Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Commie AOC: Abortion Is Part of ‘Class Struggle,’ Pro-Lifers Help Big Corporations Maintain Large Workforce

By

New in PJ Media:

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-Workers of the World Unite) on Thursday tweeted a video of herself explaining why abortion is a “class issue and class struggle,” thereby demonstrating an even more open Marxism than this avowed socialist has shown up to now. In the process, AOC demonstrated the catastrophic illogic and counterfactual nature of Marxist thinking, and showed why, underneath her ditzy exterior, she is truly dangerous for the prospects of the United States remaining a free society.

Along with the video, AOC tweeted: “Abortion rights are a class struggle too. When the powerful force people to give birth against their will, they trap millions into cycles of economic setback and desperation. Especially in a country without guaranteed healthcare. And desperate workers are far easier to exploit.” In the video herself, she expanded on this, saying:

Y’know, I think it’s important to state that, um, that abortion is an economic issue. Forcing poor and working class people, uh, to give birth, um, against their will, against their consent, um, against their ability to provide for themselves or a child is a profound economic issue, and it’s certainly a way to keep, um, a workforce, uh, basically conscripted, uh, to large-scale employers and to employers to be p-, you know, to work more against their will, to take second and third jobs against their desire and their own autonomy, and so the idea that, um, abortion and access to abortion is somehow not a profound and central economic and class issue and class struggle, um, is certainly something that I think a person who has never had to contend, uh, with the ability to carry a child, um, you know, it belies that perspective.

A few observations on this masterpiece of Marxist mind manipulation:

Why are the books on AOC’s shelf turned around so that the pages, rather than the spines, face outward? Are there books that she is reading, or possesses anyway, that she doesn’t want the world to see? Why are her photos placed face down? Who or what is in them? Why not just move the books and photos off the shelves behind her (which are largely empty anyway, echoing her vision of the ideal supermarket) before starting the video?

There is a word for a large number of people who have “never had to contend with the ability to carry a child,” and never will. What is that word? Why does AOC avoid using it?

Is AOC really unaware that the big corporations today aren’t actually pro-life at all? If her Marxist analysis of the abortion issue were correct, then corporations would be encouraging motherhood and family. Instead, they’re encouraging the LGBTQ agenda, transgender madness, and even funding abortions for their employees.

There is more. Read the rest here.

Comments

  1. Corporations do not want a large work force. Each worker costs money and profits. Corporations want robots who can replace human workers. Corporations want humans only as consumers. It does not matter if those humans are smart or how they live as long as they consume things. In fact, the dumber those humans are the better because they are more easily manipulated into consuming what the corporation produces. AOC is doing her part to help make people dumber.

    • It’s also interesting that AOC will use the argument that we must have more immigrants coming into the country so as to increase the work force.

    • They may not want a large work force, but they do want a dedicated work force, where employees do not ask for things like maternity leave, vacations, leave the workplace early to attend a PTA meet and so on. It’s the reason they pay employees to freeze their eggs (dunno what good that does) as well as sponsor them if they wanna have abortions. AOC is thinking of corporations of yesterday, that thought of themselves as a part of the larger society that they were in. That spirit is dead, and has been for at least 10, if not 20 years

      Yeah, corporations want people as their customers, but none of them think like Henry Ford used to, when he said that he wanted his employees to be able to afford his cars. In fact, none of them wonder where their employees would get their money if none of them have jobs, or they assume that every other company except their own would dedicatedly hire and pay employees while they alone become completely automated. It’s a microcosm of leftist thinking, where they don’t think beyond one step the consequences of anything they do

      • The biggest weakness with Marxism is the part about “from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.” This type of system results in some people doing all the work while others do nothing. When the people doing all the work see others doing nothing yet being rewarded just the same, the working people decide that it’s better not to work than it is to work. But somebody has to do the work. This is where either robots or slaves fit into the picture. Someone is going to have to tell me how the world can operate without one or the other – whether the economic system is Capitalism or Marxism. I guess in the future every human being will need to have a personal robot to act as a slave who will go to work and earn a paycheck.

    • CogitoErgoSum says

      Sep 30, 2022 at 11:57 am

      Corporations do not want a large work force. Each worker costs money and profits. Corporations want robots who can replace human workers. Corporations want humans only as consumers. It does not matter if those humans are smart or how they live as long as they consume things. In fact, the dumber those humans are the better because they are more easily manipulated into consuming what the corporation produces. AOC is doing her part to help make people dumber.
      ………………………………………………
      +1

      Take a peek at these articles.

