“China is not going to implement it” (the green agenda)
What ignorance! China has built more wind power in the last year than the rest of the world combined; solar also, plus recently started the World’s first commercial SMR.
This ridiculous denial of the threat posed by climate change is unbelievable. Yes, fossil fuels won’t be replaced overnight BUT they must go ASAP, or society will collapse if we think, like you, that ‘business as usual’ can continue ad infinitum.
Wellingtonsays
Bullshit. There is no hard scientific evidence that man-made climate change exists. If you think so, provide the evidence. All the man-made climate change crowd has is computer model projections and correlation studies, which are not scientific evidence and each of which has a notorious record for accuracy.
Holy Hell, CO2 is not a poison. It is food for plants. And, off hand and without looking things up, what percentage of the Earth’s atmosphere is CO2 presently as opposed to two hundred years ago? If you really know this, as well as the geological history of CO2 in the atmosphere over hundreds of millions of years, no way you would be another climate alarmist. And remember, please do, that some fifty years ago one of the great environmental scares then was global cooling. Wake the Hell up and realize that such phenomenon as ocean currents, polar changes and solar activity have far, far more to do with climate than anything puny man does.
Your turn if you care. Give it a shot.
James Lincolnsays
Jim J Fox,
So, why are leftists such as Barack Obama buying oceanfront property in places like Martha’s Vineyard?
Are they misinformed vis-à-vis “climate change”?
gravenimagesays
Good posts, Wellington and James.
Samersays
I think that who saves Britain is a ruler who is not British in terms of culture, that is, a ruler who belongs to a culture that is not Anglo-Saxon. Britain’s problem is that the British Anglo-Saxon elites still live in the same old imperial mentality. As the British Empire ceased to exist, it worked to transform the United Kingdom into a miniature empire of the same peoples who lived within the Great British Empire. For this reason, those ruling elites opened the door of immigration widely in front of all peoples, creeds and races, which became a recipe for civil war. The recent clashes between Muslims and Hindus in many British cities are just a prelude or an exercise in preparation for a large-scale civil war, unless the immigration of peoples and beliefs that cannot coexist peacefully with other peoples, beliefs and religions are limited. or stopped.
gravenimagesays
Samer, isn’t this rather contradictory–that you are anti-immigration yet believe that the problem with Britain is that it has British culture–and that she has to be “saved” from that civilized culture by those who don’t share it?
Samersays
Thanks for your response, no, there is no contradiction in my comment. Anglo-Saxon political elites, with an imperialist mentality, bear the responsibility for the deep crisis that Britain is currently experiencing. So I think that a prime minister, like the new prime minister, can save this country from inevitable collapse, given that he has a mentality and culture different from that of the Anglo-Saxon elites. After all, the new prime minister is Hindu, not Muslim.
Wellingtonsays
Samer: The problem is not “Anglo-Saxon elites” per se but rather silly and woke Anglo-Saxon elites in our era.
As for imperialism per se, all peoples across the Earth who could do so have engaged in this, but Britain did it better than all others. Consider what the great Spanish-American philosopher, George Santayana, opined about the British Empire, to wit, “Never since the heroic days of Greece has the world had such a sweet, boyish master. It will be a black day for the human race when scientific blackguards, conspirators, churls, and fanatics manage to supplant him.”
Reflect upon such polities like Zimbabwe (formerly Southern Rhodesia) since the British Empire is gone and tell me how and why the world is better off without this most benevolent of all empires in man’s history no longer existing. Yes, it was far from perfect but, a la Shakespeare, its greatness is assured, its faults lie gently upon it. Of course, such greatness will only be recognized by informed individuals. I have to wonder if you are one of them. I’m inclined to think you are not.
gravenimagesays
Thanks for your reply, Samer. Now, Rishi Sunak *may* prove to be a good Prime Minister–I admit I know little about him. But the claim that no one who has British values can save Britain is troubling and false. Both Margaret Thatcher and Winston Churchill were over all excellent Prime Ministers, and neither of them rejected British values–quite the opposite, in fact.
gravenimagesays
Agreed, Wellington.
