In France, a Muslim quoted Qur’an while raping his victim. A survivor of a Muslim rape gang in the UK has said that her rapists would quote the Qur’an to her, and believed their actions justified by Islam. Thus it came as no surprise when Muslim migrants in France raped a girl and videoed the rape while praising Allah and invoking the Qur’an. In India, a Muslim gave a Qur’an and a prayer rug to the woman he was holding captive and repeatedly raping. And the victim of an Islamic State jihadi rapist recalled: “He told me that according to Islam he is allowed to rape an unbeliever. He said that by raping me, he is drawing closer to God…He said that raping me is his prayer to God.” In India, a Muslim kidnapped and raped a 14-year-old Hindu girl, and forced her to read the Qur’an and Islamic prayers. In Pakistan, another Christian woman recounted that her rapist was also religious: “He threw me on the bed and started to rape me. He demanded I marry him and convert to Islam. I refused. I am not willing to deny Jesus and he said that if I would not agree he would kill me.” Rapists demanded that another girl’s family turn her over to them, claiming that she had recited the Islamic profession of faith during the rape and thus could not live among infidels.
The Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified.
However, anyone who points all this out will be excoriated as a “racist” and an “Islamophobe,” and accordingly ignored.
“Paris: A young woman raped in a toilet, a man arrested,” translated from “Paris : Une jeune femme violée dans des toilettes, un homme interpellé,” Actu17, August 7, 2022:
A 27-year-old American woman was raped overnight from Saturday to Sunday around 1:30 a.m. in the 4th arrondissement of Paris. A 23-year-old drunk man, believed to be homeless, was arrested on the Louis-Philippe bridge and placed in police custody
It was a friend of the victim, surprised not to see her come back from the public toilets, who went to pick her up, details a source close to the investigation. He then discovered behind the door that she was being assaulted and raped by a stranger, who had his pants down. The latter then tried to flee but was caught by security agents, then arrested by police officers from the center police station (which includes the first four districts of the capital, editor’s note).
The suspect, born in Algeria, was still in police custody this Sunday at the end of the day in the premises of the 1st judicial police district (DPJ), which was in charge of the investigations.
An investigation for rape by a person in a state of intoxication has been opened, indicates the Paris prosecutor’s office to Actu17.
somehistory says
the rapist creep was drunk on islam, and his deluded belief that it gives him the right to rape any woman, esp those “uncovered.”
Will he pay a price other than a few days in jail?
gravenimage says
Sadly, I doubt he’ll be deported.
peter says
He will be diagnosed with some obscure mental illness by the court appointed psychiatrist and will be unleashed again on the public
gravenimage says
Hardly unlikely, sadly.
James Hoagland says
See here the utter wretchedness of the religion of peace. It boggles my mind that such a perverse entity is regarded as a religion. The twisting of goodness and Light that it takes to maintain such an outlook speaks volumes to how the youth these days are not given a clear logical and reasonable path to a truly liberal education as promoted by the writers of the Enlightenment.
Pray Hard says
Here we go again … an “intoxicated man” … nothing to with islam, apparently …
Hoi Polloi says
Paris is jammed with extremely hostile newcomers. Not a safe destination.
bill says
Precisely I would not visit Paris ar most French cities with free tickets and accommodation
Infidel says
The only reason I go through Europe is that living on the East coast, most flights to my destinations would be via that. Like I recently flew to Singapore. From the West coast, it would be a single stop at Hong Kong or Seoul, but from the East coast, I had to go via London and Frankfurt to get there, and via Munich to get back. And if I didn’t wanna go through Europe, my other choice would be Middle Eastern airlines like Qatar or Emirates, and I don’t even wanna set foot in any muslim country
gravenimage says
France: Muslim migrant rapes American woman in public toilet
………………………….
This poor woman. glad her friend came to look for her or this could have been even worse.
And what this Mohammedan rapist did is perfectly Islamic.
Rod says
Muslim migrant rapes American woman in public toilet
There’s no evidence in the French or English accounts that the offender was in fact a Muslim, let alone that his religion, whatever it was, had anything to do with the offence. In fact, his state of intoxication would suggest otherwise.
But your hero Spencer, distinguished “historian” though he’s claimed to be, has little time for truth or fact or reality. (What sort of historical “truths” might he be able to reveal with this lackadaisical disrespect for accuracy? What level of credibility would genuine historians be prepared to give him?)
Nor apparently do his adoring acolytes have any inclination to seek truth amongst the garbage dished out to then daily. Meanwhile, rapes, assaults, racist crimes and murders continue, in horrifying numbers, daily, not among Muslims, in Christian America.
Yo JB says
Exactly. It’s the ultimate in cowardice to regard Islam as a religion. It is a septic political
movement who’s real purpose is to enable unrestricted sexual authority for males. Which includes buggery of young boys. “young boys scattered like pearls in paradise” per the Koran.
Infidel says
Absolutely! islam belongs in the same category as communism and nazism, and doesn’t deserve to be bunched w/ the likes of Christianity, Buddhism, Judaism, et al
peter says
Nazism and communism are no where near Islam . They don’t claim divine sanction as Islam . So you can openly denounce Nazism and Communism as anti humanitarian ,evil ideologies without invoking the wrath of religion like Islam.
gravenimage says
Islam is both a religion *and* a vicious totalitarian creed. Only in Islam is this not a contradiction.
Yo JB says
So this scumbag is reciting Koranic filth but you don’t think he’s a Muz?! He’s from Algeria, not Utah. Would you condemn a mortal curse that has committed 40,000 acts of terror – each involving one death – SINCE 9/11 if it were Christian based?