      Transhumanism is the new one-world religion
      https://leohohmann.com/2022/09/20/transhumanism-is-the-new-one-world-religion/
      ………………………………………
      Yuval Noah Harari spills the beans: ‘We just don’t need the vast majority of the population’

      https://leohohmann.com/2022/08/15/yuval-noah-harari-spills-the-beans-we-just-dont-need-the-vast-majority-of-the-population/

  2. she is a tool for the devil. One thing, she has no conception of how being a father….the “ability” to father a child… affects a man. Men who have families are expected to take care of the financial needs of his kids.

    another thing…has the idiot had a baby murdered before she was *forced* to give birth? I hope she never becomes pregnant…the baby wouldn’t survive. And she has no soul for being a mom.

    A third thing; it isn’t all the *poor* women having their unborn murdered….many of the murdering slobs are rich and could easily afford to take care of a child…or several children.

    Poor people are known to be more generous than the rich. It’s a fact. Poor women are more likely to make a serious attempt to get their children what they need. The rich think about the trips they’ll be missing, the parties they’ll be missing, the nice clothing they’ll have to put away if they have a baby.

    Her ugly face…good that she has that big loudmouth covered. too bad we can’t shut her up in a quiet room where she can’t be heard.

    • Yeah, the raison d’être for abortion used to be that women couldn’t afford to raise their kids. But that has changed over the last 12 years to enjoying abortions, like when Chelsea Handler or Lena Dunham who said, “Now I can say that I still haven’t had an abortion, but I wish I had”. In other words, getting an abortion was like smoking a joint, or doing something daring. So it’s ridiculous for AOC to assert that it’s poor women who are in the lurch due to not being able to abort

      As for AOC herself, I recall her lamenting that she wouldn’t be able to have kids b’cos of climate change i.e. her kids would die due to that climate. I do hope that Riley, her fiance, does not impregnate her, come what may. In fact, she was recently pissed at him when he refused to confront a social media influencer who called her a baby killer, and I hope that he breaks up w/ her

      Last but not least, who would have thought that unborn infants would be considered allies of those eeeeeeeeevil capitalists who want to oppress the proletariat! It would be funny if the latter weren’t the very people enouraging abortions and offering to finance their employee’s travel to states w/ lax abortion laws

      • As I mentioned farther above, any economic system needs to have workers – either human or mechanical. If an unborn child is considered not to be human, with a little science a certain portion of a fetus’s brain could be removed to turn it into a sort of automaton that would basically be a living robot. It could be sold or put to work by its “birthing person” for a profit. Perhaps someday having an abortion will be seen as a waste of a natural resource and the same as throwing money away. This seems like a logical conclusion for a technologically advanced society which has no morals.

        • In fact, the early stages of this is happening now in that the tissue from aborted babies is being used scientifically and is making money for someone.

        • it’s much akin to dr frankenstein taking body parts from dead people and soldering them together to make the monster.

          these ghouls have no morals, no regard or respect for human life and care only for what they can do to others that they wouldn’t want done to them.

          there is a website…can’t recall the exact name, but has Life as the first part…that documents experiments carried out on live infants that would be against the law if done to adults…using chemicals and electricity…doing the devil’s desire as his children.

      • More people should be aware that the eugenics ghoul began planned genocide to lower the population of those she saw as undesirable….poor of all skin tones and people with darker skin, rich or not. It’s a genocide cloaked in *caring* for those *with the ability* to carry a child and give birth, when they only care about the money and ridding the population of those they hate.

      • Thanks for mentioning that, Infidel. I went to a reproductive rights rally in 1977 when I was first at Berkeley–I thought it would mostly be about birth control. But then they introduced a woman who had had *four* abortions, and the crowd *applauded her*. I was shocked, and also wondered how *anyone* could be that sloppy with birth control if they supposedly didn’t want to get pregnant–once or twice, maybe, but *four times*? I wasn’t sure at the time how I felt about abortion, but it never occurred to me that anyone would *want* to get an abortion, or consider having gotten one some kind of badge of attainment. Sick, sick stuff.

  4. I certainly hope that AOC never decides to actually have children.

    I’m sure that they would be force-fed Leftist propaganda ad nauseum…

    • I also have that hope, James. I hope that about a lot of people these days.

  5. The people in power within the current USA government are really all bat shit crazy..
    Im watching, from afar, a country that I have always loved in committing its own demise by placing utter morons like this silly silly wee lassie to say anything out loud as she is mercifully free from the ravages of intelligence and yet she is a Member of Congress.

  6. Commie AOC: Abortion Is Part of ‘Class Struggle,’ Pro-Lifers Help Big Corporations Maintain Large Workforce
    ……………………………………………

    Unhinged bs. Besides, how many corporations these days are *really* looking for a completely uneducated, unskilled, unmotivated workforce?

Discover more from

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Skip to content