Discover more from
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
Jim J Fox says
“China is not going to implement it” (the green agenda)
What ignorance! China has built more wind power in the last year than the rest of the world combined; solar also, plus recently started the World’s first commercial SMR.
This ridiculous denial of the threat posed by climate change is unbelievable. Yes, fossil fuels won’t be replaced overnight BUT they must go ASAP, or society will collapse if we think, like you, that ‘business as usual’ can continue ad infinitum.
Wellington says
Bullshit. There is no hard scientific evidence that man-made climate change exists. If you think so, provide the evidence. All the man-made climate change crowd has is computer model projections and correlation studies, which are not scientific evidence and each of which has a notorious record for accuracy.
Holy Hell, CO2 is not a poison. It is food for plants. And, off hand and without looking things up, what percentage of the Earth’s atmosphere is CO2 presently as opposed to two hundred years ago? If you really know this, as well as the geological history of CO2 in the atmosphere over hundreds of millions of years, no way you would be another climate alarmist. And remember, please do, that some fifty years ago one of the great environmental scares then was global cooling. Wake the Hell up and realize that such phenomenon as ocean currents, polar changes and solar activity have far, far more to do with climate than anything puny man does.
Your turn if you care. Give it a shot.
James Lincoln says
Jim J Fox,
So, why are leftists such as Barack Obama buying oceanfront property in places like Martha’s Vineyard?
Are they misinformed vis-à-vis “climate change”?
gravenimage says
Good posts, Wellington and James.
Samer says
I think that who saves Britain is a ruler who is not British in terms of culture, that is, a ruler who belongs to a culture that is not Anglo-Saxon. Britain’s problem is that the British Anglo-Saxon elites still live in the same old imperial mentality. As the British Empire ceased to exist, it worked to transform the United Kingdom into a miniature empire of the same peoples who lived within the Great British Empire. For this reason, those ruling elites opened the door of immigration widely in front of all peoples, creeds and races, which became a recipe for civil war. The recent clashes between Muslims and Hindus in many British cities are just a prelude or an exercise in preparation for a large-scale civil war, unless the immigration of peoples and beliefs that cannot coexist peacefully with other peoples, beliefs and religions are limited. or stopped.
gravenimage says
Samer, isn’t this rather contradictory–that you are anti-immigration yet believe that the problem with Britain is that it has British culture–and that she has to be “saved” from that civilized culture by those who don’t share it?
Samer says
Thanks for your response, no, there is no contradiction in my comment. Anglo-Saxon political elites, with an imperialist mentality, bear the responsibility for the deep crisis that Britain is currently experiencing. So I think that a prime minister, like the new prime minister, can save this country from inevitable collapse, given that he has a mentality and culture different from that of the Anglo-Saxon elites. After all, the new prime minister is Hindu, not Muslim.
Wellington says
Samer: The problem is not “Anglo-Saxon elites” per se but rather silly and woke Anglo-Saxon elites in our era.
As for imperialism per se, all peoples across the Earth who could do so have engaged in this, but Britain did it better than all others. Consider what the great Spanish-American philosopher, George Santayana, opined about the British Empire, to wit, “Never since the heroic days of Greece has the world had such a sweet, boyish master. It will be a black day for the human race when scientific blackguards, conspirators, churls, and fanatics manage to supplant him.”
Reflect upon such polities like Zimbabwe (formerly Southern Rhodesia) since the British Empire is gone and tell me how and why the world is better off without this most benevolent of all empires in man’s history no longer existing. Yes, it was far from perfect but, a la Shakespeare, its greatness is assured, its faults lie gently upon it. Of course, such greatness will only be recognized by informed individuals. I have to wonder if you are one of them. I’m inclined to think you are not.
gravenimage says
Thanks for your reply, Samer. Now, Rishi Sunak *may* prove to be a good Prime Minister–I admit I know little about him. But the claim that no one who has British values can save Britain is troubling and false. Both Margaret Thatcher and Winston Churchill were over all excellent Prime Ministers, and neither of them rejected British values–quite the opposite, in fact.
gravenimage says
Agreed, Wellington.