Rod says
He wasn’t reciting anything Yoyo. You seem to be as careless with the truth as your dishonest propagandiser. But then, that’s what bigotry is, isn’t it? Read the story.
40,000 acts of terror since 9/11 (even if it’s true) is much less than the number of gun murders in the Christian USA since 9/11. Americans are just as good at killing people, including each other. You haven’t noticed?
gravenimage says
Opposing rape is not “bigotry” as “Rod” would have it.
john smith says
Rod, I understand how you feel I really do, and you must find it extremely annoying that people who visit this site are well aware of the teachings of islam. We understand why you condemn our truth teller Robert Spencer by branding him a liar. We understand why you always seem to take the side of evil, because we understand this is what your negative religion requires from you.
islam is from satan Rod, this is something I am 100% absolutely certain of, because everything in islam is the reverse of Christianity, EVERYTHING.
Rod says
john, I prefer the side of truth. Bigotry and racism might be amusing, but truth will lead you to much more reliable and useful conclusions.
gravenimage says
“Rod” wrote:
Muslim migrant rapes American woman in public toilet
There’s no evidence in the French or English accounts that the offender was in fact a Muslim, let alone that his religion, whatever it was, had anything to do with the offence. In fact, his state of intoxication would suggest otherwise.
………………………………………….
Of course, “Rod” hopes we don’t know that Algeria is 99% Muslim–there are just .4% who are Christian, and .4% who are unaffiliated. *That* is the truth.
And it is in fact *quite* common for Jihadists to drink or use drugs before committing their attacks, as “Rod” no doubt well knows.
The main thing is that he doesn’t want anyone to be allowed to cite Islam’s call to rape and harm Infidels. His implication that Christianity teaches the same is of course *quite* false.
And note that “Rod” does not condemn this rape–but then, why would he?
somehistory says
He says that he has had molzums care for his children. that means, he is most likely mozlum. No sane infidel person today who knows anything about islam, mozlum belief and behavior, would allow one to care for children.
john smith says
Spot on Somehistory
somehistory says
thank you, John
gravenimage says
Agreed, Somehistory and John.
Rod says
Thanks Pinocchio. According to your figures (I hope they didn’t come from the Spencer library) there must be close to half a million non-Muslims in Algeria, as well as those who are only nominally Muslim. Among migrants, I’d guess the proportions might be higher.
But, like Spencer, you’re happy to say that any Algerian is a Muslim.
Please never volunteer for jury service, where truth and facts are of vital importance, and dissuade Spencer from doing so. Please never try to obtain a science qualification. Stick to what you’re good at – bigotry and racism, where facts and truth are just irritating distractions.
The real point is that Spencer, again, is revealed as loose with the truth. But all’s fair if you’re a bigot, isn’t it?
gravenimage says
Note that once again “Rod” does not say what I have said that is inaccurate–nor will he. He hopes that calling me “Pinocchio” will substitute for that. Statistically it is highly likely that this rapist is Muslim, as “Rod” well knows–the demand that we ignore this is ludicrous. And again, opposing rape is neither bigoted or racist. But then, “Rod” has claimed before that concern for Nigerians and Egyptians is somehow “racist”.
Rod says
I repeat -The real point is that Spencer, again, is revealed as loose with the truth.
Another example – the casual assumption, unsupported by evidence, that the offender’s religion is associated with the offence. (We don’t need evidence Your Honour – he’s a Muslim, don’t you see?)
Was Al Capone a Catholic, and is that why he killed people? If you want to be an irrational bigot, you should accept that irrational stupidities will follow. (Plenty of examples among your fellow bigots.)
gravenimage says
Still no condemnation of rape from “Rod”.
Infidel says
From the news story (not Spencer’s quote) above:
According to Pew, 98% of Algerians are muslim, and according to the CIA factbook, the number is 99%. So that’s the probability that Spencer is right when he assumes that the rapist is muslim. The probability that you are right is the remaining 1-2%
gravenimage says
+1
Rod says
When honest people say something is a fact, they don’t mean it is possibly a fact or that it is probably a fact. (Especially when writing headlines in large bold face letters.)
Only dishonest people state something as truth when it might not be true.
And some silly folk still believe dishonest people.
Infidel says
I am guessing that Math is as foreign a language to you as English is
gravenimage says
There is nothing that Infidel said that is dishonest. You can find these statistics confirmed from multiple sources, and there is no mainstream source denying these statistics–indeed, I can find *no* source doing so.
Rod says
I’m intrigued by the fact that an “historian” can blatantly invent details to support his narrative. And that anybody, and I do mean any rational reader, knowing this, can take any of his statements seriously. (And this isn’t the first time I’ve pointed out his dishonesty).
Infidel thinks that a puerile insult is a devastating response to such criticism. Which proves my point, doesn’t it.
No, Pinocchio, I said nothing at all about Infidel’s statistics or dishonesty. Again, I’m wondering whether your problem isn’t really just English comprehension.
Infidel says
Rod
The person who’s lacking in English is you. Nobody else on this thread had any problems comprehending how the discovery that the rapist was Algerian pointed to the 99% likelihood of him being muslim
gravenimage says
Agree, Infidel.
notnolib says
If you ask the terrorists at the terror organization CAIR, they’ll tell you it’s just islam. Their fellow ackbarbarian was just practicing his faith as commanded by the pedophile pig-faced dog mohammed.
But they’re busy trying to explain how a muz that killed 4 other muz is an islamophobic act for which only the jooos hold blame.