘Pride’ Parade is thwarted, Antifa top dog says ‘Everywhere far-right is attacking LGBTI rights’
………………………………………..
What a lie. This Jihad terror attack had nothing to do with the far-right.
The istanbulian says
The Islamic state is far right. That is a perfect example of far right. So some small government guy.
Fuzzy Bear says
Well, I prefer a more nuanced approach, because, let’s face it, mohamedanism is indeed right wing, as in reactionary. There’s no denying that. Look at the facts: they oppose freedom of speech, freedom of religion, womens’ rights and Judaism as in antisemitism (in the sense that we use it: antijew), and they are proponents of polygamy and slavery. In light of this, I’m afraid Mr. Arnault is right on the button where mohamedanism is concerned. Where he’s totally ‘off the button’, however, is the conflation of everything ‘right’ in ‘extreme right’, which is an extremely old way of manipulating